Atheists agree: Truth is a moral issue

Even atheists admit that people who err about origins aren't necessarily "ignorant, stupid, or insane." There is a fourth option—and God's Word would agree with them.

https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/atheists-agree-truth-moral-issue/

OLAADEGBU:
Atheists agree: Truth is a moral issue

Even atheists admit that people who err about origins aren't necessarily "ignorant, stupid, or insane." There is a fourth option—and God's Word would agree with them.

https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/atheists-agree-truth-moral-issue/

When we understand and embrace God's Word, we will know the difference between the truth and the lies, and we won't be deceived.

Our most prominent global-village atheist, Richard Dawkins, said a few years ago, "If you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)."¹

That's us creationists. And despite his coy demurrals, his subsequent public statements suggest that he is all too ready to consider us not just stupid but wicked.

I’ll let Dawkins' four adjectives structure my article, but I'll reveal my main point up front: I actually agree with Dawkins on something very important, the idea that knowledge is a moral issue.

OLAADEGBU:


When we understand and embrace God's Word, we will know the difference between the truth and the lies, and we won't be deceived.

Our most prominent global-village atheist, Richard Dawkins, said a few years ago, "If you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid, or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)."¹

That's us creationists. And despite his coy demurrals, his subsequent public statements suggest that he is all too ready to consider us not just stupid but wicked.

I’ll let Dawkins' four adjectives structure my article, but I'll reveal my main point up front: I actually agree with Dawkins on something very important, the idea that knowledge is a moral issue.

He is correct to an extent.I myself don't believe in evolution,but what I don't do is go about providing ignorant,stupid or insane arguments as refutation to a theory they don't even understand.