vaxx:
You guys are really close minded, You never give room to other alternative. I keep on saying it that the physical universe is enough evidence for God.

Lets look at this perspective.....

Is fire and water a living thing? ""Disclaimer "" i fully understand fire and water are not living things. But however i am going to give it a shoot.

Fire and water both constituted of basic units. Fire is nothing more than a combustion reaction, and the resulting flame is the visible manifestation of the reaction. The intense heat of the fire vaporizes the fuel source, and, as the vaporized fuel interacts with air particles (free atoms and molecules), a glowing flame is produced. The glow is light emitted from the exited electrons of the air particles. In other words, the basic unit of a flame is the particles of air. Those particles can be thought of as a type of cell, the basic unit of the existent flame. Water is also composed of basic units. These units are called molecules, and they are of the form H2O (hydrogen and oxygen.

Water is the source of life, that most of the animate lifes depends on. It seems paradoxical, how can inanimate become a source of life to animate object? But that is the wonders of universe. Infact the major source of life are inanimate (Air, sunlight and water)

God can actually be an inanimate object, yet still still remain a source of life to everyone .

joseph1013:


You expect me to work for the devil, a fictional character who has been made up to serve as Jehovah's alibi?

vaxx:
You guys are really close minded, You never give room to other alternative. I keep on saying it that the physical universe is enough evidence for God.

Lets look at this perspective.....

Is fire and water a living thing? ""Disclaimer "" i fully understand fire and water are not living things. But however i am going to give it a shoot.

Fire and water both constituted of basic units. Fire is nothing more than a combustion reaction, and the resulting flame is the visible manifestation of the reaction. The intense heat of the fire vaporizes the fuel source, and, as the vaporized fuel interacts with air particles (free atoms and molecules), a glowing flame is produced. The glow is light emitted from the exited electrons of the air particles. In other words, the basic unit of a flame is the particles of air. Those particles can be thought of as a type of cell, the basic unit of the existent flame. Water is also composed of basic units. These units are called molecules, and they are of the form H2O (hydrogen and oxygen.

Water is the source of life, that most of the animate lifes depends on. It seems paradoxical, how can inanimate become a source of life to animate object? But that is the wonders of universe. Infact the major source of life are inanimate (Air, sunlight and water)

God can actually be an inanimate object, yet still still remain a source of life to everyone .

joseph1013:


At least you agree that God is an inanimate object.

joseph1013:


At least you agree that God is an inanimate object, even though the Bible reveals him as a living being. That's a good start.

vaxx:
At least , i agree God can and not God is. They are two different statement and there idea of treating them the same is erroneous. My understanding of God differ from the bible, therefore it will be wrong to give it bible interpretation.i sighted that the water is inanimate and likewise a process too.i gave a chemical demonstration of the water become a process. In simple term, water Is moving and changing states . From gas--liquid-solid and continually dissolving other substances into itself, then shedding those substances as it moves through plants or land or people (this is how plants get many nutrients, and also how we get oxygen to our intenal organs and glucose to muscles, etc). Water is processional so living being. So if water the inanimate object is like this , then water is very like human beings and all other entities on the planet.

Even the bible says God created man in his own image, but living and non living things are all testament of God.

darkchild64:

So you are a Christian after all

vaxx:
where do i mentioned i am a christain here.

darkchild64:
So you are a Christian after all

vaxx:
where do i mentioned i am a christain here.

darkchild64:
Well u quoted the bible so I chose to assume u are a christian ...

darkchild64:
... you don't often see non christians quoting the bible, clear me if I'm wrong

MuttleyLaff:




The devil quotes(d) the bible, and I havent seen anyone because of that assume the devil is a christian

budaatum often quotes the bible

darkchild64:
Yeah,but what I meant is that,non believers do not uphold the teachings in the bible like he did

MuttleyLaff:
Show how exactly he upheld teachings in the bible
and I'll show you budaatum, the devil and/or et al have done and/or do the same

vaxx:
At least , i agree God can and not God is. They are two different statement and the idea of treating them the same is erroneous. My understanding of God differ from the bible, therefore it will be wrong to give it bible interpretation. I sighted that the water is inanimate and likewise a process too.i gave a chemical demonstration of how the water become a process. In simple term, water Is moving and changing states . From gas--liquid-solid and continually dissolving other substances into itself, then shedding those substances as it moves through plants or land or people (this is how plants get many nutrients, and also how we get oxygen to our intenal organs and glucose to muscles, etc). Water is processional just like living being. So if water the inanimate object is like this , then water is very like human beings and all other entities on the planet.

