Annie001:

You ended up saying nothing.
Good luck to you

BoBiafra:


Animal kingdom.
Anytime I want to laugh;I read a Nigerian newspaper;or listen to a Nigerian news.
If you dont, get it.
Forget about it.

SmartyPants:


And I'm pointing out to you that it is a faulty analogy.

So many things are wrong with it.

1. We need to eat animals - we don't eat humans

2. killing an animal for food would not then equate to murder. It would equate to what we call lawful killing in the Law

So is a state execution of a murderer worse than slapping an innocent woman or child for no reason?

You tell me.

maasoap:


You should know that I'm a Muslim and Muslims don't find what they are doing to Muslim nations funny or welcoming. If you can dig into my past comments, feel free to do so, you will see it there. But before you begin, just know that I registered here more than 10 years ago. Happy searching.
This case to me, is not about whites, blacks, Muslims or Christians. It's about what it's wrong is wrong, no need to justify it.

Walkee:
you don't execute people for no reason. You execute mass murderers, if you don't execute them they'd kill more people including inmates.
You don't need to eat animals, you can survive perfectly without killing animals. You snuffed life out of a living thing because you are craving meat and you somehow believe you have the moral high ground to vilify someone who slapped a cat because it defecated on his sofa? What the fucck exactly?
There's nothing like lawfully executing an animal. The animal you killed didn't commit any crime How many people did the goat you ate killed for it to deserve death penalty?
We kill animal for food because we believe they are not our equals. It's extremely hypocritical for a specie who slaughter millions of innocent cows and pigs everyday to feign outrage over the kicking of a cat, a vicious feline that rip rats apart while it's still breathing.

IamV:


You have not answered my question.

What's your point exactly ? the point is deep down your 4kn arsse,figure out a way to check it out,thanks

Iceberg3:

I have chosen to be a piece of shit ! My c*nt of a father and mother supports my choice.

NoSentiment:


I am not denying what Zouma did is wrong. What i pointed out is the double standards. If the Westerners can reward Blair with a KNIGHTHOOD after lying on purpose to invade and kill or maimed millions of HUMAN BEINGS, what moral justification do they have to punish Zouma for kicking not KILLING a CAT? Is this not double standard? Is this not hypocracy? Or is the life of a CAT more valuable than those of HUMAN BEINGS?Tell me! You are defending the indefensible while I am only poiting double standards, hypocricy, chicanery and immoralities without diminishing the rights of animals or human beings. On the contrary you come across as valuing a cat's wellbeing (not life) over and above human lives just to appease your masters (Europeans).

SmartyPants:


It is entirely different - you can eat your cats but why beat a cat for fun??

lexy2014:


oga, u havent answered my questions:

if kicking an animal is inhumane, how is killing and eating an animal any less? will killing an animal in an abattoir be a less painful death than killing it in front of your house? if you cant kill and eat a human being because it is inhumane and barbaric, why then is killing and eating an animal whether killed in abbatoir not inhumane?