₦airaland Forum

"So You Caught Your Wife Cheating? Read This Before You Shout ‘I Want Divorce!’ "

My guys, listen up — under Nigerian law, if your wife cheats and you later sleep with her after finding out, you can’t divorce her for adultery again. It’s called CONDONATION — meaning the law believes you’ve forgiven her (with your body).

So if you say, “She cheated but I just wanted one last time,” my brother, the law will say, “You have forgiven her. Go and love your wife in peace.” Ladies, if you ever make that mistake (God forbid oo), just seduce your husband sharp sharp. Once he sleeps with you again, the law has your back. Legal immunity activated!

But wait, not every cheating counts as adultery o!

Here are the technical points:

Adultery means real penetration — male and female organ.
MouthAction, kissing, or touching no be adultery under law because under the law, the mouth can be used for different things apart from adultery. The woman can hire a good lawyer to argue that her lover was only trying to remove something from her mouth with his own mouth which is not a crime or he was just doing CPR on her so that she will not faint. To prove adultery, the husband must prove that the male and female organs generally known as exclusive tools of sin was joined together voluntarily by his wife and another man in such a way that he has now become miserable as a result. Proving adultery is not easy in the court because the court is not your village square where mere allegations are accepted once you can afford to bring some bottles of drinks, kolanuts and goat.

If you were drunk, raped, forced by kidnappers or randy bosses or drugged, it doesn’t count as adultery either (because it wasn’t voluntary).

To divorce for adultery, a man must prove not only that adultery has occurred but that the adultery has made him so unhappy and miserable that living with his wife has become intolerable.

One mistake in a 10-year marriage? The court fit say, “Abeg, forgive her — she’s just human she deserves another chance, it is the work of the devil.”

So next time you hear “My wife cheated,” ask, “Did you still sleep with her after?” — because that one round might just cancel your case.

Nigerian Law is not for the faint-hearted. It knows love is complicated, forgiveness is powerful, and one round can rewrite your destiny.

Story! Do I need to go through this process? Na she go use her hand carry her bag go her papa house, cos she will become invisible to me from that moment. I go just dey live my life dey go.

That’s very commendable 👏👏👏 let the judge marry her and let them sleep in the courtroom.

The law only applies to poor masses and this one in particular applies to husbands who are being fed by their wives. I don’t think senator Ned will need this kind of protocol or scrutiny if he wants to divorce his wives.
🚶‍♂️

No law can force a man to stay married when he doesn't want to.

Naijalegal:
"So You Caught Your Wife Cheating? Read This Before You Shout ‘I Want Divorce!’ "

My guys, listen up — under Nigerian law, if your wife cheats and you later sleep with her after finding out, you can’t divorce her for adultery again. It’s called CONDONATION — meaning the law believes you’ve forgiven her (with your body).

So if you say, “She cheated but I just wanted one last time,” my brother, the law will say, “You have forgiven her. Go and love your wife in peace.” Ladies, if you ever make that mistake (God forbid oo), just seduce your husband sharp sharp. Once he sleeps with you again, the law has your back. Legal immunity activated!

But wait, not every cheating counts as adultery o!

Here are the technical points:

Adultery means real penetration — male and female organ.
MouthAction, kissing, or touching no be adultery under law because under the law, the mouth can be used for different things apart from adultery. The woman can hire a good lawyer to argue that her lover was only trying to remove something from her mouth with his own mouth which is not a crime or he was just doing CPR on her so that she will not faint. To prove adultery, the husband must prove that the male and female organs generally known as exclusive tools of sin was joined together voluntarily by his wife and another man in such a way that he has now become miserable as a result. Proving adultery is not easy in the court because the court is not your village square where mere allegations are accepted once you can afford to bring some bottles of drinks, kolanuts and goat.

If you were drunk, raped, forced by kidnappers or randy bosses or drugged, it doesn’t count as adultery either (because it wasn’t voluntary).

To divorce for adultery, a man must prove not only that adultery has occurred but that the adultery has made him so unhappy and miserable that living with his wife has become intolerable.

