Rossinty:
The Nigerian Army Did NOT Kill Protesters In Lekki


Amnesty International Nigerian chief representative was asked directly on Arise TV by Charles Aniagolu today, what their evidence was that any person had been shot by the Nigerian army at Lekki toll gate, and she could not produce a single shred of evidence. She began to stammer.

Charles asked her, ''Do you have any bodies?''

Silence.

''Did you SEE any bodies of any dead victims?''

Silence.

''Do you have any names of people that were killed, even ONE name?''

Silence.

''Have you been contacted by even ONE family that claimed they lost a loved one?''

Silence.


..................

This is the Amnesty International that claimed the Nigerian army had killed 12 people at Lekki Toll gate.

They had ZERO EVIDENCE of the claim.

The woman then started to say ''oh well, the army has a history of shooting people and then taking away their bodies and hiding them etc etc'', which Charles Aniagolu replied, ''Sorry madam, but THAT is NOT evidence of anything. Can you come back to us when you have REAL evidence of an atrocity committed by the Nigerian army at Lekki?''

ibuildstuff:


https://www.notion.so/Lekki-Toll-Gate-Broadcast-c44965157b7b4b99a1c4942fd6f731fe

https://twitter.com/i/status/1319330058499198979

Op Reply after watching all the videos

ibuildstuff:


https://www.notion.so/Lekki-Toll-Gate-Broadcast-c44965157b7b4b99a1c4942fd6f731fe

https://twitter.com/i/status/1319330058499198979

Op Reply after watching all the videos

Righteousness89:


It's Unfortunate that Despite all the Evidences, Fellow Humans like the op donate themselves to Supress the Truth!!

In Life.. What Goes around Comes around!!
Let's be Careful of what we do..

When it hits you or those around you, You may also be Projected to be photoshopped!!

Rossinty:


You are a liar from the pits of hell.

You are clearly not interested in the TRUTH, but in your own agenda.

Rossinty:


Thank you sir.

I have watched every one of those videos.

IN NONE OF THOSE VIDEOS IS THERE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE OF A DEAD BODY.

The last video in particular looked very suspicious. One girl was covered in what looked like blood, and yet she rose up, from the floor like she was not really injured at all.

I saw one person with a wound that could have come from a rubber bullet. He was walking around.

I SAW NO DEAD BODIES IN ANY OF THE VIDEOS.

Rossinty:


Thank you sir.

I have watched every one of those videos.

IN NONE OF THOSE VIDEOS IS THERE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE OF A DEAD BODY.

The last video in particular looked very suspicious. One girl was covered in what looked like blood, and yet she rose up, from the floor like she was not really injured at all.

I saw one person with a wound that could have come from a rubber bullet. He was walking around.

I SAW NO DEAD BODIES IN ANY OF THE VIDEOS.

Awol1:


Have you heard Sanwolu confirm 2 deaths already?

Why was the army there?

Why did your president not mention the Lekki incident?

Did you hear the army took dead bodies? Can you counter that?

Uche352:
lolzzz..rubber bullet you said? from where?...what about people who were injured from direct gunshots?..all of you are claiming the soldiers didn't fire directly at the protestor's so how come they had injuries of gunshots...I really don't know what you are trying to defend or cover up..deaths or no deaths it has been established that soldiers fired live bullets on its citizens and that act alone is treasonable...there is no way you can come out here to defend the indefensible...what is wrong is wrong in totality..and this is a means of pacifying the protesters that nobody died they only sustained a minor injury so we should clap for you and the Nigerian army.. you should bury your face in shame for trying to do there dirty work of damage control..and now the governor of Lagos State has agreed that people actually died?.. with everything going on why would the youths actually believe that this government will stop police brutality... action speaks louder than words...

Rossinty:


He did not say they were shot. He said they were bludgeoned, and nobody knows who attacked them



I don't KNOW who was ''there'' or ''why''.



Probably because he's still trying to figure out what the hell happened there.



I ''heard'' a lot of things, including claims by Amnesty International that 12 people were shot dead, for which they had ZERO evidence.

You do not merely go by what you ''hear'' in ascertaining the validity of a claim, unless you are a dunce.

Rossinty:


Thank you sir.

I have watched every one of those videos.

IN NONE OF THOSE VIDEOS IS THERE A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE OF A DEAD BODY.

The last video in particular looked very suspicious. One girl was covered in what looked like blood, and yet she rose up, from the floor like she was not really injured at all.

I saw one person with a wound that could have come from a rubber bullet. He was walking around.

I SAW NO DEAD BODIES IN ANY OF THE VIDEOS.

Awol1:


And in ascertaining the validity of a claim, you dismiss all you have heard?

Mstick:
Don't bother!

ibuildstuff:

It's not an issue if dead body, the army were there, and the open life fire on unarmed protesters. It goes against their rules of engagement. Even if no one died. I am not disputing the fact of wrong information neither am I saying that 78 people were killed. But the army did open fire at them and the governor has confirmed the death of two persons n many injured.

So it's not really a matter of dead bodies but the action if the army.

They are also claims from eye witness that army went away with some bodies.

Rossinty:


In the absence of evidence, ''all you've heard'' constitutes mere hearsay, which is inadmissible on its own in any court of law.

Awol1:


So for you, you would rather move from "unknown" to "known" instead of moving from "known" to "unknown"?

Do you know what is called an "eyewitness account" in a court of law? Is it empirical?

Do you know what is called a "lead" in investigation? Do you dismiss a lead without conclusive follow up?

Rossinty:


None of what you've typed here shows that any single person was killed by the Nigerian army at Lekki Tollgate.

And yes, the army does use rubber bullets if deemed appropriate .

Rossinty:


What you are saying makes no sense.

If the army ''fired live rounds'', how come nobody was killed?

If anybody was killed, where are their bodies?

If the army carted off the bodies, where is the EVIDENCE of that?

Where are the families of the supposed dead people?

Or don't they have families?

Have they reported their loved ones missing since they went to Lekki tollgate?

If not, why not?

WHY IS THERE NO EVIDENCE OF ANYTHING?

And finally, why did Amnesty international LIE about the incident?

heendrix:


You contradict yourself...

Rossinty:


I think the former makes more sense if you have no evidence.



Eyewitnesses must be cross-examined to ascertain what they truly know.

Have you cross-examined any eyewitnesses in this case?



You do not dismiss the lead. Neither do you form a conclusion based on a mere lead without supporting, incontrovertible evidence.