Bolognese:
If you read and understood what I wrote you won’t be asking this.

Let me help you, the results for the Imo Election as declared by INEC was from about 3000 polling units, without votes from 388 Units, meaning No result sheets from all the 388 Units Hope claimed he won were included in the collation process. According to him, they were EXCLUDED during collation at the ward collation centres. If INEC had accepted the results first, before cancelling it, the results from these 388 units would have appeared under cancelled votes. But this was not the case. INEC didn’t accept it!

For all the 388 Units, Accredited Votes = 0; Total Votes Cast = 0. In the last election, Accreditation and Voting took place same time.

For example, let’s assume you wrote WAEC and you’re expected to write 9 papers. The results are out and WAEC claims you wrote only 5 papers, went ahead to produce a certificate for you saying you sat for only 5 papers. In the same certificate you passed 3 and failed 2. They claim the other 4 you cheated or were absent and yet WAEC couldn’t prove this. You took your school and WAEC to court, showed evidence that the remaining 4 papers, you indeed sat for them, but no reason was given by WAEC for the omission. If the 4 papers are marked and you passed 3, and failed 1, will the total number of papers you passed and failed remain static?

This is similar to the case of accredited and total votes in Imo!

Bolognese:
If you read and understood what I wrote you won’t be asking this.

Let me help you, the results for the Imo Election as declared by INEC was from about 3000 polling units, without votes from 388 Units, meaning No result sheets from all the 388 Units Hope claimed he won were included in the collation process. According to him, they were EXCLUDED during collation at the ward collation centres. If INEC had accepted the results first, before cancelling it, the results from these 388 units would have appeared under cancelled votes. But this was not the case. INEC didn’t accept it!

For all the 388 Units, Accredited Votes = 0; Total Votes Cast = 0. In the last election, Accreditation and Voting took place same time.

For example, let’s assume you wrote WAEC and you’re expected to write 9 papers. The results are out and WAEC claims you wrote only 5 papers, went ahead to produce a certificate for you saying you sat for only 5 papers. In the same certificate you passed 3 and failed 2. They claim the other 4 you cheated or were absent and yet WAEC couldn’t prove this. You took your school and WAEC to court, showed evidence that the remaining 4 papers, you indeed sat for them, but no reason was given by WAEC for the omission. If the 4 papers are marked and you passed 3, and failed 1, will the total number of papers you passed and failed remain static?

This is similar to the case of accredited and total votes in Imo!

Bolognese:
If you read and understood what I wrote you won’t be asking this.

Let me help you, the results for the Imo Election as declared by INEC was from about 3000 polling units, without votes from 388 Units, meaning No result sheets from all the 388 Units Hope claimed he won were included in the collation process. According to him, they were EXCLUDED during collation at the ward collation centres. If INEC had accepted the results first, before cancelling it, the results from these 388 units would have appeared under cancelled votes. But this was not the case. INEC didn’t accept it!

For all the 388 Units, Accredited Votes = 0; Total Votes Cast = 0. In the last election, Accreditation and Voting took place same time.

For example, let’s assume you wrote WAEC and you’re expected to write 9 papers. The results are out and WAEC claims you wrote only 5 papers, went ahead to produce a certificate for you saying you sat for only 5 papers. In the same certificate you passed 3 and failed 2. They claim the other 4 you cheated or were absent and yet WAEC couldn’t prove this. You took your school and WAEC to court, showed evidence that the remaining 4 papers, you indeed sat for them, but no reason was given by WAEC for the omission. If the 4 papers are marked and you passed 3, and failed 1, will the total number of papers you passed and failed remain static?

This is similar to the case of accredited and total votes in Imo!

Please, where are you going to get your answer script and attendance slip to present to court of law to prove your case?

alizma:

Oga go and read the complete judgement on the case. The supreme court has done what any reasonable court would have done. If you don't have the judgement document, ask people who have it but before then, be mindful of what you say so that you don't look stupid later. Hope Uzodinma provided evidence of record of the votes that were excluded, police provide duplicate copy that was kept with them as demand by law yet Ihedioha and Inec said they were fake, OK provide the original one, ihedioha and inec couldn't provide something to prove that what hope uzodimma provided was fake. While hope produce 54 witnesses to back his claim, ihedioha only produce 4 while inec produce one yet they stupidly expect hope to produce agent from each of the 288 polling units. is that one normal talk?

. What are you people trying to say, inec depended their results to the last, even after the supreme Court judgment, all these propaganda and rubbising post can not fool Nigerians, you people should enjoy the money paid to you people to decieve people, it will fail, the judgment was obviously clear to be tainted

alizma:

Pls answer this question, was there election in those area, if yes pls why can't ihedioha/inec present original result from those area?

