₦airaland Forum

Nigerian fintech Risevest has secured a Fund and Portfolio Manager licence from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), marking a decisive shift from regulatory scrutiny to full compliance. The approval positions the company to tap into Nigeria’s fast-growing retail investment market while strengthening investor confidence in dollar-denominated assets.

In January 2025, the mood around Risevest shifted.

For a company built on trust, trust in foreign markets, trust in curated portfolios, trust in the promise that Nigerians could build dollar wealth from their smartphones, a public warning from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) cast a long shadow. The regulator cautioned Nigerians against investing through the platform, citing the absence of a required capital market licence.

For many startups, such scrutiny can be destabilising. For Risevest’s co-founder, Eke Urum, it became a reckoning.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Urum is not new to ambition. Since co-founding Risevest in 2019 alongside Bosun Olanrewaju and Tony Odiba, he has championed a bold thesis: that middle-class Africans deserve seamless access to global wealth-building tools. At a time when inflation was steadily eroding local purchasing power, Risevest offered a different story, curated portfolios of US stocks and global fixed-income assets, denominated in dollars, accessible with relatively small ticket sizes.

The idea resonated. Nigerians worried about currency volatility found comfort in diversification. The app grew. Partnerships followed. In September 2023, Risevest acquired Chaka, an SEC-licensed digital trading startup, leveraging its regulatory framework to expand access to global securities. The structure worked, but it also placed the company within a complex web of partnerships and regulatory cover.

When the SEC warning came in early 2025, it was a reminder that ambition without direct authorisation is fragile.

Now, months later, the narrative has changed.

Risevest has secured a Fund and Portfolio Manager licence from the SEC through its subsidiary, RV Fund Management Limited.

The approval brings the company fully under Nigeria’s capital market regulatory framework, a formal recognition that closes the chapter of uncertainty.

“This approval reflects months of rigorous review and engagement,” Urum wrote to users, acknowledging both the scrutiny and the process behind the scenes. His message was careful, almost reflective. He thanked the SEC for safeguarding Nigeria’s financial system and emphasised that strong regulation builds strong markets, and ultimately, lasting wealth.

It is a statement that carries more weight after the turbulence of the year.

The licence does more than resolve a regulatory gap. It positions Risevest strategically at a time when Nigeria’s retail investment appetite is surging. In July 2025 alone, trades from Nigerian retail investors rose by 88.07% month-on-month to ₦516.50 billion.

That spike signals a broader shift: more Nigerians are participating in capital markets, searching for returns beyond traditional savings accounts.

With its new status, Risevest can now compete more directly alongside other SEC-licensed fintech players such as Bamboo and Trove. It moves from a regulatory grey area to a recognised operator, a transition that matters deeply in financial services, where perception and compliance are inseparable.

But perhaps the deeper story is about evolution.

Risevest’s journey mirrors the maturation of Nigeria’s fintech ecosystem. In its early years, speed often outran structure. Startups moved quickly to solve urgent problems, access, inflation hedging, and global diversification, sometimes relying on partnerships while regulatory frameworks caught up. As the market grows, so does oversight.

Securing this licence suggests a recalibration. It signals that Risevest is choosing longevity over speed, governance over shortcuts. It also strengthens its expansion strategy beyond Nigeria. In 2024, the company acquired Hisa, a Kenyan investment startup, marking its entry into East Africa. Operating across borders demands credibility, and regulatory clarity at home strengthens that foundation.

For Urum and his co-founders, the licence is not simply a document. It is a public affirmation that their model can exist within the guardrails of Nigeria’s financial system. It restores narrative control after months of scrutiny and aligns the company with a future where compliance is not optional but central.

In a market where trust is currency, Risevest’s turnaround may prove as important as its technology. The platform was built to help Nigerians grow dollar wealth. Now, with the SEC’s approval, it is building something equally valuable, institutional confidence.

Kenya’s Arc Ride has secured a $5 million equity commitment from the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to fuel its regional expansion across East Africa. But behind the funding lies a deeper story of conviction, climate urgency, and a founder betting that battery-swapping, not battery ownership, is Africa’s clearest path to electric mobility.

On Nairobi’s restless roads, motorcycles weave through traffic like lifelines. They carry food, medicine, parcels, and ambition. They are the pulse of informal commerce, fast, flexible, essential. But they also burn fuel by the litre, filling the air with exhaust that lingers long after the riders disappear.

Joseph Hurst-Croft saw both sides of that reality.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

When he founded Arc Ride in 2019, it wasn’t just about building another electric vehicle startup. It was about solving a contradiction. Africa’s boda-boda riders depend on their bikes to survive, yet the very machines they rely on are expensive to maintain and punishing to the environment. Electric motorcycles promised relief, lower running costs, and cleaner air, but there was a problem: batteries.

Batteries are the most expensive component of an electric motorcycle. For many riders, buying one upfront was simply impossible.

Arc Ride’s answer was deceptively simple. Remove the battery from the purchase equation entirely.

Through its battery-as-a-service (BaaS) model, riders buy the bike without its most costly part. Instead, they subscribe to a network of battery-swapping stations, exchanging depleted batteries for fully charged ones in minutes. What was once a heavy capital expense becomes a daily operating cost, predictable, manageable, and aligned with how informal transport businesses already function.

Now, that vision has attracted serious institutional confidence.

The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private investment arm of the World Bank, has committed up to $5 million in equity to support Arc Ride’s upcoming Series A round. The commitment is designed to help scale network density in Kenya, expand into new African markets, and strengthen technology capabilities through research, development, and upgrades to internationally compliant standards.

The timing matters. Investors’ appetite for e-mobility and climate solutions in East Africa is rising sharply. Cities are choking on emissions, fuel prices remain volatile, and governments are increasingly open to clean transport alternatives. Arc Ride is positioning itself not just as a Kenyan solution, but as a regional platform.

And the IFC is not alone.

Earlier in 2025, British International Investment committed $5 million in debt financing to the company. By September, Mirova International followed with a $10 million, five-year debt facility to fund additional swapping stations and battery purchases.

Together, these commitments form a layered capital stack, equity and debt, that signals long-term belief in the model.

But beyond the funding headlines lies something more interesting: validation.

For climate-focused investors, electric mobility is not just about reducing emissions. It is about inclusion. It is about ensuring the energy transition does not bypass informal workers. Arc Ride’s model acknowledges the lived reality of East African riders, daily cash flow, thin margins, relentless competition, and adapts clean technology to fit that world instead of trying to replace it.

Battery-swapping cabinets are already appearing in everyday locations: petrol stations, small shops, and warehouses. Familiar spaces. Trusted spaces. This matters in markets where infrastructure adoption depends as much on behavioural trust as on technology.

IFC’s involvement does more than provide capital. Its board-level participation and environmental and social governance standards could help de-risk Arc Ride for future private investors. In climate finance, credibility compounds. Institutional backing often unlocks the next wave of funding.

Yet funding alone does not guarantee success. Arc Ride still faces the hard work of scaling logistics, maintaining battery quality, and competing with both fuel-powered incumbents and emerging electric rivals. Expansion across Africa requires navigating regulatory diversity, infrastructure gaps, and consumer scepticism.

But perhaps Arc Ride’s greatest asset is not its swapping cabinets or capital commitments, but its framing. It does not ask riders to change their livelihoods. It simply changes the way they power them.

In that subtle shift lies the company’s deeper ambition: not just to electrify motorcycles, but to redesign the economics of mobility for the people who depend on it most.

And with $5 million from the IFC now strengthening its runway, Arc Ride is no longer just a Kenyan startup experimenting with battery swaps. It is becoming a regional bet on how Africa’s transport future might unfold, one charged battery at a time.

Talksign-1, founded by Nigerian entrepreneur Edidiong Ekong and AI engineer Kazi Rahman, is redefining sign language translation with an offline-first AI model built for Africa’s realities. Designed to work with low data and limited connectivity, it challenges tech giants by focusing on accessibility, privacy, and real-world usability for deaf communities.

In a tech landscape dominated by cloud-heavy AI, a Nigerian-led startup is quietly building a counter-narrative.

Edidiong Ekong does not speak about artificial intelligence the way Silicon Valley founders often do. He speaks about people. About faces. About childhood friendships. About standing between two worlds and realizing, at nine years old, that language itself could exclude.

“I was a native signer at 9,” he once said. That sentence explains more than any pitch deck ever could.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Growing up in Nigeria with three deaf friends, Ekong learned early that communication was not equal. He watched how conversations would stall, how explanations became exhausting, how misunderstandings were not intellectual but infrastructural. It wasn’t about intelligence. It was about access. That understanding stayed with him long after he went on to contribute to global tech products like Fireflies.ai and Boomplay. Success in mainstream tech never erased the memory of those early barriers.

Now, alongside Bangladesh AI engineer Kazi Rahman, he is channeling that memory into Talksign, and its first model, Talksign-1.

On the surface, the headline is irresistible: a Nigerian racing Google to build AI for deaf communication. Google has SignGemma. It has scale, GPUs, and cloud muscle. But Ekong’s approach is not about competing on size. It is about competing on relevance.

Most AI translation systems rely on cloud-first infrastructure. Video is recorded, streamed to remote servers, processed by massive computing clusters, and sent back as text or speech. In high-connectivity environments, this works seamlessly. But in Nigeria, and across much of Africa, that model collapses under the weight of unstable internet, high data costs, and latency.

Ekong understood this instinctively. If accessibility depends on expensive data, it isn’t accessibility at all.

So Talksign-1 does something radical in its simplicity: it processes motion data directly on the user’s device. Instead of uploading heavy video files, the system extracts landmark points, the 3D coordinates of hands, joints, and facial movements, within the browser. That lightweight “skeleton data” is interpreted locally. The raw video never leaves the device.

The result? Lower data usage. Faster response times. Sub-100 millisecond latency. And crucially, offline capability.

In practical terms, this means a deaf artisan in a crowded Lagos market does not need uninterrupted broadband to negotiate prices. A student in a rural classroom does not need constant connectivity to participate. Privacy improves because no raw footage is transmitted to distant servers.

Talksign-1 is currently in Alpha, recognizing 250 American Sign Language signs at 84.7% accuracy. It handles isolated signs for now, not yet the flowing, continuous complexity of native signing. But the ambition stretches further. Ekong hints at a fully local, server-independent experience, potentially powered by smart glasses.

What makes Talksign-1 particularly compelling is its bidirectional design. Many tools convert sign to text or speech. Talksign does both ways. It translates signs into audible speech through a webcam and converts spoken or typed words back into sign language sequences. For the first time in many informal settings, conversation can become symmetrical.

And this matters deeply in Africa’s informal economy. Think of a deaf shoemaker explaining sole types and delivery timelines to a hearing customer. Think of market traders negotiating fabric quality. Think of hospital visits, police statements, and classroom questions. Accessibility is not abstract; it is transactional, educational, and legal.

When asked about competing with Google, Ekong does not posture. “Why not?” he says when asked about investing his own savings into the mission. It is not bravado. It is conviction.

Talksign remains self-funded, driven by belief rather than valuation headlines. Ekong’s vision extends beyond commerce into fundamental rights: better healthcare access, better education, and better legal systems for over 430 million deaf and hard-of-hearing people globally.

In a world obsessed with scale, Talksign-1 feels intimate. It is not chasing dominance; it is chasing dignity. It shows that innovation built from lived experience can challenge even the largest institutions, not by being louder, but by being closer to the problem.

Sometimes the future of AI is not in the cloud. Sometimes it is in the memory of a child who simply wanted his friends to be understood.

Nigeria’s crypto founders are pushing back against the SEC’s new ₦2 billion capital requirement, calling it a disproportionate burden on early-stage startups. Through SiBAN, industry players are proposing a tiered compliance model that balances investor protection with innovation and sustainability, as regulators and operators negotiate the future of Nigeria’s digital asset ecosystem.

On a humid January afternoon in Lagos, a crypto founder refreshed his inbox, knowing the email he had just read would change his roadmap. The Securities and Exchange Commission had revised its capital requirements for digital asset operators. What once required ₦500 million would now demand ₦2 billion.

For established exchanges with foreign backing, that number was a milestone. For early-stage founders bootstrapping from co-working spaces in Yaba and Abuja, it felt like a locked gate.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

On January 16, Nigeria’s SEC introduced new minimum capital thresholds under its revised framework for virtual asset service providers. Digital Asset Exchanges and Digital Asset Custodians must now maintain ₦2 billion in operating capital. Other categories also face higher requirements. The regulator’s message was clear: resilience, investor protection, and systemic stability must define Nigeria’s newly formalised digital asset market.

But inside the country’s startup corridors, the conversation sounds different.

In a position paper submitted to the SEC, the Stakeholders in Blockchain Association of Nigeria (SiBAN), whose members include operators like Dantown, Roqqu, and Breet, described the blanket ₦2 billion rule as a “disproportionate burden.” The paper, signed by SiBAN president Barrister Mela Claude Ake, does not reject regulation. Instead, it questions calibration.

To understand the tension, you must understand the people behind these startups. Many began building during years when crypto operated in a regulatory grey zone. They survived banking restrictions, policy reversals, and public skepticism. They built products because Nigerians needed alternatives for remittances, inflation hedging, cross-border payments, and digital commerce. For them, crypto is not abstract finance; it is economic survival layered with ambition.

Now that digital assets are legalised and supervised, these founders welcome clarity. What they fear is exclusion.

