AFONJAPIG:
why are these uncircumcised cursed mallams stealing and claiming every available piece of land that belong to other religion as if all the desert around the world never full them... one day they will claim my village shrine as Muham-MAD raping site before flight took him to aljanna... Ndi Ara... Thank God Israeli will give them the trouble in full

Demmzy15:
You call a son of Abraham a bastard? You have mind sha, I pray you don't end badly.

PastorAIO:
History says that Jerusalem was a city built by the Jebusites, and a covetous King David invaded it and stole it from them and then made it his capital city.

Christians shouldn't lie. Unless lying is a core part of your christianity. Along with hatefulness and envy.

Demmzy15:
You call a son of Abraham a bastard? You have mind sha, I pray you don't end badly.

danvon:
well brainwashed people think they are not brainwashed you can't find even one verse in the Revelation that says Christians will fight for Jews nope you can't, compare America today and when it did not support Israel, Does it look blessed or cursed?

frosbel2:
Let us some simple logic.

Imagine if you and your ancestors have been living on a stretch of land for over a 1000 years and then a group of people come to show you a book that suggests the land you are living on belongs to them and therefore you have to uproot your entire families, farms, cattle, and sheep, property, and businesses, and relocate into a slum or a small parcel of land shared by millions akin to living a Ghetto.

How would you react, say the truth ??

sorom4:

Are you aware that most Americans are Jews? Are also aware that the vast economy of America is dependent on American Jews? The Jews run America

danvon:
where did you see that curse in the Bible?

Neddyogu:

Gen 16: 10-12

Hati13:
Jerusalem belongs to Ethiopia first and Israel second

Olu317:
Let us be honest with ourselves because archeology and ethnography doesn't super this. The most important aspect of Israelis tradition are mostly written in the Bible and Torah and does not support the ancient Canaan as Hebrew people before the new one(isrealis) emerged. The worship of God and animals associated with Israelis made them different. The Israelis used Heifer as sacrifice by house of prophet, which started from Aaronic dynasty, while the house of David uses Ram as sacrifice for replacement for a son that needed to die as a sacrifice to God. This does not change the fact that all ancient Israel uses ram as a form of sacrifice I'm one way or the other. Furthermore, the Islamic religion has adopted this tradition as a yearly sacrifice in their own religion. The first set of Canaanites were offshoot of Cush. The historical Israelis weren't Canaanites but adopted many names due to their migration pattern to the different locations they found themselves. And on the exodus out of Egypt was true even if different conquest had existed in Egypt, with different ethnic groups, which had erased many historical connection to Israel. Till date, the land of Onias still exist in Egypt even if the location had been destroyed because there were written document in Aramaic. Below is an attach document.

danvon:
I know how stubborn you are and won't want to hear the truth, two wrongs don't make a right both Jews and Arabs reject Jesus, you call Ishmael a bastard remember that God promised to make him a great nation, Revelation 3:9 "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of SATAN, which say they are JEWS, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." There's only one religion that uses synagogues and it's those who call themselves Jews, you can be Jewish if you accept Judaism, stop talking about Jews like they are saints the world isn't divided into Jews and Arabs.

AgentOfAllah:


I believe Analize701 is talking of Yathrib (modern day city of Medina), however, this person's understanding of the story is rather very unsophisticated. First of all, Medina is an oasis, but of course, naturally formed. It was not converted by the jews as (s)he claims. Also, I'm not sure about the day Muhammed attacked, but the outcome of that attack was devastating. In some ways also, inevitable. During their stay in Yathrib, the tensions between the Muslim and the leaders of some local Jewish tribes simmered and eroded the trust that allowed the Muslims into Medina in the first instance. I guess the Muslims felt betrayed also, because, in spite of them acknowledging the Jews as among god's chosen, and even praising all their prophets and what not, the Jewish leadership in these tribes, though accepting Muhammed's political leadership, refused to acknowledge the supremacy of his religion. Some did convert to Islam, but many didn't make it a secret that they considered Muhammed's message a fraudulent rip off! On several occasions, they would rebuff his attempts to convert them by asking him difficult questions. So, in spite of his wide acceptance in Medina, he wasn't universally liked by all the leading tribes there.
For some reason, Muhammed chronicled his frustrations with this set of Jews in several parts of the Qur'an, apparently, as god's response to them. This is just one of his responses below:



