Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,150,464 members, 7,808,647 topics. Date: Thursday, 25 April 2024 at 02:51 PM

Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye (7096 Views)

Buhari's Poor Performance: When The Bell Rings Twice - Sam Omatseye / “God Owns Lagos, Entire Universe” – PDP Blasts Oba Of Lagos / Let's Be Fair; Jonathan Has Done Well On The Economy. By Sam Ohuabunwa. (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)

Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by NeuroBoss(m): 7:35am On Apr 13, 2015
Since the Oba of Lagos uttered his controversial Lagoon jibe, Lagos has come under a certain attack. It is the foray called, “No Man’s Land.” By that the settlers say Lagos is Nigeria’s city and no ethnic group should lay claim to it as their own.
The position came into play in the just-concluded governor election. It also reared its insular head in the aftermath of the National Assembly and presidential polls in which non-indigenes scooped a haul of seats by besting indigenes.
This sort of attitude is not only arrogant, but. also inherently disrespectful. 
No one settles in a place and displays a proprietary disdain because the indigenes open their hearts and minds and money to them.
The point often made is that Lagos was Nigeria’s capital city, and because of that it soared into a special status in the country. On that score, they argue, the indigenes have lost the right to claim it. It is now Nigeria’s Jerusalem where every tribe and tongue and worshipper has as much right as the other.
This sort of thinking is defective on a number of points. One, it is historical revisionism. That Lagos was a capital city did not happen out of a whim. Where were the other ethnic groups when the indigenes fought wars, built the city, and turned it from a near wilderness into the mustard seed of city? Did they know when Kosoko and Akintoye duelled for the throne? In the colonial era, Lagos was not the only city they treasured. Others included Calabar, Port Harcourt, Lokoja, et al. The reason Lagos transcended others is rooted in the indigenous population’s attitudes to others, their cultural liberalism and economic expansiveness. The colonial authority focused on it, and developed it because it opened itself to such fertility of progress.
Lagos also allowed itself to flower during the fury days of nationalism, breeding names like Azikiwe, Ojike, Mbadiwe, Awolowo, Adelabu, etc. In fact, the dominant party was NCNC, and it was an umbrella for all tribes. The non-Yoruba politicians learned Yoruba, and that itself was homage to the indigenes. How do you learn the language of the indigenes and say it is no man’s land. Zik was fluent in Yoruba, and it helped him ascended the roof in the high noon of Nigerian nationalism. Lagos was not the only port city, and was it the only city that persons surged to make a new beginning? But Lagos exceeded others because of its indigenous people’s open arms.
What happened in the past few weeks with the Igbo against the Yoruba was unfortunate because both ethnic groups have lived together in Lagos for a generation without much rancour. In fact, many of the Igbo have resided in Lagos without a sense of alienation as the indigenes have given them free rein in commerce and culture.
But it was the last election that triggered this, and it was the shadow of President Goodluck Jonathan that we should blame. He came to town to incite the non-indigenes, including those in the Niger Delta, against the APC. By implication, he characterised the APC as a Yoruba and Hausa party. He even held meetings with them without decency and in one of such outings he said INEC was discriminating against them in the distribution of PVCs. Those who are quick to call him a statesman should note this.
Jimi Agbaje, the PDP governorship candidate, fuelled this by ratcheting up the emotions of the Igbo against the ruling party in the state. This ethnic card led to the vote pattern in the presidential poll. Southsouth and Southeast people decided to vote against the ruling party based essentially on ethnic as well as religious grounds. The factor of faith ossified the revulsion against the APC. Even though the APC prevailed, the pattern revealed ominous fault lines of faith and tribe.
The concept of no man’s land is a prostitution of the constitution that allows residency in Nigeria, and therefore allows any person of whatever tribe to contest elections anywhere as long as they are constitutionally accepted as residents. It is prostitution because few adhere although all should. If Lagos accepts and acts it, it is expected to be respected by all. But as far as I know, it is rare to see what happens in Lagos anywhere else in the country.
It is this lack of hostility to strangers that has now been taken to mean acquiescence. Only Lagos has grown to accept the spirit of residency requirement for election. Other parts of the country accept it, but only philosophically.
But before Jonathan, the indigenes have not openly challenged Lagos as Yoruba land. The last time it significantly caused rumpus was in the 1950’s when Zik wanted a Yoruba man, Prince Adedoyin, to step down from the legislative seat for him. He refused and Zik went to his father, and his father, an Oba, shunned him. Zik had earlier boasted about the role of the Igbo as the tribe of destiny in Africa, and that led to ethnic self-awareness among the Yoruba who had naively believed that the Igbo elite were playing politics without tribal fidelity.
The Yoruba, especially with the Ibadan People’s Party, scuttled Zik who was on his way to become the first premier of the Western Region. Zik cried foul, and lobbed a charge of tribal politics against the indigenes. He did not especially help himself when Eyo Ita, a minority in the East, was denied the chance to be premier of the East.
The Yoruba self-awareness in stopping Zik reflects Shakespeare’s words in Hamlet: “Beware of entrance into a quarrel; but being in, bear it that the opposed should beware of thee.” That self-awareness is palpable today in Lagos.
The bad blood in the past few weeks contradicts the feeling of mutual peace both ethnic groups have had for over a generation. Even during the civil war, the Yoruba did not only keep Igbo property, but kept their rents. It is unfortunate that it took the serpentine zeal of a Jonathan to rake up suppressed bad blood. It is the same Jonathan that did not fulfill any major promise to the Igbo and who only fattened its opportunistic elite with juicy contracts and appointments. In Lagos, all ethnic groups have enjoyed dividends of good government. It’s not perfect, but Lagos has remained the state of example.
The United States has always called itself a melting pot, and that means all who come from outside should not impose their will, but be part of the society. That is in contrast to Canada known as a mosaic. In a mosaic, outsiders maintain their full will but outside the mainstream.
The poet Walt Whitman noted this about America. “I am large/I contain multitudes.”
But we have to go back to healing now, and learn to live together. No group needs to be punished for how it voted. It is part of the beauty of democracy. But it means we should learn to understand that diversity calls for the acceptance of the other side in a bid to build a society not hampered by clannish virtues but riding on the wings of merit.

