Recently, different opinions have emerged as to whether the church was right to dedicate Linda Ikeji's son or not.

Let's look at it this way. God is holy. The alter inside the church is a sacred place where things are supposed and expected to be done in accordance to God's holy nature else such alter runs the risk of losing its sacredness and power when defiled.

A child Born out of Wedlock is a product of fornication that the church preach against. The baby per say, is innocent but the situation sorrounding its conception is sinful.


Now, is it biblically right or not to dedicate such babies on the sacred alter of God inside a church?

Respect55:
Recently, different opinions have emerged as to whether the church was right to dedicate Linda Ikeji's son or not.

Let's look at it this way. God is holy. The alter inside the church is a sacred place where things are supposed and expected to be done in accordance to God's holy nature else such alter runs the risk of losing its sacredness and power when defiled.

A child Born out of Wedlock is a product of fornication that the church preach against. The baby per say, is innocent but the situation sorrounding its conception is sinful.


Now, is it biblically right or not to dedicate such babies on the sacred alter of God inside a church?

remember the circumstances surrounding the birth of king Solomon. Compare and contrast.
Good morning

This is a really tough one.

frbona:
remember the circumstances surrounding the birth of king Solomon. Compare and contrast.
Good morning

The product of David's fornication was struck dead by GOD because Bathsheba was not his wife.When Solomon was born, Bathsheba was no longer Uriah's wife but David's. Thus,Solomon was legitimate.

frbona:
remember the circumstances surrounding the birth of king Solomon. Compare and contrast.
Good morning

It doesn't really ads up very much. My main emphasis is on the child's dedication on the holy alter of God

AryEmber:
This is a really tough one.

I'm confused too. I want to be educated

toyosi20188:
The product of David's fornication was struck dead by GOD because Bathsheba was not his wife.When Solomon was born, Bathsheba was no longer Uriah's wife but David's. Thus,Solomon was legitimate.

I don't agree with u at all

Respect55:

It doesn't really ads up very much. My main emphasis is on the child's dedication on the holy alter of God

so an innocent child should be dedicated on the alter of satan because his fathers refused to live up to his expectations? How is it the child's fault?

Respect55:

It doesn't really ads up very much. My main emphasis is on the child's dedication on the holy alter of God

there's really no way out of this. This issue comes up every now and then. That child was ordained from the start by God so the circumstances that brought him to life should be totally ignored, don't bring him any of this. leave Judgement to God the eternal Judge. Lets celebrate an innocent child who is totally oblivious of anything his parents did or didn't do to bring him into existence and give him a chance at a fulfilled life . toss the morality debate into the thrash can.

PaChukwudi44:


so an innocent child should be dedicated on the alter of satan because his fathers refused to live up to his expectations? How is it the child's fault?

Na ogboni dem for dedicate am

frbona:
there's really no way out of this. This issue comes up every now and then. That child was ordained from the start by God so the circumstances that brought him to life should be totally ignored, don't bring him any of this. leave Judgement to God the eternal Judge. Lets celebrate an innocent child who is totally oblivious of anything his parents did or didn't do to bring him into existence and give him a chance at a fulfilled life . toss the morality debate into the thrash can.

Never really know the topic has bn coming up here. My problem is not with the child, but the dedication been carried out by the parent(s) whereas the circumstances sorrounding the conception is morally wrong

PaChukwudi44:


so an innocent child should be dedicated on the alter of satan because his fathers refused to live up to his expectations? How is it the child's fault?

Who said it is the child's fault?
Who said the child should be dedicated on Satan's alter?
All I asked is if it is biblically right to do so in God's alter

Respect55:

Who said it is the child's fault?
Who said the child should be dedicated on Satan's alter?
All I asked is if it is biblically right to do so in God's alter

so which alter was the child supposed to be dedicated? I don't know why some people are incurably stupid.Is it biblically wrong to dedicate an innocent child to God? Haba what sort od stupidity is it this afternoon

Respect55:

Never really know the topic has bn coming up here. My problem is not with the child, but the dedication been carried out by the parent(s) whereas the circumstances sorrounding the conception is morally wrong

so who was supposed to dedicate the child? Your parents?

Respect55:
Recently, different opinions have emerged as to whether the church was right to dedicate Linda Ikeji's son or not.

Let's look at it this way. God is holy. The alter inside the church is a sacred place where things are supposed and expected to be done in accordance to God's holy nature else such alter runs the risk of losing its sacredness and power when defiled.

A child Born out of Wedlock is a product of fornication that the church preach against. The baby per say, is innocent but the situation sorrounding its conception is sinful.


