budaatum:

You know what nightingale? I'm going to disagree with you for the mere fact that you mistake KEB's ignorance for that of Christians generally. If you take him as your mean, you would be insulting Christians!

I do agree with your claim for atheists though. It is in fact reading that makes one an atheist.

Everybody reads but not everybody understands. Case in point.... Consider one atheist on this thread called dalaman aka the salamander. He has been reading but has never understood anything.

The simplest of things posted on this thread causes his brain to combust and switch to error mode.

For theists, understanding is a breeze but for atheists it's a struggle.

Intelligence comes through understanding what one reads and not from mere reading.

butterflyl1on:


We are not talking about BEFORE. YOU SAID HE EXPLAINED IT ON THIS THREAD.

SHOW ME.

YOU CAN ALSO COPY AND PASTE HIS EXPLANATION CAN YOU NOT?

Mr mad man. He explained special creation on this thread as the hybridization of creationism and evolution. I know what he means by the hybridization of creationism and evolution cos he has already explained it to me before. If you want him to clarify anything ask him. I owe you no explanations.

dalaman:


Mr mad man. He explained special creation on this thread as the hybridization of creationism and evolution. I know what he means by the hybridization of creationism and evolution cos he has already explained it to me before. If you want him to clarify anything ask him. I owe you no explanations.

Oh so you admit you know what it means but has been chasing your tail and dodging this question ever since.

Okay budaatum here is proof of my last comment.

DALAMAN SINCE YOU SAID EBUKA ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS TO YOU BEFORE, KINDLY EXPLAIN IT TO ME.

you need to prove to budaatum that you ain't a dumb atheist even though I already know you are but just humour me.

butterflyl1on:



Oh so you admit you know what it means but has been chasing your tail and dodging this question ever since.

Okay budaatum here is proof of my last comment.

DALAMAN SINCE YOU SAID EBUKA ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS TO YOU BEFORE, KINDLY EXPLAIN IT TO ME.

you need to prove to budaatum that you ain't a dumb atheist even though I already know you are but just humour me.

Explain it to you because you are who? I will not explain it to you, call police.

dalaman:


Explain it to you because you are who? I will not explain it to you, call police.

Case proven!

Dumb atheist confirmed!

butterflyl1on:


Case proven!

What have you proven? Did you ask him and he told you that I do not understand what he meant? Your mental illness is always making you see things that aren't there.

dalaman:


What have you proven? Did you ask him and he told you that I do not understand what he meant? Your mental illness is always making you see things that aren't there.

Haba how can someone else who spoke something to you also know you understood what he said to you?

You say he explained to you. You also said you understood what he explained so why then should I further ask him on your behalf when you admitted by yourself?

Your are beyond dumb I swear. You are giving jackbizzle aka dumbbizzle a run for his money.

butterflyl1on:


Haba how can someone else who spoke something to you also know you understood what he said to you?

You say he explained to you. You also said you understood what he explained so why then should I further ask him on your behalf when you admitted by yourself?

Your are beyond dumb I swear. You are giving jackbizzle aka dumbbizzle a run for his money.

Read up. He asked me to explain it here and I did. In our discussion on the other thread where I asked him to explain what he meant by special creation he didn't use the word "hybridization of creationism and evolution" he used a simple word and explained what he meant. If you need clarification ask him. I owe you no explanations.

budaatum:

You know what nightingale? I'm going to disagree with you for the mere fact that you mistake KEB's ignorance for that of Christians generally. If you take him as your mean, you would be insulting Christians!

I do agree with your claim for atheists though. It is in fact reading that makes one an atheist.

I don't think you had a good day.I respectfully disagree with you, The king is respected and loved across many platforms.

I certainly must agree with you that too much reading makes one an Atheist. The world is overloaded with fiction that is corruptly published as NON-FICTION.

butterflyl1on:



Everybody reads but not everybody understands. Case in point.... Consider one atheist on this thread called dalaman aka the salamander. He has been reading but has never understood anything.

The simplest of things posted on this thread causes his brain to combust and switch to error mode.

For theists, understanding is a breeze but for atheists it's a struggle.

Intelligence comes through understanding what one reads and not from mere reading.

