eleko1:
Goat. GO school first.When u graduate,u can drag it with ur equally illiterate father at home.what is lybia

Caseless:
Cuba should take advantage of this situation and, Iran and Venezuela should use this to get their nuclear program fully in ground(especially Iran) to prevent invasion. America would look for a weaker nation to test its strength after the proxy humiliation it received in Ukraine with her allies.

watersideboys:


If its paining you eat grass. Only Russia couldn't beat Germany read your history before you comment.. olodo... all this write up is waste of space and jargon...

newdawn2017:
get out of my mention u philistine.

citygarden:
Putin is a kind of leader that doesn't give any Bleep about any country. He take his citizens first before any other countries.
I wish NATO can dare him and see the end result. They will now know Russia is only rehearsing in Ukraine.

citygarden:
Why all hyping NATO like this? This is not Hollywood film. Where america army always win.

Is it not the same NATO that fight for 20 years in Afghanistan with Taliban with AK-47?
The same NATO that have been in Syria for over 10 years, that haven't win?
How many earths have NATO wipes out since they have been fighting their useless war.

They think Russia is Iraq or Libya? And they can do this successfully is because of the rebel in those countries.

HonNL:


SOURCE

bestman09:

All the commentators above should do well and join the Russian military and face NATO. Talk is indeed very cheap

eleko1:
let him invade Finland/Sweden first.We wan check something

aribisala0:
The Taliban just defeated NATO

chachazzy:


If e sure for NATO, make dem arm Finland or Sweden.
I wan check something.
Putin don dare them already.
Once Finland or Sweden is armed by NATO, Russia will respond in KIND. Lol

eleko1:
just wait and see.How many country PUTIN wan fight

alcuin:
Putin, it's a simple matter.

Place weapons in Cuba and Venezuela.

TWoods:


Russia is no match for the US in a conventional war, it only has nuclear weapons. The US has over 1800 warheads... Russia will simply cease to exist if the US is attacked.

eleko1:
suffer head.u Don chopped prison beans well

newdawn2017:
but how can we join?

Johel:



....The one wey your Pman chop Abi?

eleko1:
just wait and see.Jow many country PUTIN wan fight

Taliban defeated NATO? When did this war happen? does this one even know what NATO means? chai where this kind dundies abi mumus from dey come sef?
Abeg Nairaland should start doing Iq tests for new members I beg.

eleko1:
u look like a prisoner about yo be execute.See how u look frightened They'll eventually shot u and nail ur father balls

Bfly:
Putin wants peace. It is USA initiating bullshit and Putin don't take shit.

He is only still reacting.

I doubt what will happen if he initiates shit.
I liken Putin to a rattlesnake.

Johel:



Cry today,cry tomorrow,cry forever...Maybe you might just drown in your own tears.

eleko1:
Dey"ll eventually call u of ur cell and kill u RAT.Stop sweating

BUSHHUNTER:
Russia always flexing muscle with little nations...If Turkey is allowed they will wipe half of Russia it's a known fact. More reason Putin always urge dialogue/peace with Erdogan.

Johel:



Lol ...see frustration,eya... I'm not the cause of your misfortune dingbat...pour your anger on your failed family...poverty stricken thing...I no see better country like Russia and Switzerland apply for visa Na USA and UK wey don cast...gimme free visa sef,I no go..I rather go to Japan...U can cry all u want o,you Kuku get bucket,but that's if you can afford a bucket sef... Nonentity

eleko1:
Dey"ll eventually call u of ur cell and kill u RAT.Stop sweating

Sweetplum:

Yes this is a faceless forum. I v spoken.
You v the right to support Russia, Putin or any narcissist. But you don't v the right to be addressed well if you support evil.

loswhite:
I'm sure your super Russia has done exactly the same thing....lol. Going after small Ukraine while blaming NATO. Why doesn't he just attack NATO?

Geniuelander:










Guys continue dropping Vawolence
You're giving me joy

mach7:
Your comments here isn't factual. Actually, Russia has 5,977 warheads which is more than the United States's 5,428 according to Wikipedia. However, the number of deployed warheads is 1,644 for the US and 1,588 for Russia, but Russia's overall warhead yield (destructive power) is greater than that of the US.

With regards to conventional warfare, I think you are very wrong. Important questions you should ask yourself is where will the war be fought and with which weapons. If it is a land war, Russia smacks the US as it has more land assets. if it is an air war, then it will a brutal stalemate as Russia has air to air capabilities combined with a very robust air defence set-up. So while the US will have the edge in terms of quality of planes and their quantity, Russia has the air defence means to protect its own airspace and serve as a backup to the air fleet. With regards to Naval warfare, Russia won't fight a surface war with the US as the US has an overwhelming edge so it will be a submarine based warfare and Russia currently has more subs (both conventional/nuclear) than the US. Furthermore, look at the map of Russia, and the map of the US and tell me how and where the US major conventional naval assets i.e. Aircraft Carriers can be deployed against Russia. They can't go into the Baltic, as Russia will destroy them from Kaliningrad, they can't go into the Black Sea due to the Bosphorus Straight, they can't attack from the Pacific as they have to pass the choke points of the Kuril Island chain which Russia controls or to alternatively go through the South China Sea (between Japan and Taiwan) and that draws in China..

Also note that the farther an Aircraft Carrier is from the area of operations, the lower the payload and operational range of the aircraft it carries as they have to carry more fuel and less bombs. If they attempt by any means to near the coast, then they come into range of land based anti-ship missiles such as the Bastion system.

On a side note, from February 24th to date, Russia has launched an approximate total of 7,560 air and sea launched cruise missiles at the rate of 60 per day. Even the US cannot keep up with such rate and this doesn't even include Artillery.

Russia's military industrial backbone is state-owned, while that of the US is privately owned. So their output ability at the moment isn't comparable. Secondly, the components and raw materials needed for the manufacture of most US weapons come from Europe or China/Africa (in terms of raw materials - rare earth metals). While Russia is self-sufficient in all its component needs (vacuum tubes and quartz crystals - Russia uses these in place of conventional chips due to their durability) and all raw materials are sourced from within its own territory.

Finally, what about food. To fight a conventional war, you need to feed your populace and also your army. US is a net-importer of food and means that any war that affects food supply to the US will cause major problems (just look at the current situation - US is not even directly fighting Russia, yet food inflation is already very high). On the other hand, Russia is a net-exporter of food. It can feed itself conveniently and also export to others. Hence, it won't be affected by food.

So these are points to note and digest before drawing conclusions.