ilugunboy:



I've decided not to ever quote you again.....because of your penchant to degenerate and ridicule Islam and Muslims in general....

BTW...I'm not a Muslim....so don't get it twisted.

backtosender:
[b]Killing themselves for a religion that does not have evidence findings

In Syro-Aramaic, a language that preceded Arabic, the word "Muhammad" isn't a name but a *title* defined as "The Anointed One/Chosen One". This title was the Syro-Aramaic reference to "The Christ" of the Bible in the areas of Syria and vicinity which historical evidence indisputably proves, then it would have of an Arab Prophet whom is unable to be found outside of the Qu'ran/Hadiths unless they're the few spurious sources that can't be corroborated/verified by other contemporaneous sources sufficiently since being pseudopigraphica's, which coincidentally comes from Catholic sources ultimately, thereby being suspect as to error in translation understanding by deliberate design more so then due to it being likely to general illiteracy of such populations of these times in such areas, which as well would have assisted greatly in spreading the wrong translation definition.

In the circa 1300-1400 year old story of an "Arab Prophet" built on actual factual history or is it a corrupted version of various astro-polytheistic/pantheistic/animistic religions of western Mesopotamia merged with certain Biblical stories being understood in a philosophical/gnostic/heathen way with only touches of Abrahamic understanding when seen though the lens of evidential history? For the student whom diligently/rigorously seeks and studies factual ancient/classical history, digs even deeper, they will find that Islam's monotheistic position begins when Rome has already been in the same areas since circa mid 4th century seeking converts to Roman Catholicism. Could modern Islam be a Romanized cult that could be called "Arabian Catholicism"? intermixed accordingly with various anti-biblical heathen religions, which Catholicism basically is in different flavours depending on where it is in the world which in the case of Islam, and gave Islam it's start around 720AD (officially by evidence, not tradition) with an eerie clue being how closely the dress of a Islamic women (Hijab) and a Catholic Nun's covering is for example? Or is Islam a more nefarious strategy by Rome's agents (Egyptian - Templar - Jesuit Jews (Edomite/sons of Esau) through murder and suppression of true history among other things to use as a fierce attack dog for decimating the world population, as is already occurring in order to usher in a One World Order?
[/b]

rigarmortis:


ok, but don't you see its a phenomenon among the Muslims? they blame others for whatever harm an offshoot of their religion does and bury their head in the sand in issues like this.

someone in Denmark draws the "prophet" on a piece of paper they protest and innocent church goers and other die for it, now muslims are killing muslims and Christians....mind you.....we have not seen a single protest, they turn and blame, again.

SirShymex:


But seriously though, how did that uncharismatic, unintelligent, and inarticulate village plonker win an election in that country? Mind boggles.

The guy is a failure of epic proportions with so much blood on his hands, and I will be pissed if he leaves office unscarred. He deserves the Samuel Doe treatment. I don't even know how to describe the guy but he is worse than a despot, and definitely the worst leader ever to rule a country. Idi Amin and Mobutu were like saints compared to this guy.

Also, when you look at the id.iotic APC of a party, that is meant to be the opposition party, with the Abraham Lincoln wannabe old fart they are touting for the next election. You just have to be worried about the charade the next election would be. All these fvckers aren't serious. Hopefully, there is a revolutionary in the naij military planning to hijack that country soon cos that is the only hope.

Better cancel ya holiday plans to that Somalia-esque country before you become a victim. Staying alive is the most important thing. Had plans before but I had to nuke it.

SirShymex:


But seriously though, how did that uncharismatic, unintelligent, and inarticulate village plonker win an election in that country? Mind boggles.

The guy is a failure of epic proportions with so much blood on his hands, and I will be pissed if he leaves office unscarred. He deserves the Samuel Doe treatment. I don't even know how to describe the guy but he is worse than a despot, and definitely the worst leader ever to rule a country. Idi Amin and Mobutu were like saints compared to this guy.

Also, when you look at the id.iotic APC of a party, that is meant to be the opposition party, with the Abraham Lincoln wannabe old fart they are touting for the next election. You just have to be worried about the charade the next election would be. All these fvckers aren't serious. Hopefully, there is a revolutionary in the naij military planning to hijack that country soon cos that is the only hope.

Better cancel ya holiday plans to that Somalia-esque country before you become a victim. Staying alive is the most important thing. Had plans before but I had to nuke it.

talktrue1:
They should ban the wearing of hijab.

knightsTempler:
If the northern leaders have any iota of any common sense, they should henceforth ban the wearing of hijab ASAP.