One mistake in a 10-year marriage? The court fit say, “Abeg, forgive her — she’s just human she deserves another chance, it is the work of the devil.”

So next time you hear “My wife cheated,” ask, “Did you still sleep with her after?” — because that one round might just cancel your case.

Nigerian Law is not for the faint-hearted. It knows love is complicated, forgiveness is powerful, and one round can rewrite your destiny.

Legal Clarification (for accuracy and public understanding)

The post is funny and well-written, but it mixes humour with law, and some parts are misleading. Let’s separate what the law actually says from what is just online entertainment.

1️⃣ Adultery under Nigerian law
Under Section 15(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, adultery is one of several possible grounds for divorce. The petitioner must prove two things:

that the respondent voluntarily committed sexual intercourse with someone else, and

that the petitioner now finds it intolerable to live with that person.

In law, adultery means sexual intercourse — actual penetration between a married person and someone of the opposite sex. Mere kissing, touching or “oral acts” are not legally classed as adultery, even if they are morally wrong.

2️⃣ Condonation (forgiveness)
Condonation is recognised under Nigerian family law, but it is not as automatic or simple as the post claims. If a spouse, after knowing about the adultery, freely and intentionally resumes marital relations, including sexual intercourse, the court may interpret that as forgiveness.
However, the effect of condonation depends on facts:

It only covers the specific act forgiven, not future misconduct.

If adultery continues after forgiveness, a new ground for divorce can still arise.

If the petitioner was misled, coerced, or uncertain, it may not amount to true condonation.

So it is false to say “one last time cancels your case.” It depends on intention, timing, and continued conduct.

3️⃣ Effect on divorce
Even if adultery is proved, divorce in Nigeria is not automatic. The test is whether the marriage has broken down irretrievably. Adultery is just one piece of evidence the court will consider. Other factors — cruelty, desertion, or long separation — may also be relevant.

4️⃣ “One mistake in 10 years”
The Act does not excuse or forgive adultery based on duration of marriage. Each petition is judged on its own facts. Courts can encourage reconciliation, but that is not a rule.

Summary:
Yes, adultery is a valid ground for divorce.
Yes, condonation can weaken that ground if forgiveness and cohabitation occur.
But it is not automatic, and the law does not say “one round cancels your case.”

Nigerian divorce law is more detailed and evidence-based than social-media summaries make it seem.

you are very funny because you just said almost the same thing that I said while trying to disprove me.

Fenrir:
Legal Clarification (for accuracy and public understanding)

The post is funny and well-written, but it mixes humour with law, and some parts are misleading. Let’s separate what the law actually says from what is just online entertainment.

1️⃣ Adultery under Nigerian law
Under Section 15(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, adultery is one of several possible grounds for divorce. The petitioner must prove two things:

that the respondent voluntarily committed sexual intercourse with someone else, and

that the petitioner now finds it intolerable to live with that person.

In law, adultery means sexual intercourse — actual penetration between a married person and someone of the opposite sex. Mere kissing, touching or “oral acts” are not legally classed as adultery, even if they are morally wrong.

2️⃣ Condonation (forgiveness)
Condonation is recognised under Nigerian family law, but it is not as automatic or simple as the post claims. If a spouse, after knowing about the adultery, freely and intentionally resumes marital relations, including sexual intercourse, the court may interpret that as forgiveness.
However, the effect of condonation depends on facts:

It only covers the specific act forgiven, not future misconduct.

If adultery continues after forgiveness, a new ground for divorce can still arise.

If the petitioner was misled, coerced, or uncertain, it may not amount to true condonation.

So it is false to say “one last time cancels your case.” It depends on intention, timing, and continued conduct.

3️⃣ Effect on divorce
Even if adultery is proved, divorce in Nigeria is not automatic. The test is whether the marriage has broken down irretrievably. Adultery is just one piece of evidence the court will consider. Other factors — cruelty, desertion, or long separation — may also be relevant.

