backbone503:
God will always be God!

You're just an idiot... I don't have much to say

Dude stop arguing and making yourself appear foolish. You have a smartphone google journeymen in boxing and how much they get paid

Boxing is based on hype (promotion is the professional term) You build a fighter by creating ideal records and resumés and it is what every boxer does. Not necessarily the boxers but what their team does for them so they don’t take fights they feel would hamper their records. Get it? They don’t challenge Wilder’s high KO and win record because it is the sport and he actually fought people (boxers? Yes but not contenders or aspiring contenders)

So when people say ‘padded records’ or Wilder fights ‘nobodies’ or ‘tomato cans’ it isn’t literal because they actually fought recognized professional boxers. You only get offended by these terms only when you know little about the sport.

Start with the google search

Hope you understand why Wilder and his team never thought about fighting any of the Klitschkos even though he was still building records at the time but in contrast AJ took a fight against the former unified champ Wlad in his 19th fight something very unusual in boxing nowadays.

Wonder why Fury or Ortiz thanks Wilder? it is for giving them the fight because the sport is usually about avoiding people that could knock you out of the park. So you should know why Wilder never fought Joshua or Parker or any of the guys Joshua was fighting or Fury avoiding the Klitschko rematch or why Pacqiao vs Mayweather lingered on for years... too many

lexy2014:


D problem with some of u is that u push ur arrogance out b4 making comments but in end, u end up saying nothing of significance. I didn't make assertions. I asked simple questions. Instead answering d questions, u are trying tell me u have a longer diick. D questions are this: Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

Reeberry:
Because Fury defeated him he can't fight? Do you people have brain at all?

Do u have sense at all.. do u watch boxing ?
Wilder has a strong right punch with or without boxing, he was born with a strong right arm, that doesn't mean he is a good boxer. All his TKO are based on his right punch. Zero technique zero foot walk
If he faced any technical boxer he will continue to lose.
Moreover these r the weakest set of heavyweights I have ever seen

fairfora:
ok. I understand. Face destruction in boxing isn't new and it further proves how strong the opposition is . Joshua that I know is a careful and intelligent fighter. He's fond of always protecting his face. If you watched his previous fights you'd agree with me on this. Ruiz is a destroyer and for Joshua to still have clean face at the end of each of the 2 fights, he's a pro indeed. I hope you saw how he destroyed ruiz face in the rematch. AJ would give fury a nice treat. All he needs do is rush his head with jabs and he would faint. That's his weakpoint and he knows this . Unfortunately, wilder failed to take advantage of this. Fury has a long history of mental ilness

Yet a mad man was allowed to fight? What a funny world

judedwriter:


Wilder was simply unlucky that night. By record, he has more wins and TKO's than fury.

Fury's first KO damaged wilder's eardrum and reduced his stamina and balance for the 7 round match.

The doc said it wasn't d eardrum just a cut in his ear. Boxing is alot more than having a strong punch. That's what Wilder doesn't know, he has been knocking out weak boxers till now

exposition:
This guy where drop Braun strauman for WWE with just one punch!
I swear that Wilder no dey fear person!

stupidity is when you think a boxer can defeat a 800 pounds (350kg) deadweight lifting champion in a wrestling match

exposition:
This guy where drop Braun strauman for WWE with just one punch!
I swear that Wilder no dey fear person!

Never believe everything that happens in the WWE ring. They are full of scripts

exposition:
This guy where drop Braun strauman for WWE with just one punch!
I swear that Wilder no dey fear person!

AJ wey b indomie nkor 4 were diz two dey...no b 2 retire like mayweather sure pass

I feel I can fight and win Fury 2

lexy2014:


What has other sports and d issue of journeymen got to do with d question I asked?

Stop arguing boxing here, you know little about it.

Wilder racked up wins fighting lowly rated fighter that could be overwhelmed using his powerful right hand.

Google the list of fighters he's fought and their rankings.

Wilder wanted to move up by fighting top boxers that were past their prime e.g. Ortiz (Good but aging) almost got beaten till his right floored Ortiz.

Tried the same with Fury ( Washed up, overweight, depressed, mental issues ) and it almost worked for him again.......till Fury/Wilder 2.

See how a technical boxer toyed with Wilder, beating him like a baby....just avoid that big right and top 20 boxers will beat him silly.