SiBAN argues that while large exchanges may justify a ₦2 billion capital buffer, early-stage platforms handling smaller transaction volumes do not pose equivalent systemic risk. A uniform threshold, they say, risks narrowing the market to a handful of well-capitalised incumbents, including foreign players with deeper pockets.

In response, the association has proposed a tiered structure: an Innovation Track requiring ₦50 million to ₦200 million for startups and pilot-stage platforms; a Growth Track between ₦200 million and ₦500 million for expanding firms; and an Institutional Track of ₦500 million and above for established operators under full regulatory oversight. The philosophy is simple: align capital with scale and risk exposure.

Beyond capital restructuring, SiBAN has asked for an extended implementation timeline through 2028, allowing 12 months for classification and planning and 18 additional months for capital formation. Under the current framework, affected entities must comply by June 30, 2027.

The group has also suggested forming a Digital Asset Regulatory Working Group that includes the SEC, SiBAN, the Central Bank of Nigeria, NITDA, and independent experts. The aim would be continuous dialogue, a policy that evolves alongside innovation rather than reacting after friction builds.

Alternative compliance pathways have also been proposed: mergers and acquisitions among smaller firms, incubator partnerships under licensed operators, white-label models where technology providers do not hold customer funds, and venture studio structures centralising governance and compliance.

The SEC’s Director General, Dr Emomotimi Agama, has defended the increase, stating that stronger capital buffers ensure market integrity and investor protection in a sector still maturing. From the regulator’s lens, resilience is non-negotiable.

And perhaps that is the heart of this story, not conflict, but negotiation. Nigeria’s crypto ecosystem is no longer fighting for legitimacy; it is negotiating its architecture.

The founders do not dismiss oversight. They ask for proportionality. The regulator does not dismiss innovation. It demands safeguards.

Between those two positions lies the future of Nigeria’s digital asset economy, one that must decide whether compliance becomes a bridge or a barrier.

For now, the inboxes are still refreshing. The conversations continue. And somewhere in Lagos, Abuja, and Port Harcourt, founders are recalculating their dreams, not abandoning them, but adapting, as they have always done.

Monei has partnered with Scrub.io to embed real-time fraud monitoring into programmable wallets built for autonomous AI agents. But beyond the announcement lies a deeper shift: the redesign of financial infrastructure for a world where machines, not humans, initiate transactions, and where trust must be coded, not assumed.

For decades, every payment system in the world shared a quiet assumption: a human being would always be at the centre of the transaction. A thumbprint. A password. A final moment of hesitation before pressing “confirm.” That pause, that breath, was where trust lived.

Olanrewaju Mogaji believes that pause is disappearing.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

As the founder of Monei, an AI-native financial infrastructure platform connecting payments, banking, investments, and insurance through a unified API, Mogaji is not merely adding features to the financial system. He is questioning its foundation. If software agents can now negotiate contracts, manage procurement, renew subscriptions, and optimise treasury flows, then the financial rails beneath them cannot remain designed for human pacing.

“The shift to AI agents transacting autonomously isn’t a new feature for the financial system,” Mogaji said. “It’s a fundamental redesign of its operating system.”

That redesign has now taken a decisive step forward. Monei has partnered with Scrub.io to integrate real-time behavioural fraud monitoring into programmable wallets built specifically for autonomous agents. The system is already operating in live marketplace environments, where AI agents manage procurement tasks and recurring purchases without human intervention.

But to understand why this matters, you have to step back.

Traditional fraud detection systems were built to interpret human unpredictability. They flag unusual spending, mismatched locations, odd purchase times, and anomalies against a person’s history. Machines do not behave like people. Their transactions can be rapid, repetitive, and structurally precise. What looks suspicious in a human context might be perfectly normal for an autonomous agent executing a supply-chain mandate.

“Human-based fraud systems fail when the ‘user’ is a machine,” Mogaji explained.

The partnership with Scrub.io addresses this reality. Instead of measuring transactions against human behaviour, the system establishes a baseline of delegated authority. Every AI agent operates within encoded parameters, spending limits, merchant restrictions, and liquidity routing rules. The wallet itself becomes active infrastructure, not just a vault. It enforces policy continuously and in real time.

This transforms the wallet from a passive container into what Mogaji calls a policy engine. Authority is not implied. It is programmed. Fraud prevention shifts from post-transaction investigation to embedded enforcement within the payment flow.

The timing is no coincidence. Globally, payment giants are preparing for the same shift. Visa has introduced Intelligent Commerce frameworks. Mastercard has unveiled Agent Pay initiatives. Stripe and PayPal are embedding payments directly into AI interfaces. The signal is clear: the next generation of commerce will not always involve a checkout page.

Monei’s architecture connects to traditional settlement rails, card networks, and stablecoin systems, while building a machine-optimised logic layer on top. For Mogaji, settlement speed is no longer optional. Autonomous systems operating across time zones cannot wait for legacy clearing windows. Continuous execution demands continuous liquidity.

Yet beneath the technical architecture lies a deeper concern, currency power.

Monei integrates stablecoin rails such as USDC to enable programmable, instant settlement. Stablecoins have already reshaped cross-border payments, reducing costs and clearing times compared to correspondent banking systems. But widespread reliance on dollar-denominated digital assets carries geopolitical consequences.

“It will not turn out great for Africa if AI agents make USD their default currency,” Mogaji warned. “We are actively building a multipolar economy where the Naira plays a major role.”

His concern echoes broader continental efforts to reduce dependency on dollar clearing systems and strengthen regional payment infrastructure. If AI agents begin managing trade, subscriptions, and procurement flows at scale, the currencies embedded in their wallets could reshape liquidity patterns across emerging markets.

This is where the story deepens.

The Monei–Scrub partnership is not merely about preventing fraud. It is about encoding trust into autonomous economic actors. It is about deciding whether programmable finance will reinforce existing monetary hierarchies or support new ones. It is about designing infrastructure before behaviour hardens into default.

Monei says it has moved beyond experimentation. Active partnerships with marketplaces and service providers are already live, with AI agents managing recurring household purchases and procurement tasks. Transaction volumes remain undisclosed, but the direction is unmistakable.

If machines are to become participants in commerce, then the financial system must evolve from a human checkpoint model to a continuous governance model.

The real question is not whether AI agents can transact. It is whether society will trust them to.

And trust, as Mogaji seems to understand, cannot be assumed. It must be engineered.

Semoa Group has secured Level 3 accreditation from the Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO), positioning the Togolese fintech among a rare class of fully licensed payment institutions in WAEMU. But beyond compliance, this milestone tells a deeper story about regulatory power, regional integration, and one founder’s long bet on building fintech infrastructure from Lomé.

On January 29, Semoa Group achieved something most fintech startups in Francophone West Africa are still struggling toward: Level 3 accreditation from the Central Bank of West African States.

To understand why this matters, you have to go back, not just to the regulation, but to the man behind the company.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

In 2016, when Edem Adjamagbo returned to Lomé after graduating from Polytech Nantes, Togo’s tech ecosystem was energetic but fragile. There was ambition everywhere, young founders, mobile money growth, digital experiments, but very little regulatory structure. Fintech companies operated in partnership with banks, often navigating gray zones. Growth came first. Compliance was secondary.

Adjamagbo built Semoa in that environment, not as a flashy consumer wallet, but as infrastructure. The company developed transaction digitization systems, payment switches, voucher management tools, and, later, WhatsApp Banking, allowing customers to perform transactions without stepping into a branch. It wasn’t glamorous innovation; it was plumbing. And plumbing, in finance, determines whether the entire house stands.

Fast forward to 2024. The West African Economic and Monetary Union, home to eight countries sharing the CFA franc and serving roughly 140 million adults, saw over 11 billion electronic payment transactions processed in one year. Financial inclusion had risen from under 15% two decades ago to nearly 74%. On the surface, it looked like a success story.

But the growth had outpaced regulation.

So the BCEAO stepped in with Instruction No. 001-01-2024, requiring all fintech companies offering payment services to obtain formal licensing or cease operations. Deadlines were extended multiple times because most players were not ready. By September 2025, only about twenty payment institutions across the entire region had secured licenses.

In a monetary union of eight sovereign economies.

Semoa is now one of them, and it holds the most comprehensive license available to a non-bank institution.

Level 3 accreditation is not symbolic. It requires a minimum capital threshold of 100 million CFA francs, strict governance structures, cybersecurity standards, anti-money laundering frameworks, and formal association membership. It allows a company to issue payment instruments, handle cross-border transfers, acquire commercial transactions, and operate across the WAEMU region legally.

Without it, a fintech cannot build. With it, a fintech can scale systemically.

For Togo, this is particularly significant. The country, with a GDP hovering around $10 billion, has often been a consumer rather than a producer of financial technology. Mobile money adoption is strong, but fintech infrastructure has historically come from Abidjan or Dakar. Semoa’s Level 3 status marks the first time a Togolese company holds this level of regulatory legitimacy in payments.

And this changes the psychology of the market.

Semoa had previously limited certain cross-border activities to remain compliant. Those constraints are now lifted. The company can expand regionally without leaning entirely on partner licenses. Negotiating power improves. Investor confidence shifts. The business moves from workaround strategies to structural authority.

But the bigger story is regional.

WAEMU’s shared currency eliminates exchange rate volatility, yet payments have remained fragmented and costly. Sub-Saharan Africa continues to record some of the highest remittance costs globally. In response, the BCEAO launched an interoperable instant payment platform in late 2025, connecting dozens of institutions for real-time transfers. Discussions around a retail central bank digital currency, the e-CFA, are advancing.

The message is clear: regulation is no longer the obstacle to innovation. It is the framework defining who survives.

In this environment, innovation alone is insufficient. Regulatory maturity is the new competitive edge. Smaller fintechs that cannot meet capital and compliance thresholds will face operational ceilings. The market will consolidate around those who can.

Semoa’s journey reflects this shift. When it was founded, there was no licensing framework for payment institutions. In less than a decade, the ecosystem moved from informal expansion to regulated scale. What began as a startup navigating ambiguity has become an institution operating with central bank approval.

Adjamagbo once said his ambition was to prove that Togo could produce viable, profitable, and sustainable technology companies. That ambition now rests on something stronger than transaction volumes or partnerships; it rests on legitimacy.

In the new West African payment order, where the central bank defines who can operate across borders and at what scale, Semoa’s Level 3 accreditation is more than a license. It is a strategic position in a market being rebuilt through regulation.

And in Francophone fintech, that may be the boldest bet of all.

MTN Group has moved to acquire full ownership of IHS Towers in a $2.2 billion cash deal, marking a dramatic shift in strategy for Africa’s largest telecom operator. If approved, the transaction will consolidate control of nearly 29,000 towers and reshape the continent’s digital infrastructure landscape.

There was a time when telecom operators across Africa were told to let go.

Sell the towers. Free up capital. Lighten the balance sheet. Focus on customers, not concrete and steel.

And so they did.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Among them was MTN Group, Africa’s largest mobile network operator, which, like many of its global peers, spun off its infrastructure assets over the past decade. Towers were separated, packaged, and monetised. Efficiency became the mantra. Capital discipline became the gospel.

Now, in a move that feels almost poetic in its reversal, MTN is coming back for what it once released.

In a $2.2 billion deal, MTN is seeking to acquire the remaining shares of IHS Towers, increasing its stake from 24.7% to full ownership. The offer of $8.50 per share values IHS at approximately $6.2 billion and represents a 9.7% premium to its 30-day volume-weighted average price before MTN’s cautionary announcement. Following the news, IHS shares dipped to $8.16 on February 17, 2026, a reminder of how global tower valuations have softened under the weight of rising interest rates and emerging-market currency volatility.

But this is not merely a numbers story.

It is a story about control. About conviction. And about how leadership evolves with time.

At the centre of this decision is Ralph Mupita, MTN’s Group President and CEO — a leader who has consistently framed MTN not just as a telecom operator, but as a digital infrastructure company at the heart of Africa’s growth. For Mupita, towers are no longer passive structures leased at fixed margins; they are strategic arteries in a continent racing toward data-driven economies.

Nearly 29,000 towers stand within this transaction, physical monuments scattered across five key MTN markets. They carry voice calls, mobile money transactions, fintech services, streaming platforms, and the quiet pulse of small businesses running on smartphones. To externalise them was once prudent. To internalise them now is strategic.

Over the past decade, tower carve-outs were about unlocking value. Today, reintegration is about capturing it.

By bringing IHS fully in-house, MTN internalises the lease margins it currently pays and secures future third-party revenue streams directly. In effect, the company shifts from tenant to landlord. And in infrastructure, landlords hold leverage.

The proposed acquisition follows IHS’s divestment of its Latin American assets earlier in February 2026. Once those disposals are complete, MTN intends to acquire 100% of the remaining business, primarily concentrated in Africa. If approved by shareholders and regulators, and following IHS’s planned delisting from the New York Stock Exchange, the deal would create the largest integrated tower platform under MTN’s control.

Financing tells another layer of the story. MTN plans to fund the $2.2 billion acquisition using approximately $1.1 billion in cash already on IHS’s balance sheet, alongside available liquidity and group-level debt. No new equity issuance is required, though leverage may temporarily rise. MTN expects the transaction to be earnings-positive to both net income and cash flow.

Support is already building. Long-term shareholder Wendel has committed to vote in favour of the deal, securing roughly 40% of the required two-thirds shareholder approval when combined with MTN’s own voting rights.

IHS Chairman and CEO Sam Darwish described the deal as deepening a long-standing partnership, and that word, partnership, is telling. IHS grew alongside MTN. Its towers carried MTN’s signals. Their destinies have been intertwined for years.

