ImaIma1:


Drop the source of your statistics or forever hold your peace.

Where was it done? Was the data collected in Nigeria and analysed?

The studies is based on dating profiles from apps used in western societies where women are the most honest in their preferences for men, they are also studies showing men are reporting the lowest sex rates in recorded history, YouTube which is the most male dominated social media platform having 85% male audience has significant channels teaching men how to get sex, we don't have any channel teaching women how to get sex, we have so many blogs and online forums teaching men about sex, we have incel sites showing men frustration about sex, we don't have any site showing women are frustrated not getting sex

JESHAL:



A woman who has a promiscuous past is imprinted by her exes, and damaged for life, I can't take that chance, she has a higher probability of making me father a bastard, and empirically she is proven not to pair bond, there is even a very high probability she would be problematic in marriage and divorce me, remember Nigerian men are accepting non-virgins because they don't have the capacity to get the chaste virgins as they are not high valued enough, remember they are only lucky because our Marital institution has not become a government influenced institution with alimony, child support and child custody laws that favor women like western societies, traditions and religion still influence our Marital values hence women are incentivised to keep their homes, I can bet on my life they would destroy their marriages if they were no traditional values

You are obviously a one-way thinker who bases everything on theories and personal convictions. Try learning from the experience of people around you and stop filling your head with unverified theories.

JESHAL:



The studies is based on dating profiles from apps used in western societies where women are the most honest in their preferences for men, they are also studies showing men are reporting the lowest sex rates in recorded history, YouTube which is the most male dominated social media platform having 85% male audience has significant channels teaching men how to get sex, we don't have any channel teaching women how to get sex, we have so many blogs and online forums teaching men about sex, we have incel sites showing men frustration about sex, we don't have any site showing women are frustrated not getting sex

Dating profiles? You mean online dating profiles? YouTube? You must be kidding.

ImaIma1, those statistics are not concocted, they are peer reviewed studies based on sound empirical metrics from sampling, replicability and have led to sound scientific literature that shows a woman with a promiscuous can't pair bond easily with her new partner, I don't have any ideology or belief system influencing my judgement here, I'm working with the valid data that is well researched, can a virgin cuckold her husband, possibly, but it is far more probable that a non-virgin will cause paternity fraud because she can't pair bond

ImaIma1:


Dating profiles? You mean online dating profiles? YouTube? You must be kidding.

So you want to honestly tell me that men and women are having sex at the same rate, when women are the ones that control access to sex and are chased by multiple men and select the one they want, , why are men paying women for sex from olosho, ashewo, I don't see women paying for sex like men,why is majority of people who watch porn men statistically, remember I said there are studies reporting men are not having sex, you ignored that,if a woman refuses sex, it will not happen no matter the sexual urge of a man and that's a fact, except he rapes her and he would pay dearly

CaveAdullam:
Subjectively, you are right, individuals should find whatever mates that rocks their boats.

But as far as nature is concerned, virginity is a prerequisite for men when choosing women because it indicates that that woman is fertile. Fertility here indicates a spouse free of diseases, a spouse who will reproduce fertile kids, a spouse who has a high degree of pair bonding, a spouse who is loyal and will want a long happy relationship. These are very important because men are the ones committing, bringing more resources and less resistant to danger in the relationship.

Men don't attach emotions to sex, but women do! Women are both psychological and emotional about sex. Committing to a woman who has fvcked a lot of d!cks is a bad investment for the man because he's committing to a woman with a long standing sexual history encoded in her memory and who still have the tendency to go back down the memory lane reproducing these histories.



First of all, nature doesn't care about religion, morality(good or bad), ethics, principles blah blah blah. Everything you must understand when it comes to intersexual dynamics boils down to biology, evolution, psychology, biochemistry etc.

1. Natural selection selected females that has hymen to survive in the genetic pool because it was preferred by males. If males never found it important, women wouldn't have evolved to have hymen. Same way men didn't evolved to have hymen because women didn't see the need for it in men. Peacocks evolved to have beautiful tails because that's what peahens are attracted to and will mate with.

Men evolved to have bigger body mass and more violent because women preferred men that can protect, provide and be parentally invested. Women didn't because men never required women to defend them and also because women are the weaker sex.

