Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,143,334 members, 7,780,876 topics. Date: Friday, 29 March 2024 at 01:44 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Re - How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa (359 Views)
How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa / "If You Can, Impeach Saraki Legally" - Ben Murray-Bruce Fires Back At APC / Majority Of One-third Out Of Overall Senate Members Can Impeach Saraki – Sagay (2) (3) (4)
Re - How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa by Dewze(m): 3:17pm On Aug 16, 2018 |
The purpose of this thread is to address an article drawn from the dailytrust and posted here by Hungerbad. The article I suppose is a certain Sunusi Musa giving his own interpretation of the Nigerian constitution as it concerns the impeachment requirement of a House of Assembly president. The article from my understanding is implying that subsection 143(2) of the constitution on its own gives power to 1/3 of the members of the National Assembly to carry out impeachment besides the 2/3 that has always been known. You can check out the article here https://www.nairaland.com/4678799/how-25-senators-impeach-saraki I'm not a lawyer and I do not claim to have or ever have had anything to do with the legal proffession. I do believe that I do not need to be a lawyer to understand what is written in the constitution, and from my understanding of what is written in those sections of the constitution mentioned in the article, I can boldly say that interpretation was wrong and myopic. I say myopic because the writer failed to consider the implication of section 143 as a whole but rather picked out subsection 143(2) and made his conclusion solely on that. Before I go into what the constitution really says I will past the sections he addressed for easy follow up: Section 50(2) (C) states: Now let me delve into the true and unbiased interpretations of these sections, especially section 143. Section 143 simply tells you the procedures that should be taken for an impeachment, This is the main thing the writer failed to understand and 141(1) states it quite clearly. 141(1) states that a sitting office holder can only be impeached based on the "provisions" ( emphasis on plural not singular) of this section. Meaning it would need the combination of all subsections of this section to make an impeachment possible, not just one subsection only. 143(2) says that before an allegation against a sitting office holder is even considered at all for investigation, it should have been presented in writing, signed by not less than 1/3 of the members of the House. Meaning 143(2) does not give power to 1/3 to impeach, it only gives them power to tender an allegation. 143(3) says that after the allegation has been presented in writing and signed by 1/3 of the members of the House, the matter will then be brought to the floor of the House for a motion to be passed that the allegation be investigated. it states clearly hear that the motion to investigate the matter cannot be declared as passed until not less than 2/3 of "all the members" of each House of Assembly agrees to it. In other words, the matter cannot be investigated by the House if up to 2/3 do not agree to do so. 143(4) Note: this subsection only comes into effect after the allegation has been approved for investigation by the provision of 141(4) and the panel set up to investigate the matter has submitted a report of proof against the accused sitting officer.. This subsection says that after all that has been done, within fourteen days of the report being submitted, the National Assembly will consider the report. By a resolution, each House of Assembly, supported by not less than 2/3 of "all of its members", not 2/3 of some of them, will then proceed to impeach the accused holder of office So, in conclusion, that subsection 143(2) does not stand on its own as the criteria for impeachment, rather it is part of a procedure or series of criteria needed. Note: Section 50(2) clearly states that 2/3 of all members(not half, not some and definitely not present or sitting members) of a House are needed to make an impeachment. Also, I do not see any where in the sections mentioned by the writer where power is given to the quorom(as described in section 54) to effect impeachment. Sign Out *** I do not intend to imply anything other than the interpretations of the sections and subsections of the constitution mentioned here and as stated in the article posted by Hungerbad *** |
Re: Re - How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa by Alejoc(m): 3:17pm On Aug 16, 2018 |
Only in Nigeria! |
Re: Re - How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa by ManirBK: 3:19pm On Aug 16, 2018 |
Those pressurizing Saraki to contest are deceiving him.What would you do if after ur wedding day u found out dat the cameraman didnt take any pictures he was only flashing lights!!! |
Re: Re - How 25 Senators Can Impeach Saraki By Sunusi Musa by dukie25: 3:40pm On Aug 16, 2018 |
Yeah They can impeach him in their dream |
(1) (Reply)
PHOTOS: Thanksgiving Of APC Christian Prayer/Contact C'ttee At Govt House Binin / 250 Tambuwal's Aides Resign, Return To APC / Plateau State Governor Found On The Street Patronizing A Street Hawker PHOTOS
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 34 |