Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,150,102 members, 7,807,314 topics. Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2024 at 12:11 PM

The Close Encounters In The Bible - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / The Close Encounters In The Bible (1425 Views)

Share Your Weird,supernatural,mystical Encounters With The World. / Address Of Pope Francis At The Close Of Synod / Encounters With The Spiritual Travellers (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 4:16pm On Sep 25, 2006
HIGH-TECHNOLOGY IN THE BIBLE
by Doug Yurchey


There are readers out there who would be surprised or offended with the notion that high-technology was described in the Bible. There are other readers who have realized that the only explanations to Biblical mysteries are ancient Close Encounters. A good question is: Why are certain, Old Testament events written about in the Bible? The answer could be that these were special events between basically two groups of people: One group was the primitives or the general state of humanity in Biblical times. The other group was the relatively few HUMANS that still retained and utilized technology originating from the days of Atlantis.
When angels made an appearance, they were always human. Those who caused the Great Flood; gave Moses the instructions on building the Ark of the Covenant; and warned Lot then destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, were human beings. But, these people had advanced knowledge and flew 'chariots' in the sky. They resided on the tops of mountains; well away from the simple world of Bible prophets in the lowlands.

The most amazing example of an Old Testament Close Encounter is the Book of Ezekiel. Read the beginning of Chapter 1 in the King James Bible, only imagine that it is a UFO landing. With this idea in mind, Ezekiel's experience is almost understandable. Ezekiel's Book was so controversial that it nearly did not survive the religious editors who did throw out the Book of Enoch.

There is a warning in 19/12 to 'go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the mount shall be surely put to death.' This Biblical God was not God. 19/18: 'And mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire, and the whole mount quaked greatly.'

In Exodus, Moses was given instructions on building the Ark of the Covenant. The inventive genius, Nikola Tesla, wrote in 'The Wall of Light' that Moses had to have been a skilled electrical engineer. The Ark, Tesla concluded, was a very powerful 'condenser.' It created intense vibrations that could smash solid stone. The Israelites carted the device into battle and won wars with it; not unlike the vibration weapons the Fremen used in the film 'Dune.'

I Samuel 14/5: 'And when the Ark of the Covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted with a great shout, ' 4/8: ', who shall deliver us out of the hand of these mighty Gods? these are the Gods that smote the Egyptians, '
In II Samuel 6/6-7, a simple man named Uzzah, disregarded warnings, touched the Ark improperly and was electrocuted! ', Uzzah put forth his hand to the ark of God, and took hold of it; for the oxen shook it. And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Uzzah; and God smote him there for his error; and there he died by the ark of God.' The man attempted to place it back on the ox-drawn cart and died. They had no concept of high-voltage. 6/9: 'And David was afraid of the Lord that day.'

The story of Jericho is told in the Book of Joshua. The actual site of Jericho was found. The stone walls were over ten feet thick. What could bring down massive walls? According to the Old Testament, it was the power of the Lord. Marching around the stone fort and blowing trumpets could not possibly shatter such walls. The Ark of the Covenant was there and responsible for 'tumbling down' the walls of Jericho. There are numerous references to, again, a great shout.

Jonah was taken aboard a submarine. But, the prophets would not have that modern word; so the description became a 'great fish.' How were the 10 Commandments cut into stone? The finger of God could have accomplished this if they were lasers. The burning bush may have been electric. The Virgin Mary could have been artificially inseminated.

The Biblical reports were not understood 500 years ago or even 100 years ago. It was only until the 20th Century and its technology that we could finally understand what was really happening. There is evidence that our REAL prehistory was similar to science-fiction. Most people either reject the Bible as nonsense or believe it is the absolute word of the Supreme Being. The Bible is the most amazing account of Close Encounters. The events were real; they happened; but the truth is extraordinary
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 11:53am On Oct 04, 2006
Not a single comment on this topic?Or is it much too radical an idea?I will understand if a lot of folks here think that way,'because it is a radical idea that what was referred to as GOD in the bible,hence what we also call GOD today,might actually have been HUMANS like us,albeit far more advanced intellectually than we are right now.
This,ofcourse,will explain away a lot of the socalled "mysteries" in the bible.
For example,there is little doubt that what prophet Ezekiel witnessed was the landing of a spaceship.Anyone who think otherwise should come out and state his reasons. smiley
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by macalurs(m): 2:26am On Sep 29, 2007
it's too damn long.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by Dios(f): 8:01am On Sep 29, 2007
Summarise that crap yo
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 1:43pm On Sep 29, 2007
Ok,i'll break the post down via multiple posts,to make it easier to digest.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 1:44pm On Sep 29, 2007
'The Spaceships of Ezekiel' by Blumrich is an award-winning book that should be read by anyone investigating Biblical mysteries. Blumrich is a scientist and NASA designer of the Saturn V rocket. He wrote that his son informed him, after reading an Erich Von Daniken book, that the prophet Ezekiel described a spaceship landing. Blumrich was positive that he could disprove that concept because of his technical skills in this field. The ancient text could not possibly portray a feasible craft; he assumed. The NASA designer wrote that he was never so surprised when he actually read the Book of Ezekiel. The ancient words did indeed conform to a realistic vehicle.