Simply put, what each sexes desired in the other was selected for while others either became redundant or wiped out.

Morality may be put in place to check some excesses, however, it must be understood that nature must be worked with to achieve a positive aim rather than tamed!

And there's nothing like illicit sexual activities. I know you're ego invested in your religion/belief system. Humans have 3 mating systems: pair bonding or monogamy, casual mating or promiscuity and polygyny. (For polyandry, it is not common)!

Men rank higher in all of these sexual mating system, hence, it tends to seems that men are the only ones fvcking around. Why? Because:

1. men have a high libido fueled by testosterone.

2. A part of men's brain is stimulated when exposed to pornographic content.

3. Short life expectancy plus millions of sperms which must be spread out as fast as possible. Therefore, every mating opportunity must be properly utilized.

However, since women are the gatekeepers of sex, sex only happens when they decide! While commitment is decided by men! As a result, women can decide to have sex when they want, with whomever they want, unlike men that must persuade women before having sex. Ironically, though men are highly promiscuous, yet, they don't have sex regularly because women only want men that occupies the totem's pole of the society.



This has nothing to do with the Bible or religion dear Christian!

To be sexually free of diseases is very sacrosanct. Hence, both men and women must practice safe sex. Because, none will invest in a partner that is sexually impure. So, where this has been taken care of, virginity still comes into play as mentioned earlier.

Now, exposures to unrestricted sexual activities among a population tends to lead to decrease in social, mental and productive energy. (Alright, you're now happy)! Zooistic and manistic societies when compared to deistic societies are in the lowest scale of civilization because of their unrestricted sexual activities. The highest in this energy is rationalistic societies, however, only few societies fluctuates back and forth in it without gaining proper balance.

This progress in civilization has been traced to limiting female promiscuity, remember: women are the gatekeepers of sex. Therefore, if you observe great societies or individuals during a particular period of time tracking their progress, you will notice this kind of mating system: Monogamy>polygamy>unrestricted sex. Monogamous societies are the second in the pyramid after rationalistic societies which is at the top.



You are so full of emotions!

Evolutionary, female children are more beneficial than male children. They survive more at birth, have higher life expectancy, taken care of by men and society from birth to death, decide the number of men who will pass their genetic line to the next generation. Men are the expendable sex!

Men are the ones held responsible for everything because the growth and future of civilization falls upon their shoulders. And when they fail everything collapse. No wonder every good and great inventions and discovery has male signatures upon it.

Nobody is insinuating anything bro, it's nature doing the Lord's work. Women receiving series of harangues to remain virgins is for their own good because no reasonable man in his right senses with good resources will commit to a damaged woman.



What should be discussed on that drawing board is not Bible study nor religion, but everything that has to do with facts and figures, that's, data, statistics, observations and researches, and not fairy tales.

Understanding how things work, will be a proper guide if progress will be made. Men and women's nature must be understood, and since the sexes are sexually dimorphic, individual man and woman can decide on possible ways to work with their inherent nature rather than feel guilty. The consequences both intended and unintended must be properly analysed when discussing whether to run amok or not with our primal and inherent desires.

Thanks.

Good evening.

1. Sincerely, I wonder how virginity indicates what women are fertile. Like, where did you get this from? Virginity in no way indicates that women are fertile. Rather, virginity masks the fertility status of females. A woman with no pregnancy history may be primarily infertile and this would only be diagnosed later in marriage. If a woman has been pregnant before, it sort of proves that she can be pregnant again.

"Spouse free of diseases" should apply to both genders, no? Remember that these diseases are sexually spread. So if a female is a virgin (and thus free of diseases), she should settle down with a sexually-exposed, disease-infested man that would destroy her life eventually? I guess no.

"Who will reproduce fertile kids"? How? I understand that some STD's in pregnancy can trigger some congenital malformations which may affect the formation of the reproductive structures but I can still argue in the same line. If the woman were a virgin, she could easily get infected with STD's by her spouse and this may still happen. See why both genders should not engage in high-risk lifestyles?

