Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,148,895 members, 7,802,879 topics. Date: Saturday, 20 April 2024 at 01:15 AM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (10) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (981371 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (667) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 9:56pm On Aug 03, 2016
chinese8107:


China NORINCO has an IFV VN12, not as heavy as T55 as an altanative choice

30mm gun ,7.62mm gun ,2 x HJ73D ATGM, 4569III/IV /V protection can add slat armor against RPG.Weight 26 tons C-130 transportable , can carry 3+6 persons can launch aerosol weapon

another version called VN11 has a 100mm cannon can fire Russian bastin ATM at max range 4000m ,30mm gun,7.62mm gun.It's an variant version of BMP3 can accommodates 7 peoples..70 km/h speed.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:00pm On Aug 04, 2016
china next gen concept fighter emulator with (HMD)Head Mounted Display

not sure JF17 block 3 or 4 can equipt ,very likely block 3 at least has HMD and IRST

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:07pm On Aug 04, 2016
nemesis2u:


The Arjun MBT Mark 2






do you have video of it's actual performances ?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:10pm On Aug 04, 2016
for jungle desert or sand beach patrol

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 7:41pm On Aug 04, 2016
chinese8107:
for jungle desert or sand beach patrol
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 12:43pm On Aug 06, 2016
Odunayaw:
man...I asked that not because of NAF yo
I had a talk with a paki once abt d JH-7 and I wanted to get a Chinese POV

What does he say ?

As I mentioned earlier, it has both disadvantages and advantages.

I heard pakistan is observing waiting for the plane to upgrade.It's payloads close to Su-30 with very competitive price and some stealth technology,despite the weaker manuverablity.it's has a protential to be a good bomber if not a good fighter.

The plane is designed primarily to sank battle-ship like frigate or covertte.It has a sea skimming mode that fly only 100- 300m above sea,which is very hard to be detected by enemy rader.

Also, the avionic has been upgraded to FBW, and rader upgraded.

And Chinese engine used,a twin-engine is safer than one engine plane,which means if one engine stops the other engine may still works.That gives some confidences to users who doesn't very trust Chinese engines.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 4:12pm On Aug 06, 2016
nemesis2u:
Terminator 2

At Russian Arms Expo 2013 defense exhibition in Nizhny Tagil (Russia), the Russian Defense Company Uralvagonzavod unveiled a new version of its Terminator, fire support armoured fighting vehicle BMPT-72. The idea to build new heavily armed tank support vehicles emerged on the basis of experience acquired by the Russian military during the First Chechen War in North Caucasus, especially during the urban fighting in Grozny in 1995 when Russian troops lost a large number of combat vehicles to “guerrilla warfare” tactics used by Chechen separatists. As the first production of BMP-T, the BMPT-72 is based on the chassis of the Russian-made main battle tank T-72. The vehicle offers new protection and fire power especially in urban operations. The BMPT-72 is able to fight a full range of modern targets as main battle tank, armoured infantry fighting vehicles and other combat vehicles, dismounted infantry, and guided missile combat teams.

The BMPT-72 is an extensive modernization of the world-famous T-72 main battle tank, also produced by Uralvagonzavod. Compared with the BMPT predecessor, the BMPT-72 has an improved fire control system and better turret weapon station protection. According to manufacturer Uralvgonzavod, the key advantage that the BMPT-72 gives to all the counties that operate T-72 tanks is that they can promptly and at minimal cost upgrade their armies to an ultra-modern level, and enhance capacity, mobility, protection and armament without purchasing new high-cost machines.

The BMPT-72 or Terminator 2 is fitted with a new unmanned redesigned fully stabilized electromechanical turret, with lower profile and better protection. The main armament of the BMPT-72 turret consists of two 30mm automatic guns 2A42 and one PKTM 7.62mm coaxial machine gun which can be used against light armoured vehicles and manpower. The guns can fire a wide range of ammunitions as APERS-T (Anti-Personnel ammunitions), HEF-I (High-explosive Fragmentation Incendiary), AP-T (Armour Piercing)., and KE (Kinetic Energy). Two anti-tank guided missile Ataka-T launcher units are mounted to each side of the turret. The missile 9M1201 can be equipped with two types of warheads, hollow-charge and high-explosive concrete-piercing.