22 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by ichidodo: 7:39am On Apr 13, 2015
NeuroBoss:
[s]Since the Oba of Lagos uttered his controversial Lagoon jibe, Lagos has come under a certain attack. It is the foray called, “No Man’s Land.” By that the settlers say Lagos is Nigeria’s city and no ethnic group should lay claim to it as their own.
The position came into play in the just-concluded governor election. It also reared its insular head in the aftermath of the National Assembly and presidential polls in which non-indigenes scooped a haul of seats by besting indigenes.
This sort of attitude is not only arrogant, but. also inherently disrespectful. 
No one settles in a place and displays a proprietary disdain because the indigenes open their hearts and minds and money to them.
The point often made is that Lagos was Nigeria’s capital city, and because of that it soared into a special status in the country. On that score, they argue, the indigenes have lost the right to claim it. It is now Nigeria’s Jerusalem where every tribe and tongue and worshipper has as much right as the other.
This sort of thinking is defective on a number of points. One, it is historical revisionism. That Lagos was a capital city did not happen out of a whim. Where were the other ethnic groups when the indigenes fought wars, built the city, and turned it from a near wilderness into the mustard seed of city? Did they know when Kosoko and Akintoye duelled for the throne? In the colonial era, Lagos was not the only city they treasured. Others included Calabar, Port Harcourt, Lokoja, et al. The reason Lagos transcended others is rooted in the indigenous population’s attitudes to others, their cultural liberalism and economic expansiveness. The colonial authority focused on it, and developed it because it opened itself to such fertility of progress.
Lagos also allowed itself to flower during the fury days of nationalism, breeding names like Azikiwe, Ojike, Mbadiwe, Awolowo, Adelabu, etc. In fact, the dominant party was NCNC, and it was an umbrella for all tribes. The non-Yoruba politicians learned Yoruba, and that itself was homage to the indigenes. How do you learn the language of the indigenes and say it is no man’s land. Zik was fluent in Yoruba, and it helped him ascended the roof in the high noon of Nigerian nationalism. Lagos was not the only port city, and was it the only city that persons surged to make a new beginning? But Lagos exceeded others because of its indigenous people’s open arms.
What happened in the past few weeks with the Igbo against the Yoruba was unfortunate because both ethnic groups have lived together in Lagos for a generation without much rancour. In fact, many of the Igbo have resided in Lagos without a sense of alienation as the indigenes have given them free rein in commerce and culture.
But it was the last election that triggered this, and it was the shadow of President Goodluck Jonathan that we should blame. He came to town to incite the non-indigenes, including those in the Niger Delta, against the APC. By implication, he characterised the APC as a Yoruba and Hausa party. He even held meetings with them without decency and in one of such outings he said INEC was discriminating against them in the distribution of PVCs. Those who are quick to call him a statesman should note this.
Jimi Agbaje, the PDP governorship candidate, fuelled this by ratcheting up the emotions of the Igbo against the ruling party in the state. This ethnic card led to the vote pattern in the presidential poll. Southsouth and Southeast people decided to vote against the ruling party based essentially on ethnic as well as religious grounds. The factor of faith ossified the revulsion against the APC. Even though the APC prevailed, the pattern revealed ominous fault lines of faith and tribe.
The concept of no man’s land is a prostitution of the constitution that allows residency in Nigeria, and therefore allows any person of whatever tribe to contest elections anywhere as long as they are constitutionally accepted as residents. It is prostitution because few adhere although all should. If Lagos accepts and acts it, it is expected to be respected by all. But as far as I know, it is rare to see what happens in Lagos anywhere else in the country.
It is this lack of hostility to strangers that has now been taken to mean acquiescence. Only Lagos has grown to accept the spirit of residency requirement for election. Other parts of the country accept it, but only philosophically.
But before Jonathan, the indigenes have not openly challenged Lagos as Yoruba land. The last time it significantly caused rumpus was in the 1950’s when Zik wanted a Yoruba man, Prince Adedoyin, to step down from the legislative seat for him. He refused and Zik went to his father, and his father, an Oba, shunned him. Zik had earlier boasted about the role of the Igbo as the tribe of destiny in Africa, and that led to ethnic self-awareness among the Yoruba who had naively believed that the Igbo elite were playing politics without tribal fidelity.
The Yoruba, especially with the Ibadan People’s Party, scuttled Zik who was on his way to become the first premier of the Western Region. Zik cried foul, and lobbed a charge of tribal politics against the indigenes. He did not especially help himself when Eyo Ita, a minority in the East, was denied the chance to be premier of the East.
The Yoruba self-awareness in stopping Zik reflects Shakespeare’s words in Hamlet: “Beware of entrance into a quarrel; but being in, bear it that the opposed should beware of thee.” That self-awareness is palpable today in Lagos.
The bad blood in the past few weeks contradicts the feeling of mutual peace both ethnic groups have had for over a generation. Even during the civil war, the Yoruba did not only keep Igbo property, but kept their rents. It is unfortunate that it took the serpentine zeal of a Jonathan to rake up suppressed bad blood. It is the same Jonathan that did not fulfill any major promise to the Igbo and who only fattened its opportunistic elite with juicy contracts and appointments. In Lagos, all ethnic groups have enjoyed dividends of good government. It’s not perfect, but Lagos has remained the state of example.
The United States has always called itself a melting pot, and that means all who come from outside should not impose their will, but be part of the society. That is in contrast to Canada known as a mosaic. In a mosaic, outsiders maintain their full will but outside the mainstream.
The poet Walt Whitman noted this about America. “I am large/I contain multitudes.”
But we have to go back to healing now, and learn to live together. No group needs to be punished for how it voted. It is part of the beauty of democracy. But it means we should learn to understand that diversity calls for the acceptance of the other side in a bid to build a society not hampered by clannish virtues but riding on the wings of merit.[/s]
 