Now they may become one.

What makes this moment profound is not simply its scale, but its symbolism. Africa’s digital future will not be built solely on apps, fintech platforms, or artificial intelligence. It will be built on infrastructure, fibre in the ground, towers on the skyline, and operators willing to think long-term.

MTN’s reversal is less an admission of past miscalculation and more a reflection of shifting realities. In a world where connectivity is power, ownership matters.

And sometimes, the boldest strategy is not moving forward, but reclaiming what you once let go.

Grey has officially launched Grey Business, a multi-currency payments platform built to simplify cross-border transactions for African startups and SMEs. Unveiled on February 10, 2026, at the Africa Tech Summit in Nairobi, the platform reflects years of listening to founders struggle with slow settlements, hidden charges, and limited access to foreign accounts, and offers a faster, transparent alternative for businesses ready to scale globally.

There is a particular silence that falls over a startup office when an international payment is delayed. It is not loud. It is not dramatic. But it is heavy. Salaries wait. Vendors send reminders. Expansion plans pause.

For years, African founders have lived in that silence.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Idorenyin Obong, CEO and Co-founder of Grey, has heard those stories repeatedly, not as distant case studies, but as direct confessions from entrepreneurs trying to build across borders. The same frustration echoed across conversations: payments were slow, expensive, unpredictable. A founder in Lagos is waiting days for a U.S. client’s transfer to reflect. A small e-commerce business in Nairobi is losing margins to opaque FX charges. A remote-first startup juggling multiple platforms just to receive a single invoice.

On February 10, 2026, at an exclusive side event during Africa Tech Summit in Nairobi, hosted in partnership with Paystack and Antler, Grey responded with something deliberate: Grey Business. The launch was not just ceremonial. The founders demonstrated the product live, a quiet but confident signal that this wasn’t another promise; it was ready.

Grey Business allows startups and SMEs to open USD corporate accounts, send and receive global payments, and convert currencies instantly at real-time exchange rates. It also supports USDC and USDT stablecoin transactions, acknowledging the growing role of digital assets in global commerce. But if you only look at the feature list, you miss the deeper current driving it.

Grey did not begin with businesses. It began with individuals, freelancers, remote workers, and digital nomads across emerging markets who needed access to global banking without leaving home. Over time, nearly three million users across 70 countries trusted the platform. Transfers flowed to over 170 destinations worldwide. And somewhere along the way, a pattern emerged: those freelancers were becoming founders. Those remote professionals were launching startups.

Grey Business is, in many ways, an evolution of its users’ ambitions.

Africa’s cross-border payments market is projected to surpass $1 trillion by 2035, yet inefficiencies remain stubbornly embedded in the system. Remittances are costly. Settlement times are slow. Access to foreign accounts is restricted. For growing companies, these friction points are not minor inconveniences; they are structural barriers.

“We’ve seen too many businesses lose time and money waiting for payments to clear,” Idorenyin Obong said at the launch. “Every conversation with business owners came back to the same pain point: payments. Grey Business was built from those stories. We want to give African companies the freedom to grow without borders.”

Freedom without borders. That phrase lingers.

Regulated in the United States by FinCEN and in Canada by FINTRAC, Grey operates within strict compliance frameworks while focusing squarely on emerging markets. More than 1,000 businesses signed up during the beta period for Grey Business, a quiet validation that the need was urgent and real.

But what makes this moment significant is not just expansion into B2B payments. It is what it represents: African companies no longer waiting for global financial systems to adapt to them. Instead, they are building infrastructure that understands their rhythms, the urgency of payroll, the unpredictability of foreign exchange, and the ambition to serve customers far beyond their physical location.

Grey Business becomes more than a tool. It becomes a bridge, between local hustle and global opportunity, between ambition and execution.

In a small office somewhere in Accra or Abuja or Kigali, the silence that once followed a delayed transfer may soon be replaced by something lighter: confirmation. Settlement complete. Funds received. Growth resumed.

And sometimes, that is all a business needs.

Eden Life’s decision to pause its consumer business and pivot to B2B in 2026 is more than a strategy shift, it is a wake-up call to African founders obsessed with vanity metrics. Beneath the headlines of growth and retention lie deeper lessons about macroeconomic reality, disappearing middle-class consumers, and the brutal honesty of unit economics.

An article was written that African startups have a number problem. Not a funding problem. Not a talent problem. A number problem. We celebrate activity, we amplify press releases, and we polish pitch decks, but we rarely interrogate the math.

We didn’t have to wait long for proof.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

When Eden Life announced it was pausing its consumer business to refocus on corporate clients, it wasn’t framed as a retreat. It was described as a strategic shift. But anyone who has lived inside a spreadsheet long enough could see it for what it was: mathematical surrender. And in that surrender, Eden Life quietly exposed something about the ecosystem, and about you, dear founder.

For years, Eden Life embodied the Africa-rising middle-class thesis. A premium, tech-enabled concierge platform promising busy professionals in Lagos and Nairobi a managed life, laundry, food, and cleaning, delivered seamlessly. It was modern. It was aspirational. It was the type of startup investors love to tweet about.

The numbers told a seductive story.

In 2021, headlines celebrated a $1.4 million seed round alongside the claim that Eden had delivered 60,000 services. Months later, that number rose to 150,000, supported by an 80% retention rate and 15% month-on-month growth. It looked unstoppable. A juggernaut of scale.

But “services delivered” is a logistics metric, not a profitability metric. It tells you how many plates are left in the kitchen, not whether the kitchen is burning cash. In a B2C model battered by 40% food inflation, rising fuel costs, and currency devaluation, volume can become a trap. The busier you are, the faster you bleed.

Retention rates told another half-truth. Many of Eden’s loyal users were upwardly mobile professionals, the exact demographic that fueled the 2024–2025 japa wave. They didn’t churn because the service failed. They churned because they left the country. When your core market relocates to London, Toronto, or Manchester, your denominator shrinks in silence.

Meanwhile, Nigeria’s devalued Naira quietly turned “middle class” into “managing class.” The same customers who once paid for lifestyle convenience began reverting to WhatsApp cleaners and home cooking to save ₦10,000. Ticket sizes shrank. Flash sales inflated growth charts but hollowed out margins. The promise in 2023 that profitability was “12 months away” became a projection that reality refused to endorse.

By late 2025, Eden Life conducted an internal audit of its unit economics. That audit is the real headline. Because that is where the spreadsheet stopped lying.

The 2026 pivot to B2B is not glamorous, but it is honest. In corporate contracts, ticket sizes are predictable. Logistics are centralized. Churn depends on annual budgets, not whether a subscriber decides to cook at home to cut costs. B2B does not trend on Twitter as lifestyle startups do. But it respects arithmetic.

This shift mirrors a broader reset across African tech. Companies like Moniepoint, Chowdeck, and Twiga have all leaned deeper into infrastructure, consolidation, and operational backbone rather than consumer fantasy. It is less sexy. It is more durable.

If 2024 was the year of growth at all costs and 2025 was the funding winter, 2026 is shaping up to be the year of macroeconomic realism. Eden Life’s pivot proves a difficult truth: you cannot “product-market fit” your way out of a broken macro environment.

When inflation, currency instability, and migration reshape your market, optimism alone cannot close the gap.

Dear founder, Eden Life exposed you because it exposed the ecosystem’s addiction to vanity metrics. It reminded us that activity is not sustainability. That retention without demographic analysis is incomplete. That growth without margin is performance art.

Reliability is the only currency that matters now.

Eden is no longer selling a luxury lifestyle to individuals. It is positioning itself as an infrastructure for corporations. It has moved from aspiration to utility. From lifestyle to backbone. From narrative to numbers.

The next time funding headlines scream “unstoppable growth,” I hope we pause. I hope we ask about margins. About macro risks. About who exactly is in the denominator.

Because the numbers will always tell the truth, eventually.

A labour strike at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport has disrupted flights and cargo operations, exposing the vulnerability of Kenya’s tech supply chain. Beyond delayed departures, the dispute reveals how fragile the infrastructure behind East Africa’s digital economy can be.

At 6 a.m. on Monday, the usual rhythm of departures at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport faltered. Conveyor belts slowed. Departure boards flickered with delays. And somewhere in the cargo terminals, shipments of routers, laptops, and network equipment sat waiting, paused in limbo.

Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

The disruption followed an industrial action called by the Kenya Aviation Workers Union (KAWU), whose Secretary-General, Moss Ndiema, had earlier warned that unresolved issues around a collective bargaining agreement would lead to a strike. The action, which began despite ongoing court proceedings, was rooted in demands for better pay, improved working conditions, and the settlement of long-standing labour grievances.

Official statements quickly followed. The Kenya Airports Authority confirmed delays affecting departing flights, attributing them to the labour dispute between KAWU and the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority. Airlines such as Kenya Airways, Jambojet, and iFly alerted passengers to schedule changes. Flight-tracking data showed afternoon departures slipping beyond their allocated times.

But the story of this strike is larger than delayed boarding passes.

JKIA is not merely a passenger terminal; it is the circulatory system of Kenya’s digital economy. In 2025, the airport handled 8.6 million passengers. It is a junction linking East Africa to Europe, North America, and the Middle East. More quietly, it functions as a high-value cargo gateway. In 2024 alone, Kenya imported approximately $1.1 billion worth of electrical and electronic equipment, much of it from Asia. While bulk goods arrive at Mombasa’s port, high-value electronics and ICT hardware often fly in through JKIA.

Inside those cargo holds are the unseen enablers of innovation: servers for fintech startups, smartphones for distributors, networking cables for expanding fibre projects, replacement parts for telecom infrastructure. When airport operations slow, the ripple moves quickly, from customs warehouses to retail shelves, from data centres to small businesses awaiting equipment deliveries.

The Kenya Civil Aviation Authority announced it had activated operational continuity measures and would engage stakeholders within labour law frameworks. Earlier, on February 13, it had sought court intervention to halt the strike. A labour judge temporarily suspended the action pending further directions, yet workers proceeded.

This tension is not new. In September 2024, KAWU opposed a proposed 30-year lease agreement involving India’s Adani Group, arguing it threatened jobs and governance standards. The concession proposal was later withdrawn, but the episode revealed deep anxieties about the future of Kenya’s aviation sector.

What makes this week’s disruption significant is timing. Kenya has ambitious plans to increase JKIA’s freight capacity to one million tonnes by 2030. It is positioning itself as a logistics powerhouse under the African Continental Free Trade Area framework. Investors and startups rely on predictable air corridors to move both hardware and human capital. In December 2025 alone, nearly 314,000 passengers landed at JKIA, a 16.5% increase from the previous month, underscoring its expanding gateway role.

Yet a strike reminds us that infrastructure is not just steel and asphalt. It is human. It depends on technicians, air traffic controllers, ground handlers, and administrators. Digital economies may operate in the cloud, but their foundations are physical, and deeply social.

When a router shipment is delayed, it may postpone a product launch. When a founder misses a connecting flight, it can disrupt funding conversations. When supply chains stall, innovation slows in subtle, compounding ways.

Kenya’s aviation strain this week is not simply a labour dispute; it is a test of resilience. It challenges policymakers to reconcile worker welfare with economic ambition. It asks whether East Africa’s most important transport hub can modernise not just its terminals and freight capacity, but its labour relations and institutional trust.

For now, departures remain delayed. Cargo queues inch forward. And Kenya’s digital economy waits, a reminder that even in an era of code and connectivity, progress can still be grounded.

In Nigeria’s fast-evolving crypto ecosystem, reliability has become the ultimate currency. This deep dive explores how Monica Cash built its reputation through security infrastructure, transaction transparency, operational speed, and user trust, and why that matters in a market where every naira counts.

In Nigeria’s fast-growing digital asset market, one question outweighs every other consideration: can I truly trust this platform with my money? As more users search for where to sell bitcoin in Nigeria safely or check the bitcoin to naira rate today before converting funds, reliability has become the defining factor in choosing a crypto platform. Attractive interfaces and bold claims are no longer enough. Users want certainty. They want transparency. They want systems that work, every single time.

But reliability in Nigeria is not just about technology. It is about history. It is about lived experiences in a country where financial instability, fluctuating currency values, and digital scams have shaped how people think about money. When a Nigerian opens a crypto app to convert bitcoin to naira, it is rarely casual. It is school fees. It is rented. It is capital for a small business. It is survival.

That reality is where Monica Cash built its foundation.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

The Founder of Monica Cash understood something fundamental early on: if a platform wants to be considered the best crypto app in Nigeria, it cannot merely promise speed; it must guarantee safety. “To be recognised as the best crypto app in Nigeria, you must prioritise security above everything else,” the Founder explains. “When someone chooses to sell bitcoin in Nigeria or complete a USDT to naira conversion, they are trusting you with real value. Our responsibility is to protect that trust through reliable systems and consistent execution.”

Security begins quietly, at the point of entry. Monica Cash integrates biometric login systems and multi-layer authentication processes, reducing the risk of unauthorised access. In a digital economy where breaches can erase years of savings in seconds, protective architecture is not optional; it is existential.

Yet security alone does not build loyalty. Predictability does.

When users monitor the bitcoin to naira rate today and decide to act, they expect alignment between the displayed rate and the final payout. Monica Cash emphasizes transparent pricing structures and backend processing integrity. The absence of hidden deductions and unexpected rate shifts builds something more valuable than marketing traction: credibility.

Operational uptime is another test of reliability. Cryptocurrency markets never sleep. Volatility does not wait for business hours. A truly dependable platform must be accessible when the market moves. Monica Cash maintains stable system performance, enabling users to check rates, execute trades, and withdraw funds without frustrating downtime. Consistency becomes a quiet but powerful brand promise.

