na2016:


It takes a sound mind to understand what I wrote. Go check yourself. I am only having pity for Harry.

Ladycewhy:
diluted ? Lol and who then get to tell you how dilluted it has be for a mixed person to be referred to as white? You or the white man?

jedisco:


Bother with checking yourself. No mortal has such power over the life and destiny of another. Don't be deluded...their future does not lie in your hand.

salford1:

All those press release are just for show to appease the public. Do people really think the Queen and Prince Charles will cut off their blood (Harry And Archie)? Impossible.

The family is just on vacation as far as they are concerned. They are the real Omo baba olowo

Ladycewhy:
Only sadists will want that. . See how they have been prophesying negativity to the couple as if na Harry make den elect buhari. . Since he is not Nigerian they cant say Megan charmed him ,lol

midnighter:


You asked a question and I'm just answering you as to where the perception comes from

salford1:

eyinjuege:


You are very correct.
My family has several stories to tell. Mine still miles better than my husband's. Some things are so unbelievable and mind numbing...
One thing with the British is they are masters at vendetta. All done within the confines of the law. You need to be born and raised British to match them at their games for you will gallantly lose.
Very passive aggressive. Masters at it, with a fake smile too

Ladycewhy:
perception palnted by the white man. I wont be surprised if little Archie is classified as black

AreaFada2:

That's exactly true. Most over 55 grew up when overt racism was still very much around. And only very few are not biased to some extent. But they can camouflage it very nicely. They have centuries of practice. You must be quick in assessing them.

They also do not like it if you are too knowledgeable and you can school them. Even a barely literate one still wants to form for you as a black guy. The men even gossip more than the women. Their background gives a clue about who they are. Once you know who they are, then you know what to divulge to and what not to.

Best thing is to remain mysterious to them than be predictable. But be professional and ensure you do your duties to the highest standard daily. Mutual respect should generally be your aim, not necessarily to be liked. Certainly do not be needy for them to like you. That way you can get to your destination without having to lick arse or gossip or assassinate anyone's character.

na2016:


Your thought! Unfortunately, life doesn't work that way. Soon you will hear of a crack between those two. When she does have anybody to attack and dissociate herself from, it will b the husband

crackkhaus:

At least, trying to please them would have scored her some points.

Ladycewhy:
make i join you laugh jor .

midnighter:


He is classified as mixed-race or mixed heritage, as is Meghan.

Anyway maybe I misunderstood up your intention, I thought you just wanted to know where the terminology came from.

salford1:

Drops mic

salford1:

Exactly. She has flaws too, but is that now a justification for them to keep bullying her to the extent of involving their innocent child?
They left out Harry out if their bad and gutter reporting. They only started attacking Harry too after he called it quits.
These attacks has been ongoing since 2016 not long after they started dating. The guy has begged several times but the tabloids seems to be on an evil mission

crackkhaus:

Surely you must realize that when people don't like you, it really won't matter if you're doing nothing wrong, they would still find a way to make you look bad.

The bias against Meghan was watered by none other but herself. You can see one of the articles you posted called her 'dictatorial', they may not be far from the truth.

I followed the whole ruckus leading up to their wedding in 2018 up until the wedding itself. You should not take my word for it though, you could make some findings on your own regarding just how much she tried to break almost every protocol regarding how the wedding should go.
A lot of things were changed/altered just to accommodate her preferences - from the flower choices, to the aisle leading up to the alter that was made wider because it's what she wanted, etc.. There was a lot more which I can't even recall off the top of my head.

Now no one is saying she couldn't have creative control over her own wedding, but when you marry into a monarchy that has a certain way of doing things in keeping with age-long traditions as old as her own ancestors, then she probably should have simmered down a little. She got what she wanted most of the time because the monarchy were happy enough to make Diana's little boy happy, but she took it too far and got used to it.
After the wedding, she kept trying to get them to do things her way and most of the time she would get it, but guess what, the British people only resented her for it because she was now effectually implying that their ways of doing things was not good enough for her, her own way was better...it wasn't just an emotional bride trying to make her wedding day perfect anymore, this was a woman who had no respect for the Monarchy and its ways. She confirmed what they already suspected and gave oxygen and water to the bias already working against her. And to make it worse, she was not even that big a celebrity in Hollywood in the first place.