11 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by dunkem21(m): 7:41am On Apr 13, 2015
Crap.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Medley(m): 7:42am On Apr 13, 2015
Lagos is a south-west state and that simply means it's the yorubas. Though we should stop describing non-indigines in the state as immigrants,it those not portray that there is freedom to live in any part of the country.

11 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Nobody: 7:43am On Apr 13, 2015
When will all this tribal war stop??other countries are working on how they will move their country forward,some nigerians are busy focusing on tribalistic issue that is making them stay backward!!!!!when you get out from this country what outsiders know is that you are a nigerian,they don't care whether you are yoruba,igbo,hausa,delta,etc

4 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by luvinhubby(m): 7:46am On Apr 13, 2015
Senseless thrash !

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by demelza: 7:47am On Apr 13, 2015
If only my people can borrow small madness from the Hausas and deal decisively with this issue once and for all.
Its becoming ridiculous!

17 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by derrick333(m): 7:52am On Apr 13, 2015
Medley:
Lagos is a south-west state and that simply means it's the yorubas. Though we should stop describing non-indigines in the state as immigrants,it those not portray that there is freedom to live in any part of the country.
No mind dem,do grass grow human? All of us r immigrants if dats d case ,but d 1st set of immigrants in d settlement r the indigen

1 Like

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Chiefpriest1(m): 7:52am On Apr 13, 2015
This divisive write-up is totally unnecessary. We know who owns lagos. The yoruba people do. People should stop fanning the embers of disunity for their selfish interest.

Omatseye should calm down abeg. By the way the man who's writing is not even yoruba,but itsekiri.

