KnownUnknown:


Lmao. Nice straw man here. Take two words out of the sentence just a to write some unfounded remark.


I didn’t encourage or discourage anyone. All I did was guffaw at ancient Rosicrucian order because I’ve read enough to find it funny.

**now take “read enough” out of context to make another silly remark.

Have you read any of the books in this thread, Unknown.

Can you kindly refer me to one single book out of all those you read about ancient Rosicrucian order that you found funny so I may read and guffaw at it too please?

budaatum:


Have you read any of the books in this thread, Unknown.

Can you kindly refer me to one single book out of all those you read about ancient Rosicrucian order that you found funny so I may read and guffaw at it too please?

We obviously don’t have the same sense of humor if you can’t find the absurdity in “ancient Rosicrucian order”.

KnownUnknown:


We obviously don’t have the same sense of humor if you can’t find the absurdity in “ancient Rosicrucian order”.

How can you tell if you don't share with me 'the absurdity in “ancient Rosicrucian order"' you found?

budaatum:


How can you tell if you don't share with me 'the absurdity in “ancient Rosicrucian order"' you found?

I can tell from our interactions and your posts. I will always find the mystical absurd and often time hilarious and it’s apparent that’s not your view. e.g. The picture at the beginning of the book in the op and the “great white brotherhood” are enough for eye rolling and laughter.

If you know the layout and nature of the desert, you can quickly discount the mirages. I have a cogent hold on the nature of the desert so the mirages can only be amusing as others gawk at them.

Europeans claiming “ancient” mystical knowledge are as trustworthy as the Babalawos that have refused to collect that young man’s N2.5 million.

The supernatural is inherently nonsense so I don’t have to read the Book of Mormon to discount everything a Mormon believes or laugh at their special underwear or their “white and delightsome” god that made melanin rich skin a “curse”. Reading about Joseph Smith and his golden plates is enough to cause a guffaw. Apply same to the Rosicrucians and whatever nonsense they claim.

KnownUnknown:


I can tell from our interactions and your posts.

Known, you have not shown an understanding of any of my posts, so whatever you claim to be able to tell is false. Its why I engage with you too. So that you may know for yourself that which is currently unknown to you.

budaatum:


Known, you have not shown an understanding of any of my posts, so whatever you claim to be able to tell is false. Its why I engage with you too. So that you may know for yourself that which is currently unknown to you.

You know, that’s just your opinion man!

KnownUnknown:


You know, that’s just your opinion man!

Lol, known. Your's was just your opinion too, or wasn't it? Am I wrong in doing to you as you did to me?

Any way, let's get back to what we can objectively critique, shall we?

KnownUnknown:


I can tell from our interactions and your posts. I will always find the mystical absurd and often time hilarious and it’s apparent that’s not your view. e.g. The picture at the beginning of the book in the op and the “great white brotherhood” are enough for eye rolling and laughter.

If you know the layout and nature of the desert, you can quickly discount the mirages. I have a cogent hold on the nature of the desert so the mirages can only be amusing as others gawk at them.

Europeans claiming “ancient” mystical knowledge are as trustworthy as the Babalawos that have refused to collect that young man’s N2.5 million.

The supernatural is inherently nonsense so I don’t have to read the Book of Mormon to discount everything a Mormon believes or laugh at their special underwear or their “white and delightsome” god that made melanin rich skin a “curse”. Reading about Joseph Smith and his golden plates is enough to cause a guffaw. Apply same to the Rosicrucians and whatever nonsense they claim.

In Buddhism, it is said that the person at the bottom of the mountain can not see what the person at the top sees,

I think we must be done here, for I see no point in giving countenance or time to those who think reading "the picture at the beginning of the book" is enough for them to claim they know what is obviously unknown to them.

I do not expect you to comprehend the significance of the below and have not included it for your benefit, so just do not read it if you wouldn't please. As for my current reading, here, with no mirages on the cover to mystify you.

budaatum:


Lol, known. Your's was just your opinion too, or wasn't it? Am I wrong in doing to you as you did to me?

Any way, let's get back to what we can objectively critique, shall we?



In Buddhism, it is said that the person at the bottom of the mountain can not see what the person at the top sees,

I think we must be done here, for I see no point in giving countenance or time to those who think reading "the picture at the beginning of the book" is enough for them to claim they know what is obviously unknown to them.

I do not expect you to comprehend the significance of the below and have not included it for your benefit, so just do not read it if you wouldn't please. As for my current reading, here, with no mirages on the cover to mystify you.

Buddhism. Another crock but whatever floats your boat. How can we be done when we never started?
There is nothing to be learned from the nonsense you parade when one is not susceptible to rubbish.
Glad to see your current reading is not complete bladerdash.

If you’ve found the ideas the mystical is built upon, why would you waste time reading the musings of some “ancient order” of nonsense?

Yes, the picture at the beginning of the book is more than enough. Maybe if he had painted the picture of The Master Krishna I’d be more interested. Lol

Superman had used every one of the powers coming into his being, through the perfect attunement he had with the Krypton, to restore strength and consciousness to every part of his body and to all of his highly developed faculties.

In quietness and peace the Avengers journeyed to their homes in Titan to dwell among their brothers and sisters. That night Thanos appeared among the clerics in the retreat at Carmel and retired to the rooms that had been set aside for him as his sanctum. Thus the door of his public life was closed to humanity.

KnownUnknown:


If you’ve found the ideas the mystical is built upon, why would you waste time reading the musings of some “ancient order” of nonsense?

KnownUnknown, don't you think you should have considered your time before wasting it in this waste of your time thread?

Do you seriously think one who "found the ideas the mystical is built upon" wouldn't be much wiser than you are being and at least not guffaw at a book they never read and only saw the cover of?

budaatum:


KnownUnknown, don't you think you should have considered your time before wasting it in this waste of your time thread?

A couple of minutes to bat down nonsense are never wasted.

budaatum:

Do you seriously think one who "found the ideas the mystical is built upon" wouldn't be much wiser than you are being and at least not guffaw at a book they never read and only saw the cover of?

Like I said before, I don’t need to read the “mystical life” of guy that never existed to know its mostly rubbish.

My two previous posts prior to this one are excepts from the book with a couple of substituted words to highlight the nonsense you are parading.

Any book of mysticism that claims to know some “esoteric” truth is nonsense unless the author is actually telling the truth about mysticism i.e. actually offering explanations that can be verified. Maybe you should go read about the profane reality that the sacred nonsense is built upon then you’d stop thinking you understand things you obviously don’t.

Let’s try this.
What does Genesis 3:15 represent?

KnownUnknown:


Let’s try this.
What does Genesis 3:15 represent?

"Represent" is a weired word, known. Please let me first tell you what it is, see if we agree, before it is re-presented by either of us.

Genesis 3:15, is a section in a book written by some people that reads as follows:

And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”

budaatum:


"Represent" is a weired word, known. Please let me first tell you what it is, see if we agree, before it is re-presented by either of us.

Genesis 3:15, is a section in a book written by some people that reads as follows:

And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.”

Of course it was written by people. Who else writes books? Lol. You love to beat around the bush.

Anyway, what does it represent?

KnownUnknown:


Maybe you should go read about the profane reality that the sacred nonsense is built upon then you’d stop thinking you understand things you obviously don’t.

Care to recommend any please?

KnownUnknown:


Of course it was written by people. Who else writes books? Lol. You love to beat around the bush.

Anyway, what does it represent?

It does not represent anything to me unknown, but it is an attempt of the writers to control women.

What does it represent to you please?