Then comes speed, the psychological bridge between intention and relief. Once a user chooses to convert bitcoin to naira or process USDT to naira, delays create anxiety. Fast payouts to Nigerian bank accounts, often completed within minutes, transform that anxiety into confidence. Speed signals competence. Competence builds trust.

But what truly distinguishes Monica Cash is its ecosystem thinking. Beyond crypto conversions, the platform supports airtime purchases, bill payments, digital gift cards, and instant transfers. This breadth reveals infrastructural depth. A system capable of managing both high-value digital asset exchanges and routine financial services must operate with structural resilience. Reliability at scale becomes visible through everyday transactions.

In Nigeria’s fintech evolution, trust is cumulative. It is earned transaction by transaction. It is reinforced when users sell bitcoin in Nigeria during peak volatility and still receive accurate payouts. It is strengthened when customer support responds clearly during high-volume periods. Communication transparency, especially in moments of uncertainty, often determines whether users return.

Monica Cash’s growth reflects an understanding that in Nigeria, technology must align with cultural and economic realities. Users do not just want to convert bitcoin to naira instantly; they want to sleep peacefully after doing so.

In a marketplace crowded with claims of being the best crypto app in Nigeria, sustained performance over time becomes the true differentiator. Security protocols. Transparent rates. Continuous uptime. Rapid payouts. Responsive communication. Together, they form the anatomy of reliability.

And in Nigeria’s digital finance ecosystem, reliability is everything.

LemFi has promoted Dmitry Buzdin to Chief Technology Officer as the London-headquartered fintech accelerates its global growth. With over two decades of fintech engineering experience, Buzdin steps into the role at a pivotal time, as LemFi evolves from a remittance startup into a multi-market financial services platform processing nearly $1 billion monthly.

There is a quiet kind of power in infrastructure, the kind that does not trend on social media but determines whether money arrives safely, instantly, and without friction. In cross-border finance, trust is not a slogan. It is code. It is architecture. It is the invisible system that either holds or collapses under pressure.

For LemFi, that invisible system now has a new steward.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

LemFi, the remittance startup founded in 2020 as Lemonade Finance, has promoted Dmitry Buzdin to Chief Technology Officer, elevating its Vice President of Engineering at a time when the company is no longer simply building remittance rails; it is chasing scale across continents.

But this story is not just about a title change. It is about timing.

When Buzdin joined LemFi as VP of Engineering, the company was already expanding beyond its early focus on African migrants sending money home. What began as a remittance solution built on empathy, solving painful, expensive transfer processes, had grown into something far larger. LemFi was processing around $1 billion in monthly transaction volume and pushing into Europe, North America, and parts of Asia. With a $33 million Series A behind it and a fresh $53 million Series B closed in early 2025, the ambition was unmistakable.

Scale changes everything.

Startups often romanticise product launches and funding announcements. But scaling a cross-border fintech is less about the spotlight and more about resilience. Every new market introduces regulatory layers. Every additional currency adds complexity. Every spike in transaction volume tests the strength of systems built months or years prior.

Dmitry Buzdin understands that tension. With more than 20 years of fintech engineering experience, his career has been shaped by the mechanics of payments, compliance engineering, and core banking systems, the unglamorous but essential backbone of financial services. Over the past year at LemFi, he led core infrastructure and product engineering, tightening internal execution processes and reinforcing platform resilience amid rapid growth.

Rian Cochran, LemFi’s Co-founder and CFO, described Buzdin’s impact as transformational, strengthening the platform, raising execution standards, and organising teams for speed without sacrificing stability. That combination is rare. Fast growth often breaks systems. Stability often slows innovation. Engineering leadership at this stage requires holding both tensions in balance.

As CTO, Buzdin now oversees global technology strategy, platform scaling, product innovation, and system security. The promotion takes effect immediately, signalling more than internal recognition; it reflects a strategic pivot. LemFi is maturing.

The company is increasingly positioning itself not as a single-use remittance app but as a broader multi-currency financial platform for migrants navigating life across borders. That shift demands tighter risk controls, stronger compliance systems, and the ability to deploy new financial products without disrupting transaction flow.

Continuity matters here. By promoting from within, LemFi is betting on institutional memory, on someone who already understands the architecture, the trade-offs, the bottlenecks, and the roadmap ahead. It is a sign that the company values stability as much as ambition.

For Buzdin, the moment carries weight. “Our mission to build inclusive financial services requires a foundation that is both innovative and incredibly resilient,” he said upon accepting the role. It is a simple sentence, but it captures the dual mandate ahead: innovation without fragility.

In fintech, scale is not merely about more users. It is about deeper responsibility. When you move billions across borders, you are holding livelihoods, tuition fees, rent payments, and family support in digital form. Every line of code becomes consequential.

LemFi’s latest move suggests it understands that the next phase of growth will not be won solely through marketing or market entry announcements. It will be built carefully and deliberately in the engine room of technology.

And now, Dmitry Buzdin stands at that helm.

Nigerian defence-tech startup Terra Industries has raised an additional $22 million just one month after closing an $11.8 million round, the largest in Africa’s defence-tech sector. Led by repeat investor Lux Capital, the follow-on funding strengthens Terra’s mission to build Africa’s first vertically integrated defence prime, combining locally manufactured drones and autonomous systems with proprietary software to secure the continent’s most critical infrastructure.

In most startup stories, momentum builds gradually, a pitch here, a demo day there, a patient wait for investors to circle back. Terra Industries did not wait.

One month after announcing an $11.8 million record-breaking raise in Africa’s defence-tech sector, the Nigerian startup closed an additional $22 million round in under two weeks. In an ecosystem where follow-on funding can take years, if it comes at all, Terra moved at the speed of urgency. That urgency, according to its 22-year-old co-founder and CEO Nathan Nwachuku, is not about valuation. It is about vulnerability.

“Africa is industrialising faster than any other region,” Nwachuku has said. “But none of that progress will matter if we don’t solve the continent’s greatest Achilles’ heel, insecurity and terrorism.”
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

At 22, most founders are still finding their footing. Nwachuku is building what he calls Africa’s first vertically integrated defence technology prime. Alongside 24-year-old co-founder Maxwell Maduka, he founded Terra Industries in 2024 with a premise both ambitious and deeply pragmatic: Africa cannot outsource its security architecture forever.

The numbers support the urgency. Africa holds roughly 30% of the world’s critical mineral reserves and spends over $100 billion annually on infrastructure. Yet much of that infrastructure, mines, power plants, pipelines, and rail corridors, lies in remote or volatile terrain. Sabotage, illegal mining, insurgency, and cross-border militancy remain constant threats. Governments often depend on imported surveillance systems and defence technologies, which come with steep costs and geopolitical exposure.

Terra’s answer is different. Instead of stitching together foreign hardware with third-party software, the company builds both. It designs and manufactures long- and mid-range autonomous drones, unmanned ground vehicles, and sentry towers, all connected through its proprietary operating system, ArtemisOS. The platform enables real-time threat detection and coordinated response across land, air, and maritime environments. In effect, Terra wants to do for Africa what companies like Anduril and Palantir have done in the United States: create a tightly integrated defence ecosystem built for local realities.

The additional $22 million round, led by Lux Capital with follow-on backing from 8VC, Nova Global, and Silent Ventures, signals that investors believe Terra’s thesis is more than patriotic ambition. New investors include Belief Capital, Tofino Capital, and Resilience17 Capital, founded by Flutterwave CEO Olugbenga Agboola, alongside angel backers such as Jordan Nel and actor Jared Leto. That mix of defence-focused funds, African tech leaders, and global angels reflects the hybrid nature of Terra itself: part hardware manufacturer, part software intelligence platform, part geopolitical statement.

The capital will expand manufacturing capacity, accelerate deployments across Nigeria and allied African countries, and support hiring senior engineering and business leaders across Africa, London, and San Francisco. Terra says it already secures infrastructure assets valued at approximately $11 billion and has signed contracts worth tens of millions of dollars across multiple African nations.

But beyond the funding headlines lies a generational shift. Terra’s founders represent a cohort of African technologists unwilling to accept that advanced defence systems must always be imported. They are building not only drones and towers, but confidence, the confidence that complex, high-stakes technology can be designed and manufactured on the continent.

The speed of Terra’s follow-on raise is unusual. In Africa’s startup ecosystem, especially in frontier sectors like defence technology, momentum often stalls between rounds. Terra did the opposite. It accelerated. That acceleration suggests that investors are not just betting on a company; they are betting on a structural transformation of how African infrastructure is secured.

If Terra succeeds, it will not merely be another well-funded startup. It will redefine who builds the tools that guard Africa’s mines, railways, energy grids, and coastlines. And perhaps more importantly, it will prove that ambition, even at 22, can be engineered into something formidable.

I ordered from temu for the first time though, so scared cos I've heard and seen what I ordered vs what I got but all items are so nice and exactly as seen in the picture plus cheap.

Inside a 2,000-square-metre facility in Nsukka, Enugu State, Arone Technologies is proving that Nigeria can manufacture complex hard-tech locally. Founded by AI engineer Emmanuel Ezenwere, the startup is building drones, AI surveillance systems, and modular solar energy products while partnering with IMT Enugu in a ₦12.95 billion push to create a national manufacturing hub.

Walk into Arone Technologies’ 2,000-square-metre facility in Nsukka, and you immediately feel it, the hum of soldering irons, the quiet calibration of control boards, the skeletal frame of a drone suspended mid-assembly. It doesn’t look like the future Nigeria is used to celebrating. There are no glossy fintech dashboards here, no pitch decks promising frictionless payments. Instead, there are airframes, lithium batteries, and engineers bent over hardware, attempting something far more difficult: building hard tech in Nigeria.

Emmanuel Ezenwere did not start Arone because drones were trendy. In fact, as he often says, Arone was founded “way before AI became sexy.” Back in 2018, with a ₦3 million grant from Roar Nigeria and a modest angel cheque of $5,000, his ambition was grounded in something painfully practical: Nigeria’s last-mile healthcare problem.

In a country with over 30,000 primary healthcare centres, many buried in rural communities with unforgiving roads, a delivery of blood or vaccines can mean the difference between life and death. Ezenwere imagined autonomous drones lifting off from blood banks, flying up to 200 kilometres, and landing in remote clinics within minutes. A journey that might take over an hour by road could shrink to 15 minutes in the air.

The first cargo drone, capable of carrying 20kg, flew successfully in 2019. The second crashed.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

The crash cost more than the capital Arone had raised.

For many startups, that would have been the end. For Ezenwere, it was an education. Hardware, he realised, could not be built in Nigeria the same way it was built elsewhere. Capital was thinner. Supply chains were fragile. Every mistake was expensive. So Arone shifted its philosophy. Instead of chasing perfection, it broke its systems into modules, refining airframes, improving control software, and iterating battery systems piece by piece.

That discipline defines Arone today. More than 50% of its drone systems are locally built. Airframes are designed and assembled in Nigeria. Control systems and AI models are developed in-house. While motors and certain battery components are still imported, the company owns its software stack entirely, including its AI surveillance platform, QView AI.

The strategy is partly patriotic, partly practical. Currency volatility and import markups can cripple margins. Local manufacturing reduces exposure, even if it cannot eliminate it. And the pricing tells a story: Arone’s Aurora drone, equipped with thermal imaging for night surveillance, costs around ₦3 million. Comparable foreign systems can exceed $10,000.

Today, Arone says it supplies drones for surveillance and security applications, working with national institutions including the Defence Research and Development Bureau and the Air Force. But drones are only half the story.

As operations scaled, Arone collided with another Nigerian constraint, electricity. Unstable power threatened production timelines and client operations alike. So the company built its second vertical: modular solar energy systems. Its flagship product, Luminar 2.0, is a suitcase-sized solar unit that can power essential appliances and vaccine refrigerators during blackouts. By late 2025, Arone reports deploying over 1.35 MWh of these systems across all 36 states.

For Ezenwere, energy security and technological independence are inseparable. That belief now underpins Arone’s boldest move yet: a ₦12.95 billion partnership with the Institute of Management and Technology (IMT), Enugu. Over four years, they plan to establish what they describe as Nigeria’s first dedicated manufacturing hub for defence, aerospace, robotics, AI, and renewable energy within the IMT campus.

The targets are ambitious: 5,000 Aurora drones annually, over 30,000 Luminar systems, and more than 200 AI servers each year. More important, perhaps, is the human pipeline. The partnership aims to train over 20,000 students, embedding practical hardware engineering into academic life.

Ezenwere speaks less about profits and more about trajectory. Nigeria, he argues, cannot code its way out of industrial dependence alone. It must build. Manufacture. Test. Fail. Iterate.

In a startup ecosystem dominated by software narratives, Arone is making a contrarian bet that real transformation may require factories as much as code. And in Nsukka, amid humming workbenches and half-built drones, that bet is already taking flight.

Kenyan-born fintech Payd has partnered with UK-based payments infrastructure provider Noah to enable African freelancers to receive international payments through stablecoins. The collaboration introduces virtual USD and EUR accounts with real-time settlement, helping over 30,000 users avoid delays, high FX fees, and volatile local currencies.

For many African freelancers, the hardest part of working for global companies isn’t the job itself; it’s getting paid.