Now, is it biblically right or not to dedicate such babies on the sacred alter of God inside a church?

Hahahahahahhha. You eh. U don subtly condemn the act before asking the rhetorical question.

frbona:
remember the circumstances surrounding the birth of king Solomon. Compare and contrast.
Good morning

Do you remember that the Child born in that circumstance was not Solomon and he died?

Respect55:

It doesn't really ads up very much. My main emphasis is on the child's dedication on the holy alter of God

Like I am wondering how the church got here?

Respect55:

I don't agree with u at all

You don't have to agree but he's right, after David prayed psalm 51 ,God forgave him and he married Uriah's wife.

Visit my blog
www.omaleeblog.com
For everything love, relationship and family

PaChukwudi44:


so an innocent child should be dedicated on the alter of satan because his fathers refused to live up to his expectations? How is it the child's fault?

True talk

Anas09:

Do you remember that the Child born in that circumstance was not Solomon and he died?

That is what I'm trying to say. Solomon was born when Bathsheba was already being acknowledged as David's wife.

PaChukwudi44:


so which alter was the child supposed to be dedicated? I don't know why some people are incurably stupid.Is it biblically wrong to dedicate an innocent child to God? Haba what sort od stupidity is it this afternoon

Would have replied u but when I saw the abuses, I know something is really wrong

Anas09:

Hahahahahahhha. You eh. U don subtly condemn the act before asking the rhetorical question.

I don't think so. I just analyzed facts

Omalee:


You don't have to agree but he's right, after David prayed psalm 51 ,God forgave him and he married Uriah's wife.

He had already done evil before that if u remember

toyosi20188:
That is what I'm trying to say. Solomon was born when Bathsheba was already being acknowledged as David's wife.

That case and this has no bearings, as there's no father in Linda's case, but David was present with Bathsheba.

toyosi20188:
The product of David's fornication was struck dead by GOD because Bathsheba was not his wife.When Solomon was born, Bathsheba was no longer Uriah's wife but David's. Thus,Solomon was legitimate.

I guess this happened because killing (of innocent man) was involved

PaChukwudi44:


so which alter was the child supposed to be dedicated? I don't know why some people are incurably stupid.Is it biblically wrong to dedicate an innocent child to God? Haba what sort od stupidity is it this afternoon

Now that you left answering the question to attack her, has your bitterness subsided? If the Bible shd be followed all the way, Linda shd be hiding behind her mansion and not dare bring her bastard outside, not to talk of presenting it before God's Altar.

Money must have greased that Clergy's hands to dedicate that child to himself because God will not accept that defiled seed.


Maybe you shd take crash course on Scriptures before you come out venting your anger in public.

PaChukwudi44:


so who was supposed to dedicate the child? Your parents?

If she were a Christian, she shd ve known that her bastard will not be dedicated in Church.

Do you even know what dedication means? You see it as a mere ceremony? When a baby is stretched out, there must be hands to accept it, God's hands. But with all the filth and deception, shd God be a partaker of all of that?

Catholics and their disobedience to scriptures.

frbona:
there's really no way out of this. This issue comes up every now and then. That child was ordained from the start by God so the circumstances that brought him to life should be totally ignored, don't bring him any of this. leave Judgement to God the eternal Judge. Lets celebrate an innocent child who is totally oblivious of anything his parents did or didn't do to bring him into existence and give him a chance at a fulfilled life . toss the morality debate into the thrash can.

Going by this your logic, Lot's two sons Moab and Amon gottten by his two daughters were ordained by God from the start too? Why then was God angry and rejected them? These things happen every now and then because of Disobedience to God, it doesn't mean God has changed or will change. No.

Listen, God, the Grand Divine designer had before creating the world set laws in place to rule the Universe. One of such laws is that, when a woman have sex with a man, she'd get pregnant, but this is to be done inside marriage not outside. But if you break the law and do it outside, you'd still be pregnant, but the baby will be a child of Sin. Stained, defiled and rejected just like Lot's sons.

I

Respect55:


Would have replied u but when I saw the abuses, I know something is really wrong

Good to ignore him. The guy is really disturbed and depressed.

Anas09:

Now that you left answering the question to attack her, has your bitterness subsided? If the Bible shd be followed all the way, Linda shd be hiding behind her mansion and not dare bring her bastard outside, not to talk of presenting it before God's Altar.

Money must have greased that Clergy's hands to dedicate that child to himself because God will not accept that defiled seed.


Maybe you shd take crash course on Scriptures before you come out venting your anger in public.

U shouldn't have even replied him in the first place

Respect55:
U shouldn't have even replied him in the first place

True. He is not worth it.