Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,143,278 members, 7,780,634 topics. Date: Thursday, 28 March 2024 at 06:12 PM

Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok (8314 Views)

Eight Years After, Chibok Still Unsafe - Punch Editorial / Six Years After Chibok Kidnappings, Boko Haram Uses Coronavirus For Resurgence / Obi Questioned On Why He Invested $30m State Funds In Company Where His Family.. (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by yinchar(m): 5:12am On Apr 14, 2021
The kidnapping of hundreds of Nigerian schoolgirls from Chibok seven years ago led to the launching of a multi-million dollar plan, backed by a former UK prime minister, to bolster security at schools - but it failed to stop abductions and protect children. The swirl of dust thrown up as a helicopter came down to land heralded a high-level visit to Chibok in March 2015.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Nigeria's finance minister at the time and now head of the World Trade Organization, was received by a waiting crowd of community leaders and parents whose daughters had been kidnapped. She was in Chibok to lay the first bricks in a project to rehabilitate the Government Secondary School that had been destroyed by Boko Haram militants on that infamous night of 14 April 2014.

There was a short speech, then trowel in hand she scooped mortar from a pan held mid-air by two assistants and joined two bricks at a 90-degree angle. With the job done there were a couple of handshakes and pictures, then she was gone in another haze of dust.

Mrs Okonjo-Iweala's presence there was part of an international response following the mass abduction of 276 girls by Islamist militants in Chibok in 2014. World opinion was galvanised under the hashtag #BringBackOurGirls - and the UK's former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, spearheaded the $30m (about £22m) Safe Schools Initiative (SSI) - along with UN agencies, the Nigerian government and private business leaders. Five-hundred schools would be protected: there would be new classrooms; there would be fences; there would be armed guards.

"The aim of the plan is to ensure that young people are not only safe in going to school but that we also provide an environment ripe for learning, growth and development free of fear," Mr Brown said in May 2014. It all sounded so good, but seven years on the 500 schools have not been protected and the classrooms have not been built.

Chibok's school still shut

There were some successes including the provision of prefabricated classrooms and learning materials for children in camps for displaced people, but the plan was largely abandoned less than two years after an elaborate launch in Nigeria's capital, Abuja. The recent spate of school kidnappings in north and north-western Nigeria highlights the failure of the government to develop policies that could improve safety at schools. One-hundred-and-twelve of the Chibok schoolgirls are still missing and their school, part of 30 selected for a pilot phase of safe school models, was never fully rebuilt.
Though blocks of classrooms were put up after Mrs Okonjo-Iweala's visit, community leaders say they were poorly constructed.

"It was a substandard structure, every wind that blew destroyed a part of the building. It kept falling off again and again and till today it has not been used," Allan Manasseh, spokesman for the Chibok community, told the BBC. However, classrooms at the school are currently being renovated by the Nigerian army, funded by the Borno state government after Governor Babagana Zulum visited the school in November and was appalled by what he saw.

'Security goes beyond the cosmetic'

The safe school model, designed by what was then the UK's Department for International Development (Dfid), was aimed at providing a programme for the protection of schools, prevention of attacks, and continued education of students in a region that had been devastated by the activities of Boko Haram. But none of the 30 schools chosen for the pilot phase had their infrastructure improved, the BBC found out.

There were also questions over whether barbed wire and fences would have offered any resistance against groups like Boko Haram, whose fighters have rocket launchers and armoured personnel carriers. The school in Chibok had a fence when it was attacked. "The fences might have prevented attacks on schools, but there is no certainty of that," says security expert Aminu Bala. "The security of schools goes beyond cosmetic designs, if there is general insecurity then it is difficult to secure everywhere, especially vulnerable places like schools with thousands of them," he says.

The UK's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), which has incorporated Dfid, told the BBC that its role was to provide "expert advice on safe school approaches", including the "development of safe schools guidelines". But it added that it was not directly responsible for carrying out the projects as this was under the Nigerian army engineering corps. The Nigerian army did not respond to BBC queries about its handling of the project.

Government delays

The office of Mr Brown, who is still the UN special envoy on education, told the BBC in a statement that "following the recent kidnappings over the past year, [he] held a meeting with the Nigerian finance minister in 2020 to help encourage a new Safe Schools Initiative". His office did not respond to questions about how the initial $30m was spent, saying that "all funding was directed through and managed by the Nigerian government".

