Selfishness is just an option of human life, but the truth is that human life is designed to operate in brotherhood. That a woman wants to be the only wife of a man is a sensual choice. And it does not nullify the major factor of human life; which is brotherhood. That a woman finds herself sitting on the head of a man while eating her food, cannot make that act a permanent feature for the man, so that each time she wants to eat, the man will be called to act as a stool. There is no moral right to sole ownership of a man by a woman, in fact, it is sadism for a woman to campaign for, or enforce sole ownership of a man in the world God designed to operate in brotherhood. This is a gross abuse of free will partnership. Women should rather campaign for care, love, respect and morale boost. A responsible man ought to know this. After all said and done, we will all stand before the one who designed the human life in brotherhood to answer how our personal opinion influenced our credit life in the world God designed without our input.
We are all enjoying life as a privilege not a right. Irrespective of any situation in life, it remains sadism for any woman to enforce sole ownership of a man because we are enjoying life in credit without any power to pay back. What if you die and another woman comes in, would you be able to cough in the grave? How then do you claim sole ownership in a future owned by God that you cannot predict. It is better to share a man than for you to be pushed aside by God to enable an age long starving woman come in. This is a brotherhood existence, the earlier you understand it the better for you. Those against brotherhood, even if they have strong claims to the Bible, always crash and have permanent damage to their peace of mind. Finally, polygamy is not for everyone, even marriage itself is not for everyone. It is for those who believe in brotherhood. All I am saying is that those who can responsibly handle polygamy, should be greatly encouraged. Yes, discouraging such people is sadism.

Yeah! It's sadism for a man too to claim sole ownership of a woman. I mean why will a man feel emasculated when his wife goes sleeping around within the neighborhood. Doesn't he know their's something called brotherhood? That his elder brother, younger one's and even father should be able to lay with his wife?
And also, it's confirmed that you are a sadistic muslim who need's a better approach to justifying adultery sometime's called polygamy.

A woman is free to have more than one man, but is that sustainable? Will it guarantee peace for the woman? My opinion is that compulsion should not be used. There is room for divorce. You can even be a homosexual, that is your choice the life credit allows you to do your wish. However, I beleive people should do only things that are sustainable even if we don't care about the designer of the universe. Whose peace is affected at the end of a selfish life exploration? Selfishness is only a choice in freewill life.

Ishiusah: A woman is free to have more than one man, but is that sustainable? Will it guarantee peace for the woman? My opinion is that compulsion should not be used. There is room for divorce. You can even be a homosexual, that is your choice the life credit allows you to do your wish. However, I beleive people should do only things that are sustainable even if we don't care about the designer of the universe. Whose peace is affected at the end of a selfish life exploration? Selfishness is only a choice in freewill life.

seriously guy, are you for real?

Sounds like the OP has seen something that caught his eye....

The truth is bitter. Sometimes we do not know as much as we claim. Try and remove sentiment when reading the Bible. The God of the Bible cannot change. Anyone who has polygamy as a necessity should not be mocked. You don't seem to know what is Biblical adultery. You people make God a politician to enable you chat a new course.

Someone pls call 911.

Guiter life my friend, don't ignore minority opinion. Many are called but few are chosen. I was opposing like you but everything changed three years ago. I am fighting a fight of conscience.

My dear friend I hate to break this to you but seriously, have you considered seeking medical help? Look , I am for the emancipation of humanity and all but you don't sound like you know what you are talking about. I mean, your submission's here are not in the least coherent which speak's volume's of the state of your mind. You see the reason I am a lil bit concerned about your health now?

Ishiusah: Guiter life my friend, don't ignore minority opinion. Many are called but few are chosen. I was opposing like you but everything changed three years ago. I am fighting a fight of conscience.

The world deserves the stammering lips of the prophet, it is the trap for those who claim to be wise. Isaiah 28:11-13. You need to consider the agony of decent women who will definitly die waiting for a husband. I am sure you have not heard about the exploitation they are secretly forced to undergo. It is a sad tale, that is why I stammer.

Guitarlife I waited for another stroke from you but non came! Then let us conclude it this way: "be not thou therefore ashamed of the testimony of our lord". 2Timothy 1:8, KJV. "This know also that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves ... Without natural affection ... Having a form of godliness". 2Timothy 3:1-5, KJV. If primitive generations have natural affection for lonely decent women like Ruth, there is a question mark to our claimed advancement of mind, so called "NEW DISPENSATION". A new dispensation with a new character God and a people without natural affection.

It’s sadism for a woman to enforce sole ownership of a man?

Poor you, how heartless of a woman.

You make it sound as if the upheld monogamous structure is imposed by women...
What if the situation was reversed?
And is it a great service for polygamous men to enjoy exclusive ownership of multiple women but sadism if that woman wanted exclusivity?

Initially I thought that you were a Muslim because I understand in Islam polygamy up until a limit is allowed but if you are using Christianity to justify polygamy then surely you are at odds with the bible. If Christians claim to follow the New Testament then you must also recognise that monogamy is encouraged and not polygamy. You are talking about god etc yet ignoring your own “god’s words”.
I have to say you have actually done a shoddy job in defending polygamy...eish.

A woman is free to have more than one man, but is that sustainable? Will it guarantee peace for the woman?

Will polygamy guarantee peace for the man?

You need to consider the agony of decent women who will definitly die waiting for a husband. I am sure you have not heard about the exploitation they are secretly forced to undergo. It is a sad tale, that is why I stammer.

As if you really care. ..but are you suggesting that a solution to that is to settle for a polygamous marriage?
Have you heard of the agony that some women have to go through in a polygamous households?
And what about the plenty men waiting to get married, shall they go and get married to the same woman?

OP me I support you. I know that it was always the plan for men to have multiple partners, that's why a man can impregnate multiple women at the same time but the woman can only get pregnant once. It's how the blueprints are .

OP: Your allusion to the woman sitting on the man's head while having a meal is reminiscent of se.xual female domination which has a huge following in the western world as a kink. Have you been exposed to such? Does your wife do this to you?

^^ You want to blind people abi ?

I know a girl who is the girlfriend of a Pastor. He refuses to have sex, it says it is sin. She walks around topless before him, and excited knowing that he is unable to play.
She is relieved quietly with another man because she is not Christian.

Deep Sight, very nice photo.

Well, seriously, I do not think that polygamy is a good way ... But I'm not the one to judge anyone.

Thanks for all your reactions except the dirty picture, I have been engaged all day. Sure, there is anger against polygamy and non of you cares to know about the underlying factors. The ugly picture is caused by lazy and heartless men and women who have taken over the marriage institution. What else do you expect when untrained people become doctors? Or when a thief is made a Governor? Certainly our world will be worst if polygamy is ruled out. Monogamy will only be in name, practically free sex dorminates. Search google to see the US gender ratio as a clear example. You don't have to cut off your hands because of a mistake it caused you. I see you guys as church bench warmers, and "yes sir" members to eloquent sweet tongue pastors. Check my post on 'POLYGAMY IS JUSTICE' http://ishiusah..com/ if you need detail on Biblical marriage. A woman is free to chose any sexual prefrence she wants, but let her not frame scriptures to support herself in what the scriptures has never supported. Her act is simply her choice.Those who want heaven follow only Biblical things.

Are you circumcised, Ishiusah?
Do you eat pork?

PA1982: Are you circumcised, Ishiusah?
Do you eat pork?

Ishiusah did not like the picture, that picture disturbed his mind all day!. I think the image is illustrative and appropriate. There is no pornography at all.

Deep Sight have you more pictures?

Ptolomeus:

Deep Sight have you more pictures?

Thousands.

A personal fantasy.