Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,148,902 members, 7,802,927 topics. Date: Saturday, 20 April 2024 at 03:39 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It (31224 Views)
What Is The Logic Behind ''ingli-igbo'' Names? / Oduduwa Was Not Igbo Prince – Oluwo Of Iwo / Ikwerre Of Rivers, Ukwani And Ika Of Delta Are Not Igbo. Here Is Proof (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) ... (37) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 2:23pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gomojam: If you were benins using this insultive words on yorubas i will get a banned by a yoruba mod I can only say yorubas are coward |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:23pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11:We know him already He deceives no one but himself. 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:23pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
Just to clarify: there is no such thing as etymology for west african languages. Etymologie is the history of the written word, and the latter is a thing we didn't have until very recently. So there is no such thing as yoruba, Edo, igbo etymology ... Any paper claiming otherwise is a fraud. Anybody using etymology arguments is lying to your faces. Also, anybody using as argument: "what does that word mean in your language" is also either intellectualy deficient, either he is a concious liar. Our native dictionnaries are just as new as our written words. Let A be a word in our current dictionnary. Let B be the meaning we give to A today. Let C be the meaning our ancestors gave to A. There is no proof that B=C. Also, claims of missplellings in precolonial texts are quite illogical. Indeed may I remind you we didn't have a written language ? Our words and names didn't have spellings. So the various spellings emanating from various europeans speaking various languages are not missplellings. I can give you details of the first ooni of ife who changed his title from the format: "ooni of ife, sir adesoji" to the format "ooni of ife, oba adesoji" @areafada @samuk @gregyboy 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:26pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11:OK 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:29pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
The first ooni of ife to adopt the "oba" title in the format of his name was adesoji aderemi. All the other yoruba chiefs copied him. @areafada2 @samuk @gregyboy @valirex 2 Likes |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 2:34pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
So far in the course of this thread, the following retar.ded claims have been devastatingly debunked: (1) The retar.ded claim (by disgruntled Binis) that Yorubas began using the word “Oba” in the post-1930s. This has been debunked with written evidence of Yoruba usage from 1899, from 1897, from c.1867, from 1845, et al. (2) The retar.ded claim (by @samuk) that there exists some “600 years” old written evidence of Benin usage of the word “Oba”. This retar.ded claim is yet to be substantiated (even with an atom of evidence) despite more than 10 days (and still counting) of their torturous search. Instead, these disgruntled Binis were at best only able to demonstrate (from their own warped logic) that the Yorubas have an earlier written evidence — 1845 (Yoruba) Vs. 1867 (Bini). —————————————————— But what does it really mean that I was able to produce an 1845 written evidence and the Binis weren’t able to come even close to that ?? Well, it just simply means that the Binis weren’t able to come close to the Yorubas, despite their own bogus claim of wRiTteN eViDeNcE. Nothing more, nothing less! [I know I’m being too nice now]. To put the same question in other words: Does the comparative written evidence already provided really mean that the Binis began using this word only in the year 1867 — because that’s all they could provide ?? Funny enough, this line of warped reasoning is what the disgruntled Binis have been trailing. Should I play their game along with them? No, I’m Yoruba! To every sound and logically mind, such conclusion (based on available writing) is too obvious as a flawed reasoning and logical fallacy — even though I could have forced their own flawed reasoning down their throats. Such particular logical fallacy is know in analytical logic specifically by the name: argumentum ex silentio. ———————————————————— Having debunked their deluded claim of 1930s [see (1)]; having exposed @samuk’s fraud of “600 years” old writing [see (2)]; having exposed their inability to produce anything close to (let alone earlier than) the Yorubas’ [see (2)]; having debunked their warped logic of arguing from earlier written usage (despite the fact that it favours me); I now turn, at this point, to discussing the actual objective evidence for determining the indigenous ownership of a word — that is, the linguistic evidence. —————————————————————— The Argument: (I) If a word is in use in a particular language, but its literal meaning can not be meaningfully analyzed within that language; then such word does not originally belong to that language. Gbam! (II) The word “Ọba” (as used by the Binis for their monarch) does not have any literal meaning in the language of the Binis. (III) In conclusion, the word “Ọba” (as used by the Binis for their monarch) does not belong originally to the Bini language — In other words, it is a loanword. ———————————————————— The Evidence: An objective source of evidence for the meanings of Bini words is obviously and undoubtedly an authoritative dictionary