4️⃣ “One mistake in 10 years”
The Act does not excuse or forgive adultery based on duration of marriage. Each petition is judged on its own facts. Courts can encourage reconciliation, but that is not a rule.

Summary:
Yes, adultery is a valid ground for divorce.
Yes, condonation can weaken that ground if forgiveness and cohabitation occur.
But it is not automatic, and the law does not say “one round cancels your case.”

Nigerian divorce law is more detailed and evidence-based than social-media summaries make it seem.

Naijalegal:
you are very funny because you just said almost the same thing that I said while trying to disprove me.

You were misleading on purpose

Naijalegal:
you are very funny because you just said almost the same thing that I said while trying to disprove me.

⚖️ Legal Clarification (for accuracy and public understanding)

The post is witty and engaging, but it mixes humour with Nigerian law, and a few parts may mislead readers.
Let’s separate what the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) actually provides from what is just creative storytelling.

1️⃣ Adultery under Nigerian law

The governing law is the Matrimonial Causes Act (Cap M7, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004).

Under Section 15(1) of the Act:

“A petition under this Act by a party to a marriage for a decree of dissolution of the marriage may be presented to the Court by either party to the marriage upon the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”

Section 15(2)(b) further provides that the Court shall hold a marriage to have broken down irretrievably “if, but only if, the petitioner satisfies the Court that since the marriage the respondent has committed adultery and the petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the respondent.”

To rely on this ground, two things must be proved:

That the respondent voluntarily committed adultery (i.e., sexual intercourse) with another person; and

That the petitioner now finds it intolerable to continue living with them.

Meaning of adultery:
While the Act does not define “adultery”, Nigerian courts adopt the common-law meaning — voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone of the opposite sex who is not their spouse.
(See Eze v. Eze (2013) LPELR-20375 (CA); Bibilari v. Bibilari (2011) LPELR-3821 (CA)).

Thus, mere kissing, touching, or oral sexual activity do not amount to adultery in law, even if they are morally objectionable. Only penetrative sexual intercourse qualifies.

2️⃣ Condonation (forgiveness)

The doctrine of condonation is recognised in Nigerian matrimonial law, although it is not expressly codified in the MCA. It comes from equitable principles applied by the courts.

Condonation means forgiveness of a matrimonial offence, particularly when the innocent spouse, knowing of the offence, voluntarily resumes marital relations (including sexual intercourse) with the offender.

However, it is not automatic and depends on the facts. Nigerian courts have clarified that:

Condonation applies only to the specific act forgiven, not to future misconduct.

If adultery continues or is repeated after forgiveness, a fresh ground for divorce arises.

If the petitioner resumed relations under coercion, emotional pressure, or misunderstanding, it may not amount to true condonation.
(See Okwueze v. Okwueze (2010) 8 NWLR (Pt 1196) 518).

Therefore, the popular claim that “sleeping with your spouse once after discovering adultery cancels your case” is false in law. The courts will examine the intention, knowledge, timing, and circumstances to decide whether forgiveness actually occurred.

3️⃣ Effect on divorce

Even when adultery is proven, divorce in Nigeria is not automatic.
The court must be satisfied that the marriage has broken down irretrievably, as required by Section 15(1) of the MCA.

Adultery is only one of eight statutory facts under Section 15(2) that can prove breakdown.
Other examples include unreasonable behaviour, desertion, or long separation (see §15(2)(c)–(h)).

Thus, adultery alone does not guarantee a decree; the petitioner must show the total marital relationship is no longer sustainable.

4️⃣ “One mistake in 10 years”

There is no statutory provision that excuses adultery based on how long the marriage has lasted or how few incidents occurred.
Each petition is assessed on its own merits and evidence.

Courts may encourage reconciliation in suitable cases (see Section 11(2)(c) MCA), but that is discretionary, not a legal rule.

✅ Summary

Yes, adultery under Section 15(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act is a recognised ground for divorce.

Yes, condonation (forgiveness and resumption of marital relations) can weaken that ground — but only if clearly proven on the facts.