Even the bible says God created man in his own image, but living and non living things are all testament of God.

MuttleyLaff:
Show how exactly he upheld teachings in the bible
and I'll show you budaatum, the devil and/or et al have done and/or do the same

darkchild64:
vaxx:
At least , i agree God can and not God is. They are two different statement and the idea of treating them the same is erroneous. My understanding of God differ from the bible, therefore it will be wrong to give it bible interpretation. I sighted that the water is inanimate and likewise a process too.i gave a chemical demonstration of how the water become a process. In simple term, water Is moving and changing states . From gas--liquid-solid and continually dissolving other substances into itself, then shedding those substances as it moves through plants or land or people (this is how plants get many nutrients, and also how we get oxygen to our intenal organs and glucose to muscles, etc). Water is processional just like living being. So if water the inanimate object is like this , then water is very like human beings and all other entities on the planet.

Even the bible says God created man in his own image, but living and non living things are all testament of God.

MuttleyLaff:


Just because someone makes a reference or mention of bible verse(s) doesnt mean the person is a christian, doesnt mean the person necessarily upholds or support that particular christian value or not

Paul in his epistles, quotes pagan or unbeliever philosophers

darkchild64:

Fine so ur point is that vaxx is not a Christian ?
No probs

darkchild64:

Well u quoted the bible so I chose to assume u are a christian,you don't often see non christians quoting the bible,clear me if I'm wrong

MuttleyLaff:
My point is you cant just like that conclude he is a christian basing it on him making Bible references or mentions

joseph1013:
If you read what darkchild64 wrote, you would see that he made the assumption based on the bible quotation vaxx made, and he ASKED that vaxx clear the air if he is wrong.

I can't see what he has done wrong. Or are you just gunning for a fight at all cost?

MuttleyLaff:
"where do i mentioned i am a christain here."

The above inverted commas is what vaxx wrote replying back to darkchild64

When I quote Koran, quote etcetera, it doesn't mean I am a Muslim or what not

Some mistake giving correction to spoiling for a fight.

darkchild64:

Well u quoted the bible so I chose to assume u are a christian,you don't often see non christians quoting the bible,clear me if I'm wrong

MuttleyLaff:




The devil quotes(d) the bible, and I havent seen anyone because of that assume the devil is a christian

budaatum often quotes the bible

Anas09:

Are you now saying Budaatum is a devil? lolzzzz

joseph1013:
Again, you are gunning for a fight where none exists. He asks for clarification. The guy has provided clarification using a query. Why are you angry?

Anas09:

Are you now saying Budaatum is a devil? lolzzzz

LordReed:

If Budaatum is a devil, she's a patient civil devil. LoL

MuttleyLaff:
No, I am not saying budaatum is a devil
but that budaatum, like vaxx, references the bible
yet darkchild 64 doesn't choose to assume budaatum is a christian based on him referencing, quoting or mentioning Bible verses

vaxx:
what is wrong if Richard darwkin quote the bible or if Williams Craig quote richard darwkin book (aka) ""The god delusion ""? Is there any law prohibiting non Christian to quote the bible


Bible is part of English-speaking culture, so when quoting the bible, people familiar with english easily know what you’re talking about. Plus lots of Bible quotes have entered common speech (brother’s keeper, do unto others, etc. So it’s easy to find a quote that’s apropos to any argument.


I am not a bible advocate but the verse i reference there quite agree with the message i am passing.

Anas09:

Is Budaatum a she now?

darkchild64:

Just had to be sure

vaxx:
ok. Now , you are sure.

LordReed:


I saw Budaatum use a female personal pronoun so I presume that's the case.

Anas09:

It uses both. I asked It once if it was a she, It reverted to 'he'. lol.

Omobasuron. (am i right?) Are you male of female. Be proud of your gender. Or are you a Hermaphrodite? Don't worry if you are, I'll still accept you as you are.lolzzz.