googi:
It is a learned stereotype repeated many times that Africans repeat, even when they lived in a rich nation.

Actually, Nigeria used to pay salaries of most countries you listed.

Aconomist:
Can you list a country with a population above 3 million that isn't dependent on white people's tourism (the Caribbean Islands) or selling natural resources to non-black countries? No. Something is wrong with black people.

Rossikki:


Can you list a white country above 3 million whose riches are not based on theft, exploitation, invasions, enslavement, looting, and mass murder?

No. Something is DEEPLY wrong with white people, and your conditioned self hatred and slave menyality proves it.

Aconomist:
Law of the jungle, bro. I would prefer if our ancestors looted other countries instead of getting looted.

Rossikki:


Firstly, our ancestors had NO REASON to go round the world destroying and looting out of greed and selfishness, when they already lived in prosperity.

Secondly, our ancestors were too CIVILIZED to turn the Earth, which THEY had civilized, into a theatre of blood and greed-based warfare and conquest.

They were referred to the Greeks as ''the blameless Ethiopians'' because of their high piety and moral rectitude.

The whites, who were mostly cave-dwelling savages when black Africans were civilizing the world, are the people you should be teaching to LEARN from the HUMANIST old African philosophies they destroyed out of material greed and selfishness.

Aconomist:
A superior culture will never be conquered by an inferior one.

When these whites go to villages in Africa, you worship them -- singing and dancing like fools.

Rossikki:


Can you list a white country above 3 million whose riches are not derived from theft, exploitation, invasions, enslavement, looting, and/or mass murder?

No. Something is DEEPLY wrong with white people, and your conditioned self-hatred and slave mentality proves it.

Rossikki:


What a load of raw IGNORANCE.

So if I storm your house now, and shoot you, steal your money and loot your furniture after raping your wife, it's because I'm superior to you?

You need a refund on your education, because you must have been schooled by animals, not humans.




Not sure which village you are referring to. When a white comes to my village, nobody sings and dances and worships him, or even notices his presence in any significant way.

I think you watch way too much CNN and National Geographic for your own good . They pay villagers to perform, and who wouldn't dance for a few dollars in a village if some dumb white guy wants to drop dollars? I would.

Aconomist:


Why did you leave your door unlocked? ie, why haven't you developed defenses against invasion?

Aconomist:
Can you list a country with a population above 3 million that isn't dependent on white people's tourism (the Caribbean Islands) or selling natural resources to non-black countries? No. Something is DEEPLY wrong with black people, and your post proves it.

illicit:



The question is why do we remain at the receiving end


Those African countries you mentioned are tourist sites, nothing else

Rossikki:


Where do you get the idea that they are all ''tourist sites''?

Botswana is not a tourist site, and its economy is based on trade, mining, and manufacturing.

Neither is Namibia.

Jamaica?

''Major sectors of the Jamaican economy include agriculture, mining, manufacturing, tourism, petroleum refining, financial and insurance services.''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamaica


Trinidad and Tobago is not a ''tourist site''.

''Trinidad and Tobago has the third highest GDP per capita based on purchasing power parity (PPP) in the Americas after the United States and Canada. It is recognised by the World Bank as a high-income economy.... the Trinidadian economy is primarily industrial with an emphasis on petroleum and petrochemicals''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinidad_and_Tobago


Plus WHAT EXACTLY is wrong with tourism being a nation's main earner?

Nobody says ''Oh Dubai is only rich because of oil, so no big deal''.

So why is it an issue if a nation has arranged itself to the extent of being an attractrive destination for tourists? 

You think that is an easy thing to do?

Think again.

motymop:
You would have compared those so called developed black countries with developed white countries.

Rossikki:


I HAVE. I enjoy myself in Jamaica far more than I do when I visit the USA or UK.

I will visit Trinidad too one day, hopefully.

You should TRY visiting some of those ''so-called developed black countries'' instead of relying on your colonised, white-obsessed dunderhead to feed you negativity before even trying.

motymop:


Who do you think you are deceiving.

You should have immigrated to Jamaica permanently and enjoyed their gradious " development"

Rossikki:


Jamaica is like Heaven on Earth.

You CLEARLY have not been to Jamaica.


Kingston, Jamaican capital.

motymop:


Yeah. Jamaica is heavy on earth with nicely photoshopped images of resorts gotten from the internet

The pictures below are of Kingston

Idiko1:
Only fools at the fringe of lunacy will define human beings with colors. No human being is "White" or "Black". However there is no form of development when the countries mentioned cannot claim of any product from field to market which is a major stay in the world economy.

Rossikki:


Those are genuine resorts you dumb, ill-exposed illiterate.

The pictures below are of America and Europe, so what is your point? Every country has poor areas and poor folk.

Ode.


USA



London

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/10148597/Lets-stop-pretending-that-a-shanty-town-in-London-is-a-big-surprise.html

Idiko1:


You seemed to be delusional. There is no place on earth without slums. Even the almighty USA has considerable amount of slums. However the subject of this discourse is development.

I guess development is not about owning concrete structures such as the resorts and hotels in Jamaica.

Rossikki:


Stop talking rubbish.

Development is about PEOPLE and LIVING STANDARDS, not ''products''.

If you are going to measure countries by their ''claiming a product from field to market which is a major stay in the world economy'', then you will have to leave out a truckload of developed nations, from Australia and New Zealand to Austria, to Italy, Spain, Russia, Canada, Poland, UAE, among others.

Only a tiny handful of nations like the USA, UK, Germany, France, and Japan, can be said to have genuinely unique products that are in global demand.

Idiko1:


How would any ninny talk of "LIVING STANDARDS" without the products which sustain life? Any of the countries in the bolded statement had a product which came from the field to market. Please stop being delusional.