The designer in Lagos is delivering projects to a startup in Berlin. The developer in Nairobi is building code for a company in San Francisco. The marketing consultant in Dakar is running campaigns for a London agency. The work moves at the speed of the internet. But the money? It crawls.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Days lost to SWIFT transfers. Percentages shaved off by FX spreads. Platform fees that quietly eat into already hard-earned income. By the time the payment arrives, sometimes up to 10% has disappeared into invisible cracks of the global financial system.

This quiet frustration is where Payd found its purpose.

Payd, a Kenyan-born pan-African fintech startup, did not begin as a crypto-native experiment. It began as a response to something painfully practical: African remote workers were participating in the global economy but being paid through infrastructure that treated them like an afterthought. What Payd understood early is that the future of African work would not be limited by talent; it would be limited by access to stable, fast, and fair financial rails.

Its latest partnership with UK-based payments infrastructure provider Noah marks a turning point in that mission.

Through this collaboration, rolling out initially to more than 30,000 Payd users across Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Senegal, freelancers can now generate virtual USD and EUR accounts inside the Payd app. These accounts come with US routing numbers and European IBANs, allowing them to receive payments like locals in the United States or Europe. Employers send funds via ACH or SEPA as standard local transfers.

Behind the scenes, something transformative happens. Noah converts those incoming funds into stablecoins such as USDC or USDT and settles them into users’ Payd wallets in real time.

The difference is more than technical. It is psychological.

Instead of waiting days for international transfers to clear, users receive digital dollars almost instantly. Instead of watching income erode through conversion layers and intermediary charges, they hold stable-value assets that mirror the US dollar. Instead of scrambling to withdraw funds through costly channels, they can cash out to mobile money platforms like M-PESA, Wave, or Orange Money within minutes.

For freelancers living in volatile economies, this is not a luxury feature. It is protection.

The partnership also reflects Noah’s broader strategy. Earlier this year, the company announced a similar integration with pan-African fintech NALA. Rather than building a consumer-facing brand in Africa, Noah positions itself as a regulated backend infrastructure. It provides virtual account issuance, compliant ACH and SEPA collection rails, stablecoin conversion, settlement systems, and payout APIs. In effect, it replaces slow correspondent banking chains with programmable, real-time settlement infrastructure.

This partnership-led approach allows African fintechs like Payd to offer dollar-native accounts and cross-border payments without navigating the complexity of global banking licences or building treasury operations from scratch. It is modular finance, infrastructure quietly embedded into the apps users already trust.

The timing is strategic. Remote work across Africa has grown by more than 55% since 2020. A generation of professionals now earns in foreign currencies while living in economies where local currencies can fluctuate sharply. Stablecoins, once viewed purely through a speculative lens, are increasingly becoming tools of financial stability and accessibility.

But beyond the technology, this story is about dignity.

It is about ensuring that a developer in Abuja is paid with the same efficiency as one in Austin. It is about closing the invisible gap between contribution and compensation. It is about recognising that talent is global, and payment infrastructure should be too.

Payd’s partnership with Noah is not merely about stablecoins. It is about redesigning the last mile of global work. It is about ensuring that when African freelancers log off after delivering world-class results, their earnings arrive just as seamlessly.

And in that quiet shift, from delay to immediacy, from erosion to preservation, a new chapter of African digital work begins.

SolarAfrica has raised R1.5 billion ($94 million) to finance SunCentral 2, the next 114 MW phase of its large-scale solar development in South Africa’s Northern Cape. The funding strengthens the company’s wheeling-led renewable strategy, expands grid infrastructure, and advances affordable, reliable power for commercial and industrial customers from 2026.

There is a particular silence that settles over South Africa during load shedding. Offices pause mid-sentence. Machines power down. Restaurants scramble for generators. In that silence, businesses calculate losses, not just in rands, but in momentum. It is in this fragile space between power cuts and possibilities that SolarAfrica has built its purpose.

This week, the Pretoria-based renewable energy provider secured R1.5 billion ($94 million) to finance SunCentral 2, the next 114 MW phase of its ambitious solar development in the sun-drenched Northern Cape. Backed by Rand Merchant Bank and Investec Bank Limited, both of whom financed the first 114 MW phase that reached financial close in late 2024, the raise pushes total funding for the SunCentral project to R3.3 billion ($207 million). Delivery of power to commercial and industrial customers is scheduled to begin in 2026.

But this story begins long before the funding announcement.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

In November 2011, David McDonald and James Irons founded what was then called NVI Energy, incorporated in Mauritius before evolving into SolarAfrica. McDonald, who now leads the company as CEO, has long believed that renewable energy in Africa should not be an abstract sustainability conversation; it should be infrastructure. Tangible. Investable. Scalable.

Over the years, SolarAfrica expanded across Southern Africa, earning recognition as Africa Solar Company of the Year twice from the Africa Solar Industry Association. Yet accolades are not what define its trajectory. What defines it is a structural bet on wheeling.

Rather than installing solar panels on individual rooftops that require upfront capital from businesses, SolarAfrica builds utility-scale solar farms and wheels electricity through South Africa’s national grid to multiple commercial customers under bilateral agreements. It is a quiet but radical shift. With wheeling, companies no longer wait helplessly for tariff hikes from Eskom, the state-owned utility. They gain predictability. They gain agency.

“SunCentral is a long-term infrastructure investment that gives companies the ability to manage their costs, cut emissions, and reduce reliance on utility power that is vulnerable to tariff hikes,” McDonald noted in a recent statement.

The Northern Cape, with its relentless sun, is ideal for solar generation. But there is a complication. Eskom’s transmission network was never designed for decentralised, remote renewable plants. Grid capacity constraints have become one of the biggest bottlenecks to South Africa’s energy transition.

SolarAfrica’s response is deliberate. Each SunCentral phase allocates funding to its Main Transmission Substation, engineered to handle up to 2 GW of renewable power. This is not just about plugging panels into the ground; it is about strengthening the grid itself, future-proofing it for faster connections and additional renewable projects.

SunCentral anchors a broader 3 GW wheeling pipeline SolarAfrica is developing across the country. At full scale, the project is expected to reach 1 GW, positioning it among South Africa’s largest solar developments designed specifically for one-to-many wheeling.

Beyond megawatts and financing, there is also a social layer. Like its predecessor, SunCentral 2 includes community programmes focused on job creation, local procurement, skills development, and education around the project site. Renewable energy, in this model, is not detached from its environment; it is embedded within it.

In many ways, SolarAfrica’s $94 million raise is less about capital and more about conviction. Conviction that businesses deserve stability in a volatile energy landscape. Conviction that infrastructure must evolve alongside ambition. Conviction that Africa’s renewable future will not be pieced together panel by panel, but engineered at scale.

When the first electrons from SunCentral 2 begin flowing through the grid in 2026, they will carry more than power. They will carry the weight of a decade-long vision, one that began with two founders and a belief that control over energy should shift back to those who build, manufacture, and create.

In a country learning to live between blackouts, that shift may prove transformative.

For years, Jumia stood as Africa’s e-commerce pioneer, building trust in fragile markets and infrastructure-poor regions. Now, it faces a formidable challenger: Temu, the Chinese giant flooding the continent with ultra-cheap goods and aggressive digital expansion. What follows is not just a price war, but a battle of philosophies, profitability versus presence, infrastructure versus speed.

For over a decade, Jumia carried the weight of a bold nickname: the “Amazon of Africa.” It earned that title not because it was flashy, but because it did the hard, unglamorous work, building warehouses where roads barely cooperated, convincing customers that online payments were not a scam, and delivering parcels across cities where addresses often don’t exist.

It was not just a company; it was an experiment in belief.

Then came Temu.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Temu did not arrive quietly. It arrived like a storm, digital ads everywhere, prices slashed beyond comprehension, fashion at fractions of local retail cost. Where Jumia spent years laying bricks, Temu built a pipeline. Direct from factories in China to African doorsteps. No warehouses. No fleets of delivery vans. Just cross-border velocity and algorithm-driven marketing.

The contrast could not be sharper.

By 2025, in South Africa, the combined force of Shein and Temu had seized nearly 40% of the online apparel market. Zando, Jumia’s fashion arm, became collateral damage. It shut down. Tunisia followed. Then Algeria, a market that accounted for only 2% of Jumia’s Gross Merchandise Value but demanded outsized operational costs. By February 2026, Jumia confirmed its exit.

To some, it looked like a retreat. To others, strategy.

What was unfolding was not defeat, but contraction under pressure. Investors wanted profitability. Subsidizing complex markets was no longer romantic; it was reckless. Jumia began pruning, focusing its energy on Nigeria, Egypt, and Kenya. The strongholds.

Meanwhile, Temu continued its orange wave across Africa’s screens.

Nigeria became the fiercest battleground. When Temu launched in late 2024, it rocketed to the top of app store charts. Nigerians downloaded it in droves, seduced by prices that felt unreal. But Africa has a way of testing ambition.

By mid-2025, the fever cooled.

Fifteen to twenty days for delivery. Inconsistent product quality. Customer service friction. The romance of cheapness collided with the reality of patience. Slowly, many consumers drifted back to what they knew: Jumia’s 24-to-48-hour delivery in Lagos and Abuja. The option of cash on delivery is still critical in trust-sensitive markets. Familiar reliability.

In late 2025, Jumia Nigeria reported a rebound in GMV. It was proof that speed and trust still command value.

Egypt told a different story. Currency volatility and economic strain forced Jumia to pivot aggressively. Heavy spending gave way to a marketplace model that empowered local sellers and reduced balance sheet risk. Temu, on the other hand, ran into Egypt’s complex customs regulations. Surprise import fees at delivery diluted the cheap-price illusion. Bureaucracy, it turned out, is not easily disrupted.

Kenya added yet another layer. Geography matters. Nairobi is not Kenya. Rural reach is a moat. Jumia expanded hundreds of pick-up stations into secondary cities and leaned into its integration with M-PESA, embedding itself in the local payment ecosystem. Temu’s international shipping model struggled to penetrate beyond urban convenience.

And then came Jumia’s counter-punch.

In 2025, the company opened a major sourcing office in Yiwu, China, the same sourcing hub that powers Temu’s inventory machine. It was a quiet but radical shift. If Jumia could not win a price war through intermediaries, it would go to the source.

Now imagine the equation: Chinese factory pricing shipped in bulk to African warehouses, then delivered locally within 48 hours. Not 20 days. No surprise customs charges. A hybrid of global sourcing and local execution.

As 2026 unfolds, this is no longer a simple contest of who is cheaper. It is a philosophical duel. Temu is chasing ubiquity, flooding markets, dominating mindshare, and winning through scale. Jumia is chasing sustainability, tightening operations, defending core territories, and building depth instead of breadth.

One believes in speed from afar. The other believes in proximity.

And somewhere between a Lagos warehouse and a Yiwu factory floor, Africa’s digital future is being negotiated, not just in prices, but in trust, logistics, and the lived experience of millions of consumers deciding where to click “Buy.”

Finceptive has successfully redeemed its ₦3 billion Series 1 commercial paper, marking a significant milestone in Nigeria’s volatile debt capital market. In a year when commercial paper funding crossed ₦1.5 trillion amid tightening liquidity and rising default risks, the supply chain finance firm’s repayment stands out as a testament to disciplined execution and a founder-led commitment to predictable capital structures.

In Nigeria’s capital market, trust is rarely declared. It is proven, quietly, methodically, and often under pressure.

When Finceptive issued its debut ₦3 billion Series 1 commercial paper in May 2025, it entered a market both vibrant and volatile. Commercial paper funding across Nigerian firms had exceeded ₦1.5 trillion in 2025, buoyed by high liquidity and a pivotal 2024 Securities and Exchange Commission rule change that expanded access for startups. Fintech companies, particularly those with structured receivables and predictable cash flows, surged ahead in this new era of short-term debt financing.

But liquidity can be deceptive.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Behind the impressive funding figures lay tightening monetary policy, currency devaluation, rising interest rates, and a startup ecosystem facing consolidation and shutdowns. Non-performing loans are projected to reach 6.9% in 2025, not for lack of access to capital, but due to execution gaps. Commercial papers that once served as flexible short-term bridges became expensive obligations. Even industry giants like MTN Nigeria felt the weight, issuing 11 commercial papers between 2023 and 2024, with yields climbing from 10.41% to as high as 29% as rates tightened.

It was into this climate that Finceptive stepped forward.

Founded eight years ago, Finceptive is not a consumer-facing fintech chasing headlines. It is infrastructure. A supply chain finance company operating at the intersection of trade, liquidity, and technology. Its model is deliberate: align financing with real payment timelines, unlock working capital from trade receivables, and allow businesses to operate without distorting their cash cycles.

When the ₦3 billion issuance, authorised by FMDQ Exchange, was announced, it drew strong demand from institutional investors and was oversubscribed. That demand reflected belief. But belief in Nigeria’s debt market means little without delivery.

The true test came at maturity.

Finceptive completed full repayment of the Series 1 commercial paper using cash generated from its core operations. No restructuring. No rollover. No refinancing gymnastics. Just execution.

For co-founder and Chief Operating Officer Denike Akanbi, the redemption carried meaning beyond compliance. “This settlement confirms our ability to maintain seamless trade flows while upholding high fiduciary standards. By providing reliable access to working capital, we are reinforcing the infrastructure that supports the real economy,” she said.

Her words reveal something deeper than a financial update. Finceptive’s philosophy is anchored in the belief that Africa’s trade corridors do not suffer from a lack of ambition, but from liquidity mismatches. Farmers, manufacturers, FMCG distributors, and renewable energy providers often wait months for payments while obligations pile up daily. Finceptive positions itself in that waiting gap.

