PoliteActivist:


I quoted the bible: Genesis 5. States CLEARLY that man and woman were created same exact moment, which is the only thing that CAN make sense!

demmymoney:


It's not culture

It's nature and common sense

Men produce
Women reproduce

Men and women are fundamentally not equal

Akuruoulo:
WOMEN ONLINE IS OPPOSITE OF THEIRSELVES IN REALITY. WE KNOW THEM . THEY DNT WANA SOUND CHEAP

demmymoney:


I read wat u said and u are hinting men and women are equal

sapphiere:
How many offline have approached you for marriage?

Akuruoulo:
A woman is called MAN BECUS SHE WAS CREATED OUT OF A MAN. THEY ARE NEVER CREATED THE SAME DAY. JUST SHUT UP IF U DNT KNW WHAT TO SAY

Akuruoulo:
And genesis 1 vs 2 and 3 makes no sense abi ?

Akuruoulo:
the first creation story makes more sense

McSquishi:


So not only do you believe in the supremacy of males you also believe in the supremacy of white people.

You are all kinds of messed up.

Pathetic

Akuruoulo:
there is simply one creation story

PoliteActivist:


And that's the one that says man and woman were created same day. See my post above

PoliteActivist:


Read the creation story that starts Genesis 2:2. Compare to the one in Genesis One. Tell us how they are same!

Akuruoulo:
Bro when i get home i must pick on u bro

Akuruoulo:
Hahahaha joke of the century. I read ur logics already bro, bt its filld with blunt falacies. I wish am at home near my bible. I must pick back on ur when am home. HAVE A NICE DAY

Akuruoulo:
OH NOW I KNW YOU AREN'T ANSWERING BASE ON THE THREAD. THE THREAD ISN'T TALK ABT WHO APPROACHES WHO, BUT RATHER IT ASKD A SIMPLE QUESTION THAT DESERVES THE TRUTH. I HAVE NEVER SEEN U GIVE A FAIR ANSWER REGARDING BOTH GENDERS. WHO DOESN'T KNW THE TRUTH ON THIS MATTER BT U TRIED TWISTING IT

BLOODYSPERM:



I'm a pragmatist and I deal with truths, facts and harsh uncomfortable realities of life especially our ancestral pasts
Slavery has been an historical fact for most cultures throughout civilization whether black or white cultures
Among our black ancestors we had slaves let's not be hypocritical because white men took our people as slaves, before they took them we were using our people as slaves and they also were using their people as slaves too, but our ancestors were not wise enough to develop their own society like white men ancestors, these is facts, what were they using their time for, while at the same time white men were sailing the world, developing their Societies and reaching enlightenment era while black ancestors were tribalistic primitively worshipping idols , practising rituals and engaging in conflicts among each other , why weren't they developing their Societies like white men, why didn't our ancestors leave their dogma and discover the new world, why didn't we colonize other cultures

FACTS
Our ancestors were not as intelligent as white ancestors because they chose to dogmatically follow tribalistic rituals and traditions, white men had left tribalism and moved towards scientific enlightenment and progress

TRUTHS
See the state of Africa with it's leadership and even the people , has anything changed since post-colonization , nothing ,facts is that collectively speaking even after receiving enlightenment and information age in these 21st , the tribalistic primitive instincts of our ancestors still exists unlike in Western Societies that have risen above tribalism, we still choose to be incompetent and we don't seek out intelligence or even apply intelligence like the white men , still blinded by religion and Cultural dogmas, even black women even have an inferiority complex of their skin seeing themselves as less attractive hence they bleach to become fairer

FACTS
Black America communities have the worst mordern statistics with regards to social issues like family, marriage,
fatherlessness , the statistics even during segregation were better than now,and most blacks vote for Democrat whose politicians and media platforms manipulate your emotions with trigger words like systematic racism and white supremacy, police brutality when the statistics shows that all these are cultural marxist tools to polarize you from whites and make you all loose focus on more pressing issues like black to black violence , fatherlessness which are more systematic than any racism post civil rights