In the beginning of Ezekiel, the prophet wrote of the approach of four faces from above. In reality, the 'four' referred to the landing legs of the craft. Blumrich was shocked when he read the Old Testament report of 'straight legs' of 'burnished brass' with 'round feet.' The NASA scientist himself designed the metallic, straight legs and round footpads of the lunar lander. The famous quote from Ezekiel is 'a wheel within a wheel.' Once the lander touched down, Ezekiel saw wheels. This is the exact chronology of what would occur with a modern vehicle. The UFO landed, transformed into a wheeled rover then rolled along the ground. Ezekiel was only familiar with wheels from simple carts that moved in one direction. But, the prophet described wheels that moved in all directions which was completely alien to Ezekiel.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 1:46pm On Sep 29, 2007
[center]Breakdown 2[/center]
Enoch was Methuselah's father and Noah's grandfather. His Book should be in the Old Testament. It has surfaced from independent sources which validate the ancient text. The Book of Enoch was edited out of the Bible by the Ecumenical Council for its controversies. Enoch, like Ezekiel, was taken on many flights by the gods (angels) and witnessed great horrors and beauty. 39/3: ', a whirlwind carried me off from the earth, ' There are numerous references to whirlwinds which 'spirited' Enoch away into the sky. The angels 'showed me all the hidden things' and 'mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven.' Enoch saw views that 'no man shall see.' In 33/4, Enoch states: 'I saw a great and glorious device.'

32/2: 'And thence I went over the summits of the earth, and passed above the Erythraean Sea, and went far from it, and passed over the angel Zotiel (another ship?).

14/18-19: 'I looked and saw a lofty throne: its appearance was as crystal and the wheels thereof as the shining sun, from underneath the throne came streams of flaming fire so great that I could not look thereon.' Enoch mentions crystals and wheels. The throne could be a vehicle where the angels sat and underneath were fires from the rocket thrusters. The 'vision caused me to fly and lifted me upward and bore me into heaven.'

There are numerous references to PORTALS or windows where Earthly and celestial views appeared. 33/2: ', portals of the heaven open. 3. And I saw how the stars of heaven come forth.'

The Book of Enoch speaks of much destruction, chaos and corruption on Earth; as well as among the angels. Like Genesis, Enoch mentions 'giants' and 'the Watchers.' There were 'the Satans' - the 'Sons of Heaven' - 'angels of punishment' - 'instruments of Satan' - and the same specific Genesis angels: Michael, Raphael, Gabriel, etc. 'God' is never mentioned; only plural gods or angels. Enoch was taken to the mountaintops where the gods resided. He observed things that no primitive could understand. The angels 'corrupted the sons of man.' It was these various humans, with the technology, that played God and decided the fate of the children on Earth.

The main reason Enoch's Book was deemed heresy and taken out of the Old Testament could have been the accurate astronomy. Page after page concerns the sun, moon, yearly cycles and heavenly statistics. 'Paths of the sun and moon,' 'their stately orbits,' 'courses of the luminaries' and 'revolve in their circular chariots' are only a few quotes of Enochian wisdom.

75/8: 'And I saw in the heaven running in the world, above those portals in which revolve the stars that never set.' Only from space are there stars that never set. Remember, the Church during the time of Ecumenical editing condemned accurate astronomy. (Ask Galileo). Religious officials wanted the public to think that the Earth was flat, did not move and was in the center of all things.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 1:48pm On Sep 29, 2007
Breakdown Nr.3[center][/center]

During these ancient times, there were mad scientists (angel-demons) who cloned anything they wanted. The mythological animals were real; they were genetic experiments. Also, wars of the gods occurred. Nuclear warfare was not beyond the capability of the angels. Robert Oppenheimer, creator of modern atomics and a student of early books of India, knew that nuclear wars happened in the Old World. The deserts of today are the result of ancient, atomic wars. Assuming that these conclusions are true: The Great Flood was probably green-lighted by good gods who wanted to reduce high radiation levels. Also, the perverted creatures and their power-crazed, genetic engineers needed to be eliminated on a global scale. The Earth was a mess and needed to be wiped clean.