Op, pls add the source, I guess its the nation newspapers

2 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by eleko1: 7:54am On Apr 13, 2015
Good post. wink

3 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by hybridtm(m): 7:56am On Apr 13, 2015
Rubbish
Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by pendicle: 7:58am On Apr 13, 2015
Any one who think the indigenes of Lagos will overlook the stupidity and morbid mouth haemorrage of the chest beating but useless tribe is living in foolery.

When they turn blind eye and ethnic fighter to take on the most powerful king in their host abode for expressing a private wish to private guests in his private home and turn that into an avenue to abuse and insult their forefathers who they wake up with karate kicks then they know not who they deal with.

When the Hausa's in Sagamu took the quietness and loving nature of the Remo people for granted and felt they have the numbers to cause trouble, they were dwelt with extensively with multiple beheadings during Oro night curfews and outright and enough financial and physical pains they went to bring the sultan of sokoto and the late emir of kano to beg forgiveness.

Today an average Hausa man in sabo and other places in sagamu know his place.

The Igbos in Lagos and especially those on the Island will know the real powers of the OLOWO EKO, when you think you are something but not knowing you're nobody, only the experience after your foolishness will put it to you, the election should have proven to them who own Lagos by now and their numbers are so inconsequential that Hausa's are more useful than them in Lagos.

The politics and awareness of Lagos changed after the last election and it is now the igbos will know Lagos has been even before their forefathers learn to live like human beings and not animals.

We know how to treat fuckups like this, it is entrenched in our cultural and traditional ways long long ago, civilization made it go under but it will come out now. Oba Oyekan begged that Oro should be done very very late into the night cause of visitors and outsiders and should be confined to only indigenous part of Lagos but now we will do it everywhere in Lagos to prove the land is ours and we earned it from our forebears.

The Aworis will do gelede, the eguns will do zangbeto, the ikorodus will do agemo and eluku and then these bastards wil know the LAND OF LAGOS truly have owners.

Awon omo irankiran, ato ko wa ba leje.

38 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Soskid(m): 8:09am On Apr 13, 2015
K o

15 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by listenersky: 8:11am On Apr 13, 2015
.dfhh
Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by ibkgab001: 8:14am On Apr 13, 2015
Go to Obamtse in Kogi and claim there land nasarrawa I mean

5 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by MsTIQ(m): 8:21am On Apr 13, 2015
One thing I have learnt from the Lagos saga is ; History! grin Now I have learnt different ones, lipsrsealed and I dunno which one to believe ! The Oba was wrong, Yes! Let's forgive him smiley Peace!
Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Super1Star: 8:27am On Apr 13, 2015
Any disgruntled bastard that is pained that Lagos was, is and will forever be the Land of Oduduwa, can enter into the Atlantic Ocean.

There is the lost city of Atlantis underneath to relocate to. There is also Lagos in Portugal, as an alternative.

Bunch of greedy covetous people.

SS people beware they will soon declare PH Yenegoa and Warri no man's land too. It is an inborn lousy greedy attitude in them.

Where were their forefathers when the forefathers of others were busy fighting wars, conquering land and establishing enduring empires. They were definitely busy with dancing round a pot of boiling human beings, as recorded by the British.

Some people call themselves "Lagos Igbos" on another man's soil. is that a tribe or ethnic group or a clan?

grin grin grin grin

26 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by crownprince102: 9:04am On Apr 13, 2015
ichidodo:
^^^^ Lagos remains no man's land as long as Nigeria remains one and it struggles to become an economic hub...Simply put,the indigenes lost their ancestral rights with the steady influx of yoriba immigrants and non-yoriba immigrants,infact-just like the Columbus effect on Red Indians,throwing the entire northern American continent into no man's land for European immigrants-the core Lagos indigene has become extinct therefore Lagos is no man's land......Omatseye writes for the Nation,do the maths.
Lagos is no man's land?



What of Enugu, Portharcourt, Owerri, Onitsha and the likes?

1 Like

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Nobody: 9:06am On Apr 13, 2015
pendicle:
Any one who think the indigenes of Lagos will overlook the stupidity and morbid mouth haemorrage of the chest beating but useless tribe is living in foolery.

When they turn blind eye and ethnic fighter to take on the most powerful king in their host abode for expressing a private wish to private guests in his private home and turn that into an avenue to abuse and insult their forefathers who they wake up with karate kicks then they know not who they deal with.

When the Hausa's in Sagamu took the quietness and loving nature of the Remo people for granted and felt they have the numbers to cause trouble, they were dwelt with extensively with multiple beheadings during Oro night curfews and outright and enough financial and physical pains they went to bring the sultan of sokoto and the late emir of kano to beg forgiveness.

