Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,148,742 members, 7,802,257 topics. Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 11:41 AM

Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? - Religion (32) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? (15693 Views)

Are Jehovah's Witnesses Tied To Freemasons? / Lagos Saves Baby From Jehovah’s Witnesses Over Blood Transfusion / Who Are Jehovah’s Witnesses? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) ... (52) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Nobody555(f): 10:25am On Jan 25, 2022
I know your blind to the truth. Your still asking me to give you what i already presented.

Book of Hebrews no be part of God's word?

Jesus Christ was not of the tribe of Levi and so could not have been among the Old Covenant High Priests, this as set by God Himself! undecided
Jesus and Levi priests who is more greater? Or you don't accept the book of Hebrew as God words?

So, the question to answer is this, did Jesus Christ come as God to fulfill the Law or did He come as a man/Jew to fulfill that Covenant, much like other Jews would.

He came as the Messiah and brought a New perfect covenant that's once for all. Read the book of Hebrews from a-z

Your ideas are sure from the doctrines of men not from the bible as you claim.
Kobojunkie:
Is comprehension a major problem of yours or what? undecided

So, you didn't even understand the implications of the claims you were trying there desperately to make or is it that your overlords aka GBs have yet to feed you their digest in this area? undecided


In case, you change your mind, the questions remain for you to ponder.

The verse above does not answer the question unless you are suggesting that God, in His Old Covenant, somewhere stated that a High Priest had authority to render obsolete the Old Law. In that case, I ask that you present this scriptural evidence for us to see. undecided

Jesus Christ was not of the tribe of Levi and so could not have been among the Old Covenant High Priests, this as set by God Himself! undecided

So again...1a. First, do you at least see how Hebrews 10 vs 9 - 10 and Matthew 5 vs 17 - 19 since one contradicts the other? undecided

1b. Look, call it what yo want but the fact is the Old Covenant is an eternal Covenant/Contract between God and the children of Israel,. Meaning the only two signers to this Covenant/agreement/Contract are God and the Jews, and hence the only ones who can fulfill said Covenant are , you guessed it, God and the children of Israel - no third-parties! undecided

And as Jesus Christ told you there in Matthew 5 vs 17 - 19, He did not come to do away with the Law but to fulfill it. undecided

So, the question to answer is this, did Jesus Christ come as God to fulfill the Law or did He come as a man/Jew to fulfill that Covenant, much like other Jews would. undecided

2. God never promised the Israelites He would do away with the Old Covenant when the New Covenant arrived - both Contracts are everlasting and so remain binding to this day - every jew born into into world even today is born bound to the Old Covenant. undecided

And at that, all Jews who become of Jesus Christ retain their claim to the promise of the Old Covenant in the New Covenant - Yes, they still have claim to the long life in the land of Canaan promised by God to them in the Old Covenant. Ofcourse Gentiles in the New Covenant do not have such a promise to lay claim to.. undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 11:10am On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:

Actions speaks louder than words.
When Jesus said "love God and neighbours" he only summarized over 600 laws given to the Israelites in just one phrase.
So why was this two laws extended up to over 600? Well it's to help figure out lawless men in their society back then but since many Jews have gone to John the baptist to present themselves as willing Jews prepared to live by God's laws without being pestered. Jesus simplified things by giving them a summary of the whole laws!

YES! Matthew 16:6

YES!
Because at baptism a candidate signified with his action that he's prepared to start a new life living by the rules and regulations of the group that baptized him just as baptismal certificates approaching John knows fully well that they're prepared to surrender willingly to all the laws binding on fellow Jews.
So when Peter said "get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" {Act 2:38} he is implying that his listeners must surrender to all the rules binding on Christ's followers {John 15:13} and anyone found disobeying be EXCOMMUNICATED! 1Corinthians 5:8-13

YES! God's word says we must not greet them again {Romans 16:17; 2John 1:10-11} because they've proved to be unfaithful after knowing what is good and vowing to live for the rest of their life in harmony with what they've learned {Ecclesiastes 5:4} their turning makes them worthless from the viewpoint of our Master Lord and King! Luke 9:62


I have answered using God's word as the basis for what i believe. Can you also do the same instead of talking about what i believe?
Please present what you believe using God's word to substantiate for us to know why your submission is of God! smiley

Make I open cooler grin grin grin

Actions speaks louder than words.

grin grin grin grin The question was or my question was....

