THE MESSAGE:- Most people are
under the assumption that the Fall of
white Adamic man in the Garden of Eden
was brought on by Eve listening to the
manipulative and deceitful words of a
literal talking snake and Eve's eating of a
literal piece of fruit that she took from
the 'Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.'
In this message, I will show you that the
Fall in the Garden was not brought on by
what I just mentioned. Rather, using only
the Scriptures, I will show you that the
Fall was brought on by an unholy sexual
union between Satan and Eve. In Gen. 3:1,
we read of a 'serpent' appearing to Eve
in the Garden of Eden. It's important to
realize that the 'serpent' spoken of here
was not a literal snake, but rather Satan
in human form. The word 'serpent' here
means 'Magician or enchanter. A
spellbinder.' Check your 'Strong's
Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible' for
definition verification here. Now, in Rev.
12:7-9, we read about a war in Heaven,
when Lucifer and the angels who followed
him into rebellion against God were
defeated by Michael and the angels who
reamined loyal to the Almighty. Lucifer
became 'that old serpent, called the
Devil and Satan' (Rev. 12:9 - KJV). Now
we know that when Satan is referred to
as a 'serpent' here that it's not talking
about him being manifest in the form of a
literal snake. The same thing applies to
the use of the word 'serpent' in Gen.
chapter three. We also see in Rev. 12:9
that Lucifer and the rebellious angels
lost their place in Heaven and were cast
down to the earth. Back in Gen. 3:1, we
read that the 'serpent' was 'more subtil
(subtle) than any beast of the
field' (KJV). The word 'subtil (subtle)'
here means 'cunning or crafty (usually in
a bad sense).' Again, consult Strong's
for definition verification. So we see
that a crafty 'serpent' had appeared to
Eve in the Garden. It's important now to
point out that the 'Tree of Knowledge of
Good and Evil' was not a literal tree! The
'Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil',
first spoken of in Gen. 2:9, was
representative in a figurative sense of
the Pre-Adamic (black & yellow) races
and nations which surrounded the Garden
in which Adam and Eve lived. (For the
origins of the races, please request read
the article titled 'Can Anyone Achieve
Salvation?'. This article explains the
origins of the Pre-Adamic races and the
Adamic race.)
For good examples of how trees are used
in a figurative sense to describe people,
races and nations please read: Ezek.
31:3-9 (Assyrian Empire); Jer. 11:19
(about Jeremiah) and Matt. 3:10 (people
standing judgement). We see in Gen. 3:3
that the 'Tree of Knowledge of Good and
Evil' was the 'tree' that Adam and Eve
weren't supposed to 'touch.' We know
that literal trees posess no knowledge of
good and evil. In Ezek. 31:9 it says (in
reference to the vast Assyrian Empire)
that 'all the trees of Eden, that were in
the Garden of God, envied him' (KJV).
Literal trees can't 'envy' anything. This
Scripture is clearly showing us that the
'trees' spoken of here are merely
figurative representations of races and
nations that envied the Assyrian Empire.
In Gen. 3:4-7, we see that Satan (the
'serpent') leads Eve astray and she in
turn leads Adam astray as well. But, was
the leading astray the simple eating of a
literal piece of fruit from the 'Tree of
Knowledge of Good and Evil'? The answer
to that question is no.
First of all, we see in Gen. 2:25 that
Adam and Eve were not ashamed of their
unclothedness. They obviously had the
perfect bodies that God had intended
for them when they were created. Now,
notice after the Fall, in Gen. 3:7 & 10,
that Adam and Eve were suddenly
ashamed of their bodies. Why would you
be ashamed of your body if all you had
done was eat a piece of fruit? Now, back
in Gen. 3:3, Eve tells Satan that neither
she nor Adam can 'touch' the 'fruit' of
the 'Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil'
because if they do, they'll die. The word
'touch' here means 'to lay hands upon, to
lie with.' See Strong's again. When you
'lie' with someone in this capacity, it's
obviously sexual in nature. The words
'eat' or 'ate' when used in these
passages do not mean the literal
consumption of food. The words 'eat' or
'ate' when used in the first 15 verses of
Genesis chapter three means '(lit. or fig.)
to consume, devour (partake).' Consult
Strong's one more time. When you
partake in something, that means you are
engaging in an activity. And Eve certainly
did partake here! She engaged in sex
with Satan (the 'serpent') who appeared
to her in human form and sexually
seduced her. In Gen. 3:13, we read that
Eve, called in front of God to account
for her misdeed said, 'The serpent
beguiled me, and I did eat
(partake)' (KJV). The word 'beguiled'
here means to 'morally seduce.' IT'S
NOT A MORAL SEDUCTION TO EAT A
LITERAL PIECE OF FRUIT! This further
confirms that the grand sin that led to
the Fall in the Garden was sexual in
nature. In Gen. 3:6 & 12, we see that Eve
led Adam into this debauchery by
coaxing him into having sex with a
member of one of the Pre-Adamic races.