The ₦3 billion raised was deployed across agriculture, technology, manufacturing, oil and gas, FMCG, and renewable energy sectors, not as speculative capital, but as structured liquidity tied to real transactions. That discipline is what allowed repayment to emerge from operations rather than new borrowing.

Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Ogochukwu Anerobi has consistently emphasised predictable capital structures — models that serve investors while sustaining African value chains. In a market where commercial paper can easily become a treadmill of refinancing, predictability becomes strategy.

Following the successful redemption, Finceptive disclosed plans to scale across key African trade corridors as part of its pan-African expansion strategy. The completed Series 1 cycle does more than close a chapter; it establishes a performance record in Nigeria’s debt capital market, a credential that matters when institutional trust is measured in repayment history.

In a year defined by rising yields, execution pressure, and cautious investors, Finceptive’s ₦3 billion redemption is not just a financial event. It is a signal.

In Nigeria’s evolving commercial paper market, where access has expanded, but risks have sharpened, disciplined infrastructure players can still convert capital into credibility.

And in the end, credibility is the currency that compounds.

Firazi is redefining how Nigerians buy and sell across traditional markets by introducing a verification-driven marketplace that bridges physical trade and digital structure. Built around trust, logistics, and market expansion, Firazi is positioning itself as a modern solution for Nigeria’s informal yet powerful commercial ecosystem.

There is a certain rhythm to Nigerian markets. It is loud, human, and deeply relational. In Computer Village, Alaba International Market, Trade Fair, or even smaller regional hubs, commerce does not begin with technology. It begins with eye contact. With conversation. With trust earned over time.

For decades, buying and selling in Nigeria has depended on physical presence and personal reassurance. Buyers want to touch the product. Vendors want to see seriousness in the eyes of a customer before committing to a deal. Between both sides lies a familiar tension, distance, uncertainty, and logistical complications.

It is within this tension that Firazi was born.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Firazi did not emerge from theory. It emerged from observing the silent friction that slows Nigerian commerce. A retailer in Akure hears about better prices in Lagos but hesitates. A buyer in Abuja wants electronics from Computer Village but fears sending money to an unfamiliar seller. A wholesaler in Alaba has quality products but cannot scale beyond foot traffic and referrals.

The problem has never been a lack of supply. There has been a lack of structured trust.

Firazi steps into that space not as just another delivery app, but as a trust-based marketplace engineered for Nigerian realities. It understands that in local commerce, verification matters more than speed, and assurance matters more than convenience.

Through the platform, verified vendors and wholesalers list their products in a centralized marketplace. Buyers can browse, compare, and place orders within a structured environment. But the defining layer is what happens between order and payment confirmation: inspection.

Firazi agents verify products before transactions are finalized. This simple but powerful intervention transforms the buying journey. It reduces uncertainty. It protects both sides. It restores the confidence that traditionally came from physical presence, now translated into a digital process.

This is not about replacing Nigerian markets. It is about extending them.

Markets like Computer Village and Trade Fair are economic powerhouses. They are price drivers, supply hubs, and engines of entrepreneurship. Yet geography limits their reach. A wholesaler’s growth is often confined to those who can physically walk into their shop.

Firazi removes that boundary.

With structured logistics and verification in place, a supplier in Lagos can now reach retailers in Port Harcourt, Abuja, Akure, or even Nigerians in the diaspora looking to purchase safely from home. The stall becomes a storefront without walls. The local shop becomes nationally accessible.

For buyers, the experience becomes more organized. No endless calls. No fragmented negotiations across multiple contacts. No anxiety about whether a product will match its description. Instead, there is clarity, structured orders, verified goods, and coordinated delivery.

In many ways, Firazi represents a quiet infrastructure upgrade for informal commerce. Nigeria’s markets thrive on human relationships, but they lack systemic structure. By introducing verification, centralized listings, and coordinated logistics, Firazi adds accountability without disrupting cultural dynamics.

The impact stretches beyond convenience. When transactions feel safer, participation increases. Retailers restock more confidently. Vendors plan inventory with broader demand in mind. Buyers explore new suppliers without fear. Commerce becomes less risky and more scalable.

Firazi’s deeper philosophy is simple yet profound: trust should not depend solely on proximity. It should be embedded in the process.

As Nigeria continues its digital transformation, platforms that respect traditional systems while modernizing them will define the next chapter of trade. Firazi sits at that intersection, not erasing the market’s human core, but strengthening it with structure.

Buying becomes safer. Selling becomes borderless. And trust, once dependent on face-to-face familiarity, becomes engineered into the system itself.

Delta40 has closed a $20 million fund blending equity, debt, and grants to invest in and co-found early-stage African startups. But beyond the capital lies a deeper story about venture building, conviction in African markets, and a founder determined to pair funding with hands-on operational support at a time when startups need more than just cheques.

In African tech, money has often arrived like rain in a dry season, sudden, celebrated, and sometimes fleeting. But Lyndsay Holley Handler has never believed that capital alone builds enduring companies. She believes in scaffolding. In systems. In staying long enough to see whether an idea can survive beyond its first applause.

That belief is now backed by $20 million.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Delta40, the Africa-focused venture builder she founded in 2021, has closed a fund designed not just to invest in early-stage startups but to co-build them. The raise blends equity, debt, and grants, a deliberate structure that reflects both ambition and pragmatism. More than half of the capital is commercial, return-seeking investment, a signal that private investors are willing to bet on Africa’s earliest founders even in a tighter funding climate.

Fifty-four investors across thirteen countries participated in the raise. Among them are development finance institutions, global foundations, family offices, and, notably, twenty-five startup founders. Fourteen of the backers are based in Africa, creating a mix of local and international conviction behind the fund. Institutional names like the Soros Economic Development Fund, FMO, GIZ, and the Rockefeller Foundation sit alongside impact-focused investors and even Wilson Sonsini. This law firm advised on the structure and chose to invest as well.

But numbers, however impressive, only tell part of the story.

Handler’s approach to venture building feels less like traditional venture capital and more like an apprenticeship. Delta40 writes initial cheques between $100,000 and $500,000 at the idea-to-seed stage. Yet the money is merely the entry point. Through its venture studio model operating in Kenya and Nigeria, the firm helps develop minimum viable products, recruit early teams, refine commercial strategy, and establish governance structures before spinning projects into standalone companies.

In a continent where founders often juggle product development, regulatory navigation, fundraising, and market education simultaneously, this operational backbone can mean the difference between traction and collapse.

The fund focuses on sectors Handler believes sit at the intersection of urgency and opportunity: energy and mobility, agriculture and food systems, and financial services enhanced by data and artificial intelligence. These are not vanity sectors. They are areas of daily friction for millions of Africans: power instability, fragmented food supply chains, limited access to credit, and inefficient transport networks.

Delta40 has already backed sixteen companies, including logistics platform Lori and solar fintech company SunFi. But its ambition stretches further. The new capital will allow it to expand its portfolio and internally build more companies from scratch, deepening its role as both investor and co-founder.

The timing is not accidental. African startups are navigating a more cautious funding environment. The era of easy venture money has cooled. Investors now demand clearer paths to profitability, stronger governance, and sustainable business models. Handler’s thesis aligns with this shift: pair seed capital with hands-on company building so startups can convert early traction into durable businesses.

In Nairobi, Delta40 joins other venture builders shaping East Africa’s innovation ecosystem. In Nigeria, it plugs into one of the continent’s most energetic startup markets. Across both hubs, the firm runs corporate-backed innovation programmes and early founder engagement initiatives to test ideas before formal launch. It is not waiting for perfect pitches to arrive; it is helping construct them.

There is something quietly radical in that.

To build in Africa requires patience, cultural fluency, and a tolerance for complexity. Handler appears to understand that venture building here is not about replicating Silicon Valley playbooks wholesale. It is about adapting structures to local realities while maintaining global standards of execution.

Delta40’s $20 million fund is not just capital; it is a vote of confidence in African founders at their earliest, most vulnerable stage. And perhaps more importantly, it is a reminder that behind every promising startup is often an invisible layer of support, people willing to build alongside the dream.

Only 26 African startups raised $174 million in January 2026, a sharp drop from last year and far below the monthly average. Beyond the numbers lies a deeper shift: investors are retreating from risk, founders are being reshaped by capital scarcity, and African venture capital is quietly transforming into something more cautious, more structured, and potentially more limiting.

January has always been a quiet month in African venture capital. Deals slow, investors recalibrate, and founders brace for the long year ahead. But January 2026 didn’t just whisper, it sent a warning.

Only 26 African startups raised a combined $174 million, trailing last year’s January by $102 million and falling well below the 12-month monthly average of $263 million, according to Africa: The Big Deal. On paper, that’s a dip. In reality, it’s a signal — one that speaks less about seasonal cycles and more about how unforgiving the funding landscape has become.

Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

For many founders, January is when hope is quietly renewed. Pitch decks are refined. Conversations resume. Expectations are cautiously reset. This year, that optimism met a wall. With just over half the usual number of startups raising above $100,000, the lowest January tally since at least 2020, the data exposes a narrowing funnel that leaves little room for experimentation or error.

Zoom in on where the money went, and the story becomes even clearer. Over a third of January’s funding flowed to Egypt’s valU, which raised $63 million in debt from a local bank. Nigeria’s MAX followed with $24 million through a mix of equity and asset-backed financing. Together, these two transactions swallowed half of all capital deployed that month.

Neither deal represents classic venture risk. They are structured around lending books, vehicles, assets, and predictable cash flows. What investors were rewarding was not uncertainty, but control. Not a possibility, but collateral.

This is not accidental. It reflects a broader recalibration happening across African VC. As Olivia Gao of Verod-Kepple Africa Ventures observed, 2026 is shaping up as the year where the balance sheet returns as a competitive advantage. Startups that own or finance productive assets, vehicles, devices, or equipment are increasingly favoured over asset-light platforms chasing scale before revenue.

Nearly 40% of African startup funding now comes from local investors, a shift that brings both stability and conservatism. Local capital understands the terrain better, but it also carries a sharper memory of losses and longer fundraising cycles. The result is a market that increasingly behaves like credit underwriting rather than long-term experimentation.

Strip out the two large January deals, and the picture grows starker. Equity activity thins. First-time raises nearly disappear. Early-stage momentum stalls. For founders still searching for pre-seed or seed capital, the valley between idea and scale is widening into a canyon.

This drift toward safety compounds an already fragile ecosystem. African startups are built in environments where infrastructure gaps, regulatory shifts, and currency risks are everyday realities. Venture capital was meant to absorb that uncertainty. When risk aversion trickles downstream, fewer companies get funded, fewer mature into Series A contenders, and exits become rarer. The damage won’t be immediate; it will surface quietly over the next 18 to 36 months.

Founders are already adapting. Many are optimising for early cash generation, tightening operations, and focusing on smaller, local markets where expansion costs are manageable. This discipline may produce healthier businesses, but it also narrows the pool of companies capable of delivering venture-scale outcomes, the kind that redefine industries and inspire ecosystems.

Some will argue this shift is rational. Inflation is persistent. Exits are scarce. Limited partners are demanding returns as fund lifecycles close. In that context, asset-backed models feel safer. But venture capital, at its core, is not about safety. It is about backing potential before it becomes obvious.

If this mindset had dominated the early 2020s, companies like Paystack, Wave, and Moniepoint might never have survived their earliest institutional rounds. When safety becomes the organising principle of emerging-market risk capital, progress slows, not because founders lack ambition, but because imagination becomes too expensive to fund.

January’s $174 million is not just a number. It’s a mirror. And what it reflects is an ecosystem standing at a crossroads, between caution and courage, between protecting capital and creating the future.

Talk360 has secured a $1.4 million secondary investment as it reaches profitability, marking a pivotal moment in its nine-year journey. Beyond the funding, the story is about discipline, diaspora connection, and a company choosing depth over reckless expansion as it builds tools that reflect how Africans stay connected across borders.

Long before Talk360 became a profitable calling platform with millions of users, Hans Osnabrugge was obsessed with a simple but deeply human question: how do people stay close when distance, cost, and infrastructure are stacked against them? For many African families, connection has never been just about conversation. It has always carried responsibility, care, and presence, even when oceans stand in the way.

That insight quietly shaped Talk360 when it was founded in 2016 by Osnabrugge and Jorne Schamp, alongside South African venture builder Dean Hiine. The mission was not to build another shiny communication app, but to remove friction from something deeply emotional: calling home. Talk360 allowed users to make international calls to landlines and mobile phones without requiring internet access on the receiving end. That single decision made the product instantly relevant to African diaspora communities, where parents, grandparents, and relatives still rely on basic phones.

Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Nine years later, Talk360 has crossed an important threshold. The company has secured $1.4 million in secondary investment, led by HAVAÍC with participation from Universum Wealth, and, crucially, it has reached profitability. This funding is not about survival or hype. It is about maturity.

For Osnabrugge, profitability represents restraint. “Talk360 is entering its next phase as a profitable, scalable platform, not chasing growth for its own sake,” he said. That statement carries weight in a tech ecosystem where expansion is often pursued at the expense of sustainability. Talk360’s journey has been slower, more deliberate, and grounded in real usage patterns rather than speculative scale.

The latest capital injection follows a $1.4 million pre-Series A round in 2024 and a $3 million seed round in 2022, bringing total funding raised to $12.8 million. But the real evolution is happening in how the company thinks about its users.

Over time, Talk360 noticed something subtle but powerful. Diaspora users weren’t just calling home to chat. They were coordinating care, sending airtime, helping relatives stay online, and quietly solving problems from afar. Communication and support were intertwined. Shop360 was born from that observation.