Are the religious denominations manufacturers of the Doctrines like love God and love neighbor?

You can see the lack of correlation with the answer up there grin grin

When Jesus said "love God and neighbours" he only summarized over 600 laws given to the Israelites in just one phrase.

In reality religious denominations and organisations including yours don't manufacture the doctrine of love of God and neighbour grin grin grin

So why was this two laws extended up to over 600? Well it's to help figure out lawless men in their society back then but since many Jews have gone to John the baptist to present themselves as willing Jews prepared to live by God's laws without being pestered. Jesus simplified things by giving them a summary of the whole laws!

So why does abstaining from blood becomes abstain from primary or major blood fractions? It is to teach your traditions of 8 men and give room for lawless men in your midst. You see how your reason take be?

Do I have to find such teachings or doctrines in a religious denominations or organisation?
A. Yes
B. No

You answered yes you can only find it there because they equally get it from the source you and I know. The Bible. In reality it is not only in a religious organization or denominations you will find it.

Do I look like a lawless person or must I submit to the rules of religious organization or denominations before I get called a lawful person?

You answered YES, but your reasoning did not tell you a person that decides to voluntary leave the organisation you belong is no longer subjected to your rules and choosing to follow the rules regarding disassociation does not make such person lawless. You added.....

Because at baptism a candidate signified with his action that he's prepared to start a new life living by the rules and regulations of the group that baptized him just as baptismal certificates approaching John knows fully well that they're prepared to surrender willingly to all the laws binding on fellow Jews.

Matthew 28:18 - 20 says what Jesus taught grin grin. Compare it what is the bold.

YES! God's word says we must not greet them again {Romans 16:17; 2John 1:10-11} because they've proved to be unfaithful after knowing what is good and vowing to live for the rest of their life in harmony with what they've learned {Ecclesiastes 5:4} their turning makes them worthless from the viewpoint of our Master Lord and King! Luke 9:62

Irrelevant to the question asked.

I have answered using God's word as the basis for what i believe. Can you also do the same instead of talking about what i believe?
Please present what you believe using God's word to substantiate for us to know why your submission is of God

You answered not my question but decide to use God's word to propagate your traditions of men and what you believe as you state clearly.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 11:17am On Jan 25, 2022
Rebooting! cheesy
Post on 21st but response coming after 4 days as if this same commentator hasn't been replying other comments on this same thread!
Wahala dey for Okpoko! cheesy

achorladey:

Make I open cooler grin grin grin
grin grin grin grin The question was or my question was....
Are the religious denominations manufacturers of the Doctrines like love God and love neighbor?
You can see the lack of correlation with the answer up there grin grin
In reality religious denominations and organisations including yours don't manufacture the doctrine of love of God and neighbour grin grin grin
So why does abstaining from blood becomes abstain from primary or major blood fractions? It is to teach your traditions of 8 men and give room for lawless men in your midst. You see how your reason take be?
You answered yes you can only find it there because they equally get it from the source you and I know. The Bible. In reality it is not only in a religious organization or denominations you will find it.
You answered YES, but your reasoning did not tell you a person that decides to voluntary leave the organisation you belong is no longer subjected to your rules and choosing to follow the rules regarding disassociation does not make such person lawless. You added.....
Matthew 28:18 - 20 says what Jesus taught grin grin. Compare it what is the bold.
Irrelevant to the question asked.
You answered not my question but decide to use God's word to propagate your traditions of men and what you believe as you state clearly.