of the Bini language itself. [This is not to be confused with a dictionary of the English language which simply features a paltry number of non-English words of widespread, global, popular usage — such as: “fufu”, “agbada”, “oba”, et al.] As such, recourse will now be made to a Bini-English Lexicon. This is so that the English readers here can access the written meanings which are attributed to the actual Bini words. One such example of an authoritative material for this purpose is the work entitled: “A Concise Dictionary of The Bini Language of Southern Nigeria” compiled by the professor of African Phonetics and Linguistics, Hans Melzian. ——————————————————— Under the entry “Ọba” (for which Professor Melzian used “ɔ” to represent “ọ“, in order to distinguish /o/ as in odd from /o/ as in old ); the following are some interesting observations from this Bini dictionary. (A) Unlike what the author did with virtually all other Bini words within the same dictionary, he did not give a literal meaning to this word — as I have expected. Rather, he simply describes the person whom the Binis refer to by this word. Interesting, isn’t it?! See embedded image below: www.nairaland.com/attachments/12754901_bb7fcaad09fc479498aedbb24cb57370_jpeg_jpeg80dbd02cb7ce1db81e998db7e161c38e (B) But more than that, the author (in fact) let the cat out of the bag. He revealed why this word could not have had a literal meaning in a dictionary of Bini language. Before I reveal his reason, it is important that one is acquainted with a few notations and abbreviations which he define in his work. Two examples of these are relevant to my discourse here, and they are: “Yor.” and “cf.” which he defines as: “Yoruba” and “etymological reference” respectively. See embedded image below: www.nairaland.com/attachments/12754902_541f22648c37485488282bea682c0e27_jpeg_jpegf272ec9b7e8de333789df15c524980aa In the light of this background, let’s then see what reason the author indicates as to why this word could have appeared without a literal meaning in the Bini dictionary. See embedded image below as highlighted on the top-right corner in continuation of the bottom-left corner. www.nairaland.com/attachments/12754903_7e31a3d03b7c407ab60e863fbf8fb4c2_jpeg_jpegfba5de93eebde69a9ef00beabf7a605c In the light of his foregoing definition of abbreviations, what we have here in the phrase “cf. Yor. ɔba” then becomes extremely clear and straightforward. In other words, the word “Ọba” [ɔba] (used by the Binis for their monarch) has its ”etymology” [cf.] (aka. ”origin”) in the Yoruba language [Yor.]. Quod Erat Demostrandum! cc: Afam4eva 44 Likes 9 Shares |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:35pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
davidmarker: logics speak louder than lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGS0aK-LuKY Etinosa1234 AreaFada2 Samuk Valirex Ghostwon Davidnazee |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 2:41pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
To the yoruba, I am sorry I am smarter than you. I do maths all day everyday. And I have the advantage of being on the same side as the truth and logics and not defending fairytails. So you guys can keep fooling yourselves, the objective reader isn't fooled. the intelligent reader isn't fooled. |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 2:41pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gomojam:I am glad most Nairalanders can now see through all Benin liars. I will make these liars find a new hubby. Here is his picture: www.nairaland.com/attachments/12021796_img20200729152633_jpeg1ed633b76001f39da7470c6ef2282281 Notice the ugliness and baldness? There is no hiding place for the liar. No more. 3 Likes |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 2:45pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
davidmarker: These boring LIES are from where? Yes, you guessed right. From the pit of hell. You came too late bald head. The damage has already been done. No one on Nairaland buys Benin lies anymore 4 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 2:48pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
How to identify this @davidmarker guy on Nairaland. (1) He initially starts by pretending not to be a Bini, but continues by peddling the regular Benin lies — thus struggling to give you the impression that every one else uphold the Bini positions. (2) When the debate gets hot for him (especially when I come on board), he leaves the subject matter and begin spamming with links to maps, YouTube video on Benin bronzes, etc. (3) When that doesn’t work still, he brags about living in France in the hope that the typical Nigerian would ass-lick him and swallow his lies hook line and sinker without hesitation and scrutiny. (4) And when that still doesn’t work, he tells you he is a Mathematician and as such no historian knows history except him; no linguist knows linguistics except him. In fact, no one knows their own field of endeavor except him. Why? Because he is a primary school mAtH teacher in fRaNcE. (5) And when that too fails, he would curse out, delete his account and flee, only to reappear again (with another moniker) whenever Benin Kingdom is on fire. (6) Here is his picture, he is a low life and loser. www.nairaland.com/attachments/12021796_img20200729152633_jpeg1ed633b76001f39da7470c6ef2282281 Some of his prior monikers which I have forced him to delete after serious flogging are as follows: Prolog, Ghostwon, Wtf, Logycs, Worldhistory, Bandit, amongst several others befor this present one which he calls “davidmarker”. 