How much damages did he pay for assaulting that innocent journalist

ENU NJA WAYA, WETIN DEY?

I am not a lawyer and I think Femi has no case. Rather, the journalist should be the one suing his ass and demanding a public apology over the, 'You must be very stupid' outburst by Kayode.

JESTER!

CLOWN!

Issoryt

N6 billion . Aw mush b the newspaper wey dem dey sell na, haba

FFK Vs Nigeria Journalist and Media.

My opinion remains the question is the most stupid question ever.


Is more like asking a family man....sir who is sponsoring the feeding of your family


But funny enough to see how dumb and archaic the Nigeria journalism is....NONE OF THEM ASKED FEMI ADESINA IN ALL HIS CHARTS ON INTERVIEWS WITH JOURNALIST...WHY IS IT THAT OUR PRESIDENT CAN'T HAVE A PRESS CONFERENCE OR JOURNALIST CHART WITH US....IS IT MAYBE TRUE HE CAN'T ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT'S NOT ALREADY WRITTEN DOWN FOR HIM? THEN LETS KNOW IF THAT JOURNALIST WILL EVER ENTER ASO ROCK AGAIN


OR MAYBE SINCE THEY LACK PROFESSIONALISM why didn't they ask ORJI UZOR KALU: SIR SINCE YOU ARE EYEING PRESIDENTIAL RACE SHOULD NIGGERIANS BE WORRIED BECAUSE YOU WAS RECENTLY JAILED FOR LOOTING PUBLIC FUND EVEN THOUGH APPEAL COURT HAS CLEARED ALL ALLEGATIONS....LETS KNOW IF OUK HAS LONG OR SHORT FUSE



BUT AS BLACK AFRICANS WE THROW AWAY REASONING AND FLOW WITH WHAT EVER A LARGER NUMBER OF PEOPLE AGREED ON WITHOUT THINKING FOR OURSELVES

JUST BECAUSE EVERYBODY IS ON THE SIDE OF THE JOURNALIST DOESN'T MEAN THE JOURNALIST ASKED THE RIGHT QUESTION.... WHAT HAPPENED TO ASKING HIM HIS AIM FOR TOURING STATES

They should either prove it or pay for the defamation.

Sha collect the 6billion nd bless me abeg

Lol...... This guy self.





I welcome myself back from my ban on NL.

this man has no shame

emkz:
I do agree that the columnist used words that are damaging including calling FFK a "windbag and wankėr", and writing thus: "...his bohemian lifestyle while in the United Kingdom included an addiction to drugs for which he had to seek spiritual and physical rehabilitation in Ghana".

This is a slap on journalistic ethos by the writer and shouldn't have been passed by the Editor.

FFK, on the other hand, instigated this when he upbraided that poor journalist. As Chinue Achebe said I Arrows of God: "he who brings home ant-infested firewood should not be surprised when he is visited by lizards". FFK needs to go into sombre reflection and carefully re-examine how he treats people. He might win this case because the writer has no proof of FFK's drug addiction story, but he doesn't have to win it; he has to change for the good of all.

This.
I couldn't agree more, he wasn't right but the article seemed more libelous than anything. It read more like a gossip blog's post. I just hope for their sake that they have substantive proof.

He messed up and he apologized already, of what use is that article, it look like a setup after all , I guess FFK was right,
When I saw the article I was like , of what use is now the apology?
The bank rolling question was actually stupid, so FFK cannot pay for just one flight ticket to the first state of visit, be rest assure that his host would take care of him and arrange his next ticket for next state and the cycle continues like that, so the first ticket would definitely be what he paid for so far, politics has blocked some people's brain

Get rich or die try

Get rich or die trying

The pressman asked the question "who is bankrolling who" judging from the recent trips of FFK round the country especially the PDP states.He goes with a convoy in such trips and this means lota money.I expect a decent response from an Ivy league grad such as
1.No one is bankrolling me
2.The PDP state concerned foots the bill
3.It is self bankrolled by me
4.Next question please.

Period.

Amugbo Amukokaine , wetin make Buhari and Osinabjo sue you ?

6 billion naira ko, 6 billion shillings ni

Better still if give am 6 billion Biafran currency

Where s SDM here now? Has he said anything bout his buddy

You have sued for N6B and also calling for negotiation.

How does that work?

Does it mean that if you can arrive at a mid point, you will withdraw your case pronto?

Indeed, it seems FFK is damn broke.

I think he has a case.
The journalist couldn't possibly sue him - who measures what stupidity is or how can you objectively say what attribute qualifies someone as stupid?
But the spirit of the article was clearly to do more that condemn his outburst, it was defamatory. It just made vague accusations with no proofs and that is enough to sue for libel.

Is he now angry? Did they article lied

ppogba:
You have sued for N6B and also calling for negotiation.

How does that work?

Does it mean that if you can arrive at a mid point, you will withdraw your case pronto?

Indeed, it seems FFK is damn broke.

It stated that it was a pre-litigation letter.
Also:

The newspaper was given 14 days to comply or face legal action.

emkz:
I do agree that the columnist used words that are damaging including calling FFK a "windbag and wankėr", and writing thus: "...his bohemian lifestyle while in the United Kingdom included an addiction to drugs for which he had to seek spiritual and physical rehabilitation in Ghana".

This is a slap on journalistic ethos by the writer and shouldn't have been passed by the Editor.

FFK, on the other hand, instigated this when he upbraided that poor journalist. As Chinue Achebe said I Arrows of God: "he who brings home ant-infested firewood should not be surprised when he is visited by lizards". FFK needs to go into sombre reflection and carefully re-examine how he treats people. He might win this case because the writer has no proof of FFK's drug addiction story, but he doesn't have to win it; he has to change for the good of all.

The Editor is the writer. It's quite a nice read though. I'll suggest you should read the article. I'm with Daily Trust on this.

Na u call someone stupid, na u still want apology. U must be a drunkard

unchained mad dog,he dishes out insults and abusive words day and night claiming to be a saint ordinary simple question he can't tolerate it.ipob role mofel

emkz:
I do agree that the columnist used words that are damaging including calling FFK a "windbag and wankėr", and writing thus: "...his bohemian lifestyle while in the United Kingdom included an addiction to drugs for which he had to seek spiritual and physical rehabilitation in Ghana".

This is a slap on journalistic ethos by the writer and shouldn't have been passed by the Editor.

FFK, on the other hand, instigated this when he upbraided that poor journalist. As Chinue Achebe said I Arrows of God: "he who brings home ant-infested firewood should not be surprised when he is visited by lizards". FFK needs to go into sombre reflection and carefully re-examine how he treats people. He might win this case because the writer has no proof of FFK's drug addiction story, but he doesn't have to win it; he has to change for the good of all.

FFK drug addiction back then in the UK was common knowledge and the proof is everywhere.

Ffk u dey offside on this.