No, the law does not say “one round cancels your case.” That statement oversimplifies a complex doctrine.

No, the law does not excuse adultery because the marriage was long or the act was “only once.”

Nigerian family law is evidence-based and fact-sensitive.
The courts look at conduct, intention, and credibility — not social-media summaries.

Humour has its place — but when people wrap false statements of law in comedy, they do more harm than they realise.
The law is not a playground for creativity; it is the framework that governs lives, marriages, and destinies.
Turning it into entertainment without accuracy is not wit — it is misinformation wearing a smile.

In a country where many citizens learn about their rights from social media, every false legal claim has consequences.
It can destroy families, misguide victims, and erode public trust in the justice system.
When you speak on the law of the land, you carry a duty — whether you are a lawyer or not — to speak truthfully.

If the author of such a post happens to be a lawyer, the situation becomes far more serious.
Under the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (2007), every lawyer owes a duty of candour, integrity, and respect for the law.
Deliberately misrepresenting legislation for humour or attention is not “creative content” — it is professional misconduct.
Any lawyer who trivialises the Matrimonial Causes Act or spreads inaccuracies about Nigerian law in public is betraying the trust of the profession and could justly face disciplinary action before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee.

If the person is not a lawyer, then they must stop performing legal expertise they do not have.
There is nothing admirable about misleading others on matters that can determine the fate of a home or the outcome of a court case.
Social media should inform, not deceive.
The law is not an opinion — it is a system built on precision, evidence, and ethics.

Let’s be clear:
When people distort the law for engagement, they are not educating the public — they are endangering it.
And when those who should know better participate in that distortion, it becomes a stain on the legal community itself.

Nigeria deserves better than viral misinformation disguised as humour.
Respect for the law begins with speaking it truthfully.

Anyway you either do not understand legal principles or you are not a lawyer. Since you want to go technical you should simply quote the law verbatim and tell me how I am wrong in my own interpretation. It is not wise to accuse someone of being wrong without giving the particulars of his errors. Even when you appeal on a case the basic thing is that you must provide particulars of errors for every ground(point) of appeal, that I wrote the content in street language was simply to help people to learn the way they can easily understand because the rich audience will likely have a lawyer on retainer ship and will not need any naira land lawyer stories.

The law is very simple it is not adultery per se that is the fact to be proven to ground a divorce petition on that basis. It must also be proven that beyond the adultery the petitioner has also found it intolerable to live with the respondent and even apart from that you must join the co-respondent. If the law intended adultery simpliciter to ground divorce why would they also require joining the co-respondent. The statute has modified the common law position on that point. Being a lawyer is very easy arguing the law is the b]hard part of the work.

Fenrir:
Humour has its place — but when people wrap false statements of law in comedy, they do more harm than they realise.
The law is not a playground for creativity; it is the framework that governs lives, marriages, and destinies.
Turning it into entertainment without accuracy is not wit — it is misinformation wearing a smile.

In a country where many citizens learn about their rights from social media, every false legal claim has consequences.
It can destroy families, misguide victims, and erode public trust in the justice system.
When you speak on the law of the land, you carry a duty — whether you are a lawyer or not — to speak truthfully.

If the author of such a post happens to be a lawyer, the situation becomes far more serious.
Under the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (2007), every lawyer owes a duty of candour, integrity, and respect for the law.
Deliberately misrepresenting legislation for humour or attention is not “creative content” — it is professional misconduct.
Any lawyer who trivialises the Matrimonial Causes Act or spreads inaccuracies about Nigerian law in public is betraying the trust of the profession and could justly face disciplinary action before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee.

If the person is not a lawyer, then they must stop performing legal expertise they do not have.
There is nothing admirable about misleading others on matters that can determine the fate of a home or the outcome of a court case.
Social media should inform, not deceive.
The law is not an opinion — it is a system built on precision, evidence, and ethics.

Let’s be clear:
When people distort the law for engagement, they are not educating the public — they are endangering it.
And when those who should know better participate in that distortion, it becomes a stain on the legal community itself.

