First off, I actually find the term feminism rather inappropriate and carrying an undertone of favoritism for the female, it could have been 'gendism' or something more neutral. I'm also clearly against the liberal-hijacked and radicalized Feminazi evolution of it today which promotes misandry and most every other perverted ideology against the traditional family system and female identity.
But as per the original purported agenda of Feminism, from after WW which was simply to give women more opportunities in the workplace. I'd say that I'm in full support for the following reasons:

1.) The nuclear family system of husband, one wife and kids, the basic unit of society, is its underlying economic security. Those touting polygamy or baby mama and daddy trend as male liberation, haven't considered the full implications of those, which I will address in another thread.
But at the core of preserving this monogamous nuclear family system is fidelity in the home by both parties.

As a man with full fledged active hormones, I can easily relate to men's belief that we're wired for adventure and cheating is in our blood. Yet the truth is marrying a woman of value and your sex appeal, who maintains it, and fulfills her wifely roles, makes fidelity more realistic.
The clincher left that actually makes us seek adventure outside, is loss of interest in our wife due to the "nothing new syndrome".
All humans are designed to start looking for something new once we're used to the current. A wife's continuous personality and character evolution from constantly developing value career-wise, continually giving her husband new traits to see in her is a sure sustainer of their bond.

Hence, such feminism which gives women a skilled labour career ladder to climb, keeping them on the edge, ever causing growth in knowledge, discretion and their value altogether, also keeping you on the edge, motivating you to continuously develop yourself. The chemistry in such marriage will grow stronger with time, strengthening the spouses' bond. The ripple effect of this will unite and strengthen the vision of both spouses for the children, strengthening parent-child bond, hence adding another layer of responsibility, both bonds strengthening our resolve to preserving family in the face of the constant onslaught from the many attractive ladies throwing themselves at us.
Some of you guys, who've dated high-class, top tier women, or any woman of value will relate easily to this. Some women make your conscience prick cause you value them, they're great women. And there are some who you'll always feel guilty cheating on, even if never caught while for some others, you won't feel as bad(actually makes no sense keeping such). And those guys planning to marry some housewife or village girl you discourage from developing, are creating a cheating environment sooner or later.

2.) Just imagine for instance wartimes like WW arise again(may never happen with the way world has evolved but nothing wrong with preparing for all eventualities). We know we can't depend on women to protect any territory. It is mainly men's role to defend and protect a territory as well as extend its frontiers, war being one front of securing economic sovereignty.
But as it usually goes in dire wartimes like WW, even if the territory is preserved, there is usually an economic setback from military expenses, and the shortage of workforce with many men being drafted to the warfront. At such times if we don't have a skilled female workforce that can fill the void, cater for the family and keep the nations revenue coming, preserving the economy, we can be sure to throw a nation into great depression at such times at best, and even worse to suffer a loss in war due to economic crunch.

3.) Also if for any reason, whether physical disability, retrenchments and the unforeseen etc., fathers lose their jobs, it should be easy for our employable wives to cushion family livelihood, child education, without compromising the cost of living.

4.) Lastly, such feminism will reduce the number of slay queens on the street which are just a plain irritation in society and a loss in a nation's economy as adding no value to it yet constantly consuming created wealth, parading themselves as human causes for economic degeneration. That is, of course, such feminism being sifted of the radicalised female sexual liberation promoting female whoring and reckless objectification of their bodies.

The family and nation would benefit a lot from such a movement which seeks to make women a full part of highly skilled labour.

#Purely mental from your philosophical specimen#

You cannot be a feminist and be Religious. Focus on Religion, feminism will follow

Magnoliaa:
Mention a duo more iconic than straight men and unsolicited opinions...

A straight woman and avoiding the subject of discourse when it pricks her.
Next time try to give your contribution to the OP instead.

tobechi20:
You cannot be a feminist and be Religious. Focus on Religion, feminism will follow

The hell does this even mean? Not only does it sound contradictor, can't even fathom the part about being religious and why in the world I should ever focus on that.

Magnoliaa:


"Avoiding a subject of discuss when it pricks" - such a meaningless and empty phrase you can't sensibly connect with the character you're attaching to it; what tells you I am straight woman? Big flop for a clap back, if this was ever intended as one.

Don't derail this thread.

I'm back.

Magnoliaa:


"Avoiding a subject of discuss when it pricks" - such a meaningless and empty phrase you can't sensibly connect with the character you're attaching to it; what tells you I am a straight woman? Big flop for a clap back, if this was ever intended as one.

Learn to avoid a thread if you don't intend to contribute meaningfully rather than derailing. Have a nice day, miss troll.

Feminism is the wrong answer to the right question. Very very wrong answer.