Is shaykh jabata the first scholar that regard All Bid'ah (innovation) as Kufur?

Imam shatibī said " kullu bidatin teshri'oon " (every Bid'ah is an act of creating shari'ah) walhiyazubillah. Book: alhitisōm lishātinī.

Imam barbahary said " kullu bidatin zoharat hiya Kufur billah" (every clear Bi'diah is Kufur with Allah). Book: Sharhu Sunnah lilbarbahary.

Imam muzanī " if he initiate any Bi'diah he's out of the structure of being a Muslim and out of Islam ". Book: As-sunnah lil muzanī ..

Were all these ancestors Jabatiyyah?
Why blind following and unnecessary fault finding on the shaykh?

"The word Kullu encompasses everything and the person (prophet Muhammad saw) that used Kullu for Bid'ah knew and understood what it carries " Soliu Uthaymeen. Book , Alhibdā'u.
Note: shaykh Soliu Uthaymeen (ra) divided Bi'diah but still he accepted that the Kullu refers every Dolālah which the prophet regarded to be end in hell." Bi'diah surpasses disobedience " Imam Abdulwahab. Book : fadlul Islam..

Wallahi, Almuadith Muhammad Ali Jabata never opposed anybody who divided Bi'diah into two rather he asking to let be refutating Bi'diah and uplift Sunnah. But, simply because many acclaimed Sunnah preachers are romancing with innovators they find the shaykh strictness and straightforwardness as blockade for their relationship with innovator. They ganged up to be opposing him for not dividing Bid'ah which has no reference. Alfa Qamardeen Yunus Akorede, is a funny man , he jumped over and stated that , the shaykh is not on Sunnah path because he doesn't divide Bi'diah. Smile . When he (Akorede) presented reference for his own division it was ijtihād of a companion (marwān ) which many scholars have also rendered unworthy to be using as reference for division of Bi'diah.

May Allah guide us, hold us firmly and grant us mammoth understand of His Deen.