So what happened?
Before the Muslims arrived Yathrib, it was a relatively stable free market economy with no real leadership, just a bunch of tribes, each having their own tribal representative in a sort of community congress. These tribes were a mix of Arabized Jewish tribes like banu Aws, core Jewish ones like banu Qurayzah and Banu Nadir; as well as other core Arab tribes and perhaps others that were unrecorded. Around the year 622AD, Muhammed was invited to Medina to come and settle a dispute between two of the leading tribes then, Banu Aws and Banu Khazraj, as he was seen as trust worthy. Among the conditions for his participation was that as an independent arbiter, he was to become the de facto leader of Medina, and his decisions would be final. Made sense, as many found his judgements fair; and even became Muslims as a result. He also instituted a representative theocratic government in which Jews were expressly allowed to govern themselves in accordance with their own legal codes, but they were still subject to state taxes instituted for the welfare of the state.

Unfortunately, during one of the battles with the pagans of Mecca, the battle of the trenches (so named because the Muslims were grossly outnumbered and decided to protect themselves by digging trenches around their city),one of the Jewish tribes, Banu Qurayzah, conspired with the Meccans to attack the Muslims from behind, perhaps because they weren't happy with their new subordinate status or maybe their mistrust for the divine claims of Muhammed had reached its climax. Either way, they grossly miscalculated. The Meccans had planned to weaken the Muslims by siege; and then Qurayzah would finish them off, but the siege didn't last long, as the arid climate with its treacherous sand storms frustrated the Meccans. Meanwhile, the Muslims got wind of the intentions of Banu Qurayzah, and marched on them as soon as the battle was over. The leadership of banu Qurayzah had betrayed one of the key provisions in the Medina constitution, and Muhammed, knowing the punishment for this kind of betrayal according to Jewish traditions would be severe; and at the same time, navigating around a tense political situation (at this point, the Jews of Yathrib were still vastly more influential in the city than the Muslims), he appointed the leader of banu Aws who had converted to Islam, to pronounce judgement on banu Qurayzah according to the Torah. The judgement was severe: Kill all male members of the tribe that have attained the age of puberty; and enslave women and children. This was a politically deft move! He at once, eliminated his political opponents, while not incurring the wrath of the powerful Arabised Jewish tribes in Medina. But it was just as stupendously atrocious. Nevertheless, it solidified the Muslims' stronghold on Yathrib and allowed then to subsequently institute more severe strains of their theology.

analize701:

Your dishonesty stinks. You want Bethlehem given to the Arabs but stand against me for saying No.

Gearahia.

Olu317:
Abram wasn't an Hebrew name because he wasn't an Hebrew in the first place but his descendants were identified with such name. In fact, ISRAEL WAS THEIR ORIGINAL, which was borne out Jacob's name being changed by God. His father was Terah and was of Chaldean origin. Secondly there were account on archaeological that were found to have mentioned the dates I referred. Even your reference whom you acknowledge so dearly, in the person of Ben Tor on the same information on . The most important of Israelis tradition were borne out contact with Eli/Elohim/YHWH,through Abram. And one of the contact with God ; “And when Abram asked whereby he might know that he should inherit it, God said to him, "Take me an heifer of three years old, and a she-goat of three years old, and a ram of three years old, and a turtle-dove, and a pigeon." .These were the animals firstly associated with Abram and his descendants. In fact, you are quite funny, because identifying someone's place of origin that history has record of it has nothing incoherent about it as you seem not to be very widely read on this. Below is a journal that mentioned sixth century info and check out the YouTube info about them which has same dates I referred. Lastly, Christianity is a way of life. I know my ancestors tradition and before Jesus came, no human being took away from my ancestors their tradition and until the coming of Jesus Christ, no one will take away from my descendants and family. Christ Jesus was the promise of God to Israel.
There was ancient history , if you have no knowledge of it, doesn't matter. I hope you will agree with the archaeological information you see in it. Kindly let go of the postulation but focus on the archeology.

Check this out :https: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yc5kKSzzUI

PastorAIO:


Okay, let's see who the angry, hateful liar is here.

Please compare and contrast the following posts.
























So from the above, who is the person that has been lying from her father of lies since the beginning of this thread? Is it not you. I believe that is about 3 or 4 directly contradicting statements that you have made out of one single mouth. Jesus said when you right hand is doing something don't let your left hand know, but I think he will be shocked to see that you've taken that to the extreme of when your mouth says something immediately the same mouth will be ignorant of it and say something totally contradictory in the next breath.

