prolog2:
Look kid, the important thing is not that the autor is foreign ! Nobody gives a fvck about the origin of the autor !!!!! All that matters are the dates in which the documents were written. To describe an event which allegedly took place at date A, you need documents written at date A.
And stop just throwing names, just post the alleged documents and point out what you are quoting in the documents. That is how it is done !
Like that the people whom you are talking to can verify by themselves if your document is authentic and if the quote actually exists.
Also, don't post documents quoting other documents, just post the original thing ! Let me check the date and the quote !

Gilbert J Garraghan divides source criticism into six inquiries:
1. When was the source, written or unwritten, produced (date)?
2. Where was it produced (localization)?
3. By whom was it produced (authorship)?
4. From what pre-existing material was it produced (analysis)?
5. In what original form was it produced (integrity)?
6. What is the evidential value of its contents (credibility)?
Bernheim (1887) said The source whose account can be confirmed by reference to outside authorities in some of its parts can be trusted in its entirety if it is impossible similarly to confirm the entire text. - Hugh Clapperton issa external authority.
I gave u primary source of 1825, I gave u secondary scholarly articles of 1997 to 2008, u rejected them. I critiqued my primary source to prove his credibility, u said I was throwing names all around.
I have tried I don't give people much of my time like this but I have seen u attack people's education cause of this ur benin. Dats why I took u own bruv.
This was an important process for understanding Yorùbá culture today. Intellectual debates have followed, ethnographic, historic, linguistic, religious research. Thousands of publications are available today for people reading English, Spanish, Portuguese and Yorùbá. They include weird theories from Yorùbá being the sunken Atlantis to a lost tribe of the Egyptians. Yorùbá is the best researched African language and the culture is part of the American history, became a topic in the négritude movement and discussed among intellectual circles. The more spiritually driven discourse on the Orisha religion in the diaspora is another big issue for today’s Yorùbá identity worldwide. It spread across the world, countries, languages and skin colors and last but not least, millions of people are following the path of the Orisha! The 19th century Lagos Renaissance shaped history. Dude I am not being Yorubacentric it is just FACT. blazhykowskyi asked you a question couldn't answer it, u gave the 'i don't work for u crap' I don't for u either but I know what I am saying and brought evidence. Do me the honour and answer his questions

Read again, and read well this time:

Look kid, the important thing is not that the autor is foreign ! Nobody gives a fvck about the origin of the autor !!!!! All that matters are the dates in which the documents were written. To describe an event which allegedly took place at date A, you need documents written at date A.
And stop just throwing names, just post the alleged documents and point out what you are quoting in the documents. That is how it is done !
Like that the people whom you are talking to can verify by themselves if your document is authentic and if the quote actually exists.
Also, don't post documents quoting other documents, just post the original thing ! Let me check the date and the quote !

proudlyYoruba:
Gilbert J Garraghan divides source criticism into six inquiries:
1. When was the source, written or unwritten, produced (date)?
2. Where was it produced (localization)?
3. By whom was it produced (authorship)?
4. From what pre-existing material was it produced (analysis)?
5. In what original form was it produced (integrity)?
6. What is the evidential value of its contents (credibility)?
Bernheim (1887) said The source whose account can be confirmed by reference to outside authorities in some of its parts can be trusted in its entirety if it is impossible similarly to confirm the entire text. - Hugh Clapperton issa external authority.
I gave u primary source of 1825, I gave u secondary scholarly articles of 1997 to 2008, u rejected them. I critiqued my primary source to prove his credibility, u said I was throwing names all around.
I have tried I don't give people much of my time like this but I have seen u attack people's education cause of this ur benin. Dats why I took u own bruv.
This was an important process for understanding Yorùbá culture today. Intellectual debates have followed, ethnographic, historic, linguistic, religious research. Thousands of publications are available today for people reading English, Spanish, Portuguese and Yorùbá. They include weird theories from Yorùbá being the sunken Atlantis to a lost tribe of the Egyptians. Yorùbá is the best researched African language and the culture is part of the American history, became a topic in the négritude movement and discussed among intellectual circles. The more spiritually driven discourse on the Orisha religion in the diaspora is another big issue for today’s Yorùbá identity worldwide. It spread across the world, countries, languages and skin colors and last but not least, millions of people are following the path of the Orisha! The 19th century Lagos Renaissance shaped history. Dude I am not being Yorubacentric it is just FACT. blazhykowskyi asked you a question couldn't answer it, u gave the 'i don't work for u crap' I don't for u either but I know what I am saying and brought evidence. Do me the honour and answer his questions

prolog2:
Read again, and read well this time:

Look kid, the important thing is not that the autor is foreign ! Nobody gives a fvck about the origin of the autor !!!!! All that matters are the dates in which the documents were written. To describe an event which allegedly took place at date A, you need documents written at date A.
And stop just throwing names, just post the alleged documents and point out what you are quoting in the documents. That is how it is done !
Like that the people whom you are talking to can verify by themselves if your document is authentic and if the quote actually exists.
Also, don't post documents quoting other documents, just post the original thing ! Let me check the date and the quote !

Go back read the initial questions u asked and read the answers. And don't forget to get ur glasses Methuselah

prolog2:
Read again, and read well this time:

Look kid, the important thing is not that the autor is foreign ! Nobody gives a fvck about the origin of the autor !!!!! All that matters are the dates in which the documents were written. To describe an event which allegedly took place at date A, you need documents written at date A.
And stop just throwing names, just post the alleged documents and point out what you are quoting in the documents. That is how it is done !
Like that the people whom you are talking to can verify by themselves if your document is authentic and if the quote actually exists.
Also, don't post documents quoting other documents, just post the original thing ! Let me check the date and the quote !

Go back read the initial questions u asked and read the answers. And don't forget to get ur glasses Methuselah

adewoleshittu:
stop posting rubbish the new minister is not an hausa he is a native of iwo and a famous islam scholar in iwo.

Shit2
Lol

Don't blame the Fulani vermin blame the yaribanza Muslim goats who sold you to sokoto

Slaves