Again, a man that has had several sexual encounters before marriage is likely to continue keeping multiple sexual partners after marriage. This is fact. You can't give what you don't have. If you can't live a conscious, careful life before marriage, you MAY not be able to do this after marriage. Of course, there are exceptions to this (I used MAY, remember) but these exceptions apply to both genders. A promiscuous female can also be faithful to her spouse physically and emotionally if she trully wants to. Same applies to a promiscuous male.

2. If you observe, I did not centre my submission on religion only. Religion was mentioned because I am a Christian and I try to live my life according to the provisions of the Bible. This aside, we can talk about your Biology, evolution and Biochemistry. "Females with hymen survive in the genetic pool because it is preferred by men"?? I don't follow here. Survive, how? There are as many women without hymen that are currently happily married as there are those with hymen. Hymen does not indicate survival. Hymen is only a thin membrane that helps protect the road to the womb against the external environment. The sexual preference of males is not the reason why evolution provided it.

Illicit sex is not only defined in the Bible and in the books of other religions. In medicine (science), it is a common term used. It is often referred to as having multiple sexual partners. I have said repeatedly why this is not safe. Also, men do not rank higher in ALL sexual mating systems. There are numerous species with female dominance where the females kill their males after coitus. For example, the praying mantis.

About libido, sexual stimulation, and short life expectancy and "millions of sperms which must be spread out as fast as possible" - May I inform you that the equivalent of the hormones that drive libido is also present in females. They have their libido too which surprisingly, may be found to be high. Why then is this not expressed as commonly as seen in the case of males? The answer is easy. Our society has made it difficult for females to express themselves. If they do, they are called all sorts of names (prostitutes, etc). But a male that expresses his sexual desire and chases after numerous females is rather hailed by his peers. The limbic system (the hypothalamus is a part of this system) is responsible for sexual feelings and emotions in general. This system is present in both males and females. Males do not have any particular brain centre that is stimulated by pornography that is absent in females. Both genders are equally affected. The problem is, one gender easily expresses this because the society supports it while the other dares not because she would be crucified by you and I.

"Women gatekeepers of sex"? Again, sex is consensual. Both parties must agree before it happens. There are societies (even ours) where women approach men for sex!

The lifespan of men is shorter because men are more involved high-risk lifestyles: violence, cultism, etc. This has nothing to do with evolution. It is a matter of choice. The reproductive activity of women is limited by time (menopause). Does this then warrant them to engage in illicit sex so as to fertilize their eggs and bear children as quickly as possible? If your answer is no, then men should not engage in illicit sex because they want to spread their millions of sperm cells "as fast as possible."

"Zooistic and manistic societies when compared to deistic societies are in the lowest scale of civilization because of their unrestricted sexual activities. The highest in this energy is rationalistic societies, however, only few societies fluctuates back and forth in it without gaining proper balance" - this should be my point, thank you.

"Men are the ones held responsible for everything" - if this were true, this thread wouldn't have existed. Someone is already blaming women for failed marriages/homes. By the way, I am in no way emotional about this; I am only stating the facts.

"What should be discussed on that drawing board is not Bible study nor religion, but everything that has to do with facts and figures, that's, data, statistics, observations and researches, and not fairy tales" - thankfully, I have been able to do this in this submission.

I agree, the natures of men and women must be understood as these are in no way the same. But the right to illicit/premarital sex is not one of the natures of men.

Good morning.

ImaIma1, until you show me evidence men and women are having sexual abundance at the same rate, till then I can't listen to your arguments that we should be held to the same standards of morality with regards to virginity, till then I will work with empiricism that are rooted in sound scientific literature, seeking equality for both genders when we have different accessiblity to sex, women get it easily shows hypocrisy and dishonesty typical of Feminist

TONYE001:


1. Sincerely, I wonder how virginity indicates what women are fertile. Like, where did you get this from? Virginity in no way indicates that women are fertile. Rather, virginity masks the fertility status of females. A woman with no pregnancy history may be primarily infertile and this would only be diagnosed later in marriage. If a woman has been pregnant before, it sort of proves that she can be pregnant again.

"Spouse free of diseases" should apply to both genders, no? Remember that these diseases are sexually spread. So if a female is a virgin (and thus free of diseases), she should settle down with a sexually-exposed, disease-infested man that would destroy her life eventually? I guess no.