The SSI largely collapsed in 2016, one year after a change of government in Nigeria. Goodluck Jonathan, under whose watch the girls were kidnapped and the SSI launched, lost the presidency in a general election to current President Muhammadu Buhari. UN agencies and international donors said infrequent meetings and a change of policy by Mr Buhari hampered the activities of the initiative and led to their exit.

In its report, the British foreign office blamed the Buhari government for delays in implementing the SSI, with decisions being postponed because of infrequent steering committee meetings. Concerns were also raised about Nigeria's handling of the fund and a UK policy that no aid money should go directly to the government of Nigeria was strictly enforced.

The Nigerian presidency did not respond to questions about these concerns and the finance ministry that managed the SSI fund, did not provide details of contributions received and how they were spent.

A former high-ranking member of the Buhari government, Babachir Lawal, whose office had access to the SSI fund, is currently on trial for allegedly mismanaging 500m naira (£954,000; $1.3m) in contracts awarded for cutting grass. He denies the accusations.

Since 2016, the SSI has been passed around a succession of Nigerian government agencies overseeing the reconstruction of the north-east region, and what remains is a skeletal operation.

The positives recorded by the initiative within its first two years - the 73 prefabricated classrooms and the transfer of 2,400 students from vulnerable communities in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe (the three north-eastern states mainly affected by Boko Haram), meant only as temporary measures - now stand as its only successes. The vital component of the initiative, the construction of better-protected schools, was seen as a permanent solution.

But because it never took off, it is hard to tell if bolstered perimeter walls and barbed-wire fences held the answer to attacks on schools in northern Nigeria where mass abductions continue to happen.

The increased number of schools now shut in north-western Nigeria because of the activities of criminals, in addition to the hundreds that have remained closed for years in the north-east, is perhaps an indication that in the aftermath of the Chibok incident there was no long-term strategy in place to protect learners. For groups like Boko Haram that are against secular education, the continued closure of schools, especially that in Chibok, might seem like a victory.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-56732909

1 Share

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Pmpm: 5:24am On Apr 14, 2021
Hmmm
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Alejoas(m): 5:42am On Apr 14, 2021
cry
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by bhella10: 5:55am On Apr 14, 2021
I can only think of one reason: Corruption.

10 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by bhella10: 5:56am On Apr 14, 2021
I can only think of one reason: Corruption.

6 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Coronavirus1: 6:30am On Apr 14, 2021
yes o
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Nobody: 6:32am On Apr 14, 2021
UN agencies and international donors said infrequent meetings and a change of policy by Mr Buhari hampered the activities of the initiative and led to their exit.

In its report, the British foreign office blamed the Buhari government for delays in implementing the SSI, with decisions being postponed because of infrequent steering committee meetings. Concerns were also raised about Nigeria's handling of the fund and a UK policy that no aid money should go directly to the government of Nigeria was strictly enforced.

Because the UK refused to release funds to the Buhari Govt for management, they rather let the initiative of safer Education go to waste while sharing 5kg poverty alleviation bag of rice for election in 2023.

14 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Brunosamel(m): 6:32am On Apr 14, 2021
Who knows the agony their parents will be facing every day by day, it more difficult as it sound... The government failed them and the military failed them too

2 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by helinues: 6:34am On Apr 14, 2021
Where is the money? undecided

2 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Tigaromil: 6:37am On Apr 14, 2021
The money went for other political matters.

1 Like

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by houseontherock: 6:37am On Apr 14, 2021
A succession of corruption

1 Like

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by MANNABBQGRILLS: 6:38am On Apr 14, 2021
She was in Chibok to lay the first bricks in a project to rehabilitate the Government Secondary School that had been destroyed by Boko Haram militants on that infamous night of 14 April 2014.

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by MANNABBQGRILLS: 6:39am On Apr 14, 2021
Mrs Okonjo-Iweala's presence there was part of an international response following the mass abduction of 276 girls by Islamist militants in Chibok in 2014. 

Our prayers are still with those girls.
Madam Iweala , please don't forget them.
Keep tweeting and keeping everyone at their toes, the way you have been doing since 2014.

2 Likes 3 Shares

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Nobody: 6:40am On Apr 14, 2021
The problem of the North was created by the North and can only be solved by the North. My only worries is that their evil ways are affecting the lives of other peace loving people.

