₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,714 members, 8,423,343 topics. Date: Tuesday, 09 June 2026 at 03:58 PM

Toggle theme

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (173) - Nairaland

Nairaland ForumNairaland GeneralPoliticsForeign AffairsTechnical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (1162702 Views)

1 2 3 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 ... 669 Reply (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
oh la la grin

the aircraft is a mig 21 single seater , but i will be dammed if thats going to stop me from being a co passenger , preferably under the lady grin grin

i will make sure with the lady sitting on me , the aircraft does some crazy loops grin grin

(unfortunately in my dreams grin grin grin)

high time to ask mr.putin for citizenship , i am getting old grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
C130J Closeup ....EO POD

and i am curious about the APU exhaust above the main landing wheels

APU is generally required if u r using heavy electronic systems inside

example AWACS etc have APU

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 5:54pm On May 10, 2017
tdayof:
South Korea has a new president. He and Trump see North Korea very, very differently.
South Korea just elected a new president who is less hawkish on North Korea than Donald Trump.

Moon Jae-in of the liberal Democratic Party is a career human rights lawyer and the son of North Korean refugees. He’s pledged to review his predecessor’s decision to allow the US to deploy the THAAD missile defense system in South Korea and said he wants to improve relations with North Korea, including reopening a joint industrial park on the Northern side of the border that the previous president had said was funneling money to Kim Jong Un’s regime in Pyongyang.

Good to be back here. Phone got stolen.
won ji fone ni china na grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by tdayof(m): 6:00pm On May 10, 2017
Odunayaw:
won ji fone ni china na grin
Na so o. It was stolen during a practical class and there was no camera in that particular hall.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 6:04pm On May 10, 2017
tdayof:
Na so o. It was stolen during a practical class and there was no camera in that particular hall.
anyway. kaabo
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by gabng(m): 1:45am On May 11, 2017
@ nemesis

Tried sending you a pm.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:01am On May 11, 2017
gabng:
@ nemesis

Tried sending you a pm.
will send u a alternate email later
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 9:24am On May 11, 2017
kikuyu1:
xxxx
5th May, 2017 launch of GSLV Mk.II (Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle).

The third stage of the GSLV Mk.II is propelled by the CE-7.5, an indigenous cryogenic rocket engine, 2.8 m in diameter and uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid oxygen (LOX).

CE-7.5 is a regeneratively-cooled, variable-thrust, staged combustion cycle rocket engine.The engine has a default thrust of 7.5 tons (75 kN) but is capable of a maximum thrust of 9.31 tons (93.1 kN).

other Indian cryogenic rocket engines,

CE-20 is a gas-generator cycle based cryogenic engine. The engine produces a nominal thrust of 200 kN, but has an operating thrust range between 180 kN to 220 kN and can be set to any fixed values between them.

India is one of the only 6 countries which are capable of producing cryogenic engines.

as i said before

haters gonna hate , but never say die grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 3:14pm On May 11, 2017
Chinas CH-4 UAV

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 3:54pm On May 11, 2017
U.S. Cruise Missile Strikes in Syria – Brief Analysis


I’m going to skip the policy analysis and work on the facts of this strike and the Russian response. The al-Shayrat airbase was chosen because according to U.S. sources on April 4th a Syrian Su-22 deployed some kind of munition with chemical weapons. On April 6th two U.S. destroyers fired 60 Tomahawk cruise missiles at the base, although technically it was 61 since one failed to launch and had to be replaced, while another missile ditched into the sea (60 planned – 1 launch fail, + 1 replacement, -1 malfunction resulting in sudden conversion into torpedo). The official story is that 59 hit targets.