Funny how you don't hear about Muslims marching in the streets to protest this violence perpetrated in the name of Islam. ....but watch out if a distasteful cartoon is printed about their prophet. Then they wonder why the rest of the world sees them as violent and backwards.

ilugunboy:


While it may be difficult for me to fault your logic about people protesting and burning churches as a consequence of what abroad elsewhere....it still beget believe to come to conclusion that there are not just more than religion to the carnage we are experiencing in the North.

I maintain that the religion excuse is just a convenient tool for those mass murderers.....

Sanusi was advising Muslims the other day to confront the murderers......the following week...they targeted the mosque he worships every Friday...that should tell you that those sons of the devils will kill anyone they perceived to be antagonistic to their bloody quest...

Truckpusher:
The same bunch of people bombing Iraq and around the world doesn't have a freaking fedora hat wearing duffer as a President ,yet they've been bombing themselves back to dark ages for decades.

Here is the solution:

Kindly call your kinsmen to appeal to the conscience of their Gambari masters up North and tell them to stop the madness.
Simple, problem solved.

SirShymex:


However, where is the concrete proof to support ya assertion that there is foreign conspiracy involved? Even if it were to be true, are you saying Nigeria isn't strong enough to defend itself against an unsophisticated foreign conspiracy? At the end of the day, the bombing of certain countries to the Stone Age isn't applicable here cos there are no foreign fighter jets in the sky bombing anything.

Boko Haram isn't as sophisticated as AQIM and naij isn't as big as Algeria. However, Algeria was able to contain the group effectively, and modernise its military with all kinds of sophisticated weapons in the process. Why is naij not doing the same thing? Oh, foreign conspiracy is also responsible for the utterly corrupt folks that looted everything, no? The drunk weasel in fedora hat has no excuse whatsoever - he is the C-in-C and he is responsible for all those dead folks. He has blood on his hands!

rigarmortis:



I hope you agree with me that no matter whatever guise this is hidden under, the genesis of islamic religious violence is the mosque, bro beleive me, there is so much a person can do for monetary gain, but what a perosn can do for religion is infinite.

The inbuilt fear is instinctive, now consider imams and clerics preaching hate in the mosques and ppl saying nothing till it gets to this level. ISIS, al qaeda, al shabab all have religion as their backbone which they use to garner sympathy, recruitment, funds and radicalisation, without the brainwashing power of religion, they become mere guerrillas and there recruits and funds beocme limited..

So when innocent ppl, be they muslims or xtians are killed, i get pi55ed of when i here ''these ppl are not muslims'' stuff, its akin to running away from responsibility, the same ppl that incited fellows to violence during the call prayers when moh'd was drawn on a paper should also incite the same masses against b0k0 instead of seeking who to blame.

ISIS kills xtians and muslims, what does muslims leaders do?...they blame america, now even if US initially armed the groups that now morphed into ISIS, muslims should still get the final blame for accepting the weapons in the name of ousting assad, turn other muslims into willing pawns, brainwash them, and orders jihad minded fellow MUSLIMS arnd the world to come and kill in the name of .......you know who.

If an outsider armeds my brother to kill me and my parents, do i blame the outsider of turn and kill my neighbors and tenants?.....no, i would blame my brother first for doing the unthinkable thing of tryin to harm OUR parents and for being so gullible and silly before i blame anyone else.

Truckpusher:
You didn't read me, shy.

SirShymex:


I replied ya point. The other one was about those from the region that is affected by the bombings being responsible for it. That right there isn't plausible to discerning minds.

I'm leaning to GEJ as the guilty one here cos he has failed to prosecute anyone since the BH terror started. So it is more of a case of GEJ and his cronies being responsible for it - and that is the honest truth. I don't know what the end game is but the script is glaring.

Truckpusher:
There are too many political undertone to what is happening compared to whatever you saying genuinely as a concerned citizen of this country but these things we can't talk here because the last time people actually said this the problem they were all dismissed as GEJ's apologists and supporters.

I rest my case - I don't want any argument with my hommie

yemisitee:
Am just so tired of all these
--------------------------
For updated stories, visit my blog at www.yemisis blog.com

changes1:
again?

Well I always knew sahara reporters will never carry any good news concerning Nigeria...

If they say they shouldn't wear hijabs they'll say no one should tamper with their religion..

Now they are hiding bombs under the hijab..

If the men blow themselves cos of 72 virgins, what will the female suicide bombers get?? 72 d1cks?

Bunch of brainwashed goats..