"Who will reproduce fertile kids"? How? I understand that some STD's in pregnancy can trigger some congenital malformations which may affect the formation of the reproductive structures but I can still argue in the same line. If the woman were a virgin, she could easily get infected with STD's by her spouse and this may still happen. See why both genders should not engage in high-risk lifestyles?

Again, a man that has had several sexual encounters before marriage is likely to continue keeping multiple sexual partners after marriage. This is fact. You can't give what you don't have. If you can't live a conscious, careful life before marriage, you MAY not be able to do this after marriage. Of course, there are exceptions to this (I used MAY, remember) but these exceptions apply to both genders. A promiscuous female can also be faithful to her spouse physically and emotionally if she trully wants to. Same applies to a promiscuous male.

2. If you observe, I did not centre my submission on religion only. Religion was mentioned because I am a Christian and I try to live my life according to the provisions of the Bible. This aside, we can talk about your Biology, evolution and Biochemistry. "Females with hymen survive in the genetic pool because it is preferred by men"?? I don't follow here. Survive, how? There are as many women without hymen that are currently happily married as there are those with hymen. Hymen does not indicate survival. Hymen is only a thin membrane that helps protect the road to the womb against the external environment. The sexual preference of males is not the reason why evolution provided it.

Illicit sex is not only defined in the Bible and in the books of other religions. In medicine (science), it is a common term used. It is often referred to as having multiple sexual partners. I have said repeatedly why this is not safe. Also, men do not rank higher in ALL sexual mating systems. There are numerous species with female dominance where the females kill their males after coitus. For example, the praying mantis.

About libido, sexual stimulation, and short life expectancy and "millions of sperms which must be spread out as fast as possible" - May I inform you that the equivalent of the hormones that drive libido is also present in females. They have their libido too which surprisingly, may be found to be high. Why then is this not expressed as commonly as seen in the case of males? The answer is easy. Our society has made it difficult for females to express themselves. If they do, they are called all sorts of names (prostitutes, etc). But a male that expresses his sexual desire and chases after numerous females is rather hailed by his peers. The limbic system (the hypothalamus is a part of this system) is responsible for sexual feelings and emotions in general. This system is present in both males and females. Males do not have any particular brain centre that is stimulated by pornography that is absent in females. Both genders are equally affected. The problem is, one gender easily expresses this because the society supports it while the other dares not because she would be crucified by you and I.

"Women gatekeepers of sex"? Again, sex is consensual. Both parties must agree before it happens. There are societies (even ours) where women approach men for sex!

The lifespan of men is shorter because men are more involved high-risk lifestyles: violence, cultism, etc. This has nothing to do with evolution. It is a matter of choice. The reproductive activity of women is limited by time (menopause). Does this then warrant them to engage in illicit sex so as to fertilize their eggs and bear children as quickly as possible? If your answer is no, then men should not engage in illicit sex because they want to spread their millions of sperm cells "as fast as possible."

"Zooistic and manistic societies when compared to deistic societies are in the lowest scale of civilization because of their unrestricted sexual activities. The highest in this energy is rationalistic societies, however, only few societies fluctuates back and forth in it without gaining proper balance" - this should be my point, thank you.

"Men are the ones held responsible for everything" - if this were true, this thread wouldn't have existed. Someone is already blaming women for failed marriages/homes. By the way, I am in no way emotional about this; I am only stating the facts.

"What should be discussed on that drawing board is not Bible study nor religion, but everything that has to do with facts and figures, that's, data, statistics, observations and researches, and not fairy tales" - thankfully, I have been able to do this in this submission.

I agree, the natures of men and women must be understood as these are in no way the same. But the right to illicit/premarital sex is not one of the natures of men.

Good morning.

My argument is that women exist and get sexual access, men must create their value to get sexual access, we can never be judged by the same metric or held to the same standards of morality

JESHAL:



My argument is that women exist and get sexual access, men must create their value to get sexual access, we can never be judged by the same metric or held to the same standards of morality

Let me put it this way: Women choose their sexual partners based on values that the partners may possess. Men choose their sexual partners based on values that the partners possess. So both genders "must create their values to get sexual access." This should be the order.

