I will be relating sectarian policies and agendas of the islamo-fascist APC govt and how that correlates with the Islamic way of treating an dealing conquered non-muslins.

Your Dhimimi status will be elaborated and you can judge for yourself if there is an ongoing Islamization agenda.

Stick around

What is a Dhimmi? A Kafir?

These terms have related meanings.  Kafir is the broader term.  Dhimmi is the legally invoked status of a Kafir.
 
A Kafir is a non-believer, an infidel, or an ingrate to the Islamic faith.  A Dhimmi is alway a Kafir.  But a Kafir is not always a Dhimmi.

A Dhimmi is a person who is a non-Muslim in a Muslim dominated society.  Dhimmi is the subordinate legal status given to the kafir to "protect" him.   Why is protection needed?  Because Muslims are called upon to kill infidels as the general rule.  The creation of the Dhimmi status was a way to offer protection to the infidel in exchange for fees or taxes, and a reduced level of cultural benefits or freedoms, like voting. 

If you are an infidel, it is a good idea to be a Dhimmi in a Muslim culture.  Without being a Dhimmi you would be in violation of the rules, and the "other" option would be on the table, so to speak.

In Sharia operated northern Nigeria, non-muslims are "protected" and need timely re-assurances from both Secular and Islamic authorities of their safety and well being as can be discerned from the Sultan's chagrin to his Muslim population not to harm the infidel Igbos residing in the north.

Dhimmitude is a more recently developed broader term implying those in a non-Islamic dominated society who are being intimidated or terrorized in some manner and are accordingly fearful of taking action to counteract their condition.
 
Bat Yeor's definition of "dhimmitude" (from Wiki):

"As for the concept of dhimmitude, it represents a behavior dictated by fear (terrorism), pacifism when aggressed, rather than resistance, servility because of cowardice and vulnerability. The origin of this concept is to be found in the condition of the Infidel people who submit to the Islamic rule without fighting in order to avoid the onslaught of jihad. By their peaceful surrender to the Islamic army, they obtained the security for their life, belongings and religion, but they had to accept a condition of inferiority, spoliation and humiliation. As they were forbidden to possess weapons and give testimony against a Muslim, they were put in a position of vulnerability and humility."

The Koranic verse which dictates this fundamental character for dhimmitude is Sura 9:29:
"Fight against those who do not believe in Allah nor in the Last Day, and do not make forbidden what Allah and His Messenger have made forbidden, and do not practice the religion of truth, of those who have been given the Book [i.e. Jews and Christians], until they pay the jizya [head tax] readily and are humbled."
Within the Islamic state, all non-Muslims who are not objects of war are considered to be dhimmis - communities who are allowed to exist within the Dar al-Islam by virtue of surrender under the conditions of a dhimmi pact.  These are the permanently conquered peoples of Islam.
The historian Bat Ye'or has documented the social, political, economic and religious conditions of dhimmi communities - Jews and Christians - in the Middle East.  It is a sad history of dispossession and decline.  Legal provisions applying to dhimmis ensured their humiliation and inferiority, and to this was added the often crippling taxes which were allocated to support the Muslim community.  Under conditions of dhimmitude there was also a constant risk of jihad conditions being reinvoked - of massacre and dispossession - if the dhimmi community is considered to have failed to live up to the conditions of their pact.  History records many examples where dhimmis were attacked by their fellow Muslim citizens on such grounds, for example the massacres of the Jews of Granada in 1066, and of the Christians of Damascus in 1860.  
Like sexism and racism, dhimmitude is not only manifested in legal and social structures, but in a psychology of inferiority, a will to serve, which the dominated community adopts in self-preservation.

The law required from dhimmis a humble demeanor, eyes lowered, a hurried pace.  They had to give way to Muslims in the street, remain standing in their presence and keep silent, only speaking to them when given permission.  They were forbidden to defend themselves if attacked, or to raise a hand against a Muslim on pain of having it amputated.  Any criticism of the Koran or Islamic law annuled the protection pact.  In addition the dhimmi was duty-bound to be grateful, since it was Islamic law that spared his life.
The whole corpus of these practices … formed an unchanging behavior pattern which was perpetuated from generation to generation for centuries.  It was so deeply internalised that it escaped critical evaluation and invaded the realm of self-image, which was henceforth dominated by a conditioning in self-devaluation. … This situation, determined by a corpus of precise legislation and social behaviour patterns based on prejudice and religious traditions, induced the same type of mentality in all dhimmi groups.  It has four major characteristics:  vulnerability, humiliation, gratitude and alienation.

Terrible

It is this that inspire and fuels the belligerent attitude of most Muslims especially the uneducated ones that learn the Koran through third party.