Shop360 allows users to send airtime, data bundles, and top-ups to recipients across the world. It is not a pivot away from Talk360’s core; it is a deepening of it. The feature is powered by NjiaPay, a payments infrastructure company spun out of Talk360 in 2024, which handles payment orchestration, compliance, and settlement while Talk360 maintains full control of the user experience.

That structural separation reveals a company thinking long-term. Build infrastructure. Own trust. Expand carefully.

Today, Talk360 serves more than six million users globally and generates about $12 million in annual revenue. Its pay-as-you-go model, with call rates as low as $0.14 per minute from Nigeria and $0.21 from South Africa, reflects a deep understanding of price sensitivity in its core markets. While it competes with global players like Rebtel and Libon, Talk360 differentiates itself through accessibility, including a network of over 500,000 local point-of-sale agents in South Africa.

For HAVAÍC, doubling down through a secondary investment signals confidence not just in the numbers, but in the philosophy behind them. “As Talk360 consolidates its place as a leader in the African market and moves into the growth phase of its startup journey, we are excited to further support management,” said Ian Lessem, Managing Partner at HAVAÍC.

Talk360’s story is not loud. It is patient. It is about understanding that technology, at its best, mirrors human behaviour rather than trying to rewrite it. By choosing discipline over noise and depth over speed, Talk360 is proving that profitability and purpose do not have to sit on opposite sides of the table.

Wimbart has launched Wimbart Lite, a low-cost, fast-turnaround PR service designed for pre-seed and early-stage African startups. Built over nearly a decade of working closely with founders, the service addresses a growing gap between rising media competition and the limited communications budgets of young companies.

Long before African tech became fashionable, before pitch decks were polished and demo days streamed globally, Jessica Hope was already in the trenches with founders trying to explain what they were building, and why it mattered. In 2015, when she founded Wimbart, the ecosystem was thinner, noisier in the wrong places, and quieter where it mattered most. Many startups were doing real work, but no one was telling their stories clearly enough for the world to pay attention.

Nearly a decade later, that problem hasn’t disappeared. It has evolved.
Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

Africa’s tech ecosystem is louder now. More startups. More funds. More platforms. More competition for attention across online media, television, radio, and print. For early-stage founders, this growth comes with a new pressure: if you can’t communicate traction early, you risk being invisible to investors, partners, and even customers.

That tension led to the launch of Wimbart Lite, a new service tailored for pre-seed and early-stage African startups that have raised under $1 million. It is not a watered-down version of traditional PR. It is a deliberate response to a structural gap that has persisted for years.

Across several African markets, startups routinely spend up to $1,500 per month on basic PR retainers, while more established companies pay between $5,000 and $15,000. International campaigns can easily exceed $20,000 a month. For founders still validating product-market fit, hiring talent, and stretching runway, these numbers are often unrealistic. The result is a familiar pattern: either founders attempt PR themselves with mixed results, or they go silent at moments when visibility matters most.

Wimbart Lite was built for those moments.

The service follows a menu-based model, allowing startups to pay for exactly what they need. There are milestone announcements for launches and partnerships, founder profile packs focused on thought leadership and media positioning, and fundraising communications for early-stage rounds. Venture capital portfolio companies receive a 15% discount, a quiet acknowledgment that early visibility compounds long before Series A.

But this launch is less about pricing and more about philosophy.

“Wimbart was built in the trenches with African tech founders, before the market had fully caught up with their vision,” Jessica Hope explains. Wimbart Lite, she notes, has been in development for some time, designed for companies that don’t need full-scale, month-on-month PR, but still need credible storytelling at critical points in their journey.

To lead the new division, Wimbart appointed Maria Adediran as Head of Wimbart Lite. A founding team member, Adediran brings over a decade of experience across consumer and corporate PR and has worked on multi-market campaigns for venture capital firms and high-growth companies ranging from early-stage startups to unicorns. Her track record includes names that shaped Africa’s tech narrative, such as Andela, M-KOPA, TLcom, and Kobo360.

For Adediran, the mission is simple but demanding: turn real work into a story the ecosystem can trust. “Wimbart Lite exists to turn real work and traction, early milestones, partnerships, and fundraises, into a clear, credible story the ecosystem can understand and trust,” she says.

That credibility matters. In an environment where hype often outpaces execution, early-stage founders are judged not just by what they build, but by how clearly they communicate progress.

Wimbart’s experience gives it a rare advantage here. Since 2015, the agency has supported more than 180 companies across 20 African countries, operating across Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, and Egypt. It has seen cycles of optimism, correction, and recalibration, and understands that good PR is not noise, but narrative discipline.

Wimbart Lite is not trying to make startups louder. It is trying to make them clearer.

In a maturing ecosystem where attention is scarce and credibility is currency, that clarity might be one of the most valuable services an early-stage founder can afford.

Suddengo is positioning itself as more than a digital platform; it’s a financial super-app built for everyday Nigerians, aiming to transform routine spending into opportunities for earnings, rewards, micro-loans, and community-driven financial growth. This article explores the startup’s journey, ethos, and the deeper meaning behind its ambition.

There was a moment in the early 2020s when digital wallets and fintech apps weren’t just conveniences, they were lifelines. Across Nigeria, millions of people were already interacting with mobile money, payment apps, and digital banking tools that promised faster transfers and easier bill payments. But for many users, something was missing: a sense that the money you spend every day could give something back. That subtle frustration, the gap between spending and building value, gave rise to an idea that would become Suddengo.

Visit technaija.com for more related tech articles.

At first glance, Suddengo might sound like another entrant in the crowded African fintech scene. But to understand its soul, you have to look beyond the buzzwords and into the experiences of everyday Nigerians struggling with the limitations of traditional financial systems. Cheque books, manual accounting, delayed payments, and platforms that take a fee without offering meaningful returns, these are the daily frictions that shape people’s relationship with money. Suddengo saw those tensions not as problems to be glossed over, but as opportunities to reimagine the financial narrative.

Suddengo positions itself boldly as a super-app where your daily expenses don’t just disappear into the digital void; they become part of your financial growth. At its core, the platform promises to empower users to convert everyday transactions, buying goods, paying for services, and referring friends, into rewards and micro-loans that can grow rather than diminish personal wealth. The concept flips the usual script: instead of money leaving you with nothing, Suddengo wants those same actions to generate value for you.

What makes Suddengo compelling isn’t just its features, networked earnings, or gamified incentives; it’s the philosophy behind them. In a country where informal savings practices like ajo or esusu have historically helped communities build financial resilience, Suddengo’s model taps into that cultural logic but supercharges it with technology. The idea that collective action, referrals, and everyday transactions can create financial momentum is not just innovation; it’s continuity of deeply-rooted financial wisdom, updated for the digital age.

The startup’s referral revenue-sharing system underscores this idea. When users invite others to the platform, and those referrals spend or transact, original users earn bonuses, a mechanism that turns social networks into earning networks. It’s not merely about growth metrics; it’s about building a community where financial benefit flows through connections, rather than fees extracted at every turn. And for many Nigerians who have felt sidelined by apps that extract value without giving back, this ethos resonates deeply.

Another striking piece of Suddengo’s vision is its approach to microloans. Rather than burdening users with high-interest or punitive repayment schedules that have become all too familiar with some digital lenders, Suddengo introduces performance-based lending that can be offset with earned bonuses. This isn’t charity, nor is it predatory lending; it is a mechanism designed to reward participation and responsible engagement. In an ecosystem where many loan apps have faced criticism for opaque practices, Suddengo’s model attempts something refreshingly different.

But beyond product mechanics lies a narrative that’s often overlooked in tech journalism: the emotional journey of its users. For millions in Nigeria and across Africa, financial technology isn’t abstract; it’s personal. It represents hopes for stability, growth, and dignity in managing money that too often feels unpredictable. Suddengo doesn’t just promise convenience; it promises ownership, a chance for users to feel that they are building something, not just spending. This subtle shift from consumer to participant changes how one engages with money, technology, and community.

In a fintech landscape dominated by payments, wallets, and credit, Suddengo dares to ask a deeper question: What if the economy we participate in could return value to us simply for being part of it? The answer to that question is still unfolding, but it reflects a larger truth about Africa’s tech revolution: innovation isn’t just about speed or scale; it’s about meaning and impact.

US-backed Zipline has deepened its partnership with Rwanda to deliver life-saving medicines by drone, turning a once-impossible logistics challenge into a daily reality. Behind the technology is a human story of obsession with reliability, urgency, and the belief that distance should never decide who lives or dies.

Long before Zipline’s red-and-white drones became a familiar sight over Rwanda’s hills, Keller Rinaudo Cliffton was obsessed with a single, unsettling question: why does geography still decide who gets to live? Growing up, he was surrounded by innovation and ambition, yet he couldn’t reconcile that reality with the fragile supply chains that left clinics without blood, vaccines, or essential medicines simply because roads were bad or distances too long.

That frustration followed him into adulthood, through engineering, entrepreneurship, and eventually into the founding of Zipline. What began as a bold idea in the United States has now become one of the most quietly radical healthcare transformations on the African continent, and Rwanda is its living proof.

Zipline’s partnership with the Rwandan government is no longer “experimental.” It is operational, mature, and deeply woven into the country’s healthcare system. Today, drones fly autonomously across valleys and forests, carrying blood, vaccines, antivenom, and critical medicines to hospitals and clinics that once waited hours, sometimes days, for supplies. What used to be an emergency defined by panic and delay is now measured in minutes.

But the real story isn’t the drone. It’s the mindset.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Rwanda did something rare: it trusted the future early. At a time when many countries were still debating whether drones were safe or practical, Rwanda chose to ask a different question: What if this works? That openness aligned perfectly with Zipline’s philosophy. For Keller, technology was never the hero; reliability was. If a system couldn’t deliver every single time, in rain or heat, over mountains or open land, it wasn’t good enough.

Years into the partnership, the results are undeniable. Zipline now completes tens of thousands of medical deliveries in Rwanda each year, supporting maternal care, emergency transfusions, routine immunisation, and outbreak response. Clinics that once rationed supplies now operate with confidence. Health workers can focus on patients, not paperwork or logistics.

What’s changed recently is scale and depth. Zipline has expanded the range of medicines delivered, improved turnaround times, and integrated more deeply into national health planning. This is no longer about “drones delivering blood.” It’s about a logistics backbone that works quietly in the background, like electricity, only noticed when it’s missing.

For Keller, Rwanda represents something personal. It validates a belief he carried long before Zipline raised major funding or signed global partnerships: that emerging markets are not test grounds, but proving grounds. The innovation that survives here is stronger, more resilient, and more honest.

And while the headlines focus on Rwanda, the ripple effects reach far beyond its borders. Across Africa, including Nigeria, conversations about last-mile delivery, emergency healthcare access, and infrastructure leapfrogging are increasingly shaped by what Zipline has achieved. It offers a powerful lesson: you don’t need perfect roads to build a world-class health system; you need courage, collaboration, and systems designed for reality, not theory.

Zipline’s drones don’t just carry packages. They carry trust between governments and innovators, between technology and humanity. Each flight is a quiet rejection of the idea that progress must be slow, or that some lives are harder to reach than others.

In Rwanda’s skies, you can see what happens when vision meets execution. Not spectacle. Not noise. Just consistency. And sometimes, that’s what saves lives.

South Africa’s fintech group Lesaka has recorded its first profit since 2022, a milestone achieved amid slowing merchant activity and macroeconomic pressure. But beyond the numbers lies a longer story of patience, restructuring, and leadership navigating an unforgiving financial climate.

There is a particular silence that hangs over companies that have been unprofitable for too long. Not the loud chaos of collapse, but the quieter, heavier kind, the kind filled with internal recalibrations, investor skepticism, and leadership decisions that never make headlines. For Lesaka Technologies, that silence lasted nearly two years.

Founded with the ambition of building an inclusive financial infrastructure for Southern Africa, Lesaka’s journey has never been linear. It has been marked by pivots, acquisitions, regulatory navigation, and a relentless push to serve underbanked communities through payments, lending, and merchant services. But ambition, as history repeatedly reminds us, does not guarantee immediate reward.

Now, in its latest financial results, Lesaka has done something that once felt distant: it has returned to profitability, its first since 2022, and it has done so at a time when many of its merchants are slowing down.

This is where the story becomes interesting.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

The past year has been unforgiving for South African businesses. High interest rates, inflationary pressure, load shedding hangovers, and cautious consumer spending have all collided. Merchants, the backbone of Lesaka’s ecosystem, processed fewer transactions. Growth slowed. Margins were tested. For many fintechs, this would have been the moment profits drift even further out of reach.

But Lesaka chose a different response: discipline.

Under the leadership of CEO Lincoln Mali, the company spent the last two years quietly re-engineering itself. Cost structures were tightened. Non-core operations were scrutinised. The business leaned into efficiency rather than expansion for expansion’s sake. It was not glamorous work. It was necessary work.

This latest profit is not the result of a booming market or a sudden spike in transaction volume. It is the outcome of restraint, a word rarely celebrated in tech circles. Lesaka focused on improving unit economics across its merchant, consumer, and banking segments, ensuring that growth, when it came, would actually mean something.

That choice is mature.

Lesaka’s story also reflects a broader shift happening across African fintech. The era of growth-at-all-costs has given way to something more grounded. Investors are asking harder questions. Markets are less forgiving. Companies are being judged not by how fast they scale, but by how well they endure.

