johnydon22:


This shows you didn't read my refutation of your op or maybe forgot. . let me quote myself for you again.



The source of life is another subject of study very distinct from evolution. . evolution simply means The progressive change of heritable traits.

The fact is that evolution never happened. All that happened was the bringing up of new traits (which occur due to mixing OR were dormant/recessive OR climate and other external conditions) as the organisms get crossed, just like there are mulattos when Whites and Blacks are crossed. You have neglected every links I gave you, that it might be fulfilled that said: For the time will come when people will not put up with
sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they
will gather around them a great number of teachers to
say what their itching ears want to hear.

kay1one2:


That led to where we are now. I never asked for the source of your wonder cell. I only said it couldn't produce all of us. The evolutionary theory still begins with one cell evolving. I never asked for how the cell began.

And you are still hanging on real tight to ur misinformation. . . please cite me a scientific reference where it is asserted that evolution began with one cell evolving. . . please ?? ??

kay1one2:


Slave trade which had nothing to do with any religion but sheer clear cut Capitalism was one of the biggest banes to Africa and her development. Figure that! I can boast about my educational achievements any where in the world but I'm still a staunch Christian because of one simple word; Humility.

Hahaha....... You and humility are antonyms

johnydon22:


And you are still hanging on real tight to ur misinformation. . . please cite me a scientific reference where it is asserted that evolution began with one cell evolving. . . please ?? ??

Common sense. Or you believe different cells all emerged at the samr time? Or that the person that came out of water also had various cells doing other things?

kay1one2:


Common sense. Or you believe different cells all emerged at the samr time? Or that the person that came out of water also had various cells doing other things?

..lol.. we are talking evolution here. . . please cite a scientific reference where evolution asserts life began from one wonder cell. . . Or cant you? is your analogies based on your assumptions? #You Have Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt That You Have Never Read About Evolution.

Please am waiting for your scientific reference where evolution asserts that life began from one wonder cell. . . ??

johnydon22:


..lol.. we are talking evolution here. . . please cite a scientific reference where evolution asserts life began from one wonder cell. . . Or cant you? is your analogies based on your assumptions? #You Have Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt That You Have Never Read About Evolution.

Please am waiting for your scientific reference where evolution asserts that life began from one wonder cell. . . ??

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_history_of_life

A protocell (or protobiont) is a self-organized, endogenously ordered, spherical collection of lipids proposed as a stepping-stone to the origin of life.[1] A central question in evolution is how simple protocells first arose and how they could differ in reproductive output, thus enabling the accumulation of novel biological emergences over time, i.e. biological evolution. Although a functional protocell has not yet been achieved in a laboratory setting, the goal to understand the process appears well within reach.[2][3][4][5]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocell

Can I rest now?!

kay1one2:


http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_history_of_life




http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocell

Can I rest now?!

You see what i mean? Their is no way any of your link stipulated that evolution asserts life began from a single wonder cell. . .

This is how people fail in their own argument. . . Next time read something first before swimming in ur own river of assumptions. .

in fact here is what ur link of wikipedia said

The earliest evidence for life on Earth is graphite found to be biogenic in
3.7 billion-year-old metasedimentary rocks discovered in western
Greenland [5] and microbial mat fossils found in 3.48 billion-year-old
sandstone discovered in Western Australia . [6][7] Microbial mats of
coexisting bacteria and archaea were the dominant form of life in the early
Archean and many of the major steps in early evolution are thought to
have taken place within them. [8] The evolution of oxygenic
photosynthesis, around 3.5 Ga, eventually led to the oxygenation of the
atmosphere , beginning around 2.4 Ga. [9] The earliest evidence of
eukaryotes (complex cells with organelles) dates from 1.85 Ga, [10][11]
and while they may have been present earlier, their diversification
accelerated when they started using oxygen in their metabolism . Later,
around 1.7 Ga, multicellular organisms began to appear, with differentiated
cells performing specialised functions. [12] Bilateria , animals with a front
and a back, appeared by 555 Ma (million years ago).

Their is no mention of life beginning from one wonder cell . . .

#Sighs. .

johnydon22:


You see what i mean? Their is no way any of your link stipulated that evolution asserts life began from a single wonder cell. . .

This is how people fail in their own argument. . . Next time read something first before swimming in ur own river of assumptions. .