6 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by AreaFada2: 2:48pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gregyboy:You might as well go and argue with the lots at "Uselu in". Despite their pathology, they will reason better than the repetitive cross dresser masquerading as a historian. 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by babtoundey(m): 2:57pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gregyboy: You cannot tell the meaning and origin of the title of your king yet you are here dragging "owa". Why are you like this? I see your memory tells you Yoruba got the name oba while trading with Benin yet you don't have a simple reasonable fact to back it up. We ask for prove not for tales. Give us prove. Tells us the meaning of Oba in edo lexicon. You have been thoroughly shamed that you don't know what to say. 7 Likes 4 Shares |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 3:02pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
Just to clarify: there is no such thing as etymology for west african languages. Etymologie is the history of the written word, and the latter is a thing we didn't have until very recently. So there is no such thing as yoruba, Edo, igbo etymology ... Any paper claiming otherwise is a fraud. Anybody using etymology arguments is lying to your faces. Also, anybody using as argument: "what does that word mean in your language" is also either intellectualy deficient, either he is a concious liar. Our native dictionnaries are just as new as our written words. Let A be a word in our current dictionnary. Let B be the meaning we give to A today. Let C be the meaning our ancestors gave to A. There is no proof that B=C. Also, claims of missplellings in precolonial texts are quite illogical. Indeed may I remind you we didn't have a written language ? Our words and names didn't have spellings. So the various spellings emanating from various europeans speaking various languages are not missplellings. I can give you details of the first ooni of ife who changed his title from the format: "ooni of ife, sir adesoji" to the format "ooni of ife, oba adesoji": it is adesoji aderemi. @areafada2 @samuk @gregyboy @valirex logics speak louder than lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGS0aK-LuKY Etinosa1234 AreaFada2 Samuk Valirex Ghostwon Davidnazee 2 Likes |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by babtoundey(m): 3:18pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11: Baba is using style to admit that the name oba was a borrowed term and now a stolen term used to describe their great king. What remains for him is to admit that that the the working system presided on by the whose name is borrowed is also borrowed. 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by LegendHero(m): 3:24pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11: Mehn if you are a lawyer, you will win every case. I tuaile for you o! 3 Likes |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by LegendHero(m): 3:27pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gregyboy: Lol. You still have mouth to talk after all those things TAO said. What are you really after? Knowledge or ego massaging? If it’s knowledge, you should give up at this stage on the context of Oba and the source of the word between Yoruba and Benin. But if it’s just for ego, then you can continue. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 3:32pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
LegendHero: Knowledge my friend how can the conqueror take upon the title of a lesser conquered nation Does it make senss |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 3:35pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
babtoundey: So how did benin get the word oba from yorubas |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 3:35pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11:What! na fine guy oo 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 3:37pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
AreaFada2: She dedicate her obsession on benin, while we are commenting she is looking for books to support benin-ife connection 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 3:37pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
I’m about to debunk this mess not for others though — everyone already knows you’re a mythomaniac. I’m doing so to attempt to rescue you from your own delusions. Now read! davidmarker:This is a false statement made here without a shred of evidence. You have peddled this falsehood in the hope that people will swallow it without asking for evidence. Etymologie is the history of the written word, and the latter is a thing we didn't have until very recently.This is another lie from the pit of hell. There is no basis for the specifically bolded part (... written word) of your made-up definition of etymology. So there is no such thing as yoruba, Edo, igbo etymologyThe premises of your argument have been demonstrated above to be falsehoods. Do I still need mention what the conclusion itself is? Well — it’s still falsehood. ... Any paper claiming otherwise is a fraud.Especially if it it is from a linguist who is neither Benin nor Yoruba. Right? And especially if it proves the fact that the Binis borrowed the word “Oba” from the Yorubas — as we have already seen in an authoritative Bini dictionary. Right?? Yes, the linguists are wrong, @davidmarker is right. Why? Because @davidmarker teaches primary school mAtH in FrAnCe. . /s Haha! Also, anybody using as argument: "what does that word mean in your language" is also either intellectualy deficient, either he is a concious liar.Hmmmm! You mean just as it is