Skip to content
Vanguard News

Menu
HOME
LATEST NEWS
METRO
SPORTS
ENTERTAINMENT
VIDEOS
RELATIONSHIPS
POLITICS
FORUM


POSTED INNEWS
IPOB not a proscribed organization in UK, says British High Commission in Nigeria
May 6, 2022
Why ESN, Ebubeagu can't work together - IPOB
By Nwafor Sunday


British High Commission in Nigeria has faulted reports that UK Government has added the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to the UK’s list of terrorist groups.

This is coming a day after it was reported that UK sought to exclude IPOB members who have committed human rights abuses from its asylum program.



Clarifying its message, British High Commission in Nigeria in a statement made available to newsmen opined: “We are aware of inaccurate reporting circulating in the media and online that the UK Government has added the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to the UK’s list of terrorist groups or organisations banned under UK law. These reports are untrue. The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) is not a proscribed organisation in the UK.

“The inaccurate reporting relates to the 13 April 2022 publication by the UK Government of a revised Country Policy and Information note (CPIN) on separatist groups in SE Nigeria, including the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). CPINs provide country of origin information (COl) and analysis of COI for use by UK Government decision-makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims.



READ ALSO: FG commends UK for tagging IPOB terrorist group
“All asylum and human rights claims made in the UK are considered on their individual facts in accordance with our obligations under the UN Refugee Convention and European Convention on Human Rights, taking into account relevant background country information and case law.

“The CPIN on separatist groups in the South East, including the Indigenous People of Biafra, provides a general assessment of risks faced by individuals belonging to those groups. These assessments are based on an analysis of publicly available country information obtained from a wide range of reliable sources including media outlets; UK and other governments; local, national and international organisations; and non-government organisations.



“This CPIN also acknowledges that the Nigerian government has proscribed IPOB as a terrorist organisation, some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”

RELATED NEWS
IPOB
Asylum to IPOB members: UK disrespectful, sabotaging terrorism fight — FG
April 20, 2021
In "News"


Skip to content
Vanguard News

Menu
HOME
LATEST NEWS
METRO
SPORTS
ENTERTAINMENT
VIDEOS
RELATIONSHIPS
POLITICS
FORUM


POSTED INNEWS
IPOB not a proscribed organization in UK, says British High Commission in Nigeria
May 6, 2022
Why ESN, Ebubeagu can't work together - IPOB
By Nwafor Sunday


British High Commission in Nigeria has faulted reports that UK Government has added the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, to the UK’s list of terrorist groups.

This is coming a day after it was reported that UK sought to exclude IPOB members who have committed human rights abuses from its asylum program.



Clarifying its message, British High Commission in Nigeria in a statement made available to newsmen opined: “We are aware of inaccurate reporting circulating in the media and online that the UK Government has added the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) to the UK’s list of terrorist groups or organisations banned under UK law. These reports are untrue. The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) is not a proscribed organisation in the UK.

“The inaccurate reporting relates to the 13 April 2022 publication by the UK Government of a revised Country Policy and Information note (CPIN) on separatist groups in SE Nigeria, including the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). CPINs provide country of origin information (COl) and analysis of COI for use by UK Government decision-makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims.



READ ALSO: FG commends UK for tagging IPOB terrorist group
“All asylum and human rights claims made in the UK are considered on their individual facts in accordance with our obligations under the UN Refugee Convention and European Convention on Human Rights, taking into account relevant background country information and case law.

“The CPIN on separatist groups in the South East, including the Indigenous People of Biafra, provides a general assessment of risks faced by individuals belonging to those groups. These assessments are based on an analysis of publicly available country information obtained from a wide range of reliable sources including media outlets; UK and other governments; local, national and international organisations; and non-government organisations.



“This CPIN also acknowledges that the Nigerian government has proscribed IPOB as a terrorist organisation, some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”

LMAO. This is a dagger to the hearts of all zombies and unity beggars in the universe.

If ipob are not careful they will soon be proscribe

studio14:
If ipob are not careful they will soon be proscribe

And what will happen?

At this point even if Britain, USA, United Nations, Russia, FBI, FIFA, AU, UEFA, Michael Jackson and 2pac Shakur proscribed IPOB, it won't still stop Igbos from their pursuit for Biafra.

Those BAT supporters miscreants will not like this news o

Ishilove and naptu2 just read this topic



UK said some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”


In essence, IPOB members who haven’t done that are qualified to be given asylum.

As if the world don't know the truth.

The UK should get out abeg

Ebubu2:
Ishilove and naptu2 just read this topic

I have read it. So? How does it contradict what was previously posted? How does this, "UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB" mean that the UK has proscribed Ipob?

Can you read and comprehend simple sentences? Do you know the meaning of the word proscribed?

Read this, especially the fifth paragraph.

Series of breakfasts served to NL dears (d€vils) . BMC cretins... yaraba Muslim ewedu eaters and their closest relatives, the fulani migrants, will not like this news o. Take it easy on them

That's true but very soon the British government will definitely do the needful.
Ipob remains a TERRIFYING CANNIBAL ORGANISATION FULL OF GREEDY SELFISH DRUG ABUSERS AND MISCREANT TERRORISTS.

