Excuzeme:


You guys just bandy words around without examining the REAL MEANING!

"Incontrovertible evidence" means evidence that cannot be DENIED or CONFRONTED in any way!

The basis of Atiku's legal challenge is FAULTY , NUL and VOID.
It is trite in law that 'You cant BUILD SOMETHING on NOTHING".

Any legal challenge to Buhari's victory based on ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION oF RESULTS, is ILLEGAL (Section 10 of the Electoral Act 2010), UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THEREFORE NULL AND VOID.
It is as simple as that. Its a "technicality".

Recall: the INEC CHAIRMAN said the Results WOULD NOT be TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY, even before the election was consducted!
Also, INEC Server was Shut down and OFFLINE throughtout the elections.

The reason the INEC Server was put OFFLINE and switched-off was because the Electoral Act 2010 forbade INEC from transmitting ANY RESULT electronically!
Any INEC staff that does so, will even be committing an "electoral Act offense" because the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) forbid it.

I actually played a very crucial role on behalf of INEC, in the past election....and that is why l can confidently tell you, from the "Position of Law", why no attempt can be successfully made, to validate this Presidential election, based on card reader transmission of results.

Everything YOU are saying, is just chatter, from the camp of an Atiku who is desperate to become President of cameroun
before you argue further, go and read the 2010 Electoral Act that guided the just concluded election and specifically focus on what it say about use of card reader, vis-a-vis transmission of results.

Read it here from the INEC Chairman himself: https://www./2018/12/11/card-readers-will-be-used-in-2019-elections-inec-chairman-confirms/
http://www.topnewsmagazines.com/inec-to-deploy-manual-transmission-of-results-in-2019-elections/

The import of these is that if Buhari has signed the 2019 amended Electoral Act, it would have made ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION RESULT legal but that amendment was not signed and did not become Law!
But Card readers where still used for accreditation, as enshrined in law.

A thousand IBM, Microsoft, Apple and facebook + Twitter all roled into one, cannot change the Electoral Act 2010, which forbade the TRANSMISSION of RESULTS BY ELECTRONIC MEANS and any claim based on such ILLEGALITY, will remain illegal, null and void.
Atiku has lost completely on that ground. Bookmark this post and return to it after the tribunal has make its decision final.

Jowanson:



This is one out of so many evidences....PDP did monitor the elections very well using technology at it's best...

Did you notice what happened in Kenya?

That will also happen in Nigeria soon.

The truth must prevail... Enou

Except the Judiciary has been compromised by APC which I believe will be too glaring if the judiciary allows itself to be compromised.

Once that happens in the face of all these evidences, then Nigeria is finished under this regime!

So all eyes are on the judiciary to follow the part of truth and objectivity no matter what the cost may be.

I believe in the truth! So I want to ask, can the judiciary allow it to prevail in this case? Time will tell.

Jowanson:



You will be so shocked... Do you think the lawyers that Atiku has assembled are dumb? You think they do not know the law and all it's loopholes?
And you think they did not look into all the matters that will arise in this tribunal before going to the courts?

And you think they did not study the electoral acts properly?

You will be so shocked as to how this case will turn out in favour of Atiku. For once, let us allow the truth to prevail..

Atiku's lawyers are there to quote the necessary laws to back up their claims. That is why they are there....

Why is INEC and APC jittery? Rather than defending very well, they are springing up comedy everywhere...even citing a statement made by Nnamdi KANU as a defence statement.... how childish!

Atiku won this election at the polling units! Form EC8A!

buhariguy:
hahahahahahahahahaha,
kids plenty for this forum,
Livy uzoukwu that does not know the electoral act.
just go and play,

Benekruku:
Make una finish the loot for Atiku hand, abeg

He can NEVER become the President of Nigeria

ericsmith:





How reliable is an account or site after it as been hacked, then secondly how can you seek legal justification for what the law does not even recognised .... hacking inec server compromises its credibility after
proofing there is an inec server in court is the same as proofing voodoo or juju in court . regardless of who we want or support the fact remains the electoral act has no provision for electronic transmission of results .
lemme ask you , do you think all these lawyers & judges donn't know their is voodoo /charm but why do they fame ignorance in court

Esseite:
Atiku reeling out facts and Video evidences with utmost calm...

