The below are some images of the Fearless director of all time ADOLPH HITLER's Mother and ADOLPH HITLER himself as a child.

iku!

It really is just about the flourishing myth around this guy than it is about what he actually did. Hitler was no less a despicable leader than many other leaders of the 20th century; Mao, Ataturk and Stalin were all to varying degrees genocidal despots. Hitler was just unfortunate to have made one of the world's most powerful races his victims. And it just so followed that they, with their huge media empire, have made him into the world's biggest scapegoat.

Don't be ignorant, he isn't a devil.

kestolove95:
Devil

SuperSuave:
iku!

Devil

Antoinne:
It really is just about the flourishing myth around this guy than it is about what he actually did. Hitler was no less a despicable leader than many other leaders of the 20th century; Mao, Ataturk and Stalin were all to varying degrees genocidal despots. Hitler was just unfortunate to have made one of the world's most powerful races his victims. And it's just so followed that they, with their huge media empire, have made him into the world's biggest scapegoat.

Don't be ignorant, he isn't a devil.

oshey iwe!

Are you joking?? He was "just unfortunate" to make Jews his victims? Do you know how insensitive your post sounds? You're making it sound like wiping off 6 million people is not really a big deal, only that the affected people used their influence and power to make him look like a bad guy! I only agree with your point that the 20th century has produced its own fair share of loathesome leaders, you didn't have to back up your point with this heartless and careless post!

Antoinne:
It really is just about the flourishing myth around this guy than it is about what he actually did. Hitler was no less a despicable leader than many other leaders of the 20th century; Mao, Ataturk and Stalin were all to varying degrees genocidal despots. Hitler was just unfortunate to have made one of the world's most powerful races his victims. And it's just so followed that they, with their huge media empire, have made him into the world's biggest scapegoat.

Don't be ignorant, he isn't a devil.

angieberry:
Are you joking?? He was "just unfortunate" to make Jews his victims? Do you know how insensitive your post sounds? You're making it sound like wiping off 6 million people is not really a big deal, only that the affected people used their influence and power to make him look like a bad guy! I only agree with your point that the 20th century has produced its own fair share of loathesome leaders, you didn't have to back up your point with this heartless and careless post!

For a moment there, I was lost between the nice diction and the superb thought arrangement. I guess the ayes have it.

Thank you but it's the truth.
The ayes?

tranxo:
For a moment there, I was lost between the nice diction and the superb thought arrangement. I guess the ayes have it.

Antoinne:
It really is just about the flourishing myth around this guy than it is about what he actually did. Hitler was no less a despicable leader than many other leaders of the 20th century; Mao, Ataturk and Stalin were all to varying degrees genocidal despots. Hitler was just unfortunate to have made one of the world's most powerful races his victims. And it's just so followed that they, with their huge media empire, have made him into the world's biggest scapegoat.

Don't be ignorant, he isn't a devil.

You are here again spewing trash and trying to sound intellectual!!.

Get your facts right

Hitler(even though he was an Austrian) attacked people that were not from his country Germany while the others you listed inflicted /committed atrocities against their own people(Stalin was from Georgia, which was part of USSR then!).
Don't hold fort for someone most historians(dead and living) condemned for his atrocities against mankind!!!



On the sunny side, when they say you should take away food from the plane, you wouldn't,now look at how you're reasoning!!!

angieberry:
Are you joking?? He was "just unfortunate" to make Jews his victims? Do you know how insensitive your post sounds? You're making it sound like wiping off 6 million people is not really a big deal, only that the affected people used their influence and power to make him look like a bad guy! I only agree with your point that the 20th century has produced its own fair share of loathesome leaders, you didn't have to back up your point with this heartless and careless post!

WTF?

This is a mere coincidence

What thaaa........

No, it is not what you're thinking

I am not stalking you!!

You remain ugly!!!

Whatever, stalker!

DICKtator:


WTF?

This is a mere coincidence

What thaaa........

No, it is not what you're thinking

I am not stalking you!!

You remain ugly!!!

angieberry:
Thank you but it's the truth.
The ayes?

Yes the ayes.

What's that

tranxo:
Yes the ayes.

true true na that woman born am

angieberry:
What's that

Never watched a Senate plenary before?