Andy Ruiz jr (A real pound for pound brawler) might even shock Wilder and knock him out

I agree totally with your informed analysis. Fury savaged Wilder beyond the recognition and belief of the boxing world.

uunwanaobong3:
This wasn't a boxing match at all, this was extreme savagery, he was even licking wilders blood..... He was giving wilder his 250 pounds weight to carry, he was rough handling, brutallizing, bullying and toying with Wilder, he wanted to deafen and bind Wilder, blood was coming out from everyway from Wilder body including ear and mouth.... Infact the coach did the right thing by stopping the fight at round 7, believe me fury would have sent Wilder to the hospital in very emergency critical life threatening condition. That was a boxing match but a game of death

ba7man:
Stop arguing boxing here, you know little about it.

Wilder racked up wins fighting lowly rated fighter that could be overwhelmed using his powerful right hand.

Google the list of fighters he's fought and their rankings.

Wilder wanted to move up by fighting top boxers that were past their prime e.g. Ortiz (Good but aging) almost got beaten till his right floored Ortiz.

Tried the same with Fury ( Washed up, overweight, depressed, mental issues ) and it almost worked for him again.......till Fury/Wilder 2.

See how a technical boxer toyed with Wilder, beating him like a baby....just avoid that big right and top 20 boxers will beat him silly.

Andy Ruiz jr (A real pound for pound brawler) might even shock Wilder and knock him out

Do u no d difference between asking questions and arguing? To ask questions means to inquire about a subject in order to get clarification. To argue on d other hand means to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition or opinion. So can u pls show me d argument? Obviously, am dealing with someone who doesn't even understand basic and fundamrntal English language.

This was d question to which u sent ur epistle:

lexy2014:


What has other sports and d issue of journeymen got to do with d question I asked?

U wrote an epistle, quite irrelevant with what I asked.

These are d other question:
"Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

So far u just rambling on issues that I didn't ask u about

Dont let me call you a failure...Read what you wrote again. I see no sense in it. you mean those he fought in the past are Amateurs. You better comot here. you are talking nonsense. Amateur ko Light flyweight ni......

Pedagogueeye:
boxing fan wilder with 40 wins, who did he fight. His fight with Fury is his major fight, fighting amateurs and winning 40 doesn't make you a true boxer

CptCharlesVane:
Dude stop arguing and making yourself appear foolish. You have a smartphone google journeymen in boxing and how much they get paid

Boxing is based on hype (promotion is the professional term) You build a fighter by creating ideal records and resumés and it is what every boxer does. Not necessarily the boxers but what their team does for them so they don’t take fights they feel would hamper their records. Get it? They don’t challenge Wilder’s high KO and win record because it is the sport and he actually fought people (boxers? Yes but not contenders or aspiring contenders)

So when people say ‘padded records’ or Wilder fights ‘nobodies’ or ‘tomato cans’ it isn’t literal because they actually fought recognized professional boxers. You only get offended by these terms only when you know little about the sport.

Start with the google search

Hope you understand why Wilder and his team never thought about fighting any of the Klitschkos even though he was still building records at the time but in contrast AJ took a fight against the former unified champ Wlad in his 19th fight something very unusual in boxing nowadays.

Wonder why Fury or Ortiz thanks Wilder? it is for giving them the fight because the sport is usually about avoiding people that could knock you out of the park. So you should know why Wilder never fought Joshua or Parker or any of the guys Joshua was fighting or Fury avoiding the Klitschko rematch or why Pacqiao vs Mayweather lingered on for years... too many

Oga, what is an argument and what is a question? Are they d same thing? u can't even differentiate between an argument and a question. Who is now being foolish? When u loose sight of what is fundamental, u start displaying arrogance that is uncalled for. U are saying things that I didn't ask u. If u don't no d answers to what I asked, there's no shame in it. But u trying to show that u no and am not interested in ur false arrogance.

These are d questions I asked:

"What has other sports and d issue of journeymen got to do with d question I asked?"

Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

Even with ur access to Google, u can't answer because u can't think outside of Google. As a professor of boxing, d floor is yours. Answer d simple questions

zicoisaac:
Dont let me call you a failure...Read what you wrote again. I see no sense in it. you mean those he fought in the past are Amateurs. You better comot here. you are talking nonsense. Amateur ko Light flyweight ni......

ok, enjoy your knowledge

If you cannot find the responses to the questions you had from what I’ve written, then I’m sorry, I cannot help with your comprehension.

What is the arrogance you talk about when you’re the only one asking the same questions different commenters continue to respond to but hey! You know better about boxing and Wilder’s record right? Why haven’t other boxers disputed it?

lexy2014:


Oga, what is an argument and what is a question? Are they d same thing? u can't even differentiate between an argument and a question. Who is now being foolish? When u loose sight of what is fundamental, u start displaying arrogance that is uncalled for. U are saying things that I didn't ask u. If u don't no d answers to what I asked, there's no shame in it. But u trying to show that u no and am not interested in ur false arrogance.

