shdemidemi:

I didn't answer your questions that way though, you don't seem very comfortable with questions

italo:

There are many of my questions which you didnt even attempt to answer on this thread. You just pretended not to see them.

Do you want me to list them out?

italo: Number 1

Are you kidding me? I should show you where Jesus appointed Church fathers?

I'm guessing you mean I should show you from the Bible, right?

But did you ask this question when you accepted the same Bible that was compiled by the same Church fathers?

italo:

Paul was talking about heaven, not about scripture. You keep twisting God's word to suit your false doctrines.

Where did God ever mention "bible" to you?

It was the Catholic Church fathers that gave us the Bible.

italo:

Where did God tell you that he added the Pauline letters?

The Catholic Church compiled the Bible and it is they who tell us that they did it by the power and authority given to them by God.

And we all trust the Catholic Church fathers on that...even you haters do.

italo:

How do you know it was the Holy Spirit speaking through Paul? Did you ever see Paul?

Was it not these same Catholic Church fathers that told us that the epistles were inspired by the Holy Spirit?

italo:

If God has used the Catholic Church to compile the Bible then I trust that God continues to use it to interpret the contents of the Bible to fallible and unstable human minds like ours. In fact God has been using his Catholic Church to teach his flock even before the advent of the Bible.

If no man is infallible, then why are you claiming infallibility for yourself?

italo:

Is it possible to worship God in spirit and in truth, yet prostrate before images?

If you answer mine, I will answer yours.

italo:

When and how did he adopt Timothy?

I believe the Bible is 100% true. Because it was declared 100% true by God's Catholic Church which is 100% true.

If someone had lied to me that the Bible fell from the sky, as some of you anti-Catholics believe, I would not have taken it seriously.

italo:

If they were not leaders and Paul did not give a damn about them, why did he go to them to be sure that his preaching of 14years had not been a race "in vain?"

italo:

Isnt is you who lied that Paul was talking about scripture in 1Cor 13:12?

italo:

I see!

When Jesus gave Peter the keys to the kingdom and said anything he bound or loosed on earth would be bound or loosed in heaven, it didnt have anything to do with the gentiles, right?

When Jesus told Peter to feed his sheep, it didnt concern the Gentiles, right?

Only Jews are part of Jesus' flock, right?

That is the gospel according to the "infallible" shdemidemi.

italo:

You dont believe you (being a non-Jew) are part of Jesus' flock and kingdom.

Why should I keep on arguing Christian matters with you?

Boomark:

My hand no dey am. Demi can handle you if you don't dodge his questions. I can see you have learnt more dodgematic skills(dodgeous replies).

the handiwork of prophet bidam(fake) is unfathomable.

Yea i remember, demi is not aware that you believe in the traditions of spoken word which has no scriptural backing.

italo:


Jehovah's Witnesses. LMAO!

Bidam: Lol,the devil is the accuser of the brethren.It's no surprise his followers are like him.This is what happens when you don't endure sound doctrine.

shdemidemi:

Anyone who preaches another gospel aside trusting and believing the gospel of Christ should be accursed.

Bidam: Lol,the devil is the accuser of the brethren. It's no surprise his followers are like him.This is what happens when you don't endure sound doctrine.

Bidam: Lol, see who dey talk..You that is saying there are TWO gospels NOT ONE, i wonder whether boomark agrees with this view.If he doesn't and refuse to correct you then he is a hypocrite.

shdemidemi:

Say it, attack the scriptures if you want to or simply explain what you think the scripture is saying. Shdemidemi didn't write it, remember.

Gal 2

7 But on the contrary, when they [really] saw that I had been entrusted [to carry] the Gospel to the uncircumcised [Gentiles, just as definitely] as Peter had been entrusted [to proclaim] the Gospel to the circumcised [Jews, they were agreeable];
8 For He Who motivated and fitted Peter and worked effectively through him for the mission to the circumcised, motivated and fitted me and worked through me also for [the mission to] the Gentiles.
9 And when they knew (perceived, recognized, understood, and acknowledged) the grace (God’s unmerited favor and spiritual blessing) that had been bestowed upon me, James and Cephas (Peter) and John, who were reputed to be pillars of the Jerusalem church, gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, with the understanding that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised (Jews).

Bidam: I wonder what is making you hypertensive with this verse..I have explained it in the other thread.Read and Learn.

shdemidemi:

Say it, attack the scriptures if you want to or simply explain what you think the scripture is saying. Shdemidemi didn't write it, remember.

Gal 2

7 But on the contrary, when they [really] saw that I had been entrusted [to carry] the Gospel to the uncircumcised [Gentiles, just as definitely] as Peter had been entrusted [to proclaim] the Gospel to the circumcised [Jews, they were agreeable];
8 For He Who motivated and fitted Peter and worked effectively through him for the mission to the circumcised, motivated and fitted me and worked through me also for [the mission to] the Gentiles.
9 And when they knew (perceived, recognized, understood, and acknowledged) the grace (God’s unmerited favor and spiritual blessing) that had been bestowed upon me, James and Cephas (Peter) and John, who were reputed to be pillars of the Jerusalem church, gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, with the understanding that we should go to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised (Jews).

Boomark:

One Gospel proclaimed to Two sects of people- the Jews and the Gentiles.

I hope he is not accusing a brother of teaching/spreading Two different Gospel.

shdemidemi:

Bookmark, thanks for putting it more clearly.

To one sect He is The Lord to the other He is the king

One sect is part of his body the other sect is his subject