Oh, lol. I get it now

tranxo:
Never watched a Senate plenary before?

angieberry:
Oh, lol. I get it now

DICKtator:


You are here again spewing trash and trying to sound intellectual!!.

Get your facts right

Hitler(even though he was an Austrian) attacked people that were not from his country Germany while the others you listed inflicted /committed atrocities against their own people(Stalin was from Georgia, which was part of USSR then!).
Don't hold fort for someone most historians(dead and living) condemned for his atrocities against mankind!!!



On the sunny side, when they say you should take away food from the plane, you wouldn't,now look at how you're reasoning!!!

Do you even know what you are talking about? I'd give you a lesson in history if you want one. Clearly you don't question the knowledge you get fed and simply swallow everything hook, line and sinker.
What do you mean Hitler attacked "people that were not from his country"? What sort of reasoning is that? Is that all why you consider him a despot? Not because he slaughtered Jews in their millions? So, if someone committed atrocities against his own people like Stalin, that makes it justified? You need a check on your reasoning.

All i put forward is that, history has made one despot appear more evil than the others. Hitler in this case the victim. Of course, what he did is inexcusable. However, it's no different from what Stalin or Mao did and they should all get equal treatment from historians. Yet, Mao is still a hero in modern China. So is Genghis Khan in southern and eastern Asia, even with his history of genocidal terror well documented.

Clearly you don't know the first thing about history. If you knew, you'd understand that it's not all in the eyes of the beholder.

angieberry:
Are you joking?? He was "just unfortunate" to make Jews his victims? Do you know how insensitive your post sounds? You're making it sound like wiping off 6 million people is not really a big deal, only that the affected people used their influence and power to make him look like a bad guy! I only agree with your point that the 20th century has produced its own fair share of loathesome leaders, you didn't have to back up your point with this heartless and careless post!

Oh Christ! What first thing do you Nigerians know about history!? Phew!
History is plain and unapologetic, so yes, i don't know how insensitive the post sounds and.... I don't care!
Second, wiping off 6 million people is a big deal. But do you know how many the Belgian King, Leopold, wiped off? I guess you don't. Do you know how many Mao wiped off? I bet you don't. Do you know how many died in the early 20th century Namibian genocide supervised by an earlier German government? I'm sure you don't. Yet the persons involved in these instances don't equal an Hitler. You wanna know why? Cos the voice of those affected have been drowned out and in the case of King Leopold mainly because those involved have no media pressing their case before the world.

When You Kill 10 Million Africans You Aren’t Called ‘hitler’

You see, the problem with peeps like you is that you can't wash off that inundation which has seen you color Hitler with evil. An inundation greatly festered by biased western thinking and a now powerful Israel state. That's okay. It's just in character.

Hitler may have indeed been evil. But he was no less evil than Mao and so many other leaders of history. They were all despots who perpetrated genocide on an extreme stage. Grow your thinking and resist the fettering of baseless propaganda.

Antoinne:

Do you even know what you are talking about? I'd give you a lesson in history if you want one. Clearly you don't question the knowledge you get fed and simply swallow everything hook, line and sinker.
What do you mean Hitler attacked "people that were not from his country"? What sort of reasoning is that? Is that all why you consider him a despot? Not because he slaughtered Jews in their millions? So, if someone committed atrocities against his own people like Stalin, that makes it justified? You need a check on your reasoning.

All i put forward is that, history has made one despot appear more evil than the others. Hitler in this case the victim. Of course, what he did is inexcusable. However, it's no different from what Stalin or Mao did and they should all get equal treatment from historians. Yet, Mao is still in hero in modern China. So is Genghis Khan in southern and eastern Asia, even with his history of genocidal terror well documented.
!
Clearly you don't know the first thing about history. If you knew, you'd understand that it's not all in the eyes of the beholder.

I insist, one of the subtle rationale for labelling Hitler infamous was his deposition towards foreigners especially the Jews. When he annexed Poland, all the west and other world powers did not really bat an eyelid,it was when the "superiority complex" came into being and accusation against the Jews for Germany's woe did the West and other world powers took him seriously.