Nigeria deserves better than viral misinformation disguised as humour.
Respect for the law begins with speaking it truthfully.

Naijalegal:
Anyway you either do not understand legal principles or you are not a lawyer. Since you want to go technical you should simply quote the law verbatim and tell me how I am wrong in my own interpretation. It is not wise to accuse someone of being wrong without giving the particulars of his errors. Even when you appeal on a case the basic thing is that you must provide particulars of errors for every ground(point) of appeal, that I wrote the content in street language was simply to help people to learn the way they can easily understand because the rich audience will likely have a lawyer on retainer ship and will not need any naira land lawyer stories.

The law is very simple it is not adultery per se that is the fact to be proven to ground a divorce petition on that basis. It must also be proven that beyond the adultery the petitioner has also found it intolerable to live with the respondent and even apart from that you must join the co-respondent. If the law intended adultery simpliciter to ground divorce why would they also require joining the co-respondent. The statute has modified the common law position on that point. Being a lawyer is very easy arguing the law is the b]hard part of the work.

⚖️ THE COST OF MISCONCEPTION: WHEN “STREET LAW” BECOMES PUBLIC DANGER

You’re right that street language makes the law easier to digest — but where clarity ends and distortion begins, lives are affected.
The Nigerian legal system is already complex enough; when half-truths spread as “simplified law,” they don’t educate — they mislead.

Adultery, condonation, and irretrievable breakdown under the Matrimonial Causes Act are not casual doctrines you can bend with creative storytelling. They determine whether a person loses or keeps a marriage, custody, or property. When misrepresented, the effect is not academic — it’s human: families take wrong decisions, spouses remain trapped in abuse believing they “forgave too soon,” and courts become flooded with petitions built on false assumptions.

That is why Section 1(3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended) is clear:

“If any other law (or custom) is inconsistent with this Constitution, the Constitution shall prevail, and that other law shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.”

It’s a reminder that no opinion, culture, or “street interpretation” outranks written law.

In family law especially, precision is protection.
Misstating what condonation means, or implying “one round cancels your case,” may sound funny — but to the spouse relying on it, it’s tragedy disguised as humour.
The line between legal education and misinformation is not defined by grammar — it’s defined by accuracy.

That’s why lawyers — and even non-lawyers who speak publicly about the law — have an ethical duty to get it right.
The Rules of Professional Conduct (Rule 30 and 55) impose honesty in legal representation, and public commentary on the law carries the same moral weight.
The difference between simplifying and sensationalising is whether truth survives the explanation.

So yes, language can be street, but the law itself cannot be bent to fit street logic.
A man or woman reading these posts may make life-altering decisions based on what they believe is “the Nigerian law,” and that is precisely how misinformation ruins lives — quietly, confidently, and with good intentions.

Nigeria doesn’t need “street lawyers.” It needs truth tellers.
And truth in law is not a matter of tone — it’s a matter of fidelity to the text, the cases, and the Constitution.
That is the only language justice understands.

Naijalegal:
Anyway you either do not understand legal principles or you are not a lawyer. Since you want to go technical you should simply quote the law verbatim and tell me how I am wrong in my own interpretation. It is not wise to accuse someone of being wrong without giving the particulars of his errors. Even when you appeal on a case the basic thing is that you must provide particulars of errors for every ground(point) of appeal, that I wrote the content in street language was simply to help people to learn the way they can easily understand because the rich audience will likely have a lawyer on retainer ship and will not need any naira land lawyer stories.

The law is very simple it is not adultery per se that is the fact to be proven to ground a divorce petition on that basis. It must also be proven that beyond the adultery the petitioner has also found it intolerable to live with the respondent and even apart from that you must join the co-respondent. If the law intended adultery simpliciter to ground divorce why would they also require joining the co-respondent. The statute has modified the common law position on that point. Being a lawyer is very easy arguing the law is the b]hard part of the work.

Do you understand what it means to be neurodivergent?
Do you understand what a cultural hybrid is?

