hackney:

^^^There seems to be a confusion between partial pigmentation within a race and
difference in racial orientation.
I'm just gonna quit on this one.
Kiss and make up?; i prefer bending her over and shaging her senseless.
That's how such issues are resolved.
(Shorty riled me up, dude. not sure why it got to me but , hey. . )
Very bitchy; i want to pull her hair for an hour.
Papa190 can watch ; doesn't bother me.

hackney:

You are just an id10t.
so you think DNA tells if someone is black or white?
Do you even know what DNA is about?
you are just a fool.
Ranting with lack of knowledge on a matter that is way above your stupidity.
Anyway a lot of you are half-baked education-wise.
Better go and discuss hand-bags and  d1ck sizes with your group of half-wits
Bone-headed fool.
what an id10t.

THE AMAKA:

You still haven't gotten to the point of explaining how this baby is 100% caucasian.

Deep Sight (m)   Re: Black Parents, White Blond Baby Not Albino (picture)
« #380 on: July 23, 2010, 12:35 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tend to get better quality in terms of ripostes on the Religion Board of this forum.

Quote from: cryptic on July 23, 2010, 10:17 AM
On what grounds are you making this claim? Were u there when mary did the hoopla?

This is quite interesting. Let's have a look.

A woman gets pregnant. Two persons have different views as to how that happened.

Person 1: Has the view that, as is consistent with human reproductive experience, the woman had gotten pregnant from s.exual intercourse.

Person 2: Has the view that an intangible spiritual entity magically made her pregnant without intercourse.

Which view is more consistent with reason, human experience and common sense? ? ? ?

And some how I am the one being deleuded? Well, your choice, son.

Quote from: ~Sauron~ on July 23, 2010, 10:26 AM
Only a complete retard with spermflakes in his brain cavity would write something like this.
How old are you? Are you mentally-handicapped? Were you born brain dead?
I need to know these answers before i know what to do to your state of mind. . . .

On no account would you receive from me that which you give: namely knee jerk insults arising from a void.

There is a well studied psychological phenomenon amongst human beings and this is it; when a human being is unable to address a glaring (and painful) internal inconsistency in his beliefs, he is most likely to convulsively explode.

[size=16pt]That explosion has appeared in the form of your insults - I take no offence in the least; I merely recognise that which is obvious: namely that you are deeply pained by the absurdity that emerges as your conviction:[/size]

It is simply and civilly pointed out to you that it is not very likely that a woman would get pregnant without intercourse - and you have made exactly no logical rebuttal of that reasonable proposition. What you have done is simply evince the truth; namely that you have no answer to that obvious illogicality which happens to be your conviction. In this you are sadly supported by a group of people who have not proffered any reasonable rebuttal in that regard.

Accordingly I see no reason as yet to retract the very simple proposition that I laid before you; namely that people to not get pregnant by spiritual or magical means; but by s.exual intercourse or artificial insemination - which was not available two thousand years ago.

It is hardly my cup of tea that you subscribe to ancient semitic myths which would certainly sound ludicruous to you if they were tales of your own ancestors.

Quote
He wouldn't stand in a bus-stop and spew the same crap about Jesus but he's using his anonymity on the internet to blaspheme.
I dunno why people get erections by abusing the God millions of people serve whole-heartedly.

This is where I have a problem. And further this is what I mean by thoughtless knee-jerk reactions. You have stated –

1.   That I have blasphemed.

2.   That I have “abused’ God.

I am aghast at these conclusions. From where did you get the notion that questioning the likelihood of a pregnancy arising without s.exual intercourse, amounts to blasphemy? We are well past the age of reason, dear friend. If we are entitled to question such things as men turning into frogs, surely we are entitled to question an ancient story which tells us that a woman conceived a baby out of thin air.

Now I would urge you to be more perceptive. At time of that supposed event, the punishment for s.exual activity outside wedlock was death by stoning. What do you suppose a young female who is pregnant outside of wedlock would do? Admit that she has had s.ex? Or blame it on the Holy Ghost?

You riddle me with laughter. You do have miles to walk yet, son.

Again let us look at the second part of your statement. You stated that I have abused God! That is a grand presumption sir, for I did no such thing.

I drew out an analogy showing that it is unlikely that a woman may be pregnant without any form of natural conception. How does that amount to abusing God? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

[size=16pt]I do not know what your perception of the transcendental almighty God is: but I can assure you that I believe in God and worship God. My perception of God however, does not involve such things as miraculous pregnancies or rituals of any sort. I urge you not to make any presumptions in this regard.
[/size]

Dress warm.

Siena:

I did wonder too. What an analogy! Priceless.