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Kobojunkie: 11:17am On Jan 25, 2022
Nobody555:
I know your blind to the truth. Your still asking me to give you what i already presented.

1. Book of Hebrews no be part of God's word?
2. Jesus and Levi priests who is more greater? Or you don't accept the book of Hebrew as God words?

3. He came as the Messiah and brought a New perfect covenant that's once for all. Read the book of Hebrews from a-z

4. Your ideas are sure from the doctrines of men not from the bible as you claim.
Part of God's word, you say? But God's Word, we are told in scripture, refers to the Word out of God's Mouth and Jesus Christ is He. Your Bible is simply a collection of writings which document God's Word, the words of Satan, demons as devils along with the Opinion of men. undecided

1. The book of Hebrews may be a book in your Bible, but I believe the author's work is meant instead as an opinion piece written of God. When God’s law of 2/3 witnesses, which requires that that every truth revealed through men to be established there must be at least 2 or 3 witnesses to same truth, is applied to what is written in it, we find that much of what is stated by the author is not backed by any witnesses in scripture. Instead a good portion of the author's ideas stands in contradiction with the Word of God Himself. undecided

2. The Old Covenant Law/standard never gave to the High Priests, who were men drawn from the tribe of Levi, power to cancel the Law nor render it obsolete and this Law was God's agreement with the people of Israel. undecided

Jesus Christ came as a Jew and He lived His life in complete submission to and obedience of the Old Covenant Law of Moses, in much the same way as any man would. He fulfilled the requirements of the Law as God required men to, and this by living without sin (holy), a righteous existence, and going to his death a righteous man. undecided

In the future, the very same Jesus Christ will again return to fulfill God's end of the Old Covenant bargain when He will raise the Old Covenant righteous from the grave and grant then the promise of a long life in the land of Canaan. But so far, this part of the fulfillment is still to come. undecided

You claim Jesus Christ is greater than the Levites and I ask again by the Old Covenant Standard set by God Himself, how is Jesus Christ greater than the Levites and the other Jews? Why set Him up for us as a High Priest, a title that belongs to the Levites? undecided

3. Recall that Jesus Christ said, again, He did not come to abolish the Old Covenant but to fulfill it.

Where in the Old Covenant promise of a New Covenant tells us that the Messiah would cancel the Old Covenant, and explains this "once and for all" of yours? undecided

Here's a clue! Stop regurgitating what you have swallowed from what you have read of only in the book of Hebrews, and instead find out where else in scripture the claims made are also to be found. undecided

4. None of what I have said so far is of the doctrines and traditions of men. If you think it to be, be sure to point to it. undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 11:40am On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:
Rebooting! cheesy
Post on 21st but response coming after 4 days as if this same commentator hasn't been replying other comments on this same thread!
Wahala dey for Okpoko! cheesy


That is to say ko SORO. I told you I kept it in my cooler grin grin grin
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 11:53am On Jan 25, 2022
I don send the email

MaxInDHouse:

Send the number you're using for browsing to my gmail and let's see what we can both do monthly for the data!
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 11:58am On Jan 25, 2022
You didn't accept the book of Hebrews, what book of the NT do you accept then?

Kobojunkie:
Part of God's word, you say? But God's Word, we are told in scripture, refers to the Word out of God's Mouth and Jesus Christ is He. Your Bible is simply a collection of writings which document God's Word, the words of Satan, demons as devils along with the Opinion of men. undecided

1. The book of Hebrews may be a book in your Bible, but I believe the author's work is meant instead as an opinion piece written of God. When God’s law of 2/3 witnesses, which requires that that every truth revealed through men to be established there must be at least 2 or 3 witnesses to same truth, is applied to what is written in it, we find that much of what is stated by the author is not backed by any witnesses in scripture. Instead a good portion of the author's ideas stands in contradiction with the Word of God Himself. undecided

2. The Old Covenant Law/standard never gave to the High Priests, who were men drawn from the tribe of Levi, power to cancel the Law nor render it obsolete and this Law was God's agreement with the people of Israel. undecided

