Mr man,
Mr naval blockade
He want to block Russia fleet at Baltic Sea
No problem

railone:


see someone that didn't and probably doesn't even know what a Naval blockade is, asking me if I know what it is.

You just showed yourself that you don't know.

I have no time to converse with ignorance, I believe what I wrote is still there and you quoted it, so go back and read it again, this time as someone that passed their education.

railone:


that you have to quote me 3 times on the same issue shows you didn't even know what you were talking about in the first place.

Your map just showed Russia entry point, please bring a larger map next time.

And why the f*ck does none of you lots understand what is meant by Naval blockade.

I mean I try as much as possible to paint the scenario I was referring to as easy to understand as possible.

Go and read what I said and not what you're imagining I said, what I said since you guys don't seem to understand simple sentence is that Kalingard can be blockade by NATO when Finland and Sweden finally join NATO.

here you're saying Russia when I never said Russia. How many Naval vessels do Russia have in the Baltic compared to what NATO can pull for a blockade.

The joke was when you compare the scenario to snake island. Dude Ukraine doesn't have a navy! and you're comparing them with Sweden that operate the quietest and stealthy subs. Jeeez

The scenario you're trying to paint as easy is impossible

You're dumb, and it's very obvious from the simple scenario you're trying to paint

No matter what NATO can pull it won't blockade Russian in the baltic. You say Sweden operate the quietest sub but is it quite enough to put Helsinki at risk? This is why I say you're dumb.
Russian Belgorov sub is deployed in this waters and guess what? The Belgorov is the launch platform for the world deadliest tornado 'the poseidon'

But why try to paint a hypothetical situation that's not even possible. There's international waters in the baltic sea and blockading Russia will mean violating international treaties.

Unless you do not know the implications of blockading international water that must have been the reason why you're painting a dumbass, future impossible scenario

You still have a lot of learning to do son

seunny4lif:
The guy have no idea what is going on.
Even Turkey that controls Russia access to Black Sea can’t block Russia ships unless both nations are at war yet he talking about Naval blockade against Russia Baltic fleets, something that Russia navy wouldn’t even leave St. P and enclave island before destroying any navy fleets on the way

That guy is an absolute Dunce

There is even international waters leading to the wider baltic sea which means that Russia doesn't have any business with anyone in the baltic sea

But the fool is thinking of an imaginary blockade on the baltic sea

Learn they will not learn

Svlla:


The scenario you're trying to paint as easy is impossible

You're dumb, and it's very obvious from the simple scenario you're trying to paint

No matter what NATO can pull it won't blockade Russian in the baltic. You say Sweden operate the quietest sub but is it quite enough to put Helsinki at risk? This is why I say you're dumb.
Russian Belgorov sub is deployed in this waters and guess what? The Belgorov is the launch platform for the world deadliest tornado 'the poseidon'

But why try to paint a hypothetical situation that's not even possible. There's international waters in the baltic sea and blockading Russia will mean violating international treaties.

Unless you do not know the implications of blockading international water that must have been the reason why you're painting a dumbass, future impossible scenario

You still have a lot of learning to do son

simple reading and understanding would save a lot of you from talking like drunkards on this Seun platform.

First of I said, Russia access to Kalingard can be blockade by sea once Finland and Sweden join NATO.
I repeated it again for clarity but you kept on talking about your imagination.

Anybody worth his onions in military analysis will tell that's the first move NATO will make, securing Kalingard with speed to limit the havoc the enclave can cause the West.

Naval Blockade is not Finland telling Russia they can't use the Baltic since I know you guys don't know the difference. Once there's a Naval blockade on Kalingard, any military Naval vessel departing from St. Petersburg is a target depending on the size of the perimeter set. Do you have any idea the number of individual platform the West have that is dedicated to hunting subs?

Bro you out of your depth here, my problem with you guys is when you don't know instead of admitting you don't know, you will be coming up with imagination takes and stressing somebody.

railone:


simple reading and understanding would save a lot of you from talking like drunkards on this Seun platform.

First of I said, Russia access to Kalingard can be blockade by sea once Finland and Sweden join NATO.
I repeated it again for clarity but you kept on talking about your imagination.

Anybody worth his onions in military analysis will tell that's the first move NATO will make, securing Kalingard with speed to limit the havoc the enclave can cause the West.

Naval Blockade is not Finland telling Russia they can't use the Baltic since I know you guys don't know the difference. Once there's a Naval blockade on Kalingard, any military Naval vessel departing from St. Petersburg is a target depending on the size of the perimeter set. Do you have any idea the number of individual platform the West have that is dedicated to hunting subs?

Bro you out of your depth here, my problem with you guys is when you don't know instead of admitting you don't know, you will be coming up with imagination takes and stressing somebody.

You're even worse than I thought

How can Finland and Sweden joining Nato translate to blockading Kaliningrad.

Even armchair generals and wannabee military analyst have never had this kind of drug induced imagination

Where are you from mahn?