The idea of chasing anyone with the XX gene (females) because of sexual satisfaction should not define men. It simply indicates being loosed, being careless about one's health, and not knowing one's value.

TONYE001:


Let me put it this way: Women choose their sexual partners based on values that the partner may possess. Men choose their sexual partners based on values that the partners possess. So both genders "must create their values to get sexual access." This should be the order. The idea of chasing anyone with the XX gene because of sexual satisfaction should not define men. It simply indicates being loose, being careless about one's health, and not knowing one's value.

Please do women approach men or men approach men to initiate a relationship or get sex, who toast who?, Please be sincere

JESHAL:



So you want to honestly tell me that men and women are having sex at the same rate, when women are the ones that control access to sex and are chased by multiple men, why are men paying women for sex from olosho, ashewo, I don't see women paying for sex like men,why is majority of people who watch porn men statistically, and select the one they want, remember I said there are studies reporting men are not having sex, you ignored that,if a woman refuses sex, it will not happen no matter the sexual urge of a man and that's a fact, except he rapes her and he would pay dearly

These studies are not accurate especially as the people the information/data collected from are not even the region of discussion.

Have you tried collecting data from Nairaland?

Are the men here not having sex?

How many men here are dating without sex?

How many are not dating but still have sex?

How many have deflowered ladies and are still expecting to marry virgins?

I don't want to digress from the topic. If men want a chaste woman, they should also keep themselves clean. The men that have remained virgins till marriage don't have three heads. They have one head just like you. But here you are bringing out statistics, theories and fighting tooth and nail to justify why you cannot also say NO to premarital sex.

JESHAL:



Please do women approach men or men approach men to initiate a relationship or get sex, who toast who?, Please be sincere

Both genders. Males tend to do this more because of the society and our culture. Elsewhere (even here), both ways.

ImaIma1:


These studies are not accurate especially as the people the information/data collected from are not even the region of discussion.

Have you tried collecting data from Nairaland?

Are the men here not having sex?

How many men here are dating without sex?

How many are not dating but still have sex?

How many have deflowered ladies and are still expecting to marry virgins?

I don't want to digress from the topic. If men want a chaste woman, they should also keep themselves clean. The men that have remained virgins till marriage don't have three heads. They have one head just like you. But here you are bringing out statistics, theories and fighting tooth and nail to justify why you cannot also say NO to premarital sex.

The main premise of my argument is that women control access to sex and reproduction, no matter how thirsty and hornny a man is if the woman refuses, sex will not happen, men control access to relationship, we are the ones that propose to women, evolutionary we have higher libido due to higher testerones 13 times that of women, the main sexual drive hormones, but women are very selective with whom they give their coochies too, he must have value, you just exist and men want to fucck you even if you have nothing to offer, men care about your sexuality ( beauty, fertility, youth, chasity) primarily before anything else

TONYE001:


Both genders. Males tend to do this more because of the society and our culture. Elsewhere (even here), both ways.

Objectively the male to a higher degree, whether it's because of society or not is irrelevant, the fact is that men initiate contact with women within the Dynamics of a relationship

TONYE001:


1. Sincerely, I wonder how virginity indicates what women are fertile. Like, where did you get this from? Virginity in no way indicates that women are fertile. Rather, virginity masks the fertility status of females. A woman with no pregnancy history may be primarily infertile and this would only be diagnosed later in marriage. If a woman has been pregnant before, it sort of proves that she can be pregnant again.

"Spouse free of diseases" should apply to both genders, no? Remember that these diseases are sexually spread. So if a female is a virgin (and thus free of diseases), she should settle down with a sexually-exposed, disease-infested man that would destroy her life eventually? I guess no.

"Who will reproduce fertile kids"? How? I understand that some STD's in pregnancy can trigger some congenital malformations which may affect the formation of the reproductive structures but I can still argue in the same line. If the woman were a virgin, she could easily get infected with STD's by her spouse and this may still happen. See why both genders should not engage in high-risk lifestyles?