Today an average Hausa man in sabo and other places in sagamu know his place.

The Igbos in Lagos and especially those on the Island will know the real powers of the OLOWO EKO, when you think you are something but not knowing you're nobody, only the experience after your foolishness will put it to you, the election should have proven to them who own Lagos by now and their numbers are so inconsequential that Hausa's are more useful than them in Lagos.

The politics and awareness of Lagos changed after the last election and it is now the igbos will know Lagos has been even before their forefathers learn to live like human beings and not animals.

We know how to treat fuckups like this, it is entrenched in our cultural and traditional ways long long ago, civilization made it go under but it will come out now. Oba Oyekan begged that Oro should be done very very late into the night cause of visitors and outsiders and should be confined to only indigenous part of Lagos but now we will do it everywhere in Lagos to prove the land is ours and we earned it from our forebears.

The Aworis will do gelede, the eguns will do zangbeto, the ikorodus will do agemo and eluku and then these bastards wil know the LAND OF LAGOS truly have owners.


Awon omo irankiran, ato ko wa ba leje.

Very sweet write up Sir/Ma.

I wish these cultural festivals could be resuscitated on a larger scale. The relegation of traditional festivals to the background is killing Yoruba itself.

12 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by slap1(m): 9:20am On Apr 13, 2015
The article is balanced. Let's go back to healing. Clinging tenaciously to the past is the easiest way to lose the future.

1 Like

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by omazus: 9:22am On Apr 13, 2015
Mr. Omatseye, I like reading you every Monday at the back of the Nation. Before now, as an undergraduate I read you in the Sun Newspapers. The truth is, I do not read you because of the wisdom and the truth contained in your write up but in your mastery and skillful use of the English language. It is a pity that that skill which made me to fall in love you is lacking in this write up.

Just yesterday, as Nigerians were killing themselves I was ensconsed in Thomas Friedman's book, "The Lexus and the Olive Tree." It is a book about globalisation and world development. In that book Friedman artfully exposed what I may call the problem of Nigeria. And it is this. "Half of the world seemed to be intent ... on building a better lexus, dedicated to modernising, streamlining and privatizing their economies in order to thrive in the system of globalisation. And half of the world - sometimes half the same country, sometimes half the same person - was still caught up in the fight over who owns which olive tree." That a writer should lend his trade to struggle about ownership of an olive tree, and to lie bardefacedly while doing so tells much about us as a country.

The truth is that the Yoruba person is is ingrained with an incurable hatred of the Igbo. I do not know why. But this is why I say so. A Yoruba friend told me how as a kid he read a book about the origin of the Igbo. It was a Yoruba book which he showed to me but since I couldn't raed the language I couldn't follow with the content. In that book, the Igbo was a product of a relationship between a Yoruba female outcast and a monkey. If I did not believe this many comments I have read from Yoruba nairalanders here have4 made allusion to this. Therefore, I was not suprised when a Yoruba child of 12 years who visited me, sat on my house and was served food declared to my own daughter with whom she was sharing the food that she hates all Igbo people. I was taken aback. At such a tender age. I sat back and asked her, so you hate me. She said no that I'm a good person but she hates all other Igbo persons. The message has been delevered and Igot it. Children get their worldviews from their parents and if a child could harbour such a thought then we are all done as a nation.

My point is this, the Igbo were agitated by Oba's comment because almost all of them in Lagos are aware of this feeling of hatred against them. And in the recent time we have heard of giving the Igbo in Lagos the Hausa treatment they received in Kano. Now it is becoming an official practice to hate the Igbo and stop him by all means the Igbo must have a rethink. As a tribe we must make a conscious decision that henceforth no further buying and developing of property in Lagos. If you have made money, take it down to the East and build there. Thank you.

7 Likes 3 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Nobody: 9:24am On Apr 13, 2015
9jacrip:
The relegation of traditional festivals to the background is killing Yoruba itself.
Very True

1 Like

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Omololu007(m): 10:16am On Apr 13, 2015
omazus:
Therefore, I was not suprised when a Yoruba child of 12 years who visited me, sat on my house and was served food declared to my own daughter with whom she was sharing the food that she hates all Igbo people. I was taken aback. At such a tender age. I sat back and asked her, so you hate me. She said no that I'm a good person but she hates all other Igbo persons. The message has been delevered and Igot it. Children get their worldviews from their parents and if a child could harbour such a thought then we are all done as a nation.

we hav ibo parents dat do tell dia children not to marry yorubas,cos yoruba are bad pple,dey do say bad tinz about yorubas to dia kids too.stuff lik yorubas betray d ibos durin d civil war

6 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by Heffalump(m): 10:26am On Apr 13, 2015
NeuroBoss:
Since the Oba of Lagos uttered his controversial Lagoon jibe, Lagos has come under a certain attack. It is the foray called, “No Man’s Land.” By that the settlers say Lagos is Nigeria’s city and no ethnic group should lay claim to it as their own.
The position came into play in the just-concluded governor election. It also reared its insular head in the aftermath of the National Assembly and presidential polls in which non-indigenes scooped a haul of seats by besting indigenes.
This sort of attitude is not only arrogant, but. also inherently disrespectful. 