. Do you actually know what is happening or as usual you are being partisan, though I know who are partisan have their brain clouded with poor mentality, which results are you talking of, when Inec told you that result is fake and not among those accredited for election, when it was added by Tanko jigiry pokry judgement, what happened to the number of accredited voters,, you people are trying to bring in logic but forgetting to remember that inclusions of Hope Uzodinma results increased the numbers of official inec accredited voters in Imo State for that election

durangokid:
. Do you actually know what is happening or as usual you are being partisan, though I know who are partisan have their brain clouded with poor mentality, which results are you talking of, when Inec told you that result is fake and not among those accredited for election, when it was added by Tanko jigiry pokry judgement, what happened to the number of accredited voters,, you people are trying to bring in logic but forgetting to remember that inclusions of Hope Uzodinma results increased the numbers of official inec accredited voters in Imo State for that election

Between me and you let's check your comments and see who is partisan.
1. You said inec claimed the result was fake. When you say something is fake that means there is original but did inec produce the original result..... NO
2. You said that was not among people accredited, which means there was no election there. But again I asked you, did inec or Ihedioha said there was no election in those units.....NO
3. If there was election there, did inec or Ihedioha reported or even claimed that either do to disruption or major crisis, the election in those areas were cancelled...... No
4. If there was election in those areas why is Ihedioha not even asking for his own figure of the result from those unit, simply because he performed poorly over there and he was aware of the exclusion of but accredited vote and the result from those area and he know that talking about his own votes from that area will expose the shaddy arrangement he and Inec had.
Your problem is that you limit yourself to what INEC said. If INEC and Ihedioha planned to exclude the vote from those unit, don't you think they had been smart enough to also keep aside the accredited vote from that area? Use your brain before someone starts using it for you.

alizma:

Between me and you let's check your comments and see who is partisan.
1. You said inec claimed the result was fake. When you say something is fake that means there is original but did inec produce the original result..... NO
2. You said that was not among people accredited, which means there was no election there. But again I asked you, did inec or Ihedioha said there was no election in those units.....NO
3. If there was election there, did inec or Ihedioha reported or even claimed that either do to disruption or major crisis, the election in those areas were cancelled...... No
4. If there was election in those areas why is Ihedioha not even asking for his own figure of the result from those unit, simply because he performed poorly over there and he was aware of the exclusion of but accredited vote and the result from those area and he know that talking about his own votes from that area will expose the shaddy arrangement he and Inec had.
Your problem is that you limit yourself to what INEC said. If INEC and Ihedioha planned to exclude the vote from those unit, don't you think they had been smart enough to also keep aside the accredited vote from that area? Use your brain before someone starts using it for you.

. Because there was no registered polling units officially recognized by Inec that is why Inec had no records of those areas, and if you are conversant will inec rules and regulations no polling units register More than 500 in any polling unit, and more over all those form EC08 Hope Uzodinma brought, he won in all with less than 20 to any other political party, with no records of polling clack or presiding officers, how come now inec accredited presiding offcer claimed to have worked in those polling units?, Because those polling units never existed that was why there was no accreditation in those units and exactly why when the frivelous votes were add to Hope Uzodinma, number of accredited voters magically increased

slivertongue:
rubbish. inec stood by the results it declared

While Tanko Mohammed stood by the results tendered by a lonely corrupt police man who is not even supposed to know about vote count in the first place.

alizma:

Between me and you let's check your comments and see who is partisan.
1. You said inec claimed the result was fake. When you say something is fake that means there is original but did inec produce the original result..... NO
2. You said that was not among people accredited, which means there was no election there. But again I asked you, did inec or Ihedioha said there was no election in those units.....NO
3. If there was election there, did inec or Ihedioha reported or even claimed that either do to disruption or major crisis, the election in those areas were cancelled...... No
4. If there was election in those areas why is Ihedioha not even asking for his own figure of the result from those unit, simply because he performed poorly over there and he was aware of the exclusion of but accredited vote and the result from those area and he know that talking about his own votes from that area will expose the shaddy arrangement he and Inec had.
Your problem is that you limit yourself to what INEC said. If INEC and Ihedioha planned to exclude the vote from those unit, don't you think they had been smart enough to also keep aside the accredited vote from that area? Use your brain before someone starts using it for you.

Oga, your assertion are not only irrelevant after thought, but unfortunately confused- totally.
You find it convenient to change the official role of INEC when it suits Tanko's machinations.

Stop for a minute, and evaluate the gibberish you wrote, and place it in Buhari vs Atiku for example, also adjudged by the same court, and you'd understand that the court reversed itself from case to case, and as it pleases.

That is what happens when you place and uneducated judge at our supreme court, because he is your brother!

alizma:

Where did you get your information from that the votes where cancelled, What is happening to the youths self? Where did you get that from

Oversabi
Because you know one thing now you de do gidigidi

You should get the analogy. The WAEC example is to show why total votes cast and total accredited voters won’t remain static!!!

In this Imo case, there were duplicate copies of the result sheets signed by the Polling officers and provided to all the Political Party Agents at the polling Units, and the Police Officer at those units!...

bensowe:


Please, where are you going to get your answer script and attendance slip to present to court of law to prove your case?