Jesus Christ came as a Jew and He lived His life in complete submission to and obedience of the Old Covenant Law of Moses, in much the same way as any man would. He fulfilled the requirements of the Law as God required men to, and this by living without sin (holy), a righteous existence, and going to his death a righteous man. undecided

In the future, the very same Jesus Christ will again return to fulfill God's end of the Old Covenant bargain when He will raise the Old Covenant righteous from the grave and grant then the promise of a long life in the land of Canaan. But so far, this part of the fulfillment is still to come. undecided

You claim Jesus Christ is greater than the Levites and I ask again by the Old Covenant Standard set by God Himself, how is Jesus Christ greater than the Levites and the other Jews? Why set Him up for us as a High Priest, a title that belongs to the Levites? undecided

3. Recall that Jesus Christ said, again, He did not come to abolish the Old Covenant but to fulfill it.

Where in the Old Covenant promise of a New Covenant tells us that the Messiah would cancel the Old Covenant, and explains this "once and for all" of yours? undecided

Here's a clue! Stop regurgitating what you have swallowed from what you have read of only in the book of Hebrews, and instead find out where else in scripture the claims made are also to be found. undecided

4. None of what I have said so far is of the doctrines and traditions of men. If you think it to be, be sure to point to it. undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 12:02pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:

I don send the email
Replied yesterday!
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 12:08pm On Jan 25, 2022
achorladey:

That is to say ko SORO. I told you I kept it in my cooler grin grin grin
He needs rebooting since he's disconnected from the chord through which others gets timely spiritual food. Matthew 24:45
You will never see him chatting with any other religionists nah only Jehovah's Witnesses yet he doesn't want to submit to those feeding Jesus' sheep.
That's why father Abraham said there is a great chasm fixed between us and them. Luke 16:24-26
The great chasm is nothing else than their heart condition, that's what hinders them from accepting help from the anointed ones! smiley
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Kobojunkie: 12:16pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:
You didn't accept the book of Hebrews, what book of the NT do you accept then?
I never said I don't accept the book of Hebrews. I instead don't accept the doctrines and traditions of men which Jesus Christ warned were not of Him - Matthew 15 vs 1 - 14 & Mark 7 vs 1 - 13 . . undecided

As I made clear to you what is declared in Hebrew 10 vs 9 - 15 cannot coexist with Jesus Christ's own decree in Matthew 5 vs 17 - 19 - the messages contradict each other. And since my trust is in Jesus Christ, every doctrine and tradition which stands in contradiction to His Word, I reject. undecided

But it seems you would rather believe that which is written in Hebrews 10 vs 9 - 15 over that which Jesus Christ proclaimed, yet you avoid the questions that arise as a result of your belief. Why? undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 12:41pm On Jan 25, 2022
Jeremiah 31:31-32
[31]“The day is coming,” says the lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and Judah.
[32]This covenant will not be like the one I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand and brought them out of the land of Egypt. They broke that covenant, though I loved them as a husband loves his wife,” says the lord.


You can believe what you want to believe.
Didn't Jesus fufill the law by bringing the new covenant? undecided undecided undecided undecided undecided

Kobojunkie:
I never said I don't accept the book of Hebrews. I instead don't accept the doctrines and traditions of men which Jesus Christ warned were not of Him - Matthew 15 vs 1 - 14 & Mark 7 vs 1 - 13 . . undecided

As I made clear to you what is declared in Hebrew 10 vs 9 - 15 cannot coexist with Jesus Christ's own decree in Matthew 5 vs 17 - 19 - the messages contradict each other. And since my trust is in Jesus Christ, every doctrine and tradition which stands in contradiction to His Word, I reject. undecided

But it seems you would rather believe that which is written in Hebrews 10 vs 9 - 15 over that which Jesus Christ proclaimed, yet you avoid the questions that arise as a result of your belief. Why? undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Kobojunkie: 12:51pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:
1. You can believe what you want to believe.