The Yoruba, especially with the Ibadan People’s Party, scuttled Zik who was on his way to become the first premier of the Western Region. Zik cried foul, and lobbed a charge of tribal politics against the indigenes. He did not especially help himself when Eyo Ita, a minority in the East, was denied the chance to be premier of the East..........

rit.But we have to go back to healing now, and learn to live together..........
 

@NeuroBoss: Your write-up is disgracefully stained and beclouded with mud, if am permitted to address it this way. Who fueled the embers of bitterness and hatred in Lagos with inclinations to both tribal and religious warfare, before the presidential and guber elections? It is you, the Yorubas that started calling GEJ all sort of names because he came to Lagos to campaign, or even when he made official trips to the State for important function that affects the Nigerian State.

I am NOT an Igbo man, but one thing I can say against the Yoruba people you strongly projected in your write up is that, they are the most sentimental of all tribes in Nigeria! They think first of themselves before they realize others exist- evidence abound both in public and private places (no sarcasm attached but I am responding to your personal opinion). As for other ethnic tribes gaining political popularity in States not particularly theirs, is not only in Lagos. It has happened in a few states that I know: Edo, Benue, & Rivers in the past.

Notwithstanding, Jimi was rejected and treated as an outcast in Lagos because he aligned with the political party that is strongly dreaded and hated in the West, Lagos in particular not bearing in mind that Nigeria should be a secular State where anyone can choose to belong and incline to any party without fear or favour. But your political Godfathers, Tinubu and co. made you to believe the false tales. I heard many saying Jimi had better ideas and maturity to lead Lagos compared to Ambode. Well, I didn't listen to them during the debate, what am saying is that this guy should not be seen and painted as an outcast.
No ethnic group or tribe deserves the right to call themselves special breed in Nigeria. We are all one and the same, and should be treated with equality.

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by zimoni(f): 10:28am On Apr 13, 2015
Well written.

I've learnt a lot from nairaland.

We need to do away with the damn sophistication and do the needful.

Enop is enop.

What you can't attempt in Kano, don't try it in Lagos.

Lobatan.

11 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by ndcide(m): 11:03am On Apr 13, 2015
Omatseye, one of Tinubu's media dogs latching on to his ethnic optics because of APC. I lost respect for him a long time ago. He clearly has issue with the voting pattern of the Igbo but have no issues with the pattern of Hausa Fulani in voting.

so shameful.

Igbo have never disrespected the Yoruba in Lagos. Until the Yoruba people tried to always prove political superiority and worse was trying to force their political opinion on the Igbo especially when you know their political sentiments.

I'm not surprised about omatseye, you can see how he manipulates his guests on TVC to concur with is. opinion on TV. Mr laborus had to tell him to stop forcing guests to agree with him by stopping them when they want to make a contrary opinion.

He should should go and sit down.

3 Likes

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by mapet: 11:05am On Apr 13, 2015
My brother,

The Oba was wrong in context and time...........The Oba was seemingly wrong last week. The implication of the reaction of Igbos in words and deed is just about to begin. Trust me those that chided the Oba last week will say that he spoke the truth this week.

I'm fascinated with the study of power, a field I feel many of us can freely immerse ourselves in and learn a lesson or two. The Igbos that vented their anger through vectives thrown at the Oba and their votes, seemingly did not look beyond Saturday the 11th of April 2015. Indigenous Lagosians will now go gangster-defensive of everything about their heritage. It's likely to start with subtle harassment to open confrontation.......... we should start thinking with our heads and not our muscles..............
MsTIQ:
One thing I have learnt from the Lagos saga is ; History! grin Now I have learnt different ones, lipsrsealed and I dunno which one to believe ! The Oba was wrong, Yes! Let's forgive him smiley Peace!

5 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by mapet: 11:25am On Apr 13, 2015
omazus:
Mr. Omatseye, I like reading you every Monday at the back of the Nation. Before now, as an undergraduate I read you in the Sun Newspapers. The truth is, I do not read you because of the wisdom and the truth contained in your write up but in your mastery and skillful use of the English language. It is a pity that that skill which made me to fall in love you is lacking in this write up.

