Check it out

very correct....

so insightful..

As it goes in a cycle, after hard times comes great men again...et voila!

It goes around like a hula hoop...


Just wondering what stage Nigeria is in now

MrBrownJay1:
As it goes in a cycle, after hard times comes great men again...et voila!

Logically, There are no strong, weak and good men.
The same men, different circumstances.
In order words, men do not change, circumstances change men.

A man will be strong in hard times, he will become weak in good times and the same weak man will become strong in hard times.

Bluezy13:

Logically, There are no strong, weak and good men.
The same men, different circumstances.
In order words, men do not change, circumstances change men.

A man will be strong in hard times, he will become weak in good times and the same weak man will become strong in hard times.

I beg to differ.... There are strong men out there who are lifting the weak ones, and vice versa. A strong man will always be a strong man, same goes for weak men. If you believe that weak men become strong during hard times then I fully disagree.

I Believe that during good times, strong men relax since they have no more work to do, thus leaving weak men in charge....aka the reason things go bad again.

MrBrownJay1:


I beg to differ.... There are strong men out there who are lifting the weak ones, and vice versa. A strong man will always be a strong man, same goes for weak men. If you believe that weak men become strong during hard times then I fully disagree.

I Believe that during good times, strong men relax since they have no more work to do, thus leaving weak men in charge....aka the reason things go bad again.

Necessity is the mother of invention, says a wise man.

A weak man, when pushed to the wall of hardship, will try to fight back hardship thereby becoming strong.
A strong man, when there is nothing to show strength on, with everything at his disposal, will become weak because he will not see any need to worry or strive to survive...and in this case, weakness and strength is circumstancial

Anyways, we are erroneous not to define weak, strong, good and hard in this context because these terms are subjectively individualistic. Hence, I wish not to debunk your opinion.
So, everybody is right in everybody's perspective.

Bluezy13:


Necessity is the mother of invention, says a wise man.

A weak man, when pushed to the wall of hardship, will [s]try to fight back hardship thereby becoming strong[/s] run with his tail between his legs.

A strong man, when there is nothing to show strength on, with everything at his disposal, will [s]become weak because he will not see any need to worry or strive to survive...and in this case, weakness is subjective[/s] rest while never losing his power/determination/strength..

FIXED

You are talking of strong and weak men as if it is somethings you can gain or lose like the flu....lol

MrBrownJay1:


FIXED

You are talking of strong and weak men as if it is somethings you can gain or lose like the flu....lol

I guess you were not taught that crossing a write-up is disrespectful.

I, however apologize for mistaking you for a reasonable fellow.

Bluezy13:
I guess you were not taught that crossing a write-up is disrespectful.

I, however apologize for mistaking you for a reasonable fellow.

My apologies, where I come from this is called CORRECTING someone...

my brothers what is going on here?

MrBrownJay1:


My apologies, where I come from this is called CORRECTING someone...

Then you are poorly groomed.

MrBrownJay1:


I beg to differ.... There are strong men out there who are lifting the weak ones, and vice versa. A strong man will always be a strong man, same goes for weak men. If you believe that weak men become strong during hard times then I fully disagree.

I Believe that during good times, strong men relax since they have no more work to do, thus leaving weak men in charge....aka the reason things go bad again.

Such Unreasonable comment. Believe me you know nothing.

Bluezy13:
Then you are poorly groomed.

Poorl groomed for correcting someone?!?!

MrBrownJay1:


Poorl groomed for correcting someone?!?!

"poorl' is a typical blunder in the context in which you used it.
It is correctly spelt "poorly"


That, my friend, is how to correct someone when there is actually an error.
Like I said; you are ill-mannered.

blackgold2018:
Such Unreasonable comment. Believe me you know nothing.

Absolutely nothing.
Unfortunately, he doesn't know that he knows nothing.

Bluezy13:


"poorl' is a typical blunder in the context in which you used it.
It is correctly spelt "poorly"

That, my friend, is how to correct someone when there is actually an error.
Like I said; you are ill-mannered.

So what you are saying is that it's ok for "you" to correct MY typos, but not for me to correct yours?!

MrBrownJay1:


So what you are saying is that it's ok for "you" to correct MY typos, but not for me to correct yours?!

It would have been okay if there was any "typo" for you to correct.

And it seems you skipped "punctuation marks" classes because you do use exclamation mark and interrogation mark unscrupulously.

Everyman has a weakness. Ordinary clash of egoes of two leaders can plunge nations into civil wars