The BMPT-72 is equipped with computerized fire control system with multichannel sighting system and weapon high-accuracy laying systems. The vehicle carries 850 rounds for the 30mm guns and 2,100 ammunitions for the 7.62mm machine gun. The turret protection includes armored shields for the missiles, protecting the missiles from splinters and firing of small arms. The turret can be rotated on 360 ° with elevation from -5° to +25° for the anti-tank missile and from -5° to +45° for the guns and coaxial machine gun. The anti-tank missile can engage a target up to a maximum distance of 6,000 m while the guns have a maximum range of 2,500 against light armoured vehicles and 4,000 against light tactical vehicles and troops. A screening system increases the self-protection of the BMPT-72 which is designed to counter laser target-designators and laser rangefinders. Six smoke grenade launchers are mounted to each side of the turret. When the screening system warns the crew of laser attacks a smoke is created by the launch of grenades.

The BMPT-72 or Terminator 2 has a crew of three with the removal of two grenade launching positions, while the first version of BMP-T had a crew of five. The drive is located at the front center of the hull with gunner and commander at the rear. A panoramic sight is mounted at the front of the tank commander and the gunner position is equipped with day periscopes on 360°. The BMPT-72 hull and turret are made of steel armour and integrates latest protection systems with explosive reactive armour (ERA) to the front of the turret, a detachable ERA module on the glacis plate and applique ERA on the sides of the hull and turret. The rear parts of the turret and the chassis are fitted with slat armour to increase protection against anti-tank rocket-propelled grenade (RPG) attacks. The anti-tank launch units include armored shields for the missiles, protecting the missiles from splinters and small arms fire.



A beautiful chariot.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:29pm On Aug 06, 2016
chinese8107:


What does he say ?

As I mentioned earlier, it has both disadvantages and advantages.

I heard pakistan is observing waiting for the plane to upgrade.It's payloads close to Su-30 with very competitive price and some stealth technology,despite the weaker manuverablity.it's has a protential to be a good bomber if not a good fighter.

The plane is designed primarily to sank battle-ship like frigate or covertte.It has a sea skimming mode that fly only 100- 300m above sea,which is very hard to be detected by enemy rader.

Also, the avionic has been upgraded to FBW, and rader upgraded.

And Chinese engine used,a twin-engine is safer than one engine plane,which means if one engine stops the other engine may still works.That gives some confidences to users who doesn't very trust Chinese engines.
anyway..His disgust was on its maneuverability
I used to adore d bird cuz of its payload...well since my country doesn't need a platform that its capabilities fills...I hereby withdraw my love for it tongue
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 4:30pm On Aug 06, 2016
chinese8107:
china next gen concept fighter emulator with (HMD)Head Mounted Display

not sure JF17 block 3 or 4 can equipt ,very likely block 3 at least has HMD and IRST
can this be used to train jf-17 pilots?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:56pm On Aug 06, 2016
Odunayaw:
can this be used to train jf-17 pilots?

JF-17 has it's own emulator.The cockpit of block I and Block II is different from this,block III is unkown. Theoretically speaking you can emulate any plane on an emulator,to some extent,if you can bear the difference in cockpit, it's just some software problem.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 6:01pm On Aug 06, 2016
China Type 04A IFV (ZBD-04A)

current arment simillar to VN11 ,it too big and tall modular APC plantform designed for desert or high plateau

can add different weapons or armor

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 6:04pm On Aug 06, 2016
chinese8107:


JF-17 has it's own emulator.The cockpit of block I and Block II is different from this,block III is unkown. Theoretically speaking you can emulate any plane on an emulator,to some extent,if you can bear the difference in cockpit, it's just some software problem.
alryt bruh
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:42pm On Aug 06, 2016
chinese8107:


do you have video of it's actual performances ?


no

but i found a video of its namesake grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CHAhyZ6OyM
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 11:28am On Aug 07, 2016
This platform based on WZ534 or WZ501 chassis simillar to T-55 or BMP2 chassis it's lower in hight no easy to be seen by enemy or exposed to close fire. The type86A is lower than BMP2 in hight.pic 3.