Just yesterday, as Nigerians were killing themselves I was ensconsed in Thomas Friedman's book, "The Lexus and the Olive Tree." It is a book about globalisation and world development. In that book Friedman artfully exposed what I may call the problem of Nigeria. And it is this. "Half of the world seemed to be intent ... on building a better lexus, dedicated to modernising, streamlining and privatizing their economies in order to thrive in the system of globalisation. And half of the world - sometimes half the same country, sometimes half the same person - was still caught up in the fight over who owns which olive tree." That a writer should lend his trade to struggle about ownership of an olive tree, and to lie bardefacedly while doing so tells much about us as a country.

The truth is that the Yoruba person is is ingrained with an incurable hatred of the Igbo. I do not know why. But this is why I say so. A Yoruba friend told me how as a kid he read a book about the origin of the Igbo. It was a Yoruba book which he showed to me but since I couldn't raed the language I couldn't follow with the content. In that book, the Igbo was a product of a relationship between a Yoruba female outcast and a monkey. If I did not believe this many comments I have read from Yoruba nairalanders here have4 made allusion to this. Therefore, I was not suprised when a Yoruba child of 12 years who visited me, sat on my house and was served food declared to my own daughter with whom she was sharing the food that she hates all Igbo people. I was taken aback. At such a tender age. I sat back and asked her, so you hate me. She said no that I'm a good person but she hates all other Igbo persons. The message has been delevered and Igot it. Children get their worldviews from their parents and if a child could harbour such a thought then we are all done as a nation.

My point is this, the Igbo were agitated by Oba's comment because almost all of them in Lagos are aware of this feeling of hatred against them. And in the recent time we have heard of giving the Igbo in Lagos the Hausa treatment they received in Kano. Now it is becoming an official practice to hate the Igbo and stop him by all means the Igbo must have a rethink. As a tribe we must make a conscious decision that henceforth no further buying and developing of property in Lagos. If you have made money, take it down to the East and build there. Thank you.

Bros,

I'd rather you went straight to your points, but your retort and critique on skillful writing is ironic as you made blunders which you seemingly accused Omatseye of.

First off, I will not bother requesting for verification of the name of the Yoruba book you claimed you saw with a 12 year old on the history of Igbos. A simple check on all Yoruba literature used in schools and approved by state ministries of education will show that no such book exist. Will you rather now blame a nation for some printouts that was of no known academic background? I do not claim the mastery of the skill of writing, but I know simply logic does not permit these errors of generalization and quoting from on verified sources.

For me I think the lessons that should be learnt is hardly learnt and we keep making the same mistakes all over. Let me just say a few;
1. When we don't respect each other; or better still we outrightly ridicule each other's tribes, the embers of discord will keep growing. Considering the number of unsavory things I see on NL as reflective of some collective positions of the divide is scary
2. This feeling of "they hate me, so I hate them" will not make the problem go away
3. I think well meaning Igbos should tell their folks to back off the issue of "Lagos, a no man's land". It has not worked, neither will it. It will only incur more ill-feeling and I dare say it's senseless and disrespectful of Lagosians.
4. We have a collective responsibilities of passing the right values to our children.

On the Oba's comment's, well Igbos were obviously agitated, but wisdom at times tells us we are circumspect in our reaction and take paths that are expedient. If we're careful enough we should have handled it better collectively kill the matter quickly. We are probably going battle with dousing the smoke of this issue that will last another few more long years

11 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by pendicle: 11:31am On Apr 13, 2015
9jacrip:


Very sweet write up Sir/Ma.

I wish these cultural festivals could be resuscitated on a larger scale. The relegation of traditional festivals to the background is killing Yoruba itself.

It is the modern day western wannabe lifestyle that is rubbing off on our culture and believes. Will this nyamiris go to Oshogbo and say it is no man' s land when they see them do Osun Festival yearly, yet you will see some Yoruba pastors and imams saying it should be scrapped.

The late Ayangburen of Ikorodu had wanted to stop the Isemo days or that they should shift the events to only nights few years ago cos of civilization but it was the traditional institutions and elites such as T.O.S Benson who warned him seriously, it even led to open confrontation between the two of them, now the lesson that those who says those cultural and traditional events should be continued is now open to all who opposed it.

Lagos have many abandoned traditional events aside the popular eyo festival even the spiritual aspect of the eyo have been jettisoned to accommodate more synchronization with modern times, who born bastards to watch when the Adamu Orisha procession comes out.