4 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by 1bunne4lif(m): 6:47am On Apr 14, 2021
SNAKE SWALLOWED THE MONEY

2 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by KevMitnick: 6:49am On Apr 14, 2021
This stupid govt frustrated the whole project because they were not allowed to handle the funds. Bastards

4 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by PHPdeveloper200: 6:51am On Apr 14, 2021
Nigeria matter defies every reasonable logic
Hi I am Clinton, a fullstack web developer. I develop complex custom websites for individuals and businesses. If you need a website that can send emails and SMS to your clients, integrate payment gateway API like paystack etc kindly WhatsApp me on 0;8;0;7;9;4;13;7;3;8 contact on my profile

1 Like

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Cj4charles(m): 6:52am On Apr 14, 2021
angry
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by gambia(m): 6:52am On Apr 14, 2021
Northerner Nigeria is completely gone, bandits, unknown gunmen and boko haram has come to stay and their hypocrisy is at the peak, the earlier southerners detach themselves from this burning fire before it consume them.

5 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Amarisco(f): 6:55am On Apr 14, 2021
I now believe Buhari was sent to this country on a destruction mission.

Being shocked or disappointed at such news is now just a waste of resources.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by gambia(m): 6:57am On Apr 14, 2021
PHPdeveloper200:
Nigeria matter defies every reasonable logic

It's beyond human comprehension.

1 Like

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by shegun4sur: 7:02am On Apr 14, 2021
In nigeria, what we have are people of zero conscience in place of power and authority.
A country of no accountability
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by Nobody: 7:03am On Apr 14, 2021
Too much corruption. undecided
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by princemillla(m): 7:04am On Apr 14, 2021
Abduction/kidnapping is now a normal thing in our country.

Every tribe now engage in it as its the best form of generating quick money.



Who else noticed rate of kidnapping is high since after ENDSARS

1 Like

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by lexy2014: 7:06am On Apr 14, 2021
post=100778126:


Our prayers are still with those girls.
Madam Iweala , please don't forget them.
Keep tweeting and keeping everyone at their toes, the way you have been doing since 2014.

It's now okonjo iwealas responsibility to bring succour& safety to "those girls". Wetin come be buhari work?

3 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by MANNABBQGRILLS: 7:08am On Apr 14, 2021
lexy2014:

It's now okonjo iwealas responsibility to bring succour& safety to "those girls". Wetin come be buhari work?
We have said it time without numbers on this forum that our posts is only for reasonable and wise people.
Stop disturbing your head trying to twist our post upside down okay?
Leave our comments for intellectuals.
Fortunately for us, we won't be able to help you out.
Live with it wailer. tongue

3 Likes 3 Shares

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by lexy2014: 7:13am On Apr 14, 2021
post=100778626:

We have said it time without numbers on this forum that our posts is only for reasonable and wise people.
Stop disturbing your head trying to twist our post upside down okay?
Leave our comments for intellectuals.
Fortunately for us, we won't be able to help you out.
Live with it wailer. tongue

Since u are an intellectual, my simple question shouldn't be difficult for u to answer:

"It's now okonjo iwealas responsibility to bring succour& safety to "those girls". Wetin come be buhari work?"

5 Likes

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by MANNABBQGRILLS: 7:15am On Apr 14, 2021
Brunosamel:
Who knows the agony their parents will be facing every day by day, it more difficult as it sound... The government failed them and the military failed them too

1 Like 2 Shares

Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by SarkinYarki: 7:21am On Apr 14, 2021
A country where even joysticks of dead people are being looted and exported to China .. This country is satan's laboratory
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by DaddyGoo: 7:32am On Apr 14, 2021
Misdirected and misused funds are the problem as usual.....quick summary for those who won't bother
Re: Why $30m Didn't Protect Nigerian Pupils After Chibok by TGM2015: 7:39am On Apr 14, 2021
Check well, and get the summary.

The real reason was that the initial $30m channelled through Nigeria military under Jonathan can not be accounted for. Unfortunately, the question to how the money was being spent came up under Buhari who has no record of how the money was spent.

The UK policy of no aid money should go to Nigeria government directly was made during Jonathan government. As it is now, it is only when Nigeria government is able to account for the initial aid of $30m given under Jonathan that Nigeria can get further aid and expertise services from UK to protect the schools.

(1) (2) (Reply)

BREAKING: Armed Drone Crash Lands In Dumge, Borno State, Nigeria [PICTURES] / 10 Countries That Are Smaller Than Biafra Yet Better Than Nigeria. / 2015 Presidential Election - Final Prediction

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 46
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.