This kind of resentment will obviously make them troll her at every given opportunity...no one holds a grudge more than the British.

If say, a single never divorced well brought-up Beyoncé (still black and American) was the one who married into the royal family, she may even get a softer landing than Meghan. If a Beyoncé DIL wanted the Queen MIL to dance single ladies inside Buckingham Palace, she may have gotten away with it, just because she is a Beyoncé. Get my point?

Meghan already had everything working against her from the start - previous failed marriage, dysfunctional family set-up, being biracial, and an American actress (not even an A-list, which may have been a plus). The least she could have done to warm her way into the hearts and minds of the British people, is to at least appear that she gave a shit about the way things are done.

I'm NOT sorry to type this, but I will because it is what it is:
Meghan did not do Windsor a favor by marrying Harry, Windsor in fact did her a favor by allowing her become a part of their family and she should have acted accordingly and not take a mile when given an inch.

It's what it is.

crackkhaus:

Surely you must realize that when people don't like you, it really won't matter if you're doing nothing wrong, they would still find a way to make you look bad.

The bias against Meghan was watered by none other but herself. You can see one of the articles you posted called her 'dictatorial', they may not be far from the truth.

I followed the whole ruckus leading up to their wedding in 2018 up until the wedding itself. You should not take my word for it though, you could make some findings on your own regarding just how much she tried to break almost every protocol regarding how the wedding should go.
A lot of things were changed/altered just to accommodate her preferences - from the flower choices, to the aisle leading up to the alter that was made wider because it's what she wanted, etc.. There was a lot more which I can't even recall off the top of my head.

Now no one is saying she couldn't have creative control over her own wedding, but when you marry into a monarchy that has a certain way of doing things in keeping with age-long traditions as old as her own ancestors, then she probably should have simmered down a little. She got what she wanted most of the time because the monarchy were happy enough to make Diana's little boy happy, but she took it too far and got used to it.
After the wedding, she kept trying to get them to do things her way and most of the time she would get it, but guess what, the British people only resented her for it because she was now effectually implying that their ways of doing things was not good enough for her, her own way was better...it wasn't just an emotional bride trying to make her wedding day perfect anymore, this was a woman who had no respect for the Monarchy and its ways. She confirmed what they already suspected and gave oxygen and water to the bias already working against her. And to make it worse, she was not even that big a celebrity in Hollywood in the first place.

This kind of resentment will obviously make them troll her at every given opportunity...no one holds a grudge more than the British.

If say, a single never divorced well brought-up Beyoncé (still black and American) was the one who married into the royal family, she may even get a softer landing than Meghan. If a Beyoncé DIL wanted the Queen MIL to dance single ladies inside Buckingham Palace, she may have gotten away with it, just because she is a Beyoncé. Get my point?

Meghan already had everything working against her from the start - previous failed marriage, dysfunctional family set-up, being biracial, and an American actress (not even an A-list, which may have been a plus). The least she could have done to warm her way into the hearts and minds of the British people, is to at least appear that she gave a shit about the way things are done.

I'm NOT sorry to type this, but I will because it is what it is:
Meghan did not do Windsor a favor by marrying Harry, Windsor in fact did her a favor by allowing her become a part of their family and she should have acted accordingly and not take a mile when given an inch.

It's what it is.

crackkhaus:

Surely you must realize that when people don't like you, it really won't matter if you're doing nothing wrong, they would still find a way to make you look bad.

The bias against Meghan was watered by none other but herself. You can see one of the articles you posted called her 'dictatorial', they may not be far from the truth.

I followed the whole ruckus leading up to their wedding in 2018 up until the wedding itself. You should not take my word for it though, you could make some findings on your own regarding just how much she tried to break almost every protocol regarding how the wedding should go.
A lot of things were changed/altered just to accommodate her preferences - from the flower choices, to the aisle leading up to the alter that was made wider because it's what she wanted, etc.. There was a lot more which I can't even recall off the top of my head.