There will be so many rejuvenation of old cultural and traditional events in Lagos. The Oba has already given go ahead. The palace have realized many mistakes of the past and trust me, the saros and the Brazilian quarters have been informed on what to do, the various traditional houses and title and land owners from the ojoras to the onilegbale to the onikoyis and other houses are marshalling out plans to deal with the issue.

What have been buried will be uprooted and it won't be an open and clear thing, we will deal with them the traditional and cultural way. The way they rushed in they will rush out with their tails behind they sorry azzes.

Imagine awon omo ale daring the ELEKO on his land. They want lessons in history and surely they will be taught. The process and procedure already with those who are dealing with it.

16 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by omazus: 12:09pm On Apr 13, 2015
Thank you bro for your comment. I hope we have found a ground for conversation. But before then, let me tell you that the book in question was not found with a 12 year old but a 31 year old. And he read it in his teen. And before God and man, you cannot deny knowledge of the existence of such book. For the reason you stated that the book was not officially approved for study in schools, we have kept quite about it. But the truth is that generations who read that book whether officially or unofficially are gradually taking over reins of power, and coupled with latest happening we must be on the alert.

I will be a fool to say that Igbos are all saints. We are not. But see what most Yoruba commentators have failed to see when they converse with the Igbo. The Igbo are able to isolate the culprit whenever they criticise. In the case in point Oba was rightly isolated. In your comment about Lagos as a no man's land, you desecrate my person, rendered me a nonentity by ascribing the saying of one Igbo man to me. Lagos for me is not a no man's land but instead of you to attack the man who said it you choose to attack all the Igbo. And when the Igbo attacked Oba for his misadventure the whole Yoruba came up that they are being attacked. The same happened when Achebe's book blamed Awolowo for his role during the war the whole Yoruba race said they were being attacked. This is what others do not understand about you. But every day you write about individuals from other areas and those people do not say all of them are being attacked.

mapet:


Bros,

I'd rather you went straight to your points, but your retort and critique on skillful writing is ironic as you made blunders which you seemingly accused Omatseye of.

First off, I will not bother requesting for verification of the name of the Yoruba book you claimed you saw with a 12 year old on the history of Igbos. A simple check on all Yoruba literature used in schools and approved by state ministries of education will show that no such book exist. Will you rather now blame a nation for some printouts that was of no known academic background? I do not claim the mastery of the skill of writing, but I know simply logic does not permit these errors of generalization and quoting from on verified sources.

For me I think the lessons that should be learnt is hardly learnt and we keep making the same mistakes all over. Let me just say a few;
1. When we don't respect each other; or better still we outrightly ridicule each other's tribes, the embers of discord will keep growing. Considering the number of unsavory things I see on NL as reflective of some collective positions of the divide is scary
2. This feeling of "they hate me, so I hate them" will not make the problem go away
3. I think well meaning Igbos should tell their folks to back off the issue of "Lagos, a no man's land". It has not worked, neither will it. It will only incur more ill-feeling and I dare say it's senseless and disrespectful of Lagosians.
4. We have a collective responsibilities of passing the right values to our children.

On the Oba's comment's, well Igbos were obviously agitated, but wisdom at times tells us we are circumspect in our reaction and take paths that are expedient. If we're careful enough we should have handled it better collectively kill the matter quickly. We are probably going battle with dousing the smoke of this issue that will last another few more long years

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Who Owns Lagos? By Sam Omatseye by SirShymexx: 12:29pm On Apr 13, 2015
Lol.

I honestly can't get head around the obsession with Lagos - to warrant all the revisionism, jejune tales, and pseudo-history - by these covetous folks, to be honest.

This is a place that is half the size of London, but with a population twice that of London. Bear in mind that London's population has been almost the same for close to fifty years now. However, with Lagos, based on the population incremental rate - it has increased by an alarming 10,000%. Thus turning a very decent city into an utter chaotic one and a gigantic slum. Yet some clowns are claiming they developed a city that has always been cosmopolitan into a snarled-up slum. No, you didn't develop it - you destroyed one of the most beautiful landscape in Africa, and turned it to a big slum.

Folks need to focus on how to depopulate Lagos by at least half - and build other cities elsewhere. Leave the indigenous folks alone to enjoy their God given ancestral land. They never asked none of you to come there in the first place.

16 Likes 1 Share

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply)

Anambra Farmer Discovers Crude Oil In His Farm / Senate To Buhari: Deploy Military To Crush Bandits, Insurgents In Jigawa / 2023: APC Hasn't Shut Out Any Geopolitical Zone, Says PGF Boss

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 180
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.