If black Americans like you who live in Progressive western societies , who ought to be more intelligent than us based in Africa can be fooled by leftist politicans and manipulated with racism to make you loose focus from your main community problems , then what hope do native black Africans have when our colored folks in the west are pawns of liberal elites

As I said , I'm a pragmatist and I work with data , facts and statistics, I don't like to judge people based on their group with identity politics because I believe societal problems must be solved on an individual level with emphasizes on family building and entrepreneurial creativity of individual applying practical knowledge ( wisdom) to solve complex societal problems, I don't lament about things I couldn't control like the ineptitude and incompetence of my black ancestors but rather I make use of my intelligence to Better develop myself and Society as an individual unlike most members of my society who are dogmatic with religion and culture and can't apply critical thinking and deductive reasoning to solve our current economical and political problems

Akuruoulo:
JUDGING FROM HIS MONIKER , HE WILL ONLY ACCEPT ANY LIE IN FAVOUR OF WOMEN

McSquishi:



First, those aren’t facts. But more importantly... Why are you focusing on Black Americans? Look at the statistics in your own country. Look at the rates of domestic violence, rape, adultery, murder, robbery, kidnapping, starvation, female genital mutilation, child rape, child mortality in your majority Black country. The “Black on Black” crime can be witnessed in your own country lol

Look at the statistics of Black Africans in the UK, your people aren’t doing well there. 3% of the population representing about half of the criminals...

Stop obsessing over us. Focus on you.

Why should Black Americans be “smarter” than Africans? You believe Black people in a country that banned Black people from even reading for 250 years and then kept Black people for another 100 years from attending white educational facilities should be smarter and more educated than African people (males at least) who have always had access to education?

Your belief in white supremacy is astounding, more disturbing than your hatred for women...

I’m almost certain there is a white incel behind this account.



There is a difference between the presence of slaves and a slave economy. It’s sad you don’t understand this basic concept. In the West people were stolen and forced to be slaves generation upon generation upon generation... and slaves were the primary mode of production and the driving economic force of nations. Differing totally from slavery in Africa. There was no such system in Africa and slaves in Africa were more akin to serfs in Europe of the same time period.

“slavery as a mode of production was not present in any African society, although some slaves were to be found where the decomposition of communal equality had gone furthest.”

“In Africa there were social formations represent hunting bands, communalism feudalism and many positions intermediate between the last two.”

“[b]The weakness in Africa seemed to have been the lack of a professional interest in acquiring more scientific knowledge and in devising tools to lighten the load of labour as well as to transform hostile environments into areas suitable for human activity. As far as agriculture in Europe was concerned, this professionalism was undertaken by the class with a vested interest in the land — namely, the feudalist landowners and later the capitalist farmers”

“Under communalism every African was assured of sufficient land to meet his own needs by virtue of being a member of a family or community. For that reason and because land was relatively abundant, there were few social pressures or incentives for technical changes to increase productivity”[/b]


You don’t have a basic understanding of ancient history, modern history, or science.


And who even mentioned slavery? You just ramble on like a crazed person.

sapphiere:
The thread says women see marriage as huge achievement. I asked how many women have approached you for marriage?

PoliteActivist:


Do so. But don't fail to get back to me to thank me for teaching u something

PoliteActivist:


Starts Genesis 2:4 not 2:2. Already corrected it.

Do so. Then buy me origin for teaching u something

McSquishi:


Point of correction: your argument was that this other guy was correct to say women ripen earlier than men and you shared an article about a study that briefly spoke of *girl’s* brain’s maturing earlier than boys to help prove his point even accusing me of not doing research or being properly knowledgeable.

You’re incorrect about the differences lasting through the 20’s. I’ve told you that the maturation process where girl’s brains mature earlier than that of boys is something that happens in adolescence. By the time those kids are 17 that maturity gap will have closed.