2. Didn't Jesus fufill the law by bringing the new covenant? undecided undecided undecided undecided undecided

1. The Israelites "broke" the Old Covenant repeatedly in the Old Testament, but God never canceled the Covenant as a result. So I am not certain why you reference Jeremiah 31 vs 31 - 34, which speaks of God's promise of New Covenant to come. undecided

2. How exactly does the arrival of the New Contract agreement mean a fulfillment of the Old Contact in this case? undecided

Where is it stated in the terms and conditions of the Old Contract that the arrival of a New Contract would imply the Old contract is rendered null and void .I.e. canceled? undecided

If the Old Contract is canceled, as you continue to claim, what fate awaits the righteous dead of the Old Covenant, the many who did as God commanded in His Old Covenant? undecided
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 4:39pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:
Why are the idols they worship? No be Catholics de bow to statues?
I am not Catholic.
Can Satan promote God's Truth?
What you did is more than criticizing. They are just false accusations though.
[/quote]
This comment belongs to your brother in faith, MaxInDHouse.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 4:57pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:

He needs rebooting since he's disconnected from the chord through which others gets timely spiritual food. Matthew 24:45
You will never see him chatting with any other religionists nah only Jehovah's Witnesses yet he doesn't want to submit to those feeding Jesus' sheep.
That's why father Abraham said there is a great chasm fixed between us and them. Luke 16:24-26
The great chasm is nothing else than their heart condition, that's what hinders them from accepting help from the anointed ones! smiley

No over boil like you did in the case of tctrills. grin grin grin

You will never see him chatting with any other religionists nah only Jehovah's Witnesses yet he doesn't want to submit to those feeding Jesus' sheep.

Who I choose to chat with is not within your JURISDICTION to decide. Last time I checked the rules and regulations on nairaland was here long before you know this platform grin grin

The great chasm is nothing else than their heart condition, that's what hinders them from accepting help from the anointed ones!


That great chasm is why you keep asking for better performing group everyday and repeatedly on this particular section of nairaland. grin grin
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 4:59pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:





°First, GOD called humans gods.
John 10:33-36
[33]They replied, “We’re stoning you not for any good work, but for blasphemy! You, a mere man, claim to be God.”
[34]Jesus replied, “It is written in your own Scriptures that God said to certain leaders of the people, ‘I say, you are gods!’
[35]And you know that the Scriptures cannot be altered. So if those people who received God’s message were called ‘gods,’
[36]why do you call it blasphemy when I say, ‘I am the Son of God'? After all, the Father set me apart and sent me into the world.
°Second, God made Moses a 'God' unto Pharaoh
Exodus 7:1
New King James Version
So the LORD said to Moses: "See, I have made you as God to Pharaoh, and Aaron your brother shall be your prophet.

KJV
And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee a god to Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet

*The early Bible manuscripts/ versions didn't have capitalization. Let say the verse was like this then; "in the beginning was the word, and the word was with god, and the word was god".....did capitalization change the meaning of the verse? No!

If you really want to understand the word "God" in Hebrew perspective, check out this link; https://www.ancient-hebrew.org/god-yhwh/hebrew-word-for-god.htm
I don't accept Russell's version of the Bible and I don't believe his words either. Let just accept that we are both right. I am really not interested in arguing, believe whatever you want to believe, l will continue to hold on to my belief. If I am on the wrong path, Jesus will not even answer me when I address Him as God. I have got a lot of personal experience and the Holy Spirit has been working through me. Thanks again for your concern.

John1:1
New International Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Living Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Study Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

King James Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New King James Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New American Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1995
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1977
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Amplified Bible
In the beginning [before all time] was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God Himself.

Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

American Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.

Contemporary English Version
In the beginning was the one who is called the Word. The Word was with God and was truly God.

Douay-Rheims Bible
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Revised Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Good News Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

International Standard Version
In the beginning, the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Literal Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

NET Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God.