The BMP 1/2 is a good desigen not only can carry extra troops on it's top,

but also function as a bunker sometimes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:47pm On Aug 07, 2016
Ukraine refurbish T-72 /T 64 from junk stock.This is an indutry.American also do this.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:55am On Aug 08, 2016
New British IFV

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:58am On Aug 08, 2016
Old infographic


Project Yansen

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 9:43am On Aug 08, 2016
German IFV not bad,even if not new,the problem is the price, even 2 hand not cheap.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 1:11pm On Aug 08, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 1:30pm On Aug 08, 2016
4 Ways Russia's Military Technology Is More Advanced Than You Might Think

Vladimir Putin is not a man to back down from provocation, especially a direct, lethal provocation like the shooting down of a Russian Su-24 aircraft by Turkey on Tuesday. Such an attack raises the possibility of a direct military confrontation, and makes you wonder just what Russia could do if you rattled its cage. How dangerous are they?

Russia's defense complex may be just a shadow of the old Soviet Union, with defense spending only about 12 percent of the USA's. As such, many in the West tend to see Russian hardware as second-rate—stuck with 1970's electronics, crude manufacturing standards, and no money to improve matters. If the Russians make anything good, the thinking goes, they must have copied it from the West. The poor performance of the Russian-equipped Iraqi army in 2003 (and Russian-supplied Arab forces against the Israelis) reinforces the idea of inferior Russian military tech.

In reality, Russia can be innovative in weapons design, and sometimes ahead of the West. Occasionally the country pursues crazy ideas than cannot work, like mind control weaponry. Yet just as often they develop weapons with no counterparts in the U.S.

ROCKETS
Nobody should doubt Russian rocket science. After all, they have provided all the manned flights to the International Space Station since the retirement of the Space Shuttle in 2011, and Russia's military rockets have a long pedigree.

In 1973, new Soviet-built guided anti-tank missiles carried by Egyptian infantry decimated Israeli armor in their first large-scale use on the battlefield. Similarly, Russian SA-7 "Strela," a shoulder-launched heat-seeking surface-to-air missile, gave the Israeli Air Force real problems in the same 1973 conflict. They did not shoot down many aircraft, but forced pilots to change tactics. Portable missiles meant a plane could not just cruise over looking for targets. The SA-7 was the contemporary of an American missile, the FIM-43 Redeye. Both weapons were limited to shooting at the jet exhaust of receding aircraft only; the Russians  introduced an upgraded Strela-3 which could tackle aircraft head-on in 1974, a capability which the US could not match until the FIM-92 Stinger arrived in 1982.

Russian surface-to-air missiles are still formidable, hence the long-running concerns over the possible supply of the advanced S-300 system to Iran. The Russians themselves have a more sophisticated air-defense system, the S-400, which they are now set to deploy in Syria. These are dangerous weapons. Far from being backward, the Russian developers have "mastered the difficult embedded software technology so critical for radar and electronic warfare system," according to analyst Carlo Kopp.

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidexiii: 1:36pm On Aug 08, 2016
CONTINUATION

AIR-TO-AIR
In air-to-air combat, the Russians have long pursued an approach of firing salvoes rather than single shots. Planes like the Su-27 Flanker may carry a dozen missiles, launching two or three at a time. The missiles have different guidance types—a mixture of infra-red and radar-guided—that makes jamming or avoiding all of them difficult, and gives a high chance of a kill. A radar-guided missile may be fired alongside another missile that homes in on radar jamming, guaranteeing a hit whether or not a jammer is used.

Russian aircraft's missiles are sophisticated, too. The Russian Vympel R-73 dogfight missile has an "off-boresight" capability to hit targets not directly in front of the aircraft. It was introduced in 1982, and NATO planners soon noted the advantage it gave Russian pilots in a close-quarters fight compared to their equivalent, the AIM-9 Sidewinder. U.S. pilots did not gain the same off-boresight capability until the AIM-9X version of the Sidewinder more than 20 years later. Meanwhile, the Russian R-73 has enjoyed several upgrades, and missile buffs still argue about which is better.

For longer-range air combat (40 miles or more) the Russians have the Vympel R-77, another advanced piece of hardware. The latest version has an Active Phased Array Antenna that gives it "zero reaction time to unexpected evolutions of the target," according to the designers. Called the "can't miss missile", the K-77M appears to be more sophisticated than the current version of the West's equivalent, the AIM-120 AMRAAM. War Is Boring writes that, "The U.S. military doesn't have anything like it … or adequate defenses." The K-77M was revealed in 2013 and may already be in production.