A protocell (or protobiont) is a self-organized, endogenously ordered, spherical collection of lipids proposed as a stepping-stone to the origin of life.[1] A central question in evolution is how simple protocells first arose and how they could differ in reproductive output, thus enabling the accumulation of novel biological emergences over time, i.e. biological evolution. Although a functional protocell has not yet been achieved in a laboratory setting, the goal to understand the process appears well within reach.[2][3][4][5]


I think I'm spending too much time on you and it's belittling of me!

kay1one2:



A protocell (or protobiont) is a self-organized, endogenously ordered, spherical collection of lipids proposed as a stepping-stone to the origin of life.[1] A central question in evolution is how simple [size=20]protocells[/size] first arose and how they could differ in reproductive output, thus enabling the accumulation of novel biological emergences over time, i.e. biological evolution. Although a functional protocell has not yet been achieved in a laboratory setting, the goal to understand the process appears well within reach.[2][3][4][5]


I think I'm spending too much time on you and it's belittling of me!

protocells!!! Read it again !!! #SMH

advice : Pick a book on evolution, read it first and know exactly what is it you are dealing with before coming to nairaland to raise baseless assumptive yarns. .

johnydon22:


protocells!!! Read it again !!! #SMH

So you want to see "wonder cell" before you make a link between the two. Are you purposely trying to be a nuisance? !

johnydon22:


You see what i mean? Their is no way any of your link stipulated that evolution asserts life began from a single wonder cell. . .

This is how people fail in their own argument. . . Next time read something first before swimming in ur own river of assumptions. .

in fact here is what ur link of wikipedia said


Their is no mention of life beginning from one wonder cell . . .

#Sighs. .

Why not read down to the parts of "current theories"?!

johnydon22:


protocells!!! Read it again !!! #SMH

advice : Pick a book on evolution, read it first and know exactly what is it you are dealing with before coming to nairaland to raise baseless assumptive yarns. .

I just keep laughing when you say that. You might want to find out what I do before asking me to do that. Just figure.

kay1one2:


So you want to see "wonder cell" before you make a link between the two. Are you purposely trying to be a nuisance? !

Nope am trying so hard to find where it is stipulated that evolution asserts life began from one cell. . . but none of your links seems to support this your baseless assumptions that have been the basis of your constant yapping from the beginning of this thread. . .

This is what you get when ur argument is based on assumptions and not knowledge.. oga go pick a book and read about evolution.

johnydon22:


Nope am trying so hard to find where it is stipulated that evolution asserts life began from one cell. . . but none of your links seems to support this yout baseless assumptions that have been the basis of your constant yapping from the beginning of this thread. . .

You know what they say; "I'm making sense. You're just not smart enough yet to get it!"

kay1one2:


You know what they say; "I'm making sense. You're just not smart enough yet to get it!"

..lmao when you cant even back up your naive assumptions i don die.

I ask again please cite me a scientific reference where evolution asserts life began from one single cell ( in ur own voice ; Wonder cell )

johnydon22:


..lmao when you cant even back up your naive assumptions i don die.

I ask again please cite me a scientific reference where evolution asserts life began from one single cell ( in ur own voice ; Wonder cell )

So the one above isn't enough to at least keep you busy for a while? Well read it at least twice and tell me if you've started connecting the strings.

kay1one2:


So the one above isn't enough to at least keep you busy for a while? Well read it at least twice and tell me if you've started connecting the strings.

..hahahahaha why is this your "evolutionary yarn on one wonder cell" so hard for you to back up

boy take it from me.. Go and start reading, you need more books

johnydon22:


..hahahahaha why is this your "evolutionary yarn on one wonder cell" so hard for you to back up

boy take it from me.. Go and start reading, you need more books

I keep laughing at your ignorance. If that will make you sleep at night no problem!

kay1one2:


By creating. The details I cannot give. But His magnificence I have studied.

How would you know his magnificence, when you don't even know him? You are praising something you are not certain of his existence. You have never met your father, yet you claim he loves you. Wake up!

theAtheist101:



How would you know his magnificence, when you don't even know him? You are praising something you are not certain of his existence. You have never met your father, yet you claim he loves you. Wake up!

You've never met obama yet to claim he gives aid to nigeria! Keep applying your faith along the wrong avenues!

kay1one2:


You've never met obama yet to claim he gives aid to nigeria! Keep applying your faith along the wrong avenues!

But I see Obama on a TV! I have heard him speak. The man visited other countries. He apologies for his wrongs and so many others, so I know of his magnificence.

How do you study a thing you don't know of his existence?

plaetton:


The biggest mystery that I have always pondered is whether Dumb people are naturally drawn to religion, or, whether religion makes ordinary folks Dumb.

The latter seems to be correct

rationalmind:


The latter seems to be correct

Seconded...it appears smart people turn into zombies once the religious button comes on. It all emanates from childhood indoctrination. As someone said earlier, #KEEP RELIGION AWAY FROM CHILDREN.

harakiri:


Seconded...it appears smart people turn into zombies once the religious button comes on. It all emanates from childhood indoctrination. As someone said earlier, #KEEP RELIGION AWAY FROM CHILDREN.

You can introduce yours to porn stars!

kay1one2:


You can introduce yours to porn stars!

Do i need remind you that a lot of porn stars are CHRISTIANS!

Religion really dumbs the mind.

harakiri:


Do i need remind you that a lot of porn stars are CHRISTIANS!

Religion really dumbs the mind.

Christian means christ - like. Your definition is off point!