Now no one is saying she couldn't have creative control over her own wedding, but when you marry into a monarchy that has a certain way of doing things in keeping with age-long traditions as old as her own ancestors, then she probably should have simmered down a little. She got what she wanted most of the time because the monarchy were happy enough to make Diana's little boy happy, but she took it too far and got used to it.
After the wedding, she kept trying to get them to do things her way and most of the time she would get it, but guess what, the British people only resented her for it because she was now effectually implying that their ways of doing things was not good enough for her, her own way was better...it wasn't just an emotional bride trying to make her wedding day perfect anymore, this was a woman who had no respect for the Monarchy and its ways. She confirmed what they already suspected and gave oxygen and water to the bias already working against her. And to make it worse, she was not even that big a celebrity in Hollywood in the first place.

This kind of resentment will obviously make them troll her at every given opportunity...no one holds a grudge more than the British.

If say, a single never divorced well brought-up Beyoncé (still black and American) was the one who married into the royal family, she may even get a softer landing than Meghan. If a Beyoncé DIL wanted the Queen MIL to dance single ladies inside Buckingham Palace, she may have gotten away with it, just because she is a Beyoncé. Get my point?

Meghan already had everything working against her from the start - previous failed marriage, dysfunctional family set-up, being biracial, and an American actress (not even an A-list, which may have been a plus). The least she could have done to warm her way into the hearts and minds of the British people, is to at least appear that she gave a shit about the way things are done.

I'm NOT sorry to type this, but I will because it is what it is:
Meghan did not do Windsor a favor by marrying Harry, Windsor in fact did her a favor by allowing her become a part of their family and she should have acted accordingly and not take a mile when given an inch.

It's what it is.

Ladycewhy:
The Nigerian man is misogynistic and sexist, they would have slept better if Megan left the palace without Harry and little Archie.

When a man supports his wife and there is harmony between the couple,its either his wife charmed him or the man is a weakling so says Nigerian men.

crackkhaus:

Surely you must realize that when people don't like you, it really won't matter if you're doing nothing wrong, they would still find a way to make you look bad.

The bias against Meghan was watered by none other but herself. You can see one of the articles you posted called her 'dictatorial', they may not be far from the truth.

I followed the whole ruckus leading up to their wedding in 2018 up until the wedding itself. You should not take my word for it though, you could make some findings on your own regarding just how much she tried to break almost every protocol regarding how the wedding should go.
A lot of things were changed/altered just to accommodate her preferences - from the flower choices, to the aisle leading up to the alter that was made wider because it's what she wanted, etc.. There was a lot more which I can't even recall off the top of my head.

Now no one is saying she couldn't have creative control over her own wedding, but when you marry into a monarchy that has a certain way of doing things in keeping with age-long traditions as old as her own ancestors, then she probably should have simmered down a little. She got what she wanted most of the time because the monarchy were happy enough to make Diana's little boy happy, but she took it too far and got used to it.
After the wedding, she kept trying to get them to do things her way and most of the time she would get it, but guess what, the British people only resented her for it because she was now effectually implying that their ways of doing things was not good enough for her, her own way was better...it wasn't just an emotional bride trying to make her wedding day perfect anymore, this was a woman who had no respect for the Monarchy and its ways. She confirmed what they already suspected and gave oxygen and water to the bias already working against her. And to make it worse, she was not even that big a celebrity in Hollywood in the first place.

This kind of resentment will obviously make them troll her at every given opportunity...no one holds a grudge more than the British.

If say, a single never divorced well brought-up Beyoncé (still black and American) was the one who married into the royal family, she may even get a softer landing than Meghan. If a Beyoncé DIL wanted the Queen MIL to dance single ladies inside Buckingham Palace, she may have gotten away with it, just because she is a Beyoncé. Get my point?

Meghan already had everything working against her from the start - previous failed marriage, dysfunctional family set-up, being biracial, and an American actress (not even an A-list, which may have been a plus). The least she could have done to warm her way into the hearts and minds of the British people, is to at least appear that she gave a shit about the way things are done.