Even physically where girls enter puberty 1-2 years earlier than boys on average, they have caught up to each other by their late teens. The terms “boy” and “girl” are used for a reason, these studies have to do with kids. Not people in their 20’s.

Both men and women’s brains are considered fully developed at 25. The gender differences in maturation are not present in our 20’s, though.

I was on topic referring to the “ugly” part because it highlights that you sharing a article that briefly mentions brain maturation was irrelevant since that’s not the point the guy was making who you were hoping to defend.

Certainly, it’s not just men who pressure women. But it’s disingenuous for any man to ask why women see marriage as a major accomplishment when they themselves tell women it is a major accomplishment for us.

benji93:
Why the bolded, when i clearly mentioned that my argument doesn't go beyond that. Besides, I never said people in their 20's. I said it's until 20. 20 is an the upper limit. I do apologize for making such an assumption with respect to your knowledge. That was an assumption based on past history. I clearly mentioned that. I used the first article for the 20 upper limit. You could certainly find another article that suggests an age lesser than 20, which I wouldn't argue with cos it's clear for these developmental periods are not quite specific. You will always have a plus or minus, but i would appreciate it if you post one, so we know your argument at least has support. Now there's certainly the issue of reliability of a source, which can be ignored as we don't have lots of journal publications on the subject. The second article does suggest that the catching up occurs by late high school, but does not indicate the age while another suggests it narrows. Perhaps classifying the argument as correct is a little too confident but the 20 years cap is quite reasonable, considering the age problem. For the last bolded, i cannot argue with that. It is certainly disingenuous. The guy made a lot of points, the ugly part was clearly not the only one. We could go back and forth on what his end was, but that's beside the point, cos he did make multiple points, even though they probably shouldn't belong in the same test. However, when I first mentioned you I clearly indicated which of those points I was supporting, so again bringing up the "ugly" thing is definitely not on point, but again it could have been cos you misinterpreted my initial argument.



https://www.baronnews.com/2020/02/28/why-do-girls-mature-faster-than-boys/#:~:text=Girls%20physically%20mature%20faster%20than,to%20their%20differences%20in%20biology.

https://shine365.marshfieldclinic.org/kids-health/boys-girls-maturity-gap/

ImpactCrater:


if you are able to catch a mugu who is obligated to provide the basics of life and protect you free of charge while you can afford to nag, disrespect, insult and feel entitled without accepting any responsibility... wont you celebrate such a lopsided arrangement?
Marriage is designed for womens' exclusive benefits and the man is just a diaposable workhorse who is deceived by imaginary gains to provide for her and her children in life and even after his death.
plus the society has been manipulated to use the apparatus of the state to fight men on behalf of women.
A man has no real benefit in the arrangemnt of marriage which I suspect was cleverly imposed on him.
The more I ponder on this issue the more I dont see any sense in it from the view point of a man's benefits.

Klass99:


[s]I think and feel differently about this, the woman Eve was created because of the man Adam.

God saw his loneliness and dissatisfaction with having to relate with just animals and The Lord alone, so he created him a companion.

The woman met the man on ground already so she never experienced the same feelings of loneliness and dissatisfaction Adam did.

I smiled at a few comments, men are mostly the ones who have a problem being alone and by themselves, they tend to crave companionship the same way Adam did.

A senior colleague (divorced male) was trying to date and get into an exclusive relationship again, every few months I would hear about a different woman he was spending time with and I asked him one day why was he trying so hard to be in a relationship and he said men weren't designed to be alone or by themselves, they don't do well on their own and he was caught up in that situation.

My colleague said so not me and coming from a man who was in his 40s at the time I didn't doubt him, the story of Adam & Eve's creation validates what that colleague said.[/s]

SimplyFacts:


Imagine that!

If ground is levelled, they are supposed to worship men as small gods. Instead, the new breeds are now fighting for the caps wey men take dey camouflage/cover the bald-as-a-result-of-too-much-responsibilities head.

And to think you would still be the one to pay on top arrogance, pride & equality,,,,,what an entanglement!