There was a Great Flood that covered all of the land. Sea shells were found on top of Mount Everest. There is water erosion on the Sphinx. All land is a sedimentary deposit. Many Noahs sailed during Waterworld. The Chinese have their old stories of an Ark and a Great Deluge. Numerous indian cultures have their legends of a Flood, a Noah and an Ark.

Most people do not believe in the Biblical story of Noah because of a basic problem: How could a few people gather ALL the animals, feed and care for them on board a ship for months? The answer comes from, who controlled the Earth thousands of years ago? The angels (the humans with the technology) built the Arks, collected the animals and caused the rains. The chosen animals were probably the best examples of their specie and worthy of being saved. It is scientifically possible to place a life form in suspended animation reduced down to its DNA. This was the cargo within the Arks. The samples of DNA would be revived, later, after the waters receded. Nowhere in the Bible does it mention that Noah went out and gathered each animal. It only says Noah brought them into the Ark. If the 'life cannisters' were all assembled for the Noahs by the gods and the simple people merely carried them in and secured them in place, then this does explain the Noah story.

The world began again. In Genesis, it says that after the Flood: Noah went to live with the 'gods.' This was one of the few plural references that survived the editors of the Bible. The reference 'gods' was later changed to the singular 'God.' The simplified term was changed to accommodate a world that had become extremely simple.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by jagunlabi(m): 1:58pm On Sep 29, 2007
[center]Breakdown Nr.4[/center]

Atlantis was Eden. Compare these two legends. Each was our mother-civilization or the place where we originated. Each was a Paradise. Each fell and mankind had to leave in disgrace.

It is not far-fetched how the people of Earth could divide itself into two races; a simple one and a complex one. If a nuclear war happened today, the survivors would continue in tribal communities. After generations, they would forget what technology was. But, the few who knew of the coming nuclear devastation and even caused it, would have protected themselves and be the few who still possess advanced knowledge. These 'gods' could deal with the numerous primitives as they saw fit. This concept is ancient history.

The Genesis story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is not a mystery when you plug in the idea of a modern technology. How do two cities, realistically, get wiped off the face of the Earth? The inhabitants of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may know the answer. Two, human angels came into town and warned people of the coming destruction:

19/17: ', Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain; escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed.'
19/24: 'Then the Lord rained upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven.'
19/26: 'But his wife looked back from behind, and she became a pillar of salt.'
19/28: ', the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.'
19/30: ', he (Lot) feared to dwell in Zoar: and he dwelt in a cave, he and his two daughters.'
The angels directed Lot and his family to save their lives by running to the mountain. A land mass can protect one from a nuclear blast. The cities were 'consumed' with 'brimstone and fire.' This is a perfect description of a nuking. A mushroom cloud moving vertically could be the meaning of 'went up as the smoke of a furnace.' Lot's wife did not make it; not because she looked back, but because she trailed 'behind' the rest of her family. A primitive seeing an atomic explosion would be more than stunned; they would tend to stop in their tracks. Not looking back is good advice to those running for their lives. The 'pillar of salt' could have come from finding her body later and discovering the effects of radiation. Finally, hiding in a 'cave' because of the fall-out until the land was ready for habitation is very logical.

Genesis 1/26: 'And God said, let us make man in our image, after our likeness, '
2/21: 'And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh, '
In Genesis 1/26, there are important clues that the creation of Eve from Adam was not conducted by a singular God. In this one sentence, there are three plural references: 'us,' 'our' and 'our.'
This was a CLONING operation observed by a primitive who did not understand. First, one of the technicians caused Adam to fall into a 'deep sleep.' This was the anesthesia. Second, a cell must be taken from somewhere on the body to create another body. The rib area was where the cell was taken. They 'closed up the flesh' is a modern expression describing the completion of the operation. Master-cloners could quickly form an adult and change the sex from the original. This idea was illustrated in a Star Trek Next Generation episode where a primitive was brought back to life and mistook Captain Picard as a god. He prayed to 'the Picard' and was later corrected.

Before the Red Sea parted, there were two UFOs leading the people out of Egypt. Exodus 13/21: 'And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them away; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night.' These objects in the sky could very well be spacecraft when you consider: clouds (or smoke) by day and fire by night. Rocket thrusters could create billowing smoke in sunlight. But, at night, the flames from the propulsion systems would be what was mainly visible. These chariots in the air could have held back the waters of the Red Sea with forcefields.