Mmmmm interesting. I am wondering at the incredible revelations on this inspiring thread. It may be that Dalaman is not to blame for the difficulties presented throughout this debate, could the blame be with the inferior education system he was subjected to ?

We all know that in an inferior education system no understanding is required. You get all your grades by rote memory only.
I think a measure of compassion for Dalamans predicament is in order. I mean just look at the childish topic an esteemed Nairaland atheist wrote titled, WHY DO GOD HAVE ANGELS

ScienceWatch:
I notice that there is some intellectual conflict slowly brewing on the horizon between a human and another species. To be fair, the standards for judging IQ will be hugely different Sir. I dare say that in the heat of the moment you may be missing the important difference between you and Dalaman. You are a created being with sovereign citizenship of planet earth.
On the other hand, Dalaman is a self confessed accidental product of two miscreant planets. I have no reason to disbelieve him. It is just worrisome to have aliens among us. Who gave them permission to live on our planet ??

Yekpa !

Hello ScienceWatch. I noticed you there. Any update on that thing you were getting me? One shouldn't go thinking things up with no evidence now. And then go about accusing others of ones own sins.

ScienceWatch:
I don't think you had a good day.I respectfully disagree with you, The king is respected and loved across many platforms.

I certainly must agree with you that too much reading makes one an Atheist. The world is overloaded with fiction that is corruptly published as NON-FICTION.

dalaman:


Read up. He asked me to explain it here and I did. In our discussion on the other thread where I asked him to explain what he meant by special creation he didn't use the word "hybridization of creationism and evolution" he used a simple word and explained what he meant. If you need clarification ask him. I owe you no explanations.

LMAO so your problem is the use of the word "hybridization ".

Indeed sciencewatch was right. Your educational background is useless!

butterflyl1on:


LMAO so your problem is the use of the word "hybridization ".

Indeed sciencewatch was right. Your educational background is useless!

Says the person that can not even read and comprehend. Where did I say that my problem is the use of the word hybridization Mr lie lie?

butterflyl1on:


Below are some notable things about him. You would do well to carefully scrutinize. Those places that featured him, I guess he went there to play video games right?

Please click on references for this individual and let me know if he plays video games, right?

budaatum:

Please click on references for this individual and let me know if he plays video games, right?

Christopher Langan is still smarter than Richard Dawkins . Because someone is a professor and slanders religion does not mean he is incredibly intelligent . I think I even have a higher IQ than Richard

budaatum:

Please click on references for this individual and let me know if he plays video games, right?

What about this guy ?

He is like 1000 Richard Dawkins

This thread is just filled with a lot of meaningless banter and puerile memes. It veers totally away from the reason for the thread.

By the way, anyone who has read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers will know about Chris Langan.
I also believe in evolution and creationism like he does but sadly he is not the best example of anything.
As a matter of fact he is more of an example of failed potential. And none of his theories have been verified or proven to have experimental value. Neither does he have any inventions or patents to his name.

So what is this thread about again?

KingEbukasBlog:


What about this guy ?

He is like 1000 Richard Dawkins

Are you just trying to miss the point? Here's another guy with lengthy references! It does not prove what your sidekick was attempting to use them to pfove.

NPComplete:
This thread is just filled with a lot of meaningless banter and puerile memes. It veers totally away from the reason for the thread.

By the way, anyone who has read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers will know about Chris Langan.
I also believe in evolution and creationism like he does but sadly he is not the best example of anything.
As a matter of fact he is more of an example of failed potential. And none of his theories have been verified or proven to have experimental value. Neither does he have any inventions or patents to his name.

So what is this thread about again?

Thanks for this. This thread itself is an example of failed potential. The topic could have made for an educative discussion, but that wasn't the intention of the op going by its title.

There is hope for us still though.

budaatum:

Are you just trying to miss the point? Here's another guy with lengthy references! It does not prove what your sidekick was attempting to use them to pfove.

Hahaha ... Oga Butterflylion come see oo . Dude is trying to feign ignorance of what he did

NPComplete:
This thread is just filled with a lot of meaningless banter and puerile memes. It veers totally away from the reason for the thread.