The heart attack goes to Yoruba Muslims and Northerne bandits.




Their UK master really deal with them.

Whoever that is responsible for the senseless killings in the east should stop immediately or be disgraced

UK, US, and the World know that ipod is not a terrorist group, no matter how much Buhari and Tinubu terrorists would want to confuse the people.

And the pain was delivered directly to the camp of zombies, one Nigerian urchins and their zoo government....

...some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”

IPOB are blind to the quote above. IPOB terrorists and foolishness.

naptu2:


I have read it. So? How does it contradict what was previously posted? How does this, "UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB" mean that the UK has proscribed Ipob?

Can you read and comprehend simple sentences? Do you know the meaning of the word proscribed?

Let them be wallowing in ignorance. The message is clear to those that can read and comprehend. This is just the begining by the time UK starts implementing those policies they will know what they are in for.

Why is this news not making front page

Balkan:
Why is this news not making front page

Because many afonja and Northern bandits will die of heart attack.





But had it be that UK commissioner confirm the news to be truth,it will be like four in front page with different caption.




When I heard Kanu on radio saying blow caption I didn't understand what he meant.

naptu2:


I have read it. So? How does it contradict what was previously posted? How does this, "UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB" mean that the UK has proscribed Ipob?

Can you read and comprehend simple sentences? Do you know the meaning of the word proscribed?

Read this, especially the fifth paragraph.

…”advises that persons who have committed human rights against the public will not be granted protection”.


I’m certain that that does not include IPOB members who no records or proofs proves they have committed human rights abuses against the public.


In essence, IPOB members without human crimes abuses will not be denied protection.

MasterJayJay:


IPOB are blind to the quote above. IPOB terrorists and foolishness.

the denial of protection is only for IPOB members who have abused human rights. In essence those who hadn’t, will be provided asylum.

Ebubu2:
…”advises that persons who have committed human rights against the public will not be granted protection”.


I’m certain that that does not include IPOB members who no records or proofs proves they have committed human rights abuses against the public.


In essence, IPOB members without human crimes abuses will not be denied protection.

Good God in heaven! Is this sentence too difficult to comprehend? It's quite simple and short.


"UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB"


OK, I'll spell it out for you.

In 2021 the UK Government initially published an advice which stated that they would grant asylum to Ipob members. They withdrew that advice after protest from the Nigerian Government. That advice was published on Nairaland.

In 2022, the UK Government published another advice which stated that Ipob has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian Government and that there have been reports that it has been involved in violent attacks. Therefore, it advised its officials not to grant asylum to Ipob members that have been involved in violent attacks.

Is that too hard to understand?

MasterJayJay:


IPOB are blind to the quote above. IPOB terrorists and foolishness.

In essence, IPOB members who haven’t done that are capable to be given asylum.

ThickSharon123:

.



“This CPIN also acknowledges that the Nigerian government has proscribed IPOB as a terrorist organisation, some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”

RELATED NEWS
IPOB
Asylum to IPOB members: UK disrespectful, sabotaging terrorism fight — FG
April 20, 2021
In "News"


Skip to content
Vanguard News

Menu
HOME
LATEST NEWS
METRO
SPORTS
ENTERTAINMENT
VIDEOS
RELATIONSHIPS
POLITICS
FORUM


POSTED INNEWS
IPOB not a proscribed organization in UK, says British High Commission in N



“This CPIN also acknowledges that the Nigerian government has proscribed IPOB as a terrorist organisation, some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”

Fake news from IPOB Terrorist.

naptu2:


Good God in heaven! Is this sentence too difficult to comprehend? It's quite simple and short.


"UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB"

“violent members”


Are all of the members of IPOB violent ?

The members of the group who can prove they’re not violent shall be granted asylum.

Ebubu2:
“violent members”


Are all of the members of IPOB violent ?

The members of the group who can prove they’re not violent shall be granted asylum.

I added this to my last post, since it seems very difficult for you to understand.

naptu2:





OK, I'll spell it out for you.

In 2021 the UK Government initially published an advice which stated that they would grant asylum to Ipob members. They withdrew that advice after protest from the Nigerian Government. That advice was published on Nairaland.

In 2022, the UK Government published another advice which stated that Ipob has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian Government and that there have been reports that it has been involved in violent attacks. Therefore, it advised its officials not to grant asylum to Ipob members that have been involved in violent attacks.

Is that too hard to understand?

How does that contradict this: UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB

Ebubu2:
Ishilove and naptu2 just read this topic



UK said some members of IPOB have reportedly used violence against the state and members of the public, and advises that persons who have committed human rights abuses must not be granted protection.”


In essence, IPOB members who haven’t done that are qualified to be given asylum.

Lol, one of the people you mentioned is a tribal bigot and ethnic champion, disguising as a neutral person

Small small his true colours would be revealed

Lalasticlala and Mynd44, why is this thread or similar ones not on front page yet?