For Lesaka, profitability is not a victory lap; it is a checkpoint. Merchant activity may be down, but the infrastructure remains. The relationships remain. And the company has proven that it can survive without burning endlessly.

What makes this moment especially significant is that Lesaka serves communities often ignored by traditional financial institutions. Spaza shops, informal traders, small merchants operating at the edge of formal finance, these are not customers who deliver explosive quarterly growth. They deliver resilience. And resilience, as Lesaka has learned, compounds quietly.

This profit does not signal the end of challenges. Merchant demand is still cautious. Economic recovery is uneven. But it does signal something more important: control. Lesaka is no longer reacting to the market. It is responding with intention.

In fintech, survival is an achievement. Sustainability is a triumph.

And for Lesaka, this return to profit is not just about numbers on a balance sheet; it is proof that patience, when paired with clarity, can outlast turbulence.

Nigeria’s telecom landscape is shifting again as T2 Mobile records its third consecutive month of internet user growth, according to the latest NCC data. Beyond the numbers lies a deeper story of reinvention, resilience, and a company slowly rebuilding trust in one of Africa’s most demanding digital markets.

There is a particular kind of silence that follows a comeback. It isn’t loud. It doesn’t announce itself with billboards or chest-thumping press releases. It simply shows up in the data.

That is where T2 Mobile finds itself today.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

According to the latest figures released by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), T2 Mobile has added internet users for the third consecutive month, a modest headline on the surface, but a significant signal beneath it. In an industry where subscriber losses can snowball quickly and consumer trust is fragile, sustained growth, however incremental, is rarely accidental.

To understand why this matters, you have to step back from the charts and step into the story of Nigeria’s telecom market, a space shaped by intense competition, infrastructure strain, regulatory pressure, and a population that relies on mobile internet not as a luxury, but as oxygen. For millions of Nigerians, connectivity is work, school, commerce, and community wrapped into a small glowing screen.

T2 Mobile’s journey has not been linear. Like many operators outside the dominant telecom giants, it has lived on the margins of attention, often overshadowed by players with deeper pockets and louder voices. But markets do not always reward noise. Sometimes they reward consistency.

What the NCC data reflects is not just an increase in numbers, but a shift in behavior, users choosing to stay, returning users testing the waters again, and new customers quietly onboarding. In a sector where churn is relentless, three months of consecutive growth suggest something is finally clicking.

Part of that story is strategic restraint. While others chase aggressive expansion, T2 Mobile appears to be focusing on service stability, data accessibility, and targeted customer acquisition. It is the slow work of rebuilding, the kind that doesn’t trend instantly but compounds over time.

Another layer of the story is timing. Nigeria’s digital economy is expanding rapidly, even as economic pressures force consumers to scrutinize value more than ever. Internet users today are less forgiving. They measure every megabyte. They notice network reliability. They talk loudly when service fails. Growth in this climate is earned, not gifted.

Behind the data is also a human reality: engineers optimizing networks, customer service teams handling complaints in real time, and decision-makers navigating a volatile regulatory and economic environment. Telecom growth is not just infrastructure; it is endurance.

The NCC’s role here is crucial. By publishing transparent, monthly data, the regulator offers more than statistics; it provides a mirror. And in that mirror, T2 Mobile’s reflection is changing. Not dramatically. Not explosively. But steadily.

This moment also speaks to the broader Nigerian tech ecosystem. Growth does not always belong to the biggest or the loudest. Sometimes it belongs to those willing to rebuild quietly, listen closely, and move deliberately. T2 Mobile’s three-month streak may not rewrite the telecom hierarchy overnight, but it signals momentum, and momentum, in technology markets, is often the most honest currency.

As Nigeria’s appetite for data continues to grow, driven by fintech, content creation, remote work, and digital entrepreneurship, the space for alternative players widens. T2 Mobile’s recent performance suggests it understands this opening.

The story, then, is not just that T2 Mobile added internet users again. It is that in a market that rarely gives second chances, the company appears to be crafting one, patiently, persistently, and on its own terms.

MTN Group is in talks to acquire a 75% stake in IHS Towers, a move that could quietly redefine Africa’s telecom infrastructure landscape. Beyond the deal is a long story of control, survival, and a continent learning to own the backbone of its digital future.

There are moments in business when a deal is less about numbers and more about memory. About history catching up with ambition. MTN Group’s ongoing talks to acquire 75% of IHS Towers feel exactly like that, not a sudden move, but the continuation of a story that has been unfolding for years across Africa’s telecom corridors.

To understand why this matters, you have to understand MTN itself.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

MTN didn’t grow into Africa’s largest telecom operator by accident. It grew by betting early, staying stubborn, and learning hard lessons in markets that punished hesitation. From the early days of rolling out GSM infrastructure in Nigeria to navigating regulatory storms, currency volatility, and infrastructure bottlenecks, MTN learned one thing very well: control what keeps you alive.

And in telecoms, towers are oxygen.

IHS Towers, now one of the world’s largest independent tower companies, was born in Nigeria in 2001. At the time, mobile networks were expanding faster than infrastructure could keep up. IHS stepped into that gap, buying, building, and managing towers so operators like MTN could focus on subscribers, not steel and diesel.

For years, the relationship worked. Operators outsourced infrastructure to free up capital. Tower companies scaled, listed, and expanded across Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East. IHS became global. MTN became continental. But markets changed.

Energy costs soared. Currency devaluations hit hard. Tower leases became more expensive. Power supply remained unstable. And suddenly, what once felt like freedom began to feel like dependency.

This is where the current talks matter.

MTN’s interest in acquiring a controlling 75% stake in IHS Towers isn’t just about consolidation. It’s about reclaiming leverage in a business where margins are tightening, and efficiency is no longer optional. By owning the infrastructure, MTN doesn’t just reduce long-term costs; it gains strategic flexibility in how it deploys 5G, expands rural coverage, and navigates future regulatory pressure.

But there’s also a human layer to this story.

IHS was built by African grit, scaled by global capital, and tested by emerging-market realities. MTN was built by African ambition, refined by adversity, and hardened by survival. This potential reunion feels like two veterans of the same battlefield deciding it’s time to stop renting shields and start forging their own.

For Nigeria, the implications are profound. Telecom infrastructure has always been the silent engine behind fintech, media, e-commerce, and remote work. Whoever controls the towers controls the pace at which digital Nigeria grows. A deal like this could signal a shift toward operators owning more of their critical infrastructure again, especially in markets where external shocks are the norm, not the exception.

It also sends a message to the continent: African tech giants are no longer content being tenants in systems they helped build.

If the deal goes through, it would mark one of the most significant infrastructure realignments in Africa’s telecom history. Not flashy. Not loud. But foundational.

Because real power in technology doesn’t always live in apps or platforms. Sometimes, it lives quietly in steel frames, humming generators, and towers standing tall in places where connectivity once felt impossible.

And MTN, it seems, wants those keys back.

CWG has reported an 84% growth in profit, driven by strong software and IT services performance. But beyond the numbers lies a deeper story of resilience, leadership, and a company that has learned how to survive Nigeria’s toughest tech cycles and emerge sharper.

Long before profit margins and quarterly reports became the language of success, Austin Okere was simply obsessed with possibility. In the early days of Nigeria’s tech awakening, when software was still treated as a luxury, and IT infrastructure felt foreign to many businesses, he believed something quietly radical: that African enterprises deserved technology built for their reality, not imported assumptions.

That belief became CWG.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

Today, as the company posts an 84% increase in profit, driven largely by strong software and IT services sales, it feels less like a surprise and more like a long-overdue reckoning. CWG’s story has never been about explosive hype. It has been about endurance, the kind that survives currency shocks, policy uncertainty, shrinking enterprise budgets, and the constant reinvention demanded by Nigeria’s economy.

The latest financial performance tells a clear story. Businesses are spending again, not recklessly, but deliberately. They are investing in software that improves efficiency, IT services that reduce operational friction, and systems that help them stay competitive in an environment where every decision counts. CWG sits at the centre of that shift, not as a newcomer chasing trends, but as a veteran that understands institutional pain points intimately.

What makes this moment significant is not just the profit growth, but where it came from. Software and IT services are not impulse purchases. They are trust-based decisions. They signal that enterprises are choosing reliability over experimentation, depth over noise. CWG’s platforms, enterprise solutions, and managed services have become quiet infrastructure, the kind that doesn’t trend on social media but keeps businesses running.

To understand why this matters, you have to return to the man behind the vision. Austin Okere didn’t build CWG for applause. He built it during a time when Nigerian tech founders were still explaining why software mattered at all. Over decades, he watched global tech cycles rise and fall, while navigating local realities that rarely made headlines but shaped every strategic decision.

That patience is now paying off.

CWG’s profit surge reflects years of repositioning, moving from hardware-heavy models into higher-margin software solutions, expanding IT services, and aligning offerings with the evolving needs of banks, governments, telecoms, and large enterprises. It is the result of institutional learning, not sudden luck.

There’s also something symbolic about this moment. In an era where Nigerian tech headlines are often dominated by layoffs, funding slowdowns, and survival stories, CWG’s growth offers a counter-narrative. It suggests that sustainability, when paired with relevance, still wins. That companies built for Africa, by Africans, with a long-term lens, can thrive even when the market tightens.

This performance also hints at a broader shift in Nigeria’s tech ecosystem. As businesses prioritise efficiency, compliance, and digital transformation, demand for enterprise-grade software and IT services is rising. CWG is not merely benefiting from that trend; it helped shape it.

An 84% profit growth is a number. But behind it is something harder to quantify: trust earned over time, systems refined through experience, and leadership that understands when to evolve and when to hold steady.

CWG’s story reminds us that technology success is not always loud. Sometimes, it is steady. Sometimes, it is patient. And sometimes, after years of quiet work, it speaks for itself, in numbers that finally demand attention.

PwC has taken over Koko Networks after the clean-cooking startup entered administration, marking a sobering turn for one of Africa’s most ambitious climate-tech stories. Behind the headlines lies a deeper narrative of bold vision, rapid scale, and the brutal realities of building capital-intensive solutions in emerging markets.

For years, Koko Networks felt like one of those rare African tech stories that carried both moral weight and commercial ambition. Clean energy. Climate impact. Real households. Real kitchens. It wasn’t about convenience or clicks; it was about changing how millions cook, breathe, and live.

At the center of it all was Greg Murray, a founder who didn’t arrive with a shallow pitch deck or borrowed buzzwords. He came with conviction. Koko wasn’t built to chase trends; it was built to solve a problem that quietly kills hundreds of thousands across Africa every year: indoor air pollution from charcoal and kerosene.
Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

The idea was deceptively simple and dangerously complex at the same time. Replace dirty cooking fuels with ethanol, distributed through smart vending machines placed in neighbourhoods. Let families refill clean fuel as easily as they buy phone airtime. Make clean cooking affordable, scalable, and habitual.

And for a while, it worked.

Koko expanded aggressively across Kenya, raising hundreds of millions of dollars from global investors who believed this was climate tech done right, with measurable impact, physical infrastructure, and real-world adoption. The company employed thousands, built local supply chains, and became a symbol of what African climate innovation could look like when backed by serious capital.

But ambition has a cost.

Unlike pure software startups, Koko’s model was brutally capital-intensive. Hardware, logistics, fuel supply, maintenance, and last-mile distribution all had to work in harmony. Margins were thin. Any disruption, currency swings, supply chain pressure, or funding slowdowns could tilt the balance.

When the funding climate tightened globally, that balance cracked.

PwC’s takeover as administrator marks the moment the story shifted from expansion to survival. Administration doesn’t mean instant death, but it does mean the company could no longer meet its obligations as they came due. For employees, partners, and households relying on Koko’s network, it is a moment filled with uncertainty.

Yet, to reduce this moment to “startup failure” would be lazy.

Koko Networks did not collapse because the problem wasn’t real. It didn’t fail because people didn’t want clean cooking. It faltered because building physical climate infrastructure in emerging markets demands patience, deep pockets, and policy alignment, all at once.

Greg Murray’s journey is emblematic of a generation of founders who dared to tackle foundational problems rather than cosmetic ones. He chose kitchens over convenience, impact over virality. And while the outcome is painful, the attempt itself pushed the conversation forward. Governments took notice. Investors learned hard lessons. Competitors adjusted their models.

PwC’s role now is to assess whether parts of Koko can be salvaged, sold, or restructured, the technology, the infrastructure, the data, or even the operating model. In many cases, administration is not the end of innovation, but its pause button.

For Nigeria and the broader African tech ecosystem, Koko’s story carries weight. It reminds us that not all important startups look glamorous on the balance sheet. Some are heavy, slow, and expensive, but necessary. Climate and clean energy ventures will not follow the same playbook as fintech or SaaS, and pretending otherwise only sets them up for heartbreak.

As the dust settles, one truth remains: Koko Networks tried to solve a problem that matters. And even in administration, its story will shape how the next generation of climate-tech founders build, more cautiously, perhaps, but not less boldly.

In just two years, Moniepoint evolved from Nigeria’s largest PoS backbone into a full-stack financial ecosystem. But behind the speed is a founder’s quiet obsession with infrastructure, trust, and building for people who are usually ignored by big banks.

Long before Moniepoint became a household name across Nigeria’s streets and markets, Tosin Eniolorunda was already thinking about systems most people never notice, the invisible rails that keep businesses alive. He wasn’t chasing glamour. He was chasing reliability.

Years earlier, Tosin had built and exited a payments company. He had seen how fragile Nigeria’s financial plumbing was, especially for small businesses that lived daily on thin margins and unpredictable cash flow. So when