RIP to the dead.

talktrue1:
They should ban the wearing of hijab.

Etruth:
For real? Or was your account hacked? From your previous posts, you always professed to be an unapologetic unrepenant JonaTANian , even if the world caved in......Have you seen the light?

babestella:


shut up, animal. step down for your father to step in and stop boko haram. useless animal. just hate GEJ for nothing. If you father managed his home properly, you not be talking from your poo hole. rubbish.

ilugunboy:


Like I said earlier, your logic and stand on the issue you've raised sounds plausible as the is a variant of Islam that is extremely intolerant....perhaps even if you are not an adherent of such variant..you are not a Muslim in their definition of who a Muslim is .....would you then go ahead to blame the heinous activities of those type of Muslims on every Muslim?

There are Muslims that even at great personal risk to their lives genuinely preach against the activities of BH, quoting relevant portion of the Quran.....would you still also castigate those?

We should never lose sight of the fact that these people are murderers and are simply mercenaries.

Personally I won't call them Muslims.....but mercenaries....merchant of death.

ilugunboy:


Like I said earlier, your logic and stand on the issue you've raised sounds plausible as the is a variant of Islam that is extremely intolerant....perhaps even if you are not an adherent of such variant..you are not a Muslim in their definition of who a Muslim is .....would you then go ahead to blame the heinous activities of those type of Muslims on every Muslim?

There are Muslims that even at great personal risk to their lives genuinely preach against the activities of BH, quoting relevant portion of the Quran.....would you still also castigate those?

We should never lose sight of the fact that these people are murderers and are simply mercenaries.

Personally I won't call them Muslims.....but mercenaries....merchant of death.

changes1:
again?

Well I always knew sahara reporters will never carry any good news concerning Nigeria...

If they say they shouldn't wear hijabs they'll say no one should tamper with their religion..

Now they are hiding bombs under the hijab..

If the men blow themselves cos of 72 virgins, what will the female suicide bombers get?? 72 d1cks?

Bunch of brainwashed goats..

RIP to the dead.

knightsTempler:
If the northern leaders have any iota of any common sense, they should henceforth ban the wearing of hijab ASAP.

Funny how you don't hear about Muslims marching in the streets to protest this violence perpetrated in the name of Islam. ....but watch out if a distasteful cartoon is printed about their prophet. Then they wonder why the rest of the world sees them as violent and backwards.

backtosender:
[b]Killing themselves for a religion that does not have evidence findings

In Syro-Aramaic, a language that preceded Arabic, the word "Muhammad" isn't a name but a *title* defined as "The Anointed One/Chosen One". This title was the Syro-Aramaic reference to "The Christ" of the Bible in the areas of Syria and vicinity which historical evidence indisputably proves, then it would have of an Arab Prophet whom is unable to be found outside of the Qu'ran/Hadiths unless they're the few spurious sources that can't be corroborated/verified by other contemporaneous sources sufficiently since being pseudopigraphica's, which coincidentally comes from Catholic sources ultimately, thereby being suspect as to error in translation understanding by deliberate design more so then due to it being likely to general illiteracy of such populations of these times in such areas, which as well would have assisted greatly in spreading the wrong translation definition.

In the circa 1300-1400 year old story of an "Arab Prophet" built on actual factual history or is it a corrupted version of various astro-polytheistic/pantheistic/animistic religions of western Mesopotamia merged with certain Biblical stories being understood in a philosophical/gnostic/heathen way with only touches of Abrahamic understanding when seen though the lens of evidential history? For the student whom diligently/rigorously seeks and studies factual ancient/classical history, digs even deeper, they will find that Islam's monotheistic position begins when Rome has already been in the same areas since circa mid 4th century seeking converts to Roman Catholicism. Could modern Islam be a Romanized cult that could be called "Arabian Catholicism"? intermixed accordingly with various anti-biblical heathen religions, which Catholicism basically is in different flavours depending on where it is in the world which in the case of Islam, and gave Islam it's start around 720AD (officially by evidence, not tradition) with an eerie clue being how closely the dress of a Islamic women (Hijab) and a Catholic Nun's covering is for example? Or is Islam a more nefarious strategy by Rome's agents (Egyptian - Templar - Jesuit Jews (Edomite/sons of Esau) through murder and suppression of true history among other things to use as a fierce attack dog for decimating the world population, as is already occurring in order to usher in a One World Order?
[/b]

Thebrightest:
In case you havent been told, let me tell you this and please let it stick to that brain of yours that you are very pretty.

talktrue1:
They should ban the wearing of hijab.