I'm NOT sorry to type this, but I will because it is what it is:
Meghan did not do Windsor a favor by marrying Harry, Windsor in fact did her a favor by allowing her become a part of their family and she should have acted accordingly and not take a mile when given an inch.

It's what it is.

sorepco:
As for those saying Meghan made a prince to leave his throne. Note that Harry has always wanted a life away from the monarchy. Even before he met Meghan!

sorepco:
What ub u wrote up here made some sense. But on the flip side look at it this way.
Even before prince Harry met Meghan he had sworn that his future wife shall not be maltreated and mistreated like his dead mother princess Diana!
So to him he is doing all to protect his bride from a system that eventually lead to his mother's death.
As for those saying Meghan made a prince to leave his throne. Note that Harry has always wanted a life away from the monarchy. Even before he met Meghan!

For all we even know the op nite be a white British embassy employee pretending to Nigerian! I don't trust the Brits. They can do and undo!

Ladycewhy:
i had to laugh at the bolded ,so he is black then if we follow your first analogy

Ladycewhy:
They made these classifications and now want to bend the rules with mixed people cos they doesn't want "browning " of their superior race

baby124:

Bukatyne, she’s an actress. He’s hustling jobs for her. He’s a great husband. They have moved on and are looking towards their future as a couple. Be happy for them.

cococandy:
You’re not related to her. So all what you typed her is stuff you don’t actually know for real.

Imagine if folks who have never met you for once in their lives or even if they have, they don’t even really know you, decide to go on the internet and spread stories about you as if they were proven facts? Did you live with them know she destroyed her the relationship?

Or you’re echoing the things you’ve heard that suit your prejudices?

Like I said you will believe what you want based on what you have pre-decided to believe

salford1:

I will rather they say it to my face. We scatter everything then Rearrange/rebuild . But the British, very cunning. They would downplay their racism and use words like bigot, unconscious bias and all other BS. How can you solve a problem when you don't even believe or acknowledge that the problem exists?

Ladycewhy:
I thought i was the only one that shared this line of thought. She is more white than black, but racists will say she is black.

RunThins:


I think you totally missed the point! Or you are one of those "victim of 400 years of conditioning. The man has programmed my conditioning. Even my conditioning has been conditioned.”(Chameleon Street by Wendell B. Harris). I would like to believe it's the former! All that is is nothing but nuance racism, everyone who's lived, studied or worked in the west have experienced it one way or the other. Go ask around in the fortune 500 corporate world, a Caucasian is smart and confidence, while a black man is uppity and headstrong for having the same qualities. Re-read those headlines and what you see are two people doing the same thing, but one is said to be "smart and confidence" and the other "arrogant and disrespectful". The reason for that is nothing but racism; those headlines above show nothing but the racism of the British (Caucasians in general) people.

And if the latter of the two reasons; well I truly feel sorry for you! Reason being you are probably an "Uncle Ruckus" from the boondocks! You hate yourself, you have accepted the "essence" of the black race from the very racist Caucasian distillery. You are probably one of those people that is more "oyinbo than the oyinbos".You are probably in the category of people that sees little Jamal's tantrum as violent acts and should be monitored, while little Billy's tantrum is nothing but just that! I feel sorry for you because there's nothing anyone can do to help someone like you, you live your life in perceptual fear--fear of being judged, that you are behaving like a black man, you are self conscious, you are aware of the fact that you are being watched and being held to a higher standard just for the fact that you are black. And you hold every other black man to this standard dictated by the white man, not for everybody but just for the black race. And you get mad at them for giving the black race a bad name, whenever they choose to live freely, because that's the only way to live! New Hampshire state motto: Live Free or Die!!
And that my friend is the American way! To hell with the British and their nuance racism, because the only way we live is free or dead!

Damsonkc:


The mistake we make is to run along with things we read on the internet as fact. Everything you said she did wrong were things the press told you she did wrong. You were not there. You didn’t see her. You don’t know her personally. You also saw clearly that this very same press is very biased against her but you still go with them for whatever reason. Lol. What you think you know about her is simply what someone who doesn’t like her wanted you to know about her.