tsdarkside:

then albinos should stay away from there...problem solved.....i dont even understand why you want to come white in this world anyway....

You think albinos choose to be albinos? Asswipe...

iceberylin:
I knew their skin would be white

They aren't white; they're Asians.

Clueless fisherman vs illiterate abokee. No matter which one wins, Nigeria is doomed. Things are looking good for Ghana. God bless the land and people of Ghana. AMEN.

bushdoc9919:
[

Liberia gained its independence in 1847. American dependent, yes. American colony? No. And the black slaves were originally from?




Which means that it is much older than Ghana, not so?
It was even the country that inspired Pan Africanists like Marcus Garvey.....



By your definition of indigenous....the Malagasy people, the Lingala people, infact MOST african peoples won't be indigenous.

Many African tribes are migrant tribes.

And Egyptians are not Arabs BTW....and the Sudanese are mixt between Arabs and Blacks.

But they are still Africans.....so yer point does not stand.



Oh well....the operative term is Black Majority rule. (Some black tribes migrated into South Africa ages ago....displacing the original tribes. Long story).



No need to be angry, old chap. And indigenous Africans are not all black.

And anyway.....the important fact is that we have done nothing with all that independence.....and no, I am not just talking about your own country.

You need to read African history. Africa was once black top to bottom: from the Nile Delta to the Cape of Good Hope. Egyptians were black, but they have been wiped out, and their black blood was diluted. Same thing with the Maghreb countries (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya).

Rather than fighting over meaningless technicalities, African countries should unite to liberate the northern third of the continent from Arab rule.

And yes, the Malagasy are not indigenous. They are a mix between indigenous Africans and Indonesian invaders. Those with more Indonesian blood should be deported from Africa. Lingala originated in Africa, and so they do not count as invaders.

lucianohase:
. For instance England colonised US but presently,US is england's master!Anything that US says "this is the way we want on world issue" england will say"I concur sir !".lol.... England can't challenge US economically,politicaly and militarily. Nigeria is ghana's master and u know that in ur heart. Economically,politically,n militarily in west africa' if should narrow it! There is no need dragging over something that is so obvious. Politically we have more influence in west africa than ghana,go ask any person! U knw that in ur heart. In africa as a whole, u see Nigeria,south africa and Egypt (forget about the countries experience) ,they are the once that have much influence in Africa. Ghana no follow for wetin dey happen. I knw ur heart agrees with wht I'm saying cos its the obvious truth! No need for aguements,gudmorning n v a great day!

Nigeria has more influence in West Africa only because of its large population size and size of economy (vulnerably dependent on oil). It does not mean that Nigeria has a good reputation or commands respect. Far from it.

bushdoc9919:


Sorry to be rather pedantic but...

1.Liberia...independent in 1847.
2.Ethiopia (regained independence in 1941 after five years of rule by Mussolini's Italy).
3.Tunisia (1956)
4.Sudan(1956)
5Egypt(at least nominally independent since the 19th Century).
6.The Union of South Africa(1910).

Ghana is hardly the first.

By independent, I mean returning sovereignty to the indigenous African population. Liberia was controlled by freed American slaves at its founding, which made a de facto American colony.

Ethiopia was never recognised as a colony. It was occupied for around 10 years, so it never really gained independence.

Tunisia, Egypt, Sudan: These countries are still under Arab rule today. How are they ruled by the indigenous African people?

South Africa was not returned to indigenous rule until 1994 when Mandela took office.

So you need to read up on history, because ignorance is very embarrassing. Every educated Africans know that Ghana started the movement for indigenous self-governance in Africa.

lucianohase:
lol...our last son ghana don turn to our big brother abi? Joke of the century...hahahaaaaaa....come but ghana's economy is still in shambles nah!

Ghana is the father of African nations because we gained independence first, and only then did other Africans want to end colonial rule. If it weren't for Ghana, you would still be ruled from London as colonial subjects.

Ghana taught Africans dignity and self-esteem.

lucianohase:
Over reliance on oil is bad...Y can't we learn from china,india,japan even South africa how they v been making it big without having oil,but thru a diversified economy!

Don't forget your big brother next door: Ghana.

tpia1:


african descent means someone descended from the negroid groups of africa.


blonde haired blue eyed are not of african descent in racial classification because they are descended from caucasian ancestors in recent history which is verifiable, unlike your everybody is african theory.

if everybody is african then who is from the other continents? Nobody?


millions of years theory is not the same as couple hundred years fact.


learn to distinguish between the two when discussing.

What is a "negroid" group? How to delineate this group? What features must one have to be included? Your reasoning is flawed.

optimumprimus: All human beings have a sense of beauty. you can look at something and say "hey,that thing looks good"
t

That's too touchy-feely for me. I'm not saying there are no decent (both in appearance and personality) Indians out there, but as a race they are repulsive to the extreme. If you ever seen how they act in Africa, you would have to agree.

fr3do:

Your head go fall off o

As I see it, Arabia is just an extension of Africa, separated from the mainland by a very narrow Red Sea, much narrower than the Persian Gulf that separates it from Asia.

I wouldn't wish GEJ on my worst enemy...

tpia1:



Black is applied to people of african or negroid descent.

Indians are considered caucasian since some caucasians are indeed dark skinned but not of african ancestry.

African descent: what does that even mean? Didn't science prove that all mankind descended from Africans? So with that in mind, how is a blond blue-eyed white from Iceland of less African descent than Michael Jordan? They are both 100% of African-descent because their ancestors came from Africa.

The whole notion of negroid, caucasoid and mongoloid as biological groupings have been disproven by science decades ago.

Can't we all just accept that all human beings differ from each other in various ways, and some differ more than others?

optimumprimus: you mean indian & sri lankan tamils ?

I don't know and frankly don't care what they are called, but those people are truly a disgusting race of people: poverty-stricken, greedy, lustful, inhumane, and reeks to high heavens.

Not all human races are created equal lol.

chinkichun:

False.
The grass is greener where you water it.

Amen brutha!