These are d questions I asked:

"What has other sports and d issue of journeymen got to do with d question I asked?"

Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

Even with ur access to Google, u can't answer because u can't think outside of Google. As a professor of boxing, d floor is yours. Answer d simple questions

Just logged on to see all the bashing!because of my post on Braun strowman and fury!
Someone even called me stupid!
Broda and sister na joke I dey o!

JastSiryin:
You're just an idiot... I don't have much to say

You're a disgrace, not only to your family and kindred, but also to your ancestors. Hence, you're not deserving of any word from me. I channel my blame on the fool that begot you. He should have used a condom, nylon or just had pulled out.

miketayo:


Do u have sense at all.. do u watch boxing ?
Wilder has a strong right punch with or without boxing, he was born with a strong right arm, that doesn't mean he is a good boxer. All his TKO are based on his right punch. Zero technique zero foot walk
If he faced any technical boxer he will continue to lose.
Moreover these r the weakest set of heavyweights I have ever seen

Fūck off, idiot. This same old shït people say about him is what you are saying here again. You have zero sense. Come up with a different shït.

hey furry want kill person oo

backbone503:
God will always be God!

Anybody that challenges God always get disgraced

eduman365:


WWE is scripted oga...

If he can do it unscripted, is it scripted he can't do it?

jcmaiah:
Anybody that challenges God always get disgraced

Naso, my brother. I just wish Wilder wasn't humiliated that way.

Reeberry:
Fūck off, idiot. This same old shït people say about him is what you are saying here again. You have zero sense. Come up with a different shït.

Mumu there are fundamentals to every sport, he doesn't have boxing fundamentals, strong right arm won't work forever

CptCharlesVane:
If you cannot find the responses to the questions you had from what I’ve written, then I’m sorry, I cannot help with your comprehension.

What is the arrogance you talk about when you’re the only one asking the same questions different commenters continue to respond to but hey! You know better about boxing and Wilder’s record right? Why haven’t other boxers disputed it?

If u can't differentiate between an argument and a question, how then do u want to help me with my comprehension when u are having ur own comprehension issues? Isn't that misplaced arrogance? If u don't no d difference between two small English words, then there's a possibility of u writing off point but thinking u are on point.

On two occasions, u said that I nothing about boxing. For u to have said so, u mean u no more than me. I have no intention of proving u right or wrong as this isnt a contest. But according to u:

CptCharlesVane:

What is the arrogance you talk about when you’re the only one asking the same questions different commenters continue to respond to but hey!

Pls what is d relationship between arrogance and me asking d same questions? Once again, off point. Am sure u see why u can't convince me

backbone503:


You're a disgrace, not only to your family and kindred, but also to your ancestors. Hence, you're not deserving of any word from me. I channel my blame on the fool that begot you. He should have used a condom, nylon or just had pulled out.

Errrr...You're still an idiot, nothing's gonna change that

lexy2014:


Do u no d difference between asking questions and arguing? To ask questions means to inquire about a subject in order to get clarification. To argue on d other hand means to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition or opinion. So can u pls show me d argument? Obviously, am dealing with someone who doesn't even understand basic and fundamrntal English language.

This was d question to which u sent ur epistle:


U wrote an epistle, quite irrelevant with what I asked.

These are d other question:
"Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

So far u just rambling on issues that I didn't ask u about

You're talking too much for a topic you know little about.

Keep defending your ignorance while you wallow in it.

This was expected. I always knew fury would win

ba7man:
You're talking too much for a topic you know little about.

Keep defending your ignorance while you wallow in it.

Pls read again.

lexy2014:


Do u no d difference between asking questions and arguing? To ask questions means to inquire about a subject in order to get clarification. To argue on d other hand means to invent and offer reasons to support or overthrow a proposition or opinion. So can u pls show me d argument? Obviously, am dealing with someone who doesn't even understand basic and fundamrntal English language.

This was d question to which u sent ur epistle:

"What has other sports and d issue of journeymen got to do with d question I asked?"
U wrote an epistle, quite irrelevant with what I asked.

These are d other question which with all ur knowledge u disgracefully can't answer:

"Y has Wilders "padded records" not been contested by any other boxer and pressed for his disqualification? How come all world governing boxing organizations recognise these "padded records"?

So far u just rambling on issues that I didn't ask u about

miketayo:


Mumu there are fundamentals to every sport, he doesn't have boxing fundamentals, strong right arm won't work forever

Still same old shït from a fool.