What did the missiles hit? This base hosted two squadrons of Su-22M3/M4 bombers and one squadron of Mig-23ML/MLD fighters. For those who don’t know, these are legacy aircraft from the Soviet Union, long retired in Russia. If memory serves Su-22s were taken out of service in the Russian air force back in 1998, but are still flying in Poland. These squadrons were distributed in three different parts of the airbase, and it looks like the missiles hit two out of three sectors. As a consequence they got 5 Su-22M3s, 1 Su-22M4, and 3 Mig-23ML fighters for a total of 9 aircraft destroyed (Pentagon claimed 20, but so far we can only count 9, then subsequently in a recent press release the Pentagon changed the story to 20% of Syrian air power destroyed.) The squadron of Su-22s located in the northwest of the base seems largely untouched, which is why one of the planes was shown on video launching from the base within the same day.


READ MORE @; https://russianmilitaryanalysis./2017/04/10/u-s-cruise-missile-strikes-in-syria-brief-analysis/

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 3:59pm On May 11, 2017
FROM RUSSIAN WITH LOVE................ grin kiss

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:02pm On May 11, 2017
MORE LOVE... grin

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:05pm On May 11, 2017
cool cool

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:07pm On May 11, 2017
RANDOM

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:10pm On May 11, 2017
I LOVE THESE BABIES.... kiss kiss kiss

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:12pm On May 11, 2017
MORE BABIES..... shocked shocked shocked

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 4:14pm On May 11, 2017
EXTRAS... kiss

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 5:05pm On May 11, 2017
many interceptors came and went yet the same bombers still torments the west.

that's why I love Russia.

.

the consistency.


.
the staying true to the the cause.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 5:05pm On May 11, 2017
many interceptors came and went yet the same bombers still torments the west.
that's why I love Russia. the consistency. the staying true to the the cause.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Odunayaw(m): 5:15pm On May 11, 2017
lionel4power:
many interceptors came and went yet the same bombers still torments the west.

that's why I love Russia.

.

the consistency.


.
the staying true to the the cause.
very pragmatic,the Russians . No time for futurism
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by lionel4power(m): 5:29pm On May 11, 2017
Odunayaw:
very pragmatic,the Russians . No time for futurism
true... Russian gears are utilitarian, practical and rugged.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by MikeCZA: 6:00pm On May 11, 2017
lionel4power:
true... Russian gears are utilitarian, practical and rugged.
Ever heard about the B-52?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by bidex111: 6:40pm On May 11, 2017
lionel4power:
many interceptors came and went yet the same bombers still torments the west.

that's why I love Russia.

.

the consistency.


.
the staying true to the the cause.
grin grin shocked grin grin
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:55pm On May 11, 2017
Isreali military forces

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody:
the MSP Groza ( "thunderstorm" ) silent pistol , the smallest silent pistol in the world

is a double-barrel, derringer-type firearm designed in the Soviet Union in 1972. The firearm is chambered for the silent 7.62×38 SP-3 cartridge which is fed via a two-round clip. The weapon was designed at the request of the Spetsnaz and KGB as an assassination weapon. It is no longer in production, having been superseded by more modern designs.

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 4:10am On May 12, 2017
Chinas other 5th gen fighter FC-31

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 7:54am On May 12, 2017
evolution of Indian space launchers from yesteryear till date

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:16am On May 12, 2017
RUDRA with 2X DUAL HELINA ATGM AND 2XFZ 70MM ROCKET PODS

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:18am On May 12, 2017
overhead weapons pylon on jags for self defence role

India uses ASRAAM on its jag overhead pylons

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 8:26am On May 12, 2017
Yakovlev Yak-28

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by gabng(m): 9:32am On May 12, 2017
nemesis2u:
will send u a alternate email later
Will be waiting.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nobody: 10:48am On May 12, 2017
new Mi-26T-2 for Algerian AF

1 2 3 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 ... 669 Reply

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President TrumpPhotos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian.@elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday234

Russia-Ukraine War: World News, Weapons & Battlefield Discussions - LiveAmerican Politics Thread: Trump Is The 47th President!Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military .

Viewing this topic: 1 guest(s)