The Electronic backup was meant to be an attestation to the result collated manually, why do the results differ?

ogmask:


Reserve your para for the right time. The court victory go sweet me as e dey pain you. Nor be here we dey. I go remind you then. Mkpi...

Excuzeme:


You guys just bandy words around without examining the REAL MEANING!

"Incontrovertible evidence" means evidence that cannot be DENIED or CONFRONTED in any way!

The basis of Atiku's legal challenge is FAULTY , NUL and VOID.
It is trite in law that 'You cant BUILD SOMETHING on NOTHING".

Any legal challenge to Buhari's victory based on ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION oF RESULTS, is ILLEGAL (Section 10 of the Electoral Act 2010), UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND THEREFORE NULL AND VOID.
It is as simple as that. Its a "technicality".

Recall: the INEC CHAIRMAN said the Results WOULD NOT be TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY, even before the election was consducted!
Also, INEC Server was Shut down and OFFLINE throughtout the elections.

The reason the INEC Server was put OFFLINE and switched-off was because the Electoral Act 2010 forbade INEC from transmitting ANY RESULT electronically!
Any INEC staff that does so, will even be committing an "electoral Act offense" because the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) forbid it.

I actually played a very crucial role on behalf of INEC, in the past election....and that is why l can confidently tell you, from the "Position of Law", why no attempt can be successfully made, to validate this Presidential election, based on card reader transmission of results.

Everything YOU are saying, is just chatter, from the camp of an Atiku who is desperate to become President of cameroun
before you argue further, go and read the 2010 Electoral Act that guided the just concluded election and specifically focus on what it say about use of card reader, vis-a-vis transmission of results.

Read it here from the INEC Chairman himself: https://www./2018/12/11/card-readers-will-be-used-in-2019-elections-inec-chairman-confirms/
http://www.topnewsmagazines.com/inec-to-deploy-manual-transmission-of-results-in-2019-elections/

The import of these is that if Buhari has signed the 2019 amended Electoral Act, it would have made ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION RESULT legal but that amendment was not signed and did not become Law!
But Card readers where still used for accreditation, as enshrined in law.

A thousand IBM, Microsoft, Apple and facebook + Twitter all roled into one, cannot change the Electoral Act 2010, which forbade the TRANSMISSION of RESULTS BY ELECTRONIC MEANS and any claim based on such ILLEGALITY, will remain illegal, null and void.
Atiku has lost completely on that ground. Bookmark this post and return to it after the tribunal has make its decision final.

FreelanceRebel:


The difference shows that Both Atiku and Buhari share all the votes, while other candidates got zeros.

Which one did you believe?

Excuzeme:


People like you are just noise-makers, you dont have intellect and you dont think logically!
Even to read, you cannot read but when things turn against you, it is then that the song will change to 'marginalisation and with-hunting'!


- Answer these Questions honestly and the result of Atikus' tribunal quest will stare you in the face:

1.) Can a Judge give you a Positive verdict, for an Act that is ILLEGAL under the Law or an Act that is UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

2.) Which Law guided the 2019 Presidential Elections?

3.) Does the Law (Electoral Act) which operated the 2019 Presidential elections, ALLOW for the Transmission of Election Results, ELECTRONICALLY?
4.) If 'Election Results' where transmitted electronically, as Atiku is relying on, can such result be VALID and relied upon, to give him a mandate?

These are the summary of the TRUTH tha will invalidate the whole bruhaha that Atiku's lawyer will not tell him because they want to eat his money as much as is possible and you Wailers want to push him over the Cliff into a Pit in Cameroun.