Do not misquote me, I never said what Stalin,Mao Zedong,Pol pot,Rwanda Hutus or whatever they did was justifiable. What I said was that Hitler's atrocities were horrendous because:
1. It was an unprovoked race issue. When someone doesn't want you around and claims his race is superior over others, that is dementia and delusion of the grandeur!!!.
In cases like that, neighbouring countries would get apprehensive on such ridiculous excuse
2. Hitler is not the first person to mistreat the jews. Jews have faced a lot of persecutions before Hitler from the Dreyfuss accusations to some countries telling Jews to leave their land. This was what was expected of Hitler instead of carrying out a well thought out annihilation of a race,creating gas chambers in concentration camps and using them for inhumane experiments!!.
Please I hate typing much but you really want to put me on the spot and want me to break my modus operandus on this forum so imma stop here

Genghis Khan? You gotta be kidding me!!
What century are you talking of? When men were savages ,barbarians and survival of the fittest was the norm then?

Mao Zedong a hero? Perhaps I need to dust my history book as regards this or check Google and ascertain this. But Chinese I've met detest this man for the atrocities he committed like you typed

What makes you think Stalin doesn't get close to the same treatment as his ilks? He was an Ally during the 2nd world war so certain "good" can be attributed to him but he has been discarded in the dustbin the evils' history because of his post war attitude. What happened to Stalingard? Wasn't the name changed? Research on what happened to his corpse!!!

I never typed all of history is in the eyes of a beholder. Historians always have different perspectives of course!!. That why some historians would tell you the 1st world war wasn't a world war hence the name great war while the 2nd was the 1st!!

Some American historians even believe that America won the Vietnam war!!!

DICKtator:


I insist, one of the subtle rationale for labelling Hitler infamous was his deposition towards foreigners especially the Jews. When he annexed Poland, all the west and other world powers did not really bat an eyelid,it was when the "superiority complex" came into being and accusation against the Jews for Germany's woe did the West and other world powers took him seriously.

Do not misquote me, I never said what Stalin,Mao Zedong,Pol pot,Rwanda Hutus or whatever they did was justifiable. What I said was that Hitler's atrocities were horrendous because:
1. It was an unprovoked race issue. When someone doesn't want you around and claims his race is superior over others, that is dementia and delusion of the grandeur!!!.
In cases like that, neighbouring countries would get apprehensive on such ridiculous excuse
2. Hitler is not the first person to mistreat the jews. Jews have faced a lot of persecutions before Hitler from the Dreyfuss accusations to some countries telling Jews to leave their land. This was what was expected of Hitler instead of carrying out a well thought out annihilation of a race,creating gas chambers in concentration camps and using them for inhumane experiments!!.
Please I hate typing much but you really want to put me on the spot and want me to break my modus operandus on this forum so imma stop here

Genghis Khan? You gotta be kidding me!!
What century are you talking of? When men were savages ,barbarians and survival of the fittest was the norm then?

Mao Zedong a hero? Perhaps I need to dust my history book as regards this or check Google and ascertain this. But Chinese I've met detest this man for the atrocities he committed like you typed

What makes you think Stalin doesn't get close to the same treatment as his ilks? He was an Ally during the 2nd world war so certain "good" can be attributed to him but he has been discarded in the dustbin the evils' history because of his post war attitude. What happened to Stalingard? Wasn't the name changed? Research on what happened to his corpse!!!

I never typed all of history is in the eyes of a beholder. Historians always have different perspectives of course!!. That why some historians would tell you the 1st world war wasn't a world war hence the name great war while the 2nd was the 1st!!

Some American historians even believe that America won the Vietnam war!!!

@bolded. You would mean "Austria" there or "Czechoslovakia". By the time he invaded Poland, the war was already in full swing.

Today, there are still monuments dedicated to Stalin and to Mao. These men have not got what I'd truly deserving of their genocidal legacy. Hitler, on the other hand, has suffered more than appropriately. Mention one monument to Hitler in modern Germany; i bet you won't find any. Truth is, history is not fair and unrightly so. But it helps to see where things are being subtly adjusted to favor a set of people. Clearly, world opinion today hasn't dealt equally with many leaders who have been just as despotic as Hitler was.

Antoinne:


@bolded. You would mean "Austria" there or "Czechoslovakia". By the time he invaded Poland, the war was already in full swing.