Again, a man that has had several sexual encounters before marriage is likely to continue keeping multiple sexual partners after marriage. This is fact. You can't give what you don't have. If you can't live a conscious, careful life before marriage, you MAY not be able to do this after marriage. Of course, there are exceptions to this (I used MAY, remember) but these exceptions apply to both genders. A promiscuous female can also be faithful to her spouse physically and emotionally if she trully wants to. Same applies to a promiscuous male.

2. If you observe, I did not centre my submission on religion only. Religion was mentioned because I am a Christian and I try to live my life according to the provisions of the Bible. This aside, we can talk about your Biology, evolution and Biochemistry. "Females with hymen survive in the genetic pool because it is preferred by men"?? I don't follow here. Survive, how? There are as many women without hymen that are currently happily married as there are those with hymen. Hymen does not indicate survival. Hymen is only a thin membrane that helps protect the road to the womb against the external environment. The sexual preference of males is not the reason why evolution provided it.

Illicit sex is not only defined in the Bible and in the books of other religions. In medicine (science), it is a common term used. It is often referred to as having multiple sexual partners. I have said repeatedly why this is not safe. Also, men do not rank higher in ALL sexual mating systems. There are numerous species with female dominance where the females kill their males after coitus. For example, the praying mantis.

About libido, sexual stimulation, and short life expectancy and "millions of sperms which must be spread out as fast as possible" - May I inform you that the equivalent of the hormones that drive libido is also present in females. They have their libido too which surprisingly, may be found to be high. Why then is this not expressed as commonly as seen in the case of males? The answer is easy. Our society has made it difficult for females to express themselves. If they do, they are called all sorts of names (prostitutes, etc). But a male that expresses his sexual desire and chases after numerous females is rather hailed by his peers. The limbic system (the hypothalamus is a part of this system) is responsible for sexual feelings and emotions in general. This system is present in both males and females. Males do not have any particular brain centre that is stimulated by pornography that is absent in females. Both genders are equally affected. The problem is, one gender easily expresses this because the society supports it while the other dares not because she would be crucified by you and I.

"Women gatekeepers of sex"? Again, sex is consensual. Both parties must agree before it happens. There are societies (even ours) where women approach men for sex!

The lifespan of men is shorter because men are more involved high-risk lifestyles: violence, cultism, etc. This has nothing to do with evolution. It is a matter of choice. The reproductive activity of women is limited by time (menopause). Does this then warrant them to engage in illicit sex so as to fertilize their eggs and bear children as quickly as possible? If your answer is no, then men should not engage in illicit sex because they want to spread their millions of sperm cells "as fast as possible."

"Zooistic and manistic societies when compared to deistic societies are in the lowest scale of civilization because of their unrestricted sexual activities. The highest in this energy is rationalistic societies, however, only few societies fluctuates back and forth in it without gaining proper balance" - this should be my point, thank you.

"Men are the ones held responsible for everything" - if this were true, this thread wouldn't have existed. Someone is already blaming women for failed marriages/homes. By the way, I am in no way emotional about this; I am only stating the facts.

"What should be discussed on that drawing board is not Bible study nor religion, but everything that has to do with facts and figures, that's, data, statistics, observations and researches, and not fairy tales" - thankfully, I have been able to do this in this submission.

I agree, the natures of men and women must be understood as these are in no way the same. But the right to illicit/premarital sex is not one of the natures of men.

Good morning.

I have occupied this position before, and definitely, I understand where exactly you are coming from. In addition, your Christian belief will never make you accept anything contrary unless it harmonizes with the Bible. Ergo, it will be mere waste of time arguing.

Most people that come up with different arguments in respect to the intersexual dynamics do not understand it and follows the societal scripts already established, hence, anything that opposes these scripts is anathema!

Homo sapiens are sexually dimorphic, until we are able to get around this fact can there be a peaceful complement between both genders as witnessed before the advent of feminism and the sexual revolution. Welcome to chaos 101 if we ever think men and women can hold on to the same standard or behave similarly all way round.

Have a nice day!

