₦airaland Forum

iLegendd:
Sent

iLegendd:
Man, I'm trading. Time is money. If I go through your modification, trust me you'll end up taking 4th position. There are people like CaveAdullam, SuperOnyi, etc. who commented. Those people always make sense and they'll most likely win.

For us to stop going back and forth, I'll send you 2k card as a bribe for the argument to stop. Though, the winner is newfoundlove or whoever you people present to me as the best. Drop number let me send the card.

iLegendd:
My plate is full of things to do, I can't really reread everybody's post to finally choose. For this, I might give it to the first commenter or the first person that made an effort and it happens to be Newfoundlove. The only thing don't like about her is, my spirit is telling me the person behind the moniker is man, but using (f).

If she can admit that she's not a "she" but a man, I'll send it to him. Or, she can prove she's a woman by giving me a video call on WhatsApp via the number on my page.

Or, you people should choose who you think is the winner.

I know the 5k card is small, but I just added the prize for fun. I know everyone here is bigger than that.

iLegendd:
Almost 1k views. Who do you guys suggest I give it to?

WhiteIverson:
Lol maybe dem dey consider to stop the whole thing sef. I miss those days when sporty dey give random gift, it doesn't matter your stake. Now, gifts are given based on your stake alone and if your tickets have a high chance of winning, your potential loyalty reward reduces.

DelilahMakinde:
Lol ! I lived beside a guy who tried it many years ago. He remembers how he used to beg female co- travellers to piss for him to drink so he wouldn't die from dehydration.

Sam2310:
Wetin dey worry this one again

Prophetkelly:
Dummy..it means his cousin wey be girl, cousin brother, his cousin wey be boy. If he used only cousin, how will you know if na boy or girl he dey talk about.

donself9:
double standard, how

helinues:
Hope you are aware he's a labour party Senator

Merry100:
Just take the L and move on. Your argument crumbled the moment you had to shift from "women never contribute" to "but men guided them!"

Did men guide Marie Curie to two Nobel Prizes? Did they hold Margaret Hamilton’s hand while she wrote the code that put men on the moon? Did they whisper the structure of DNA to Rosalind Franklin before stealing her work?

The only thing men truly guided was erasing women’s names from history. And yet, despite centuries of suppression, credit theft, and gatekeeping, women still revolutionized science and technology. Imagine what we’d accomplish without insecure little men like you trying to hold us back.

By whining about "not that many," you're just proving my point - women were systematically silenced and excluded. It’s not about ability, it’s about access.

Wake up, man. Biological makeup doesn’t determine intelligence. Science isn’t a boys' club, it’s a collaboration. And whether you like it or not, women have always been part of it.

Now go cry in a corner while using Wi-Fi invented by a woman. 🤡

helinues:
Source: Razor Gazette

The admin behind this gazette media should be checked into psychiatric hospital

So the person was barred after suggesting Natasha's suspension or before?

ispreloaded:
the fastest inplay bookies is livescorebet... Sportybet doesn't encourage inplay

Merry100:
Women have been shaping science and technology for centuries.

Ever heard of Ada Lovelace, the first computer programmer? Or Katherine Johnson, whose calculations sent men to the moon? Or Hedy Lamarr, who helped invent the foundation of Wi-Fi?

Funny how you’re using technology built by women to spread your outdated nonsense.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Merry100:
You must be a clown. After implying that women are merely baby factories just to degrade women, you are now claiming you are simply being casual.

Let’s go through a bit of history. Before World War II, many countries excluded women from formal education. Even in Western societies that did offer education, women were often barred from fields like medicine, engineering, and law. It was only after World War II that women began entering a wider range of fields, including science, engineering, and law. However, discrimination and gender bias persisted for many years.

Start considering underlying factors before drawing conclusions, as I have indicated before. Creativity-based courses, such as language and arts, were historically assigned to women by society, which is why women tend to dominate and perhaps excel in these fields. Similarly, science-related and problem-solving courses were traditionally assigned to men, which is why men tend to dominate and perhaps perform better in them.

While there are differences in brain structure and function between males and females, these differences do not determine individual abilities or predispositions.

If girls perform better in verbal creativity and boys excel in science-related analysis and problem-solving, as you claim, it would be due to a variety of factors, including cultural, environmental, and educational influences, not simply differences in brain connectivity.

If biological factors alone dictated abilities, then boys and girls wouldn’t both excel individually in high school, and there would be a clear gender-based distinction in subject performance.

Puntingnoob:
No only am.

Braga and porto no do 1.5 too

Ilamina:
I should go to the mental hospital

Merry100:
This is similar to saying that cooking is actually every girl's hobby simply because most rural girls learn to cook by the age of six.

You claim to be observant, yet you conclude that female children in rural areas are less interested in complex patterns without considering the underlying factors. Societal standards for girls in rural settings and established norms play a significant role in shaping their interests.

Females and males are not treated equally; different standards have been set for them. Even female and male children don't simply make their own preferences; there are established standards that dictate these choices. Therefore, your observation is irrelevant.

There is a distinction between societal standards and individual preferences. To illustrate my point more clearly, let's consider toys and action figures, though they are more common in urban settings. While society often assigns dolls and teddy bears as toys for girls, there are boys who also prefer playing with dolls or teddy bears. Conversely, although action figures, toy cars, and balls are predominantly marketed toward boys, many girls choose to play with them as well.

SultanOfAbia:
The percentage of people that play home are in hundreds of millions 96% compared to the 4% that played those options you listed there

SultanOfAbia:
if he score that pk bookies will lose.
Do you know how much that missed pk made for bookies??

SultanOfAbia:
na fixed match

Sajdah1:
I have all. Baltasar Ebang Engonga complete 400 videos, his wife scandals too and several similar 5€x scandals  gathered within 9ja  are plenty with me. Get and cool yourself with them.They are spicy! Chat Now

Puntingnoob:
The smallest odds na him wan cut 250 odds
God abeggi