I was born in Norway to a Norwegian–Swedish–Danish family.
At the age of 13, I was legally emancipated and recognized as an adult under the law, then sent to the UK to live independently.

So yes — I have a Scandinavian mind, thoughts, and emotional framework, expressed through a British voice and vocabulary.

However, I’ve spent most of my life around Africans, particularly Nigerians. Because of this, I understand both European and African cultures deeply.

And no, I’m not a lawyer — but it’s clear that I studied law before choosing a different path, earning multiple PhDs in:

Philosophy

Ancient History

Anthropology

Zoological Anthropology

Cultural Anthropology (specializing in African, and further in Nigerian, studies)

I began my higher education at 15–16 and completed it by 21, followed by a successful 12-year military career.

In school, one studies several disciplines simultaneously — so what’s your excuse for slowing down after formal education?

The law is not a game, nor is it a matter of wordplay. Treating it with “street language” only diminishes its weight and meaning.
Please do better — or simply stop. You’re doing more harm than good.

Let me set out the exact words of the statutte in S.15(2)(b) which states that: Since the marriage the Respondent has committed adultery and the Petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the Respondent.

Under Common Law, adultery alone was enough to ground a divorce but the statute has modified that position by adding another extra condition to it by stating that the petitioner must also have found it intolerable to live with the petitioner as a consequence. By this, the statute has cured a defect in the common law position. There are many decided cases in the UK and Nigeria based on this points. I would have as usual not given you the decided cases on this point but out of the kindness of my large heart, let me enlighten and teach you for free so that you can learn and be liberated from your confusion and feel happy to learn legal technicalities because I understand your pain, childhood trauma and confusion of not being able to practice the tough career of law. If you had informed me earlier that I was arguing with a non-Nigeria cut and join mixture of national and continental confusion I would not have wasted so much energy and intellectual capacity arguing with you in all my previous post which has recently obviously caught your obsession or OCD.

To educate your mind on the current statutory position of the law kindly read the cases of Goodrich V. Goodrich, Cleary V. Cleary then compare it with the case of Roper V. Roper and tell me the difference. Then you should read the Nigerian cases of Megwalu V. Megwalu and the case of Anagbado V. Anagbado. When reading all the cases and the statutes you must bear in mind the relevant rule of interpretation applied when a statute is made to cure a defect in a common law position. Since you want to do the hard work of being a lawyer I will be happy to engage with you and show you that Nigerian lawyers are better trained than all those foreign trained philosophers. Like I said in my other post every principle I have written about was distilled from decided cases, I only summarized it in a way that the common man will be able to grasp. You don't expect me to write in Nairaland as if I am writing for the Harvard Law Review. Anyway, I would appreciate if you would stop calling me out unnecessarily, you can engage with my post with more respect and we can exchange ideas but you must stop making me look like a liar. Any idea can be expressed in more than one way but that does not make one person a liar. You are not the first Nigerian to be born abroad or to obtain a PHD abroad, Nigerians have been doing it even before the independence.

Fenrir:
Do you understand what it means to be neurodivergent?
Do you understand what a cultural hybrid is?

I was born in Norway to a Norwegian–Swedish–Danish family.
At the age of 13, I was legally emancipated and recognized as an adult under the law, then sent to the UK to live independently.

So yes — I have a Scandinavian mind, thoughts, and emotional framework, expressed through a British voice and vocabulary.

However, I’ve spent most of my life around Africans, particularly Nigerians. Because of this, I understand both European and African cultures deeply.

And no, I’m not a lawyer — but it’s clear that I studied law before choosing a different path, earning multiple PhDs in:

Philosophy

Ancient History

Anthropology

Zoological Anthropology

Cultural Anthropology (specializing in African, and further in Nigerian, studies)

I began my higher education at 15–16 and completed it by 21, followed by a successful 12-year military career.

In school, one studies several disciplines simultaneously — so what’s your excuse for slowing down after formal education?

The law is not a game, nor is it a matter of wordplay. Treating it with “street language” only diminishes its weight and meaning.
Please do better — or simply stop. You’re doing more harm than good.