By the way, anyone who has read Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers will know about Chris Langan.
I also believe in evolution and creationism like he does but sadly he is not the best example of anything.
As a matter of fact he is more of an example of failed potential. And none of his theories have been verified or proven to have experimental value. Neither does he have any inventions or patents to his name.

So what is this thread about again?

How modern scientists have inventions and patents to their names? how many modern scientists have had their theories verified ?

Take your time o !

KingEbukasBlog:


How modern scientists have inventions and patents to their names? how many modern scientists have had their theories verified ?

Take your time o !

Well the respectable ones do. The very smart ones. Unless you are saying we should compare this "genius" to the average Joe. Then that will lead again to my question: what is this thread about?
"Oh gee, look at the smartest Christian in the world. Be advised though, he is just as useless as the next guy. Praise Jesus". Is that what you are trying to tell us?

KingEbukasBlog:


Hahaha ... Oga Butterflylion come see oo . Dude is trying to feign ignorance of what he did

Someone with buddha and atum as his moniker on needs constant corrections and not contributions. Confusion is running rife.

NPComplete:


Well the respectable ones do. The very smart ones. Unless you are saying we should compare this "genius" to the average Joe. Then that will lead again to my question: what is this thread about?
"Oh gee, look at the smartest Christian in the world. Be advised though, he is just as useless as the next guy. Praise Jesus". Is that what you are trying to tell us?

The point of the thread is to show shallow atheists that one can be incredibly smart and still maintain his belief in the existence of God or still profess that Christ is the son of God .
To shame their ridiculous assertion that intelligence leads to atheism while facts like Chris's case destroys this assertion.

I mean , also , we have an atheist lowbrow who claimed reading makes people become atheists while Chris through reading coupled with his high intelligence was able to develop his knowledge about so many fields of study.

butterflyl1on:


Someone with buddha and atum as his moniker on needs constant corrections and not contributions. Confusion is running rife.

He is an embodiment of confusion indeed . I wonder if he actually believes the tripe he spews but I find it adorable and funny anyway

dalaman:


Says the person that can not even read and comprehend. Where did I say that my problem is the use of the word hybridization Mr lie lie?

Your quote below and be kind enough to note the words in highlights

dalaman:


Read up. He asked me to explain it here and I did. In our discussion on the other thread where I asked him to explain what he meant by special creation he didn't use the word "hybridization of creationism and evolution" he used a simple word and explained what he meant. If you need clarification ask him. I owe you no explanations

The word in view all this while has been hybridization and you kept dodging it but here you said earlier ebuka did not use that word but he used A SIMPLER word and explained it.

This simply means that the word "hybridization " which he now used in place of THAT SIMPLER WORD you said he used earlier is giving you migraine which was why you could not offer an answer to my question but kept dodging.

So the word hybrid or hybridization is big grammar to you and way too much for your low level atheist brain to process?

Your shame is extremely profound and your dance of shame is extremely entertaining

KingEbukasBlog:


He is an embodiment of confusion indeed . I wonder if he actually believes the tripe he spews but I find it adorable and funny anyway

And one is expected to allow you to be the judge of your own rationality?

I'd present for a lobotomy first!

budaatum:

And one is expected to allow you to be the judge of your own rationality?

I'd present for a lobotomy first!

Why go back to redo what you already did. Or was the first botched?

butterflyl1on:


Someone with buddha and atum as his moniker on needs constant corrections and not contributions. Confusion is running rife.

Hmm. You noticed. When you grow up you too will see the implied significance.

In the meantime, mu.

KingEbukasBlog:


The point of the thread is to show shallow atheists that one can be incredibly smart and still maintain his belief in the existence of God or still profess that Christ is the son of God .
To shame their ridiculous assertion that intelligence leads to atheism while facts like Chris's case destroys this assertion.

I mean , also , we have an atheist lowbrow who claimed reading makes people become atheists while Chris through reading coupled with his high intelligence was able to develop his knowledge about so many fields of study.

Sorry to burst your bubble though, Chris Langan is not a Christian. At least not from his theories and beliefs. So reading may not have made him an atheist (sorry atheists it doesn't always work that way) but he sure is far less religious and definitely no longer a conventional Christian because of it.