Esseite:


All results from every political party are in that server since the PO's claimed to have inputed them.. Atiku may have only singled out that of him and Buhari.

id911:


Reserve your endless epistle for the court to decide and stop defending fraud

Benekruku:
Make una finish the loot for Atiku hand, abeg

He can NEVER become the President of Nigeria

post=77822186:
Good development.........


CONFIRM!
You are so on point bro!

Benekruku:










You guys watch too much of cartoons

Sane Nigerians know better. Y’all be shocked.

Now you believe so much in impossibilities

Jowanson:



You will be so shocked... Do you think the lawyers that Atiku has assembled are dumb? You think they do not know the law and all it's loopholes?
And you think they did not look into all the matters that will arise in this tribunal before going to the courts?

And you think they did not study the electoral acts properly?

You will be so shocked as to how this case will turn out in favour of Atiku. For once, let us allow the truth to prevail..

Atiku's lawyers are there to quote the necessary laws to back up their claims. That is why they are there....

Why is INEC and APC jittery? Rather than defending very well, they are springing up comedy everywhere...even citing a statement made by Nnamdi KANU as a defence statement.... how childish!

Atiku won this election at the polling units! Form EC8A!

id911:



You're too ignorant for me to waste my time on. Don't assume you know more than the highly learned and extremely competent legal team assembled by Atiku. I understand you must defend your pay masters but you must do it conscientiously

Jowanson:



So the instructions given to those POs and with all the evidences that showed that the results were indeed transmitted to the servers will amount to null? Is that what you are trying to say because the electoral law did not approve it? Then who are those that gave those POs the directive to do so?

And you feel with so many evidences portraying the facts that the elections were rigged will not be in favour of Atiku? Alright...bookmark this too..let's watch and see! Already APC and Inec are jittery.

People just don't want the truth to prevail!

Atiku and his team did do their due diligence before coming to the tribunal and you think they never thought about this so called technicalities and ways to counter it? You will be so shocked soon..

You cannot TRANSMIT ANYTHING to a Server that is OFFLINE and POWERED DOWN!
That should not be too difficult for all these Atiku-looters to comprehend now?

At the best case scenario, you SEND and it is NOT RECIEVED......which doesnot amount to a DELIVERY to the Server!

It is obvious that before the election, Atiku and PDP has paid some INEC staff to compromise this election.
It is those sort of staff that will go against the instruction of the INEC chairman and then come back to attempt to 'witness' against their employer!
INEC should do quick and weed out those sort of criminals from its staff roll.

id911:
There's an incontrovertible evidence Atiku won the election but INEC and APC connived to alter the results with utmost impunity to favour the ruling party. I urge the Atiku legal team to focus more on the electoral empire at the tribunal because INEC is now really confused on how to defend the electoral fraud esp on the server issue and the readiness of Atiku to call on IBM and Microsoft to testify and authenticate the results he submitted to the tribunal. honestly this is funny i was part of the ad hoc staff in the last election, and we were forced to transmit result on the card reader to the inec server before summiting result sheet, how these people are de
nying this things I can't understand oo
I wish them goodluck

Benekruku:
Make una finish the loot for Atiku hand, abeg

He can NEVER become the President of Nigeria

buhariguy:
i just tire Ooo,
someone broke or hack into my secret room and put things I'm unaware of, and the same thief is still claiming I have what I don't have in my secret room.

what a desperate generation is this?
arm rubber will still be claiming right.

ericsmith:





only those with decomposed dead brains will argue or think atiku won the election, if you sabi talk alway remember some pple are gud @ reasoning via reply.
In an election were carder reader was not 100% used across polling units ... how can inec servers present reliable & authentic results.
In areas where corpers/ad hoc could not even operate the device to authenticate voters and manual accreditation was opt for ... how will inec server account for those votes, how did atiku get a complete statement of results , can we dwell on a server results that disenfranchises manual accredited voters regardless of the fact it has no electoral act backing

Gunayo:
Your write up just showed that APC rigged the election.