Gen. 3:15 then tells us that two literal,
biological seedlines are to come forth
from Eve. They are the seedline of Satan
and the seedline of the woman (through
Adam). Verse 15 also tells us that the
two seedlines would be in direct conflict
with one another and in the end the
Satantic seed will be crushed. And there
is to be a major 'enmity (hatred)'
between the two seedlines. Also, the
'fruit' spoken of in these passages is not
literal fruit like an apple or an orange.
The 'fruit' spoken of here is offspring,
descendants. Hit Strong's once more. We
know that a literal piece of fruit isn't
the product of a sexual relationship
between a man and a woman. More people
are the product of those types of
relations. Let's briefly re-cap the Fall in
the Garden as spoken of in Gen. chapter
three. We now that the 'serpent' was not
a literal snake, but rather Satan in
human form. We also know that that the
grand sin that led to the Fall was not the
consumption of literal fruit, but rather
improper sexual relations. Eve was
'touched' (engaged in sexual relations
with) Satan after he 'beguiled' (morally
seduced) her. (Satan probably appeared
to Eve as a handsome white god. Ps. 82:6
says the white race is a race of gods.) We
also see that Eve led Adam astray as well
by enticing him into having sexual
relations with a member of one of the
Pre-Adamic races. She gave him 'fruit'
from the "Tree of KNowledge of Good
and Evil' and Adam did 'eat (partake,
engage in an activity).'
Finally, Eve was to have two literal
seedlines come forth from her womb. One
being the 'serpents' (Satan in human
form) and the other being hers through
Adam. And these two seedlines are to be
in direct conflict and have a deep-seated
hatred of one another until the end
times. Gen. 3:15 alone should point out
the utter absurdity of the whole being
deceived by a literal snake and eating a
piece of fruit led to the Fall in the
Garden story. Are we to believe that Eve
had sex with a literal snake? Is our
enmity and conflict with an army of scaly
creatures that move along the ground?
Of course not! How ridiculous would that
be!? In Gen. 4:1 & 2, we read that Eve
gave birth to Cain and Abel. NOw Abel
was Adam's son. But Cain was not! Cain is
found nowhere in any geneaology in the
Bible that traces back to Adam. Read
Gen. 5:3-5; 1 Chron. 1:1 and Luke 3:38. In
Luke 3:38, it states that the unpolluted
descendants of Adam are the sons of
God (this of course is a verse tracing the
geneaology of Jesus on Mary's (His
blood's) side). Why is Cain not mentioned
here if he was an unpolluted descendant
of Adam? In Gen. 4:8-12, we read about
the first major enmity between the two
seedlines that was promised by God in
Gen. 3:15. Here, Cain murders murders
Abel. Now, in Gen. 4:25 and 5:3, we read
that Adam and Eve had a son named
Seth. The name 'Seth' means
'substitute.' Go to Strong's one more
time! Seth was the 'substitute' for who?
ABEL! Remember, Cain was driven away
from Adam and Eve. So why couldn't
Seth have been a 'substitute' for Cain if
he was Adam and Eve's son as well?
After all, he no longer lived with them.
The answer is simple. Cain was NOT
Adam's son! In 1 John 3:12, we read who
Cain's literal, biological father is. It's
Satan!
Cain's descendants are mentioned
prominently in the New Testament. In
Matt. 23:35, Jesus (who was not a Jew
but rather of the white Adamic race)
tells the Jewish heirarchy that their
people are responsible for the deaths of
all the righteous that have been
murdered on the earth and he begins the
list of the righteous with Abel. Who
killed Abel? CAIN KILLED ABEL!
Remember, the black and yellow races
were on the earth long before Adam, Eve,
Cain and Abel. But Jesus clearly traces
the bloodline of the righteous only
through the white Adamic race. In Matt.
23:33, Jesus calls the Jews 'serpents.'
This is an obvious reference to their
literal, biological father as spoken of in
Gen. chapter three. He also says that
they are a Hell-bound race of people and
their fate is sealed at the end of verse
33. In John 8:44, Jesus proclaims Satan
as being the Jews literal, biological
father. In Matt. 23:15, we see that Jesus
states that Judaism (then known as the
'Tradition of the Elders' and later
evolving into Babylonain Talmudic
Judaism) is a religion of Hell! Finally, in
Rev. 2:9 & 3:9, Jesus tells us that there
will be impostor Israelites (the Jews)
who are, in reality a 'synagogue of
Satan.' (The word 'Jew' is a
mistranslation here. The correct word is
'Judahite.' And true racial 'Judahites'
are Aryan Israelites!) Thank you for
reading. I welcome an open dialogue on
this and other key Bible issues!