No matter how hard They try to set in motion these uncivilized principles and doctrines, the greater majority of educated Nigerians will continue to resist them.
Myself and several others have come to realise that it is alot more better to live this life for the paradise it is, than be obsessed with a metaphysical life that we know not what it holds.

I just wonder why some humans fight on behalf of an almighty.....if that be the case, what then is mighty about the ALL

Still, as "People of the Book," Jews (and Christians) are protected under Islamic law. This was pragmatic approach by the Jihadi conquerors not based on any humanitarian grounds but because virtually all captured territory of the expanding caliphate had majority of Christians and Jews.

The traditional concept of the "dhimma" ("writ of protection") was extended by Muslim conquerors to Christians and Jews in exchange for their subordination to the Muslims.

Peoples subjected to Muslim rule usually had a choice between death and conversion, but Jews and Christians, who adhered to the Scriptures, were allowed as dhimmis (protected persons) to practice their faith.

This "protection" did little, however, to ensure that Jews and Christians were treated well by the Muslims. On the contrary, an integral aspect of the dhimma was that, being an infidel, he had to openly acknowledge the superiority of the true believer--the Muslim.


In the early years of the Islamic conquest, the "tribute" (or jizya), paid as a yearly poll tax, symbolized the subordination of the dhimmi. Later, the inferior status of Jews and Christians was reinforced through a series of regulations that governed the behavior of the dhimmi.

Dhimmis, on pain of death, were forbidden to mock or criticize the Koran, Islam or Muhammad, to proselytize among Muslims or to touch a Muslim woman (though a Muslim man could take a non Muslim as a wife).

Dhimmis were excluded from public office and armed service, and were forbidden to bear arms. This has already become institionalized by the highly lopsided appointments o security chiefs favouring northern Muslims and the purging of Southerners/ Christians from the military by the Buhari Islamic govt.

They were not allowed to ride horses or camels, to build synagogues or churches taller than mosques, to construct houses higher than those of Muslims or to drink wine in public.

They were not allowed to pray or mourn in loud voices-as that might offend the Muslims.
This is what El Rufai is pushing in Kaduna with his diabolical religious bill.

The dhimmi had to show public deference toward Muslims-always yielding them the center of the road.

The dhimmi was not allowed to give evidence in court against a Muslim, and his oath was unacceptable in an Islamic court.

To defend himself, the dhimmi would have to purchase Muslim witnesses at great expense. This left the dhimmi with little legal recourse when harmed by a Muslim. The case of the elderly Igbo woman murdered in Kano and whose killers have all since been released by the Kano State govt comes to mind.

Dhimmis were also forced to wear distinctive clothing. In the ninth century, for example, Baghdad's Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews, setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany.

Why Igbos should not expect any help from the west..

We all watched with awe as ISIS declared an Islamic State with full backing of both the Obama WH and European nations.

We are all witnesses to Obama's hesitation to declare Boko Haram and ISIS as terrorist groups and how the same Obama de-listed the Taliban from a Terrorist organisation to an armed insurgency.

We also saw how Christian and Yazidi refugees mostly composed of women and children where denied asylum by both the EU and Obama in preference to Sunni Muslims mainly composed of Males of military age (M.A.M.).

We also saw how the purported head of the Christianity - the Pope never once advocated on the plight of Christians in Iraq, Syria and Nigeria but rather we saw how on instructions from the Vatican, the Catholic Church pulled out of CAN. The Pope rather took the opportunity to canvass for acceptance of Muslim "refugees" into Europe while at the same time defending Islam.

The Church of England through Welby continues to openly embrace the divisive and sectional Buhari.

Behind all this madness is EURABIA.

Eurabia is a political neologism, a portmanteau of Europe and Arabia, used to describe a conspiracy theory of globalist elements, allegedly led by French and Arab powers, to Islamise and Arabise Europe, thereby weakening its existing culture and undermining a previous alignment with the U.S. and Israel.

The concept was coined by Bat Ye'or (pen name of Gisele Littman) in the early 2000s and is described in her 2005 book titled Eurabia: The Euro‐Arab Axis. Europe, Ye'or argues, has surrendered to Islam and is in a state of submission (which she referred to as dhimmitude) in which Europe is forced to deny its own culture, stand silently by in the face of alleged Muslim atrocities, accept Muslim immigration, and pay tribute through various types of economic assistance. According to the theory, the blame rests with a range of groups including communists, fascists, the media, universities, mosques and Islamic cultural centres, European bureaucrats, and the Euro-Arab Dialogue.

Transcription:
Terrible

You never see something.

NEXT LEVEL will lead to Total Islamization.

Now, it is Jihad again!

[s]

Guestlander:
Now, it is Jihad again!

[/s]

It has always been their plan and agenda but you will fail.

Out from this rubbish Nijeriya will disintegrate and we will leave you backward moon worshipping pagans