Exodus 14/22: 'And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon dry ground: and the waters were a wall (on either side).' With a flick of a switch. turning off the forcefield at the appropriate time, the 'waters returned, and covered the chariots' of the Egyptians.

All through Exodus, this Lord God demands that 'I am the Lord' and 'I will be to you a God: and ye shall know that I am the Lord, your God.' In 15/3, there is a strange reference: 'The Lord is a man of war.' This is curious because it says God is a 'man' and not a very nice one. It is more like God is a big bully; having power over people; pushing his weight around only because he has the ability to do so.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by Horus(m): 1:58pm On Sep 29, 2007
During these ancient times, there were mad scientists (angel-demons) who cloned anything they wanted
Caucasians were cloned.The Caucasian has not been chosen to lead the world. They lack true emotions in their creation. We never intended them to be peaceful. They were bred to be killers, with low reproduction levels and a short life span,but they went insane, lost control when they were left unattended. They were never to taste blood. They did, and their true nature came out.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by KAG: 2:44pm On Sep 29, 2007
So, um. where are these aliens now?


jagunlabi:

Breakdown Nr.3[center][/center]

During these ancient times, there were mad scientists (angel-demons) who cloned anything they wanted. The mythological animals were real; they were genetic experiments. Also, wars of the gods occurred. Nuclear warfare was not beyond the capability of the angels. Robert Oppenheimer, creator of modern atomics and a student of early books of India, knew that nuclear wars happened in the Old World. The deserts of today are the result of ancient, atomic wars. Assuming that these conclusions are true:


They aren't. There's absolutely no geological evidence to suggest that the deserts of today were caused by atomic wars. Moreover, the fact that the natural processes that caused deserts to form through the dearth of vegetation and things are still occuring should tell you something.

There was a Great Flood that covered all of the land.

No there wasn't.

Sea shells were found on top of Mount Everest.

Yes. So?

There is water erosion on the Sphinx.

It's wind and sand erosion. Colin Wilson, Graham Hancock and Rand Flem-Ath, amongst others, are either grossly wrong or intentionally misleading people.

All land is a sedimentary deposit.


That's not true. Besides, how would sedimentary deposits be evidence for a worldwide flood?

Many Noahs sailed during Waterworld. The Chinese have their old stories of an Ark and a Great Deluge. Numerous indian cultures have their legends of a Flood, a Noah and an Ark.

And some cultures don't. In keeping with the evidence thus far, it's more likely that many cultures share the stories either because of a coastal flood in the past that has become legendary or flooding is some type of an archetype.

Most people do not believe in the Biblical story of Noah because of a basic problem: How could a few people gather ALL the animals, feed and care for them on board a ship for months?


Actually, it's a lot more than that. There's also the distinct lact of evidence; the timeline problem; the distinct lack of evidence; the fact that it seems allegorical; the distinct lack of evidence; and rain falling for forty days would do unthinkable things.

The answer comes from, who controlled the Earth thousands of years ago? The angels (the humans with the technology) built the Arks, collected the animals and caused the rains. The chosen animals were probably the best examples of their specie and worthy of being saved. It is scientifically possible to place a life form in suspended animation reduced down to its DNA. This was the cargo within the Arks. The samples of DNA would be revived, later, after the waters receded. Nowhere in the Bible does it mention that Noah went out and gathered each animal. It only says Noah brought them into the Ark. If the 'life cannisters' were all assembled for the Noahs by the gods and the simple people merely carried them in and secured them in place, then this does explain the Noah story.

The story also mentions the animals being carted into the ark two by two. and or by their sevens. It also mentions two physical birds (not DNA thingymabobs) being released from the ship. Furthermore, the story has Noah building the ark, not angels (and the rest of the people of the town were amused. Something you wouldn't expect from people witnessing angels building a structure). Finally, if they had that much technology and stuff, why not just take Noah, his family and the animals out of orbit? What's the deal with building a boat?

The world began again. In Genesis, it says that after the Flood: Noah went to live with the 'gods.' This was one of the few plural references that survived the editors of the Bible. The reference 'gods' was later changed to the singular 'God.' The simplified term was changed to accommodate a world that had become extremely simple.