Your thought process is marveling

This fool even said any military naval vessel departing st Petersburg is a target....you know nothing at all

So Russian naval assets will be sitting duck, docked at St Petersburg waiting to be blockaded

Even all there patrol vessels will go to st Petersburg to wait for your drug imposed blockade

Am wasting my time with you

Go look up Russian Navy Orbat and see where there vessels are currently patrolling, at least those known

Svlla:


You're even worse than I thought

How can Finland and Sweden joining Nato translate to blockading Kaliningrad.

Even armchair generals and wannabee military analyst have never had this kind of drug induced imagination

Where are you from mahn?

Your thought process is marveling

This fool even said any military naval vessel departing st Petersburg is a target....you know nothing at all

So Russian naval assets will be sitting duck, docked at St Petersburg waiting to be blockaded

Even all there patrol vessels will go to st Petersburg to wait for your drug imposed blockade

Am wasting my time with you

Go look up Russian Navy Orbat and see where there vessels are currently patrolling, at least those known

Guy read because I'm tired of your ignorance.

First off is that you don't even know what a Naval blockade is. instead of looking that up and learning first.
You're here trying to say prove how powerful Russia is at sea.
and that's not even the worst, because no matter what I explain, you just want to prove yourself right.

Even if we want to go by sheer number at this point, Russia Naval vessels is infinitesimal to what NATO can pull and that won't even be all of NATO assets.. I mean they can easily pull a 3:1 advantage and you're saying what exactly.

Bro you just dumb, leave am

railone:


Guy read because I'm tired of your ignorance.

First off is that you don't even know what a Naval blockade is. instead of looking that up and learning first.
You're here trying to say prove how powerful Russia is at sea.
and that's not even the worst, because no matter what I explain, you just want to prove yourself right.

Even if we want to go by sheer number at this point, Russia Naval vessels is infinitesimal to what NATO can pull and that won't even be all of NATO assets.. I mean they can easily pull a 3:1 advantage and you're saying what exactly.

Bro you just dumb, leave am

You're a mumu, what do you enforce a Naval blockade with abi is it mouth you use to blockade

You think Russian navy is infinitesimal then you're obviously ignorant

It will take the whole US navy+Nato with their aircraft carriers to enforce a naval blockade anywhere near st Petersburg.

Kaliningrad house many long range missiles, Hypersonic cruise missiles and ballistic missiles alone to make any attempt at blockade futile not to mention Russian navy headquarters at St Petersburg.

Also, like I said earlier Tallinn and Helsinki is withing range of Hypersonic missile systems in St Petersburg and they will have little or no reaction time

You need to familiarize yourself with the baltic sea area before coming here to type trash.

A simple Google search will do d trick, and if you are on data budget then use operamini free browser. Don't allow pride to make you ignorant, operamini can help with your education

Dunce

Svlla:


.

A simple Google search will do d trick, and if you are on data budget then use operamini free browser. Don't allow pride to make you ignorant, operamini can help with your education

Dunce

You get time to deh go back and forth with such a neophyte in geo-politics .

Drenimarcus:


You get time to deh go back and forth with such a neophyte in geo-politics .

Asin.....I just waste my time with d ode

Svlla:


Asin.....I just waste my time with d ode

I was just laughing seeing y'all go back and forth

UPDATE:

Something worrisome for Estonians: Russian Mi-8 military helicopter invaded Estonian airspace

According to the General Staff of the Estonian Defense Forces �, the incident in the southeast of the country lasted about two minutes, and the flight plan of the helicopter of the Russian border troops was not agreed with the Estonian side.
The helicopter transponder was turned off, the Russian pilots did not get in touch with the Estonian air traffic controllers.

Waiting for the reaction of the almighty NATO with their Article 5.

Drenimarcus:


You get time to deh go back and forth with such a neophyte in geo-politics .

I swear
Immediately I saw him shouting blockade up and down on Baltic Sea then I knew he has no idea about Baltic Sea.
Kaliningrad hosted all kinds of missiles and those missiles are within ranges of all Baltic Sea and there are rumours that Russia already placed nukes there but nobody can verify

Drenimarcus:


I was just laughing seeing y'all go back and forth

UPDATE:

Something worrisome for Estonians: Russian Mi-8 military helicopter invaded Estonian airspace

According to the General Staff of the Estonian Defense Forces �, the incident in the southeast of the country lasted about two minutes, and the flight plan of the helicopter of the Russian border troops was not agreed with the Estonian side.
The helicopter transponder was turned off, the Russian pilots did not get in touch with the Estonian air traffic controllers.

Waiting for the reaction of the almighty NATO with their Article 5.

Nato won't do shit...see how Lithuania is looking for a way to save face

Russia has these people by the balls

Meanwhile eastern part of Estonia is dominated by Russians at least 90%
They make up 400k of Estonian 1.3m population

seunny4lif:

I swear
Immediately I saw him shouting blockade up and down on Baltic Sea then I knew he has no idea about Baltic Sea.
Kaliningrad hosted all kinds of missiles and those missiles are within ranges of all Baltic Sea and there are rumours that Russia already placed nukes there but nobody can verify

This SMO exposed most of them ignoramuses to geo-politics. Meanwhile, Russia don breach Estonia airspace, make them activate article 5, i wan check something.

