DoctorAlien:


My brother, this is the same argument religious people present; just with the terms changed viz: You cannot see GOD but you can tell whether or not He is present in a life by observing what fruits the person yields.

You accuse religious people of having faith in an unseen GOD? You are guilty of having faith in an unseen phenomenon too.

I would tell you to rather sift everything you hear from "scientists" and reason with your own head. A lot faith is exercised today even in the camp of those who label themselves as empiricists.

akintom:





Don't get your question

ValentineMary:

Should we believe in this watchman based on religious doctrins alone?

DoctorAlien:
ValentineMary,

A whole lot is wrong with modern science. The whole idea of dark matter exists because it is assumed that the spacetime is a geniune proposition. Please follow this link to find out that the idea of spacetime is a hoax that not only needs to be immediately retired, but also raises questions about the veracity of what most people hold as "truth" today, supposedly from the stables of science.

raphieMontella:

lol..conspiracy theories have really gotten to you bruh...

akintom:



The religious folks have the right to so believe.

Personally, as humanist, since i don't subscribe to religious beliefs, and because there is no iota of scientific evidential basis for the the believe in watchman, i entertain no such belief.

ValentineMary:
Is absence of evidence the evidence of absence ?

DoctorAlien:


A little--I mean, a little research will just expose the many illogical and reason-contradicting deceptions and lies in modern Physics.

ValentineMary:

But we know it takes place by the increase in volume per unit volume of each rise intemperature. By God matter do u mean gravity or dark matter because these have proven to be the binding force.

lordnicklaus:

No the "god matter" is a cosmical constituent, the said particle responsible for the cosmos. it is quite smaller than any sub-atomic particle that is said to arise from a vacuum.

EyeHateGod:

There is no such thing as The God Matter Rather what we have is The God particle

ValentineMary:

Is absence of evidence the evidence of absence ?

EyeHateGod:
like?

DoctorAlien:


Look up the impossibility of motion in spacetime.

EyeHateGod:

What do u mean by space time? or do u mean space?

If that's what you mean then how do Meteors And asteroid and planets Move in space?

EyeHateGod:

What do u mean by space time? or do u mean space?

If that's what you mean then how do Meteors And asteroid and planets Move in space?

DoctorAlien:




Can you see that you'd have been better off reading and educating yourself, rather than frantically searching this board and opening meaningless topics here and there about a Being you insist does not exist?

Let me help you: Follow www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm]this link.

lordnicklaus:
spacetime determines "cause and effect"

EyeHateGod:

Rebelscience. org are u kidding me? and why are u Ashamed to put the link on the open? And besides why are u changing the topic?

EyeHateGod:

Time na illusion to me i don't put too much reference on it

lordnicklaus:

But planetary oscillations determine time. Time is just a reference to such dimensions.

DoctorAlien:


Can you read the article and forget the web address? Are you allergic to reason?

I didn't want to derail the thread. That was why I diverted you to a link.

EyeHateGod:

Why did u put the link out so people would know where you get your source from? are u Ashamed?

DoctorAlien:


Can someone tell me exactly what is wrong with this boy's brain?

Please don't mention me again.

Thank you.

DoctorAlien:


A little--I mean, a little research will just expose the many illogical and reason-contradicting deceptions and lies in modern Physics.

Just a little.

You owe it to yourself to make sure that in trying to find out the "truth" , you don't get lied to.

Let me give you a tip: with little/minimal Math/Physics skill, you can quickly decipher that any type of motion whatsoever is not possible in 4D spacetime, which has time as a fourth dimension. Yet, "scientists" keep propagating the lie that the universe is most correctly viewed as spacetime.

Pathetic

raphieMontella:

@the first bolded-----lol...i laughed hard bro

@the second bolded---another laugh bro


@the third bolded---all im just saying is simple---slow down on the conspiracy theories you ''go'' into...

DoctorAlien:

You can continue laughing.

lordnicklaus:

No the "god matter" is a cosmical constituent, the said particle responsible for the cosmos. it is quite smaller than any sub-atomic particle that is said to arise from a vacuum.

lordnicklaus:
Reality is experience in the making. It would sound weird to assume that since we cannot physically deduce the cubic expansivity of a liquid, that its fractional increase is abstract. Likewise we might not see God but would it still be logical to assume that God is merely the binding energy of the cosmos? Likewise, the "god matter" is extremely puny to the naked eye, but theoretically, it has been confirmed to be there and to be the supplementing intricate universal constituent. Most scientific facets have not been witnessed in reality but can we deem science as wrong? Likewise the existence of God is not a conceptual piece we should entirely doubt. CC ValentineMary donnffd johnydon22 shadeyinka butterfly88 raphiemontella.

johnydon22:


Good thoughts brother, love it - i have been terribly busy lately brother.. My grandma's burial is coming up next week plus work, i barely have time to discuss.

I'd have loved to take part in this intellectual squabble - maybe after everything i'll be back to discuss extensively once more

ValentineMary:

Oh!!! u mean the "God particle" also known as Higgs Boson? u are right. It is responsible for the formation of mass but it is not God (unless u adopt the pantheist view). It only interact with all forms of matter unlike other particles thus creating mass.

lordnicklaus:

Exactly. I was just trying to point out the fact that since the god particle is relatively minute, we cannot dispute its presence because we cannot see it and this should apply to the existence of God.