A lot of things constitute our societal ills today that tends to put the child on the receiving end. Who is to be blamed for a child's faulty moral upbringing and not doing well at school? . Who is better equipped and informed to train a child to be of enviable or formidable character? The Father or the mother?

I have often advocated for the role of an ideal fatherly figure in the up bringing of a child which does not necessarily have to be the biological father of the child in question. Once the man is missing, the child's security ideology has lost its guard & becomes superfluous or exposed to some mischievous tendencies. Even when nature posit it that the motherly care is more pressing to a child's up bringing than the fatherly figure as it is seen in the animal kingdom, it must be noted that we as humans are a little bit of higher calling or significance than the lower animal we refer to here just as humans go to school & not animals, human get a career & not animals, human run an organised community or establishment & not animals etc. I want to believe there could be some reserve school of thought contrary to my opinion or that supports my take. Lets do justice to attend to this question of defining priority as our decisions affect or shape the life & future of our kids. www.winterbaker.com

Despite his time, he may not always be with the child, but the little time spent with them, he doesn't take a shit from or give a dam to them, believed u me, father is still the best among all