cococandy: She was actually the wronged party here.
That judge is closet gay for him to make such a biased judgement.

He was cheating on his wife that should count for something.

Anyway this story seems 'doctored'

soulglo:


She had to have done something to not get primary custody. I don't believe her

soulglo:


She had to have done something to not get primary custody. I don't believe her

Babygal4eva:

What ever she did as long as it wasn't murder doesn't justify the judges decision , the mother almost always gets primary custody except in extreme cases so this is just pure bias.

I hope she appeals this decision.

freecocoa: There's no way this story is entirely true.

cococandy:
Yep. Most def.

You're the mom(primary care giver)
Hubby cheats on you,
Hides his sexualityy from you(deception),
And finally divorces you when you should be the one divorcing him

And then the court gives him the kids because?

Nonso23:
The way you say A on one thread and B on another is really amusing. Mother = Primary care giver now abi? Because divorce is involved. Whatever happened to your gospel of 'stay at home dads' as primary care givers to the child. This una 'victim' chant is very amusing.

Chai! Una don see ojoro wey pass una own.
NO. That isn't how the judge will interpret the above. The gay man can make a case of self preservation - (protecting himself from the attack of society. A very strong case for homosexuals BTW) and also claim to have considered his homosex condition as something he had to protect his family from and deal with his own way. Which he did for 10 solid years without cheating. Yes he did not cheat. The court upholds the principle of ''Innocent till substantial evidence proves you guilty''. From the story, e sure me say wifey no get shishi to put forward as evidence else she definitely would have so he was a faithful husband....

The Judge was impressed with his case. I would be too, if i were in his shoes.
The truth is everything you and Mondisweets listed are very insufficient to launch even a feeble appeal in homosex tolerant countries.

He's in a better position to take care of them in the eyes of the law not forgetting his LGBT rights too.

The story doesn't look doctored at all. It's just not the norm you women are used to regaling yourselves with.

Maybe now you'll feel the pain of men who lose their kids and half their fortune in a very peaceful divorce. Messy divorce, anybody
Enjoy your Independence day celebrations.

Nonso23:

The Judge was impressed with his case. I would be too, if i were in his shoes.
The truth is everything you and Mondisweets listed are very insufficient to launch even a feeble appeal in homosex tolerant countries.

He's in a better position to take care of them in the eyes of the law not forgetting his LGBT rights too.

The story doesn't look doctored at all. It's just not the norm you women are used to regaling yourselves with.

Maybe now you'll feel the pain of men who lose their kids and half their fortune in a very peaceful divorce. Messy divorce, anybody
Enjoy your Independence day celebrations.

My ex-husband and his partner went on to marry. Their first ceremony took place before our state redefined marriage. After it created same-sex marriage, they chose to have a repeat performance. In both cases, my children were [size=14pt] forced—against my will and theirs [/size] to participate.

USA Today did a photo journal shoot on my ex and his partner, my children, and even the grandparents. I was not notified that this was taking place, nor was I given a voice to object to our children being used as props to promote same-sex marriage in the media.

My children are brought to gay parties where they are the only children and where only alcoholic beverages are served. They are taken to transgender baseball games, gay rights fundraisers, and LGBT film festivals.

My daughter suffers too. She needs a dad who will encourage her to embrace her femininity and beauty, but these qualities are parodied and distorted in her father's world. Her dad wears make-up and sex bondage straps for Halloween. She is often exposed to men dressing as women. [size=14pt] The walls in his condo are adorned with large framed pictures of women in provocative positions. [/size] What is my little girl to believe about her own femininity and beauty? Her father should be protecting her sexuality. Instead, he is warping it.

[size=14pt] My son is now a maturing teen [/size] ,and he is very interested in girls. But how will he learn how to deal with that interest when he is surrounded by men who seek _sexual gratification from other men?

Nonso23:
No. But i see a very fitting equivalent in the name of your 'house husband policy/stay at home dads'.
Then I ask myself: Who becomes primary care giver to a child in such a home?
The 'stay at home parent' obviously.
Reconciling the above conclusion and your first paragraph (read previous post) is where the problem lies.

I don't preach the house husband/stay at home dad message.I only state that I understand it if the woman makes more money and the man can't cater for the family if she doesn't work. Hence it becomes something they HAVE to do because that what suits their style and will ensure their survival. I bet you expect me to be unrealistic like most of yous are and root for keeping the traditional roles in cases where it is not productive to do so.


The emboldened. I see more house-husband gospel than 'be more involved in your child's upbringing' from you. Although both of them seem like paraphrased substitutes when critically appraised. Approaching it from that angle automatically erodes the notion that the mother is the primary care giver and installs the house-husband in her place. That is my point.

only to dane people will it seem so. Gender roles are still defined pretty much. That's why moms get the kids and dads are made to provide in case of a split union and even in most marriages. They are only reassigned or SHARED by the couple THEMSELVES within their marriage if they see it as their best option in that circumstance.


I don't know of any great marriage where the couples make 'demands' of each other though. I think dialogue and consensus' is more appropriate.

you believe in dialogue and consensus? Yea. I could say we are on the same page or I could just try to be mischievous like you and say that all your NL post history favors dictatorship. Even if you say otherwise. Who will spank me for DELIBERATELY miscontruing your opinions?
No one. Just like you're doing now.


It is very amusing and i'm enjoying myself.
Why the personal attacks by the way?? Oh. It's easier to ignore the latter portions of my post by employing the misdirection tactics.
Anyway, your 'shifting of goalpost' style is more or less a regular now.

well you find it amusing. I don't. So please next time you're looking for cheap fun,quote people who don't mind repeating themselves even when you choose not to get it. And until you provide a link to a post that I said men should be regarded as primary care givers same as women(unless the couple decides by themselves to do so),your goal shifting phrase will keep appearing like the joke that it is.

Mondisweets:


I guess the appropriate thing to do is to say screw the children rights and the mother's parental rights, so long we take revenge for every man that has lost custody to their children in a peaceful/messy divorce.

This men violated these children's rights by forcing them to participate in something they had a right to choose to or not to attend. He forced them to attend a ceremony THEY DIDN'T WANT TO BE PART OF, all in a bid to get publicity.

He went on to use them as his guinea pigs to get publicity, again the best interests of the children was violated.

He builds a 10yrs marriage on deception and obviously has extra-marital affairs during his marriage and for some reason such a person is deemed fit to have sole custody of his children who are not for his union in the first place.

No man or woman who is fit and proper to have sole custody of his/her would take underage children to bars or force them to go to gay film festivals. You cannot force or impose your sexual orientation on your children, its their choice to make whether they want to be part of _homosexuals society or not.

Lets say screw these children's right to freedom of choice and association so long we use them to get revenge on every woman out there that got sole custody of her children, thats all that matters. Whether actions of parentals are psychologically detrimental to the children or not, its not their decision to make, so long the gay father gets what he wants. Your judgement based on sentiments is far much more important than the protection of the best interests of the child

pickabeau1: Cococandy


What do you have to say to GSKing point

The man was being forced by society to conform hence d deception

Can't u see he was d victim

cococandy: Lame excuse.

One could as well ask why he married. He would have just kept having strings of girlfriends to conceal it.

Which society? Their pro gay society forced him to conform?