I kind of feel sorry for you because I can tell that you have a lot of angst and to seek relief you are just lashing out incoherently and islam is one of the things that serves as your kind of punchbag to give you a little bit of relief from your violent torment.

lakesider:
How will this affect Nigerians and Nigeria
Why are Nigerian Op and bloggers very stupid people ?

NotComplaining:



I agree that Abram was neither a jew or a xtian. He Abram was one who submitted to the will of God and that in arabic is 'Tasleem', and the one who submits is a Muslim. Abram was a Muslim as Islam was was the first of all religions on the planet.

Culturally, Abram was a persian. His name originates from the persian Farsi language, not Hebrew, Aramaic or Latin. So linguistically you christians have no claim to the name neither does the Torah, Thalmud or New Testament.

Whenever you mount an attack on Islam and Muslims you are mounting a greater attack on xianity. Jesus never ever called his followers christians! Remember he was always a jew!

Christianity is not a way of life, we know this because Jesus only came to implement the laws that came before him. So you mean Judaism is a way of life. And we know today that Judaism is obsolete, irrelevent and unrobust.

All the people of the past were Muslims. You cant bring a point without showing bias. Why cant we call Jesus a Muslim?

And Jesus spoke of one that will come after him that his name will be Ahmed (praise worthy) and Muhammed is the praise worthy one. Is Ahmed not mentioned in Barnabos gospel? How many Ahmeds came after Jesus that achieved the feat of Muhammed?

You guy lack sincerity and dont know history.

Please dont let me start because if I do you will run..If you dont know your religion abstain from debate.

danvon:
I know how stubborn you are and won't want to hear the truth, two wrongs don't make a right both Jews and Arabs reject Jesus, you call Ishmael a bastard remember that God promised to make him a great nation, Revelation 3:9 "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of SATAN, which say they are JEWS, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." There's only one religion that uses synagogues and it's those who call themselves Jews, you can be Jewish if you accept Judaism, stop talking about Jews like they are saints the world isn't divided into Jews and Arabs.

danvon:
Then let them (the Jews) fight Mohammed it's not your war

Olu317:
Let us be honest with ourselves because archeology and ethnography doesn't super this. The most important aspect of Israelis tradition are mostly written in the Bible and Torah and does not support the ancient Canaan as Hebrew people before the new one(isrealis) emerged. The worship of God and animals associated with Israelis made them different. The Israelis used Heifer as sacrifice by house of prophet, which started from Aaronic dynasty, while the house of David uses Ram as sacrifice for replacement for a son that needed to die as a sacrifice to God. This does not change the fact that all ancient Israel uses ram as a form of sacrifice I'm one way or the other. Furthermore, the Islamic religion has adopted this tradition as a yearly sacrifice in their own religion. The first set of Canaanites were offshoot of Cush. The historical Israelis weren't Canaanites but adopted many names due to their migration pattern to the different locations they found themselves. And on the exodus out of Egypt was true even if different conquest had existed in Egypt, with different ethnic groups, which had erased many historical connection to Israel. Till date, the land of Onias still exist in Egypt even if the location had been destroyed because there were written document in Aramaic. Below is an attach document.

danvon:
I know how stubborn you are and won't want to hear the truth, two wrongs don't make a right both Jews and Arabs reject Jesus, you call Ishmael a bastard remember that God promised to make him a great nation, Revelation 3:9 "Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of SATAN, which say they are JEWS, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee." There's only one religion that uses synagogues and it's those who call themselves Jews, you can be Jewish if you accept Judaism, stop talking about Jews like they are saints the world isn't divided into Jews and Arabs.

RedPanda:

This is a very twisted understanding of scriptures no wonder muslims are as confused as anything. This is just plain rubbish

How can Jesus speak of muhammed when Islam came in 1000 years after Judaism. My God....such delusions

In Muhammad's lifetime, it was a fairly unimportant city in the Byzantine Empire. It was a Christian city without a single mosque.

Nakuza:
point of correction Sir, after the Holocaust, that is the killing of six millions Jews by Adolf Hitler of Germany. The whole world took pity on what befell the Jews and proposed a nationality of Jews should be created to avoid another onslaught on them. Then the first place that the world suggested for their settlement was Ethiopia which the Jews rejected and said they prefer to go back to their ancestry city Jerusalem. I would advise you to do research on Zionists Movement to have a clear picture of the whole story. Tnks.