malvisguy212:
let me quote what I say on the other thread.

The Qur’an is based completely on the
personal experiences of one illiterate
man spanning a period of 23 years.Only one person allegedly saw the “angel.” Only one person allegedly heard a voice. The entire faith is limited to one book with only one person who allegedly received the vision. There is absolutely no way to verify anything. Our question is, “Does not this then mean that the only way to become a Muslim is to take this one man’s word for it?”

Mr. Malvisguy we believe everything the Prophet Muhammad says because it's from the Almighty, so any problem?

malvisguy212:
let me quote what I say on the other thread.

The Qur’an is based completely on the
personal experiences of one illiterate
man spanning a period of 23 years.Only one person allegedly saw the “angel.” Only one person allegedly heard a voice. The entire faith is limited to one book with only one person who allegedly received the vision. There is absolutely no way to verify anything. Our question is, “Does not this then mean that the only way to become a Muslim is to take this one man’s word for it?”

Demmzy15:

Mr. Malvisguy we believe everything the Prophet Muhammad says because it's from the Almighty, so any problem?

lexiconkabir:
let me quote what i said in one thread, since songs of solomon is a pornfilled book, that describes b'reast of women as wine, and where a woman is lusting over a man thinking of him s'ucking her(sorry to say), is that in anyway divine? should it even be in the "holybible"?

Demmzy15:

Mr. Malvisguy we believe everything the Prophet Muhammad says because it's from the Almighty, so any problem?

Annunaki:


And to make matters worse, this one man was a villain, armed robber, murderer, rapist, paedophile and psychopath that had zero credibility.

malvisguy212:
in the bible, God always revealed himself to his prophet and someone will confirmed it , Abraham claimed God spoke to him and Sarah confirmed it , Moses heard from God and Aaron confirmed it .David heard and solomon confirmed it. Elijah heard and elisha confirmed it , the list goes on and on. But the case of muhammed is even worse, it was not God himself that revealed himself to muhammed, but angel Gabriel who comes with a different attitude contrary from the biblical angel Gabriel. Who confirmed it ? NO one bear witness of his alleged calling, it was his wife, kadijah who never had an encounter with God angel , she convinced muhammed of his prophethood . The faith of muslims worldwide begin in an encounter in the cave of hira.

Oya that's it, we're OK with it! So what's your problem?

malvisguy212:

The song of solomon is about a man who is describing the body of his wife. The book was not introduced as a vision neither is the word "God" mention only in verse 16 (I think) even the new testament church did not make reference on it , the reason the book is in the bible, is because it was about solomon

lexiconkabir:
i'm very glad you admitted that the book of solomon is not divine(not introduced as a vision like you stated) then why did paul said all the scriptures are God's breath? did i hear you say it was solomon and his wife? lets see songs of songs8:1-3 "if only you were to me like a brother, nursed by my mothers breast! then if i found you outside, i would kiss you and no one will despise me. i would lead you and bring you to my mothers house, she who has taught me, [b]i would give you spiced wine(i.e vagin'a semen), the nectar of my pomegranate" the woman is clearly lusting over a man that was not her husband, considering the emboldened.

Demmzy15:

Oya that's it, we're OK with it! So what's your problem?

malvisguy212:
ask questions ,be convinced of what you believe ,the bible say "search the scripture ,ask questions and be convinced of your faith"

malvisguy212:
there is big different between inspiration and vision.

When I say , the book is not introduced as a vision, I mean something like this "thus say the Lord " the writer did not begin like that.compear tp others books.

lexiconkabir:
ok if it was not introduce as a vision, then how do you describe such book, divine or not divine? and please tell me that verse i quoted was talking about a man and his wife.

malvisguy212:
because song of solomon talk about female breas't and you say it is impossible that such verse is inspired by God , okay what about this quranic verse:
Quran 23:1-7
Successful indeed are the believers,
Who are humble in their prayers, And
who keep aloof from what is vain,
And who are givers of poor-rate, And
who guard their PRIVATE PARTS , EXCEPT
BEFORE THEIR MATES (azwajihim) or
those whom their right hands possess, for they surely are not blameable, But whoever seeks to go beyond that, these are they that exceed the limits;

lexiconkabir:
Mr man, the arabic word for husband is zawjun and the arabic word for wife is zawjaha, now the plural wives in arabic is azwajuhum, which was what is used in that verse not zawaj as the site you copied and pasted fron claimed, see http://quran.com/23/1-7 i can see how desperate and frustrated you are, now answer my question in the previous post especially that songs of solomon8:1-3 and stop being a coward.

malvisguy212:
Qatadah said, "A woman slept with her male slave so they brought her to Umar. And they told him she
UNDERSTOOD VERSE 23:6 TO SAY THAT ,
so Umar shaved the male slave head
and let her go after expelling the
slave from Madina and said the
woman shouldn’t marry any one after
that." (Tafsir Ibn Kathir on Sura 23:6;