Naijalegal:
Let me set out the exact words of the statutte in S.15(2)(b) which states that: Since the marriage the Respondent has committed adultery and the Petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the Respondent.

Under Common Law, adultery alone was enough to ground a divorce but the statute has modified that position by adding another extra condition to it by stating that the petitioner must also have found it intolerable to live with the petitioner as a consequence. By this, the statute has cured a defect in the common law position. There are many decided cases in the UK and Nigeria based on this points. I would have as usual not given you the decided cases on this point but out of the kindness of my large heart, let me enlighten and teach you for free so that you can learn and be liberated from your confusion and feel happy to learn legal technicalities because I understand your pain, childhood trauma and confusion of not being able to practice the tough career of law. If you had informed me earlier that I was arguing with a non-Nigeria cut and join mixture of national and continental confusion I would not have wasted so much energy and intellectual capacity arguing with you in all my previous post which has recently obviously caught your obsession or OCD.

To educate your mind on the current statutory position of the law kindly read the cases of Goodrich V. Goodrich, Cleary V. Cleary then compare it with the case of Roper V. Roper and tell me the difference. Then you should read the Nigerian cases of Megwalu V. Megwalu and the case of Anagbado V. Anagbado. When reading all the cases and the statutes you must bear in mind the relevant rule of interpretation applied when a statute is made to cure a defect in a common law position. Since you want to do the hard work of being a lawyer I will be happy to engage with you and show you that Nigerian lawyers are better trained than all those foreign trained philosophers. Like I said in my other post every principle I have written about was distilled from decided cases, I only summarized it in a way that the common man will be able to grasp. You don't expect me to write in Nairaland as if I am writing for the Harvard Law Review. Anyway, I would appreciate if you would stop calling me out unnecessarily, you can engage with my post with more respect and we can exchange ideas but you must stop making me look like a liar. Any idea can be expressed in more than one way but that does not make one person a liar. You are not the first Nigerian to be born abroad or to obtain a PHD abroad, Nigerians have been doing it even before the independence.

⚖️ THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARGUMENT AND INSECURITY

You finally quoted the statute — good. It says exactly what I cited from the start:

“Since the marriage, the respondent has committed adultery and the petitioner finds it intolerable to live with the respondent.”
That is Section 15(2)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, verbatim.
So there is — and never was — any disagreement on the text or the dual requirement of adultery + intolerability.

The problem is not the section; it’s your earlier public claim that “sleeping with your spouse once after discovering adultery cancels your right to divorce.”
That statement is false in law, as both statute and case law show. You have now quietly abandoned that position — and in doing so, conceded the very correction you ridiculed.

As for your attempt to turn this into a contest of personal history, nationality, or psychology:
No competent lawyer trained in advocacy substitutes evidence with insult.
The Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules 30, 32 & 55) require lawyers to maintain candour, courtesy, and respect in all public and professional exchanges.
When someone claiming to be a lawyer resorts instead to personal attacks, emotional diagnosis, and nationalist boasting, it signals not confidence but deficiency.
If you truly are a lawyer, you’ve just written a case study in conduct the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee could cite under “bringing the profession into disrepute.”
If you’re not a lawyer, then you’ve publicly impersonated one — which is worse.

Either way, the record now stands as follows:

1️⃣ The statutory wording has been correctly stated.
2️⃣ The case law you mentioned supports — not contradicts — my explanation.
3️⃣ You have conceded, through your own quotation, the very point you called “confused.”
4️⃣ Your personal remarks have no bearing on law and only diminish your credibility.

You cannot reverse those four facts by replying, rephrasing, or reaching for new insults.
Law is not performance — it’s precision, and the written evidence here is permanent.

What is spoken by many, argued by few, but decided only by the written word?
The law.

When truth and ego meet in public, which survives when silence enters the room?
Truth.

Between noise and knowledge, which one leaves evidence behind?
Knowledge.

The statute has spoken. The authorities have spoken. The record is closed.