Today, there are still monuments dedicated to Stalin and to Mao. These men have not got what I'd truly deserving of their genocidal legacy. Hitler, on the other hand, has suffered more than appropriately. Mention one monument to Hitler in modern Germany; i bet you won't find any. Truth is, history is not fair and unrightly so. But it helps to see where things are being subtly adjusted to favor a set of people. Clearly, world opinion today hasn't dealt equally with many leaders who have been just as despotic as Hitler was.

Lmao!!!

You still don't get it!!!

The idea behind monuments for these despots( Stalin and Mao Zedong cos you're stuck on both) is based on their laudable achievement in their various countries at that time devoid of belligerent external policies!. The Germans were defeated by the Soviets (why they were given East Germany after the war!)during the war under Stalin's leadership and he carried out genuine reforms during his regime. (NOTE that USSR and China were both Socialist and Communist states during their reign!).Note that Stalin's monuments in his hometown of Georgia has been pulled down!!!. Please kindly post any Stalin monumnets that you know of.
Mao Zedong is a nationalist, he fought against the Japanese to liberate China from their control!. He is still partly honoured in China probably because of this and other reforms he undertook AND because China is still "party- Communist" (or should i state totalitarian? )in nature!!.
I insist Hitler's policies were very unpopular even among Germans and what do you mean by monuments for Hitler? Do you recognise that that may be against the law?
Isn't the same Hitler not honoured among skinheads and other race-hate groups? Isn't the swastika still used by some people?
What other honour are you talking about?

Hitler leveraged on the economic downturn in Germany to seize power and instead of improving the Germans lives, who were all eager for genuine change, he used fake propaganda to entice the people based on his oratory skills, even faked an assassination attempt on his life to appear invincible and god-like and kill his opponents and blame the jews for Germany's problems

Or perhaps I should explain it this way, Stalin and Zedong killed their children (subtling condemned and killed their children)-- INTERNAL AGGRESSION ON HIS CHILDREN
While Hitler did not blame his children but was punishing and killing other people's children,even entering other people's country to kill the same children and causing needless war and untold hardship to his children all because he wanted to restore a so-called German pride--EXTERNAL AGGRESSION ON OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN

THAT WAS AN ANALOGY


Note that Mussolini is also widely perceived a persona non grata in Italy

And thanks for the correction, it wasn't Poland

You're so unbelievable! So, in other words, Hitler is not such a bad guy, just that the west is painting him so? I get your point that other leaders have perpetrated worse evils, but that doesn't mean you should try and exonerate him!

Antoinne:

Oh Christ! What first thing do you Nigerians know about history!? Phew!
History is plain and unapologetic, so yes, i don't know how insensitive the post sounds and.... I don't care!
Second, wiping off 6 million people is a big deal. But do you know how many the Belgian King, Leopold, wiped off? I guess you don't. Do you know how many Mao wiped off? I bet you don't. Do you know how many died in the early 20th century Namibian genocide supervised by an earlier German government? I'm sure you don't. Yet the persons involved in these instances don't equal an Hitler. You wanna know why? Cos the voice of those affected have been drowned out and in the case of King Leopold mainly because those involved have no media pressing their case before the world.

When You Kill 10 Million Africans You Aren’t Called ‘hitler’

You see, the problem with peeps like you is that you can't wash off that inundation which has seen you color Hitler with evil. An inundation greatly festered by biased western thinking and a now powerful Israel state. That's okay. It's just in character.

Hitler may have indeed been evil. But he was no less evil than Mao and so many other leaders of history. They were all despots who perpetrated genocide on an extreme stage. Grow your thinking and resist the fettering of baseless propaganda.

angieberry:
You're so unbelievable! So, in other words, Hitler is not such a bad guy, just that the west is painting him so? I get your point that other leaders have perpetrated worse evils, but that doesn't mean you should try and exonerate him!

How exactly am I exonerating him?

You're making him seem like the victim here,maybe exonerate is not the exact word to use, you're downplaying the atrocities he committed! Please, call a spade a spade, he did bad.

Antoinne:

How exactly am I exonerating him?

angieberry:
You're making him seem like the victim here,maybe exonerate is not the exact word to use, you're downplaying the atrocities he committed! Please, call a spade a spade, he did bad.

Did you try to upplay this?
When You Kill 10 Million Africans You Aren’t Called ‘hitler’