Notice the passage that was cited to
justify what the woman had done with
her male slave. They clearly understood
Sura 23:6 to be permitting even the
women to enjoy sexual intimacy with
their slaves without being required to
marry them. Now how did Umar
respond? Did he use a Quranic verse to
refute them or did he simply forbid them from engaging in sexual relations even though

lexiconkabir:
malvisguy212, i am waiting, (1)is songs of solomon8:1-3 about a man and his wife?.........(2)you made a statement that, "the book was not introduced as a vision" now i'm asking you, is such book called DIVINE or NOT DIVINE?............(3)you kept lamenting that a man mentioned b'reast in that book and i'm complaining, no malvisguy12! my complaint is, why would he say the b'reast and v'agina of a woman taste like wine? even if it his wife, is this morally right? especially when underaged children has access to this book of porn a.k.a songs of solomon. these questions should also interest parisbookaddict, come help your friend parisbookaddict.

malvisguy212:
there is big different between inspiration and vision.
When I say , the book is not introduced as a vision, I mean something like this "thus say the Lord " the writer did not begin like that.compear tp others books.

lexiconkabir:
that verse was explicitly talking to men, that was why azwajuhum meaning WIVES so tell me, how can women use this verse? hahahaha make una come help me laf malvisguy oo , no source of the hadith sef. I've answering you questions now answer mine!

malvisguy212:
trash, As it stands, this passage is formulated gender neutral, i.e. it applies to both male and female believers, and thus indeed permits Muslim men and Muslim women to have sex with those whom
their right hands possess without needing to be married first.

lexiconkabir:
malvisguy212 i asked a simple question, is the book divine or not if it is not why did paul said the all the scripture is God's breath?, you've not talked on songs of solomon8:1-3

malvisguy212:
the song of solomon is divine , an inspiration FROM GOD on how a man should love his wife, the different is that the book did not start as a VISION. It is because of your dirty mind that is making you to imagine dirty things. Is there anything wrong for a man to described the body of his wife ? And to admired her soo much ? Pleased stop derailing this topic, answer the op or I will report you to the moderator. Thank you.

lexiconkabir:
so the book is divine which means song of solomon8:1-3 is also divine right? weldone! admiring your wife's body is no problem, i agree, but exposing it to the whole world is a big problem, except if you are saying that you malvisguy can expose how your wife body looks like or how her b'reast taste to the whole world. you started derailing the thread at first! you cant threaten me with the mods, believe me, if you go to the bathroom, i will be there, in your dreams, i will be there, even when you are watching tv, i will be there!

malvisguy212:
are you alright ? Did solomon exposed his wife body ? How does the body look like ? Alright, keep on following me as a pet. *a man best friend is dog*

lexiconkabir:
so the book is divine which means song of solomon8:1-3 is also divine right? weldone! aQdmiring your wife's body is no problem, i agree, but exposing it to the whole world is a big problem, except if you are saying that you malvisguy can expose how your wife body looks like or how her b'reast taste to the whole world. you started derailing the thread at first! you cant threaten me with the mods, believe me, if you go to the bathroom, i will be there, in your dreams, i will be there, even when you are watching tv, i will be there!

plainbibletruth:
[size=5pt][/size]
It is only in depraved and twisted minds of Muslims like you that you can fabricate what you've done in your recent posts.

There is nothing in the Song of Solomon that suggests the words you've created to satisfy your lust for vindictiveness. Only warped minds can come up with such 'creations'.

Thankfully Allah has thought it fit to put Mohammed's depravities in the Quran but in order to hide from it you think that 'creating' your own and 'stamping' it on the Bible will make you 'feel' better.

BTW, you are not using any Bible translation but your own 'creation' to make the gullible think you're right.

As usual with you guys, instead of sticking to the thread you want to divert attention away to some other inconsequential issues.

lexiconkabir:
yes he did, and now i know that her v'agina and b'reast taste like wine(i told ya, i will haunt you like a ghost)

malvisguy212:
just as you guys successfully derailed this topic :
https://www.nairaland.com/2535883/allegedly-corrupted-scripture-questions-muslims

You want to do the samething here .

And none of you answer this topics
https://www.nairaland.com/2374316/which-one-correct

https://www.nairaland.com/2121425/allahs-invalidate-own-revelation

lexiconkabir:
malvisguy212, i am waiting, (1)is songs of solomon8:1-3 about a man and his wife?.........(2)you made a statement that, "the book was not introduced as a vision" now i'm asking you, is such book called DIVINE or NOT DIVINE?............(3)you kept lamenting that a man mentioned b'reast in that book and i'm complaining, no malvisguy12! my complaint is, why would he say the b'reast and v'agina of a woman taste like wine? even if it his wife, is this morally right? especially when underaged children has access to this book of porn a.k.a songs of solomon. these questions should also interest parisbookaddict, come help your friend parisbookaddict.

lexiconkabir:
malvisguy212, i am waiting, (1)is songs of solomon8:1-3 about a man and his wife?.........(2)you made a statement that, "the book was not introduced as a vision" now i'm asking you, is such book called DIVINE or NOT DIVINE?............(3)you kept lamenting that a man mentioned b'reast in that book and i'm complaining, no malvisguy12! my complaint is, why would he say the b'reast and v'agina of a woman taste like wine? even if it his wife, is this morally right? especially when underaged children has access to this book of porn a.k.a songs of solomon. these questions should also interest parisbookaddict, come help your friend parisbookaddict.