Atheists are you proud of where you come from?

if you dont believe in a God,then
you have no option than to believe that the whole world
is a physical thing.
and if so,you'll have to believe in the evolution myth.
which means that you believe you came from apes or somethng like that.

But despite all the inexplicable wonders of so called evolution-
like givin man a physical mind - with complex emotions,
man still feels insulted being calld a monkey.
man should be happy answering that name instead of being angry.
even atheists need some indoctrination to accept that they are
really higher monkeys.
Evolution cudnt evolve a physical mind that could naturally
and instinctively accept its roots.
too bad for evo.

Despite the so called lapses of religion,
the bible and i think major religions (i know only the bible)
gives man a noble origin. it paints a picture of a thoughtful
God who created man with the intention of nobility from the start.
with the gift of intelligence, with a notion of justice
. with the desire for freedom.
so much for religion but it creates a stark - but uplifting picture of the vision for Man-than evolution and atheism.

if you believe in atheism then you believe that in essence you are a
monkey,an animal , nothing more nothing less.
you'll feel kindred sympathy for other animals because you're no better than them..

Some atheists (though I'm quite sure its a few) don't believe in evolution.

Evolution is not a myth, it is a fact with concrete evidence. And it is not a monkey, evolution states we evolved from a common ancestor.

"gives man a noble origin. it paints a picture of a thoughtful
God who created man with the intention of nobility from the start" but it is inaccurate, at best a mere fantasy.

"if you believe in atheism then you believe that in essence you are a
monkey,an animal , nothing more nothing less.
you'll feel kindred sympathy for other animals because you're no better than them.." There is no such thing as believing in atheism, it is not a religion but a conclusion based on the lack of empirical evidence for a supernatural being. Not all atheists accept evolution, and feeling sympathy for other animals has nothing to do with it.

From an Atheist.

Another silly thread with that bears the trademark of the religious inability to differentiate facts from fiction and science from religion

As evolution is to naturalist, so is creation to christian; as atheist believe they are descendants of apelike creature thus are apes, christians believe they are descendants of adam, thus men. Men are higher than apes!

hisblud: As evolution is to naturalist, so is creation to christian; as atheist believe they are descendants of apelike creature thus are apes, christians believe they are descendants of adam, thus men. Men are higher than apes!

Adam came from mud

But all humans came from ape-like ancestors.


apes better than mud.



Chew on that

Logicboy03:


Adam came from mud

But all humans came from ape-like ancestors.


apes better than mud.

Chew on that

chewing: ape like ancestors from what? Hot stew?
Chewing: logicboy is related to an ape in the zoo!

Chewing: op you are right afterall lol

Chewing! Chewing!! Its making sense chewing

I have always known religious people as great liars.Darwin specifically stated in his book,that men and apes have a common ancestor,yet the lying religious pastors and imams are claiming that Darwin said we are descended from apes.Stop displaying your ignorance on public forums!!!Tomorrow,they will claim that Satan is the father of lies!!!

Niflheim: I have always known religious people as great liars.Darwin specifically stated in his book,that men and apes have a common ancestor,yet the lying religious pastors and imams are claiming that Darwin said we are descended from apes.Stop displaying your ignorance on public forums!!!Tomorrow,they will claim that Satan is the father of lies!!!

oops are you one of those dat dont believe in evolution? Well logicboy gave me what to chew and that all naturalist are descended from APE-LIKE creature, so your relation is in the zoo! Chewing!

hisblud: As evolution is to naturalist, so is creation to christian; as atheist believe they are descendants of apelike creature thus are apes, christians believe they are descendants of adam, thus men. Men are higher than apes!

Evolution is a scientific not an atheistic dogma. But I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

musKeeto:

Evolution is a scientific not an atheistic dogma. But I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

chewing again! Are you distancing your belief from scientific proof that all naturalist aka atheist are related to apes in the zoo by reason of ape like creature?

Chewing: but you uphold evolution as the most plausible reason above creation?

Q. Is mosquito related to apes?

A. Go to the zoo for answers.

[img]http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTN92L35QBjLwYnFnKfKRe2Z9j6mh-9rbixpmMeVvpG4tDtzRPcacQ7Df4[/img]

Chewing: "atheist dogma" so the church should not boast as the only one with dogmas. He he!

Back to chewing, atheist are related to apes!

Hmm

Atheist: logicboy gave me some chewing to do, please can you add more nuts for me to chew lol, dont be shy, i wont tell that all you are related to apes... Oops

kambo: Atheists are you proud of where you come from?

if you dont believe in a God,then
you have no option than to believe that the whole world
is a physical thing.
and if so,you'll have to believe in the evolution myth.
which means that you believe you came from apes or somethng like that.

But despite all the inexplicable wonders of so called evolution-
like givin man a physical mind - with complex emotions,
man still feels insulted being calld a monkey.
man should be happy answering that name instead of being angry.
even atheists need some indoctrination to accept that they are
really higher monkeys.
Evolution cudnt evolve a physical mind that could naturally
and instinctively accept its roots.
too bad for evo.