Well, in my Bible it says after the flood Noah sacrificed one of the animals he revived from the DNA pool, then he got proper liquored.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by dreamnaira(m): 4:31pm On Sep 29, 2007
can all these your analogies give you eternal life?
Why not turn to Jesus today than wasting your time in exegetic sophistry that cannot gain salvation to your soul.

It quit obvious that those that want to know the secret thing of GOd that has not been revealed to man will fall into temptation and snares of the archenemy whose effort is to tell man that there is something God is hiding from them that would have been of great importance to them.

"the secret things belong to God and those things that are revealed is for us and our children" {Duet29:29}. God had through Jesus christ revealed the way to salvation to you, if you will accept Jesus as your Lord and personal savour today when you get to heaven you Know more thing, like the Heavens that was mentioned in Genesis and no much comment was finally given how it were made but God is the creator of the universe.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by paulisbad: 11:33am On May 14, 2010
There is evidence of huge heat caused by nuclear or greater forces in some of the deserts of the world. There are also hundreds of flood legends from cultures all over the earth. Forget timing, the last ice age and the great flood are the same event. There is nothing wrong with searching for evidence and truth, it is exactly what Jesus the son of God would expect us to do. If more Christians looked for the real evidence then we wouldnt have 40 thousand denominations who dont listen to Jesus who said Whoever keeps my sayings will never see death, and instead are following the commandments of a man called the thirteenth apostle, paul of tarsus who is the only man on the planet who magnifies himself in gods holy of holies the bible. Pauls thirsteen books made the tally 66. He misquotes scripture. He is a liar and the father of it. And he was a murderer from the beginning who remained not in the truth.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by KunleOshob(m): 1:38pm On May 14, 2010
Taking a second look at some of the biblical events, one cannot completely rule out what we might term today as extra terrestrial intervention or intervention by and advanced human race. We have to take into consideration that the ancient writers of biblical events wrote them down trhe way they understood it with their limited vocabulary, thus the way they would describe phenomenal events then would obviously be different to the way we would describe them today. Ezekiel's wheel would definitely be labelled a UFO if it was seen today. But seriously extra-terrestrial intervetion cannot be ruled out of the human history as there are various accounts from all over the world of such beings coming from above whom the ancients described as gods/ angels. I believe it is something worth investigating further as it could actually put a lot of things into clearer perpective if properly grasped.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by benodic: 2:18pm On May 15, 2010
@jagunlabi,

kudos again. a well researched info you have provided.

after reading lobsang Rampa's The Hermit, i threw away my bible and started serious spiritual research.

if you read the book "Initiation" by Elizabeth Haich, you will understand the point of view of the writers of the old testament. imagine a primitive man seeing an airplane. how do you think he will describe it.

it is left for those with an open mind to ask questions and find out things for themselves.
Re: The Close Encounters In The Bible by MadMax1(f): 7:59am On May 16, 2010
Maybe Rampa was your introduction to Tibetan Mysticism. In The Hermit, he wove very little Lamaist Buddhism around UFO mythology, bad science, and human mythology, including Genesis. High comedy, but then few people take Rampa seriously. He was a British plumber who said he was chasing a bird or something, and the soul of a dead Tibetan monk entered him. The British press hounded him out of Britain. Why didn't he go to Tibet, his 'soul's homeland'? Because he was a laughingstock. The real Buddhist mystics either considered him a nuisance or a joke. In The Hermit we learn Moses was an alien spy. All that advanced alien technology, and Moses was the best they could do in spycraft.  The Blind Hermit described Rampa's aliens, who have been controlling human history: they looked like people, but were 14 feet tall and had egg-shaped heads. The female aliens had kinky hair (African hair) or straight white hair.

A long and unique sequence of evolutionary events made humans look this way. An alien from another planet would have a completely unique biological history, and they would look absolutely NOTHING like us. But Rampa didn't know this at the time. In one of his books, Rampa entered an alien Spacecraft and was taken to the planet Venus. Venus was a popular tourist spot for humans on alien travel in the 70s and 80s. One famous American 'abductee' even described the planet: there were aliens in robes, and flowers grew wild. Venus isn't next door, so it's not as if anyone could debunk their stories. Till a NASA space probe entered Venus in the 90s and discovered the planet had a temperature of 900 degrees fareinheit and the atmosphere was composed of sulphuric acid.

But Rampa was dead by this time. It would have been interesting to have reached him for comment. Nice guy though. My Dad had his books when I was a kid. You threw a bible (or any holy book) away for Lobsang Rampa. Amazing.

(1) (Reply)

Convenant Of Single And Married / Religion Is Bullshit / God's Son in the Old Testament

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 86
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.