Svlla:


Nato won't do shit...see how Lithuania is looking for a way to save face

Russia has these people by the balls

Meanwhile eastern part of Estonia is dominated by Russians at least 90%
They make up 400k of Estonian 1.3m population

Russia has exposed NATO hairy balls . See EU pushing the blame to Lithuania and vice-versa. So much for their Unity

Drenimarcus:


Russia has exposed NATO hairy balls . See EU pushing the blame to Lithuania and vice-versa. So much for their Unity

E shock me

EU couldn't say pim

Even Poland that is quick to rant has been mysteriously silent on the issue

Svlla:


E shock me

EU couldn't say pim

Even Poland that is quick to rant has been mysteriously silent on the issue

Who born monkey . Rumor has it Russia is silently mobilizing.

Drenimarcus:


Who born monkey . Rumor has it Russia is silently mobilizing.

True

They may be mobilizing but for what

Svlla:


True

They may be mobilizing but for what

Honestly i don't know. Speculation could be for events going on in Kaliningrad. Better be prepared than caught unawares. I guess we will see in coming days.

Drenimarcus:


Honestly i don't know. Speculation could be for events going on in Kaliningrad. Better be prepared than caught unawares. I guess we will see in coming days.

This whole Kaliningrad issue is an unnecessary escalation but I don't think NATO will be stupid enough to go to war with Russia or Russia with NATO so I expect diplomacy to be employed in resolving this Kaliningrad upset

Make everybody chill abeg

Svlla:


You're a mumu, what do you enforce a Naval blockade with abi is it mouth you use to blockade

You think Russian navy is infinitesimal then you're obviously ignorant

It will take the whole US navy+Nato with their aircraft carriers to enforce a naval blockade anywhere near st Petersburg.

Kaliningrad house many long range missiles, Hypersonic cruise missiles and ballistic missiles alone to make any attempt at blockade futile not to mention Russian navy headquarters at St Petersburg.

Also, like I said earlier Tallinn and Helsinki is withing range of Hypersonic missile systems in St Petersburg and they will have little or no reaction time

You need to familiarize yourself with the baltic sea area before coming here to type trash.

A simple Google search will do d trick, and if you are on data budget then use operamini free browser. Don't allow pride to make you ignorant, operamini can help with your education

Dunce

I hope one day you can cure yourself of ignorance because at this point I cannot can.

Go back and read what I wrote, the scenario I painted before you followed Sunny4lif to type trash.

I said in case of further escalation which would imply a war between NATO and Russia, that if Sweden and Finland successful join then Russia ability to reinforced Kalingard is lost.

In subsequent post I also said clearly that Kalingard because of the missiles there will be the first to be run over by NATO because of the threats those missiles pose..

I said this like my first reply to you and third is I'm not mistaken but you and your ally keep jumping up and down without saying anything reasonable.
First you came up with map, and was shouting map, map, map until you realized I was right all along.
Then you switch to number of vessels in Russian Navy. That just showed how ignorant you are on the issue.
Talking about US needing all of its Navy vessels plus that of her allies to defeat Russian's. What exactly do you smoke.

The only vessel Russia can boast of in large number right now is subs and not all dock at the Baltic.
The West on the other hand have dedicated platforms can solely hunt for subs. I mentioned it earlier too but you don't listen just click quote and type nonsense in this 21st century.
Sea hunter, P-8 poseidon, frigates, attack subs (there's a reason they are called hunter killer), Sea Guardians.

Like I said, YOU ARE OUT OF DEPTH

railone:


I hope one day you can cure yourself of ignorance because at this point I cannot can.

Go back and read what I wrote, the scenario I painted before you followed Sunny4lif to type trash.

I said in case of further escalation which would imply a war between NATO and Russia, that if Sweden and Finland successful join then Russia ability to reinforced Kalingard is lost.

In subsequent post I also said clearly that Kalingard because of the missiles there will be the first to be run over by NATO because of the threats those missiles pose..

I said this like my first reply to you and third is I'm not mistaken but you and your ally keep jumping up and down without saying anything reasonable.
First you came up with map, and was shouting map, map, map until you realized I was right all along.
Then you switch to number of vessels in Russian Navy. That just showed how ignorant you are on the issue.
Talking about US needing all of its Navy vessels plus that of her allies to defeat Russian's. What exactly do you smoke.

The only vessel Russia can boast of in large number right now is subs and not all dock at the Baltic.
The West on the other hand have dedicated platforms can solely hunt for subs. I mentioned it earlier too but you don't listen just click quote and type nonsense in this 21st century.
Sea hunter, P-8 poseidon, frigates, attack subs (there's a reason they are called hunter killer), Sea Guardians.

Your Ifs and buts are becoming too much mahn, better snap back to reality

Your ignorance is at a grandiose level

I could educate you a little bit on the Russian Navy as well as Nato and the Finland but that will be a waste of academic point on you

So I will let run off with your assumptions and delusions, it is best your type remain ignorant for the sake of the society otherwise we will have too many mental case roaming the streets