In any conflict, US warplanes will be heavily dependent on stealth technology to make them invisible to radar and give them the edge. Of course the Russians have long been working on counter-stealth systems. For example the Russian 55Zh6ME air defense radar released in 2013 has multiple radar modules working at different wavelengths. It is easy to design an aircraft that is invisible at one wavelength, but progressively harder the more wavelengths involved. We do not know how well this counter-stealth radar works, but aviation guru Bill Sweetman points out that the Russians have had 25 years to work on it.

THE WEIRD STUFF
The Russians also have a surprising ability to think out of the box—for good and bad. For example, the Shkval rocket-torpedo forms a bubble around itself, reducing friction to travel at an amazing 230 mph under water – more than four times as fast as any Western torpedo. The same work produced a unique underwater assault rifle for Special Forces; US development in similar "supercavitating" projectiles lags behind.

This oddball thinking extends to the strategic arena. In 2012, Putin wrote an article for Rossiiskaya Gazeta on the strategic military balance in which he advocated "weapons systems based on new principles: beam, geophysical, wave, genetic, psychophysical and other technology."

Some of this is dubious. In the field of new wave principles, the Soviets started research into Torsion field weapons in 1987. These are supposed energy fields (not recognized by Western science) with electrical and gravitational effects, and researchers promised to use them to shoot down ballistic missiles. A review by the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1991 concluded that torsion fields were a scam to get money, having attracted some five hundred million roubles of state funding (roughly $15 billion dollars).

Russian research into so-called "psychotronic" weapons for mind control has been similarly fruitless.  "Geophysical weapons" to create earthquakes remain imaginary, though one Russian analyst suggested earlier this year that the Yellowstone supervolcano might be triggered with a nuclear strike to destroy the US. So there's that.

THE UNKNOWN
We can still expect the unexpected. A recent Russian TV news report appears to have leaked Putin's plans for a unmanned submarine carrying a 10-megaton dirty bomb. This would be detonated at a port city, submarine base, or other coastal site, spreading a lethal radioactive cloud over a wide area. The main purpose of this unusual delivery method seems to be bypassing any possible antimissile defences.

Scare stories notwithstanding, the Russians are unlikely to have any exotic superweapons. But it is dangerous for the rest of the world to underestimate its capability. A regional conflict in Syria may not be a pushover against second-rate forces with outdated equipment, but could turn into something very much bloodier.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 6:24pm On Aug 08, 2016
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:01pm On Aug 09, 2016
http://player.youku.com/embed/XMTY3NDY4MDg4OA==

2016 August 6 tank biathlon Zimbabwe/Russia/China T-72B3/T-72B3M/Type-96B Russia starts from 14:42 ,China ends 39:00

The T-72 series are( MT )manual transmition while Type-96B is (AT )automatic transmition,that's why has different manuverablity.
It has steeling wheel like another Chinese tank VT-4,driving like a car.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:35am On Aug 10, 2016
2016 Suworov assult

Russia Kazakhstan China

BMP-2 VS Type-86A

http://player.youku.com/embed/XMTY3MjkwMzU5Mg==
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 4:46am On Aug 10, 2016
Japan Toyota HMMWV

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by chinese8107: 5:55am On Aug 10, 2016
nemesis2u:


shkval torpedo

no suprise

Russia Ukraine China can or maybe Iran can make

US China Germanny is developing supercavitating submarine. USA already has experimental fast attack craft based on this technology

[img]http://easyread.ph.126.net/bsvNDx0UqO6k-2OF-8WVlQ==/8796093022575322606.jpg[/img]

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 9:47am On Aug 10, 2016
CIWS

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:06pm On Aug 10, 2016
pic 1 2 south korean patrol vessel

pic 3 4 F16 block 70 proposed for made in india

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:10pm On Aug 10, 2016


Elbit Systems completed recently a trial test torpedo launch from its Seagull multi-mission, autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessel(USV) system. The trial, performed out of Israel's Haifa port,demonstrated the capability of Seagull to install and launch lightweight torpedoes, adding to the advanced capabilities of the USV, which is designed to carry out unmanned maritime missions, such as protection of critical sea areas and high-value assets against submarines and sea mine threats.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:12pm On Aug 10, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IFSlnaAe6k

good weapon systems shown here , some very good especially for CT ops
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:19pm On Aug 10, 2016
pic 1 Tejas flying with Python-5! Python-5 + DASH HMD .

pic 2 3 naval varient tejas


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR88zf50vAU
airshow display at Bahrain

(1) (2) (3) ... (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) ... (667) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 62
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.