wrong for an English boy (living in England) to ask his English teacher: “Sir, what does this word mean (of course: not in Chinese language, but in the same language) in English language ?? Shebi!?. I guess your brain is retarding at the speed of light. Our native dictionnaries are just as new as our written words.Interesting!! In other words, the native speakers of a native African language have no clue what the words in their own language mean all along. Until when some foreigners show up to teach them how to write. That is when any word in their language can have any meaning. So, they’ve been communicating with guesses all along. Where are you from again? ... Benin, OKAY! Everything makes sense to me now. Amazing! Let A be a word in our current dictionnary. Let B be the meaning we give to A today. Let C be the meaning our ancestors gave to A. There is no proof that B=C.Hmmm! In other words, between the days of our ancestors and present-day: There was no continuous communication in words (and their referents) between the successive generations. I didn’t expects sanity form you. That would be asking for too much. Also, claims of missplellings in precolonial texts are quite illogical. Indeed may I remind you we didn't have a written language ? Our words and names didn't have spellings. So the various spellings emanating from various europeans speaking various languages are not missplellings.Stop being a dunce! The same EuRoPeAns would describe the same geographical location, etc. by two or more different spellings — sometime within the same written document. For example: (A) Is it. ”Beny”, or ”Benin”, or ”Ubini”, among other spellings in EUrOpEaN writtings? (B) Is it “Jekri”, or ”Jakri” or ”Chekerie”, among other spellings in EUrOpEaN writtings? (C) Is it “Youriba”, or ”Yar.ribah”, or ”Yoruba” as all seen in EUrOpEaN writings? (D) Is it “Eyeo”, or ”Awyaw”, or ”Oyo”, as all seen in EUrOpEaN writings. You have to make up your mind on how (at least) two different spellings in reference to the same thing does not imply a misspelling in at lest one of them. I will be waiting! I know that as a deluded Bini, you would still go — there is no misspelling in the EUrOpEaN writtings. I can give you details of the first ooni of ife who changed his title from the format: "ooni of ife, sir adesoji" to the format "ooni of ife, oba adesoji": it is adesoji aderemi. Sane Person asks: In what capacity did he use the designation “Sir”? Is it wrt his traditional stool? Insane Bini: [scratches head and goes] Well, that was in his capacity as a politician and governor of Western Nigeria Sane Person: Mttchew! In your life, don’t you ever call me for this kind of nonsense talk again oo — Ever! logics speak louder than lies.Exactly what I’ve been explain to your bald thick skull. Cheers! 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 3:38pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
gomojam:It’s not gregy. It’s a certain guy by the moniker @davidmarker. The following are some of his other monikers which I have forced him to delete in the past: Prolog, Ghostwon, Wtf, Logycs, Worldhistory, Bandit, amongst may others. Here is his modus operandi: https://www.nairaland.com/6234931/why-ikwerres-not-igbo-logic/17#96530093 This is so you can identify him whenever he deletes his latest moniker and appears with a new disguised one. ——————- As for @gregyboy, he is one and the same person as @Edeyoung. I confirmed this 100%. It’s tested. He likes to deny it with his last blood though. In fact, he will sometimes start quoting himself logging in and out (whenever I point this out) just to pretend he isn’t. 6 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by Nobody: 3:41pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11:I don modify my comment. Thanks. 1 Like |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 3:45pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
LegendHero:Lol. Thank you sire! 3 Likes |
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 3:47pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
TAO11:
|
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 3:49pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
LegendHero: If your oba could at one time adopt the benin ceremonial sword, that is indegenous to benin why can't he adopt name
|
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by TAO11(f): 4:02pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
I’m glad someone finally proved that the ADA scepter which the Binis use today originally came from Ife. The original Bini Facebook poster claimed it was introduced to Benin by the Benin ruler named — Ogiso Ere. Well, let’s find out where this Ogiso Ere (the second Ogiso) come originally from according to Bini traditions ?? See attached for an answer. See my specific comment at this link for more details on the subject: https://www.nairaland.com/6013716/why-does-ooni-ife-make#93935979 cc: LegendHero 7 Likes 2 Shares
|
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by gregyboy(m): 4:11pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
davidmarker: This same nigga
|
Re: Why Ikwerres Are Not Igbo - The Logic Behind It by scholes0(m): 5:59pm On Nov 28, 2020 |
Benin people call the king's wife Olori Another borrowing from Ife and Yoruba language, 3 Likes |
(1) (2) (3) ... (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) ... (37) (Reply)
Pictures From Igbo-Ora Twins Festival 2022 / Queen Okwukwe Nwoko Ejected From Palace Over Allegation Of Infidelity(photo) / Maryland, USA Adds Yoruba as Language for Driver Learner’s Permit Test
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 124 |