Despite the so called lapses of religion,
the bible and i think major religions (i know only the bible)
gives man a noble origin. it paints a picture of a thoughtful
God who created man with the intention of nobility from the start.
with the gift of intelligence, with a notion of justice
. with the desire for freedom.
so much for religion but it creates a stark - but uplifting picture of the vision for Man-than evolution and atheism.

if you believe in atheism then you believe that in essence you are a
monkey,an animal , nothing more nothing less.
you'll feel kindred sympathy for other animals because you're no better than them..

Interesting thought but does nobility in the origin of man prove how man came to be?

Niflheim: I have always known religious people as great liars.Darwin specifically stated in his book,that men and apes have a common ancestor,yet the lying religious pastors and imams are claiming that Darwin said we are descended from apes.Stop displaying your ignorance on public forums!!!Tomorrow,they will claim that Satan is the father of lies!!!

thanks Niflheim. COMMON ANCESTORS wit apes. Interesting. Chewing naturalist aka athest have a common ancestor as apes, therefore they are related. Wonderful revelation.

Uyi Iredia: Some atheists (though I'm quite sure its a few) don't believe in evolution.

Hmmm...

fifa456n: Evolution is not a myth, it is a fact with concrete evidence. And it is not a monkey, evolution states we evolved from a common ancestor.

"gives man a noble origin. it paints a picture of a thoughtful
God who created man with the intention of nobility from the start" but it is inaccurate, at best a mere fantasy.

"if you believe in atheism then you believe that in essence you are a
monkey,an animal , nothing more nothing less.
you'll feel kindred sympathy for other animals because you're no better than them.." There is no such thing as believing in atheism, it is not a religion but a conclusion based on the lack of empirical evidence for a supernatural being. Not all atheists accept evolution, and feeling sympathy for other animals has nothing to do with it.

From an Atheist.

LWKMD!!!

musKeeto:

Evolution is a scientific not an atheistic dogma. But I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

Evolution a scientific dogma?...Hmmm.

striktlymi:

Evolution a scientific dogma?...Hmmm.

Hmmm....scientific dogma.......muskeeto, explain thysself

Logicboy03:


Hmmm....scientific dogma.......muskeeto, explain thysself

Lol, wrong word.. I meant theory..

damn you, stryk

musKeeto:

Lol, wrong word.. I meant theory..

damn you, stryk

chewing: are you saying evolution is a scientific theory not an atheistic dogma? Or evolution is a scientific dogma not an atheistic theory? Which has dogma or theory...make it simple so that a non-ape related being might understand you better!

musKeeto:

Lol, wrong word.. I meant theory..

damn you, stryk

Lol!!!

hisblud: chewing: are you saying evolution is a scientific theory not an atheistic dogma? Or evolution is a scientific dogma not an atheistic theory? Which has dogma or theory...make it simple so that a non-ape related being might understand you better!

Your ignorance isn't funny, you pig bed...

Logicboy03: Another silly thread with that bears the trademark of the religious inability to differentiate facts from fiction and science from religion

Yeah ! Like your talk of humans 'not being sure if they are not controlled in a simulated reality' based on a film.

Uyi Iredia:

Yeah ! Like your talk of humans 'not being sure if they are not controlled in a simulated reality' based on a film.

A point was illustrated by a film not based on it.


You should have read about the author on such philosophy that anony gave me in that thread.......knowledge is power

musKeeto:

Lol, wrong word.. I meant theory..

damn you, stryk

It is a dogma adhered to in spite of the evidence.

dogma
n.
1.a religious doctrine that is proclaimed as true without proof
2.a doctrine or code of beliefs accepted as authoritative

By dogma I mean definition 2. I think many people confuse these 2 definitions.

Uyi Iredia:

It is a dogma adhered to in spite of the evidence.



By dogma I mean definition 2. I think many people confuse these 2 definitions.

How does evolution fit in definition 2?

fifa456n: Evolution is not a myth, it is a fact with concrete evidence. And it is not a monkey, evolution states we evolved from a common ancestor.

"gives man a noble origin. it paints a picture of a thoughtful
God who created man with the intention of nobility from the start" but it is inaccurate, at best a mere fantasy.

"if you believe in atheism then you believe that in essence you are a
monkey,an animal , nothing more nothing less.
you'll feel kindred sympathy for other animals because you're no better than them.." There is no such thing as believing in atheism, it is not a religion but a conclusion based on the lack of empirical evidence for a supernatural being. Not all atheists accept evolution, and feeling sympathy for other animals has nothing to do with it.

From an Atheist.

The evidence includes misinterpreted data, wild extrapolations and just-so stories. What I find ironic in science is how ambiguous terms can be. Take evolution for instance, it could mean change in allelle frequency, survival of the fittest or descent from a universal common ancestor in different context. Most Christians by evolution mean the last definition (common ancestry) and this my friend has never been observed.

Double Post

Logicboy03:


Adam came from mud

But all humans came from ape-like ancestors.


apes better than mud.



Chew on that

The apes evolved from fishes which came from [url=en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis#Clay_hypothesis]mud[/url]. The two came from mud. Receive it !

Good reads for all. Debunking evolution and this. Rebuttals are welcome.

Good reads for all. Debunking evolution and this PDF. Rebuttals are welcome.