JESHAL:



The main premise of my argument is that women control access to sex and reproduction, no matter how thirsty and hornny a man is if the woman refuses, sex will not happen, men control access to relationship, we are the ones that propose to women, evolutionary we have higher libido due to higher testerones 13 times that of women, the main sexual drive hormones, but women are very selective with whom they give their coochies too, he must have value, you just exist and men want to fucck you even if you have nothing to offer, men care about your sexuality ( beauty, fertility, youth, chasity) primarily before anything else

All cock and bull...

YOU...can you also abstain from sex till you get married to a virgin? If not, why do you think you deserve a virgin?

You want to carry your baggage and soul ties into the marriage but you want someone with a clean slate. Hypocrisy or not?

Please if you are going to answer with empirical findings, hypothetical studies or fantasies, don't bother responding.

ImaIma1:


All cock and bull...

YOU...can you also abstain from sex till you get married to a virgin? If not, why do you think you deserve a virgin?

You want to carry your baggage and soul ties into the marriage but you want someone with a clean slate. Hypocrisy or not?

Please if you are going to answer with empirical findings, hypothetical studies or fantasies, don't bother responding.

Personally,I don't want to father a bastard and the chances a promiscuous woman will possibly do that to me is very high, I can't trust her she had a past, no matter how promiscuous I'm I can't make my wife to mother a child that's not her own, women can decietfully do that, i must ensure that my children are my genes, I don't want a woman with imprints from her exes, her soul is gone, men can have sex detached without Emotions involved, sex is like pissing you don't understand how hornny we are, we can sleep around and still love our main girl, women can't do that, that why men through out history could have multiple wives with concubines and treat them well


But I understand your opinion and where you are coming from Ma, take care

CaveAdullam:


I have occupied this position before, and definitely, I understand where exactly you are coming from. In addition, your Christian belief will never make you accept anything contrary unless it harmonizes with the Bible. Ergo, it will be mere waste of time arguing.

Most people that come up with different arguments in respect to the intersexual dynamics do not understand it and follows the societal scripts already established, hence, anything that opposes these scripts is anathema!

Homo sapiens are sexually dimorphic, until we are able to get around this fact can there be a peaceful complement between both genders as witnessed before the advent of feminism and the sexual revolution. Welcome to chaos 101 if we ever think men and women can hold on to the same standard or behave similarly all way round.

Have a nice day!

In my response, I put aside my religious belief. I was scientific and not religious. Wonder why you are still talking about my religion.

Have a nice day too.

JESHAL:


Personally,I don't want to father a bastard and the chances a promiscuous woman will possibly do that to me is very high, I can't trust her she had a past, no matter how promiscuous I'm I can't make my wife to mother a child that's not her own, women can decietfully do that, i must ensure that my children are my genes, I don't want a woman with imprints from her exes, her soul is gone, men can have sex detached without Emotions involved, sex is like pissing you don't understand how hornny we are, we can sleep around and still love our main girl, women can't do that, that why men through out history could have multiple wives with concubines and treat them well


But I understand your opinion and where you are coming from Ma, take care

Just know that it's not only women that get affected by soul ties. The men are also tied spiritually and emotionally to these women they had sex with. Contrary to what you believe, men also have emotions even if it's not as compared to the women.

Have a good day.

iRepNaija1:


Honestly, I'm not sure. But NL is not the place. You have too many toxic, misogynistic, sexist people (notice I said people and not just men) who are very happy remaining ignorant and narrow-minded. You'll drive yourself crazy trying to educate others here. But I still appreciate your effort.

Especially people without experience, just theories and fantasies. They have a shielded mindset that is almost impossible to penetrate. Some of them.outgrow it.

Besides, some of the guys insisting on marrying virgin end up not getting it. Nature always has a way of humbling them.

Kindly update your diary.

TONYE001:
Just a while ago, I read in dismay the thread about virginity on the Front Page.

I wouldn't go into the flawed arguments of the original poster and his supporters. Whether virginity is a prerequisite for a successful

Felixnyle:
Kindly update your diary.

Hello,

I'd do that soonest. Didn't forget, I've been terribly busy.

Thanks for reading.

I am aware that you are a very busy person. How is your studies going?
I enjoy reading your diary.
All the best.

TONYE001:


Hello,

I'd do that soonest. Didn't forget, I've been terribly busy.

Thanks for reading.