New Heart English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

World English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Young's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 4:59pm On Jan 25, 2022
Rosement:

Can Satan promote God's Truth?
What you did is more than criticizing. They are just false accusations though.

This comment belongs to your brother in faith, MaxInDHouse.

You see how he looked elsewhere when I told him the founding father of the religious organization he belongs are IDOL WORSHIPPERS.

He boycotted it yet he will come back and say na blood palaver I carry for head grin grin

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 5:10pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


Yeah i know you're part of the CHRISTIANS with contradicting teachings and conflicting doctrines that makes you feel so ashamed that you can't even mention the name of the sect you belong out of the thousands of different religions all claiming denominations in Christendom! smiley
That is the point, you guys are just traditional worshippers, so you cannot understand what Christianity means. God will not judge collectively, He will judge everybody individually, not based on the Church they attend. The main thing, I am observing and following the true word of God.

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 5:14pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


You're still hiding your religion, shey? cheesy
Never mind, we understand! wink
Who told you your opinion even matters? Do you think I will be bothered if you don't understand? Stop deceiving yourself, you are just a mere human being, nobody is looking for validation from you. Learn to emphasize your authority on your family members and your brothers in faith alone. This is not jw's forum or your father's house, this is a public forum so you are not higher than anyone and you have no authority over others, so think before you type.

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 5:19pm On Jan 25, 2022
achorladey:


You see how he looked elsewhere when I told him the founding father of the religious organization he belongs are IDOL WORSHIPPERS.

He boycotted it yet he will come back and say na blood palaver I carry for head grin grin
They have been brainwashed by that ignorant bloke, Russell. Some of them don't even understand that they are serving the devil and following wrong teaching.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 5:46pm On Jan 25, 2022
Rosement:

Who told you your opinion even matters? Do you think I will be bothered if you don't understand? Stop deceiving yourself, you are just a mere human being, nobody is looking for validation from you. Learn to emphasize your authority on your family members and your brothers in faith alone. This is not jw's forum or your father's house, this is a public forum so you are not higher than anyone and you have no authority over others, so think before you type

It's OK we understand! smiley
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 5:51pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:


It's OK we understand! smiley
Who cares?
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 6:07pm On Jan 25, 2022
Rosement:

Who told you your opinion even matters? Do you think I will be bothered if you don't understand? Stop deceiving yourself, you are just a mere human being, nobody is looking for validation from you. Learn to emphasize your authority on your family members and your brothers in faith alone. This is not jw's forum or your father's house, this is a public forum so you are not higher than anyone and you have no authority over others, so think before you type.

This should be simple enough for man that boasts and brags about military intelligence to understand.

We know how their people run their various forums or social media similar to this. grin grin grin
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 6:16pm On Jan 25, 2022
Rosement:

Who cares?
It's OK! smiley
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by achorladey: 7:48pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:

Thanks to JEHOVAH we are enduring the final part of the days!
Do you know i was really touched the year 2020 when a seemingly unserious student of mine said:
"you taught me that JWs issued the order to start preaching from house to house since 1919 after the release of J.F. Rutherford and his team?"
I responded "Yes"
Then he asked again:
"and ever since then you people have been doing this your preaching till now?"
I responded again "Yes"
He said:
"and it's exactly the year 2019 that another order from the same Governing Body came that you should stop visiting people in their homes"
I responded again "Yes"

His next question is:
"Please tell me, is God's Kingdom about to start so that i can quickly join you people?
How come it's precisely a hundred years that the same Governing Body asked you to stop visiting people?"

I said "because of Covid19 nah!"
He said:
"you know i always attend to you anytime you come, please i'm feeling somehow with the whole thing as you people started preaching in 1919 and stopped in 2019 due to COVID-19!"

This is a person who often dodge stylishly when we go for his Bible study o!



The same person that accuse members of other religious denominations for not being educated about vaccinations and what type of vaccines out there.


But your Rutherford didn't tell in 1921 what was captured in the image belowgrin grin

Interesting words for the one and only true RELIGION on earth. Should the whole world had dance to the tune of the only true religion on earth in 1921 about vaccinations the present only religious group on earth won't be alive to say it members should get vaccinated even getting opportunity to be employed because they are vaccinated grin grin grin

After you read it you can choose to call it REBOOTING grin grin grin

Vaccinations never prevented anything and never will, and is the most barbarous practices of an otherwise civilised nation

This are the kind of examples Jesus met before and after 1919 that gave the religious organization the only true RELIGION on earth. 100 years after, vaccinations that can never prevent anything and never will is providing job opportunities for your members grin grin grin

See the strong words never prevented anything and never will.

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 8:44pm On Jan 25, 2022
I didn't quote from NWT, i quoted from NLV and KJV and NKJV.
I didn't intend to argue too but have a fruitful discussion.
It's clear that my points are scriptural. I didn't quote no Russell's word.

Even if you hold to your believe, i want to drop the idea that JWs are worshiping Satan or they aren't christians and all that.

Jesus taught his followers to worship the Father (not Trinity) in spirit and truth.
Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world and didn't engage in politics. That's what the JWs do today. They don't join the military too.

It's obvious that they strictly follow Christ teachings and are not anti-christian.
Also they have the purest form of worship.
They don't use images in their worship like some churches do. God warned against using images and all that.


"Hear O Israel the lord your God is one!".
God almighty is not three persons but one person, men doctrines would make you think so.

The Bible aslo teaches that Jesus will return his rulership back to God the Father and Jesus will be subjected to God's rule. God the Father will be all in all. 1 Corinthians 15:24-28
Perhaps you didn't notice that no one knew Jesus untill he came to earth and the Israelites didn't worship Trinity Gods but one singular God YHWH.
Also God made Jesus everything he is. He gave him everything he has, the kingdom, name power, authority et al. He empowered Jesus for a purpose, to fulfill His will for the earth.

JWs believe that Jesus is a God but not just the Almighty GOD his Father.

Acts of the Apostles 2:36
[36]“So let everyone in Israel know for certain that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, to be both Lord and Messiah!”

Peace be onto you smiley[b][/b]

Rosement:

I don't accept Russell's version of the Bible and I don't believe his words either. Let just accept that we are both right. I am really not interested in arguing, believe whatever you want to believe, l will continue to hold on to my belief. If I am on the wrong path, Jesus will not even answer me when I address Him as God. I have got a lot of personal experience and the Holy Spirit has been working through me. Thanks again for your concern.

John1:1
New International Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New Living Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Study Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Berean Literal Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

King James Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New King James Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

New American Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1995
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

NASB 1977
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Amplified Bible
In the beginning [before all time] was the Word (Christ), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God Himself.

Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

American Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
In the origin The Word had been existing and That Word had been existing with God and That Word was himself God.

Contemporary English Version
In the beginning was the one who is called the Word. The Word was with God and was truly God.

Douay-Rheims Bible
IN the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

English Revised Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Good News Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

International Standard Version
In the beginning, the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Literal Standard Version
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

NET Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God.

New Heart English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Weymouth New Testament
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

World English Bible
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Young's Literal Translation
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;

1 Like

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 8:57pm On Jan 25, 2022
cornelboy:
I didn't quote from NWT, i quoted from NLV and KJV and NKJV.
I didn't intend to argue too but have a fruitful discussion.
It's clear that my points are scriptural. I didn't quote no Russell's word.

Even if you hold to your believe, i want to drop the idea that JWs are worshiping Satan or they aren't christians and all that.

Jesus taught his followers to worship the Father (not Trinity) in spirit and truth.
Jesus said his kingdom is not of this world and didn't engage in politics. That's what the JWs do today. They don't join the military too.

It's obvious that they strictly follow Christ teachings and are not anti-christian.
Also they have the purest form of worship.
They don't use images in their worship like some churches do. God warned against using images and all that.


"Hear O Israel the lord your God is one!".
God almighty is not three persons but one person, men doctrines would make you think so.

The Bible aslo teaches that Jesus will return his rulership back to God the Father and Jesus will be subjected to God's rule. God the Father will be all in all. 1 Corinthians 15:24-28
Perhaps you didn't notice that no one knew Jesus untill he came to earth and the Israelites didn't worship Trinity Gods but one singular God YHWH.
Also God made Jesus everything he is. He gave him everything he has, the kingdom, name power, authority et al. He empowered Jesus for a purpose, to fulfill His will for the earth.

JWs believe that Jesus is a God but not just the Almighty GOD his Father.

Acts of the Apostles 2:36
[36]“So let everyone in Israel know for certain that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, to be both Lord and Messiah!”

Peace be onto you smiley[b][/b]

This is just your own assumption of what John 1:1. I don't agree with your view of the Bible but I have no interest in arguing with you. Peace be onto you too.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 10:55pm On Jan 25, 2022
John 1:1 NLV
[1]In the beginning the Word already existed.
    The Word was with God,
    and the Word was God.

"The Word was with God"
The word is Jesus and he was with God YHWH

"..and the Word was God."
Here is where the confusion lies. Since an indefinite or definite article is not put before the God, it makes the verse hard to understand.

Let me try to put the articles in the phrase:
"..and the word was the God"
This would have proved Jesus to be the God he was initially with, which will contradict Trinity doctrine that says Jesus and God are distinct persons working as one God. Adding article "the" makes the verse invalid.

"..and the word was a God.."
Article"a" would make the sentence more meaning and logical. That is; Jesus was in the beginning with God and Jesus was a God.
Amen smiley


Rosement:

This is just your own assumption of what John 1:1. I don't agree with your view of the Bible but I have no interest in arguing with you. Peace be onto you too.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 11:02pm On Jan 25, 2022
cheesy cheesy cheesy
I laugh in Hebrew grin
Always accusing wrongly. Your criticism is what I find hard to understand. I thought you don't criticize when you first comment on my post.

Rosement:

They have been brainwashed by that ignorant bloke, Russell. Some of them don't even understand that they are serving the devil and following wrong teaching.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by cornelboy(f): 11:12pm On Jan 25, 2022
MaxInDHouse:
i try sending you email, it says mail not sent.
dj450701@gmail.com mail me an I'll reply

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by MaxInDHouse(m): 6:27am On Jan 26, 2022
[quote author=cornelboy post=109694098][/quote]
OK

2 Likes

Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Rosement(f): 8:42am On Jan 26, 2022
cornelboy:
cheesy cheesy cheesy
I laugh in Hebrew grin
Always accusing wrongly. Your criticism is what I find hard to understand. I thought you don't criticize when you first comment on my post.

I only gave you guys a taste of your own medicine. I am a human being not an angel, I have decided to reiterate.
Re: Are Jehovah Witnesses Right About Their Belief Against Blood Transfusion? by Nobody555(f): 9:11am On Jan 26, 2022
Definitely criticizing and insulting other religions, even wrongly accusing them is not bad. So you know your a human not an angel
He didn't even criticize any body or church, he only said "JWs have the purest form of worship" and that "roman Catholic influenced Christianity of today with their dogmas". And you know yourself that these are facts.

But you came shouting "don't criticize bla bla bla" and all you have been doing is criticizing, insulting and giving false accusations.

Instead of blindly accusing that they worship Satan and idols, i would rather you bring evidence.

Rosement:

I only gave you guys a taste of your own medicine. I am a human being not an angel, I have decided to reiterate.

(1) (2) (3) ... (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) ... (52) (Reply)

Holy Ghost Vs Holy Spirit / Tithers And Seed Sowers Like Us "Na Blessing And Favour Dey Rush Us"~ Obiwest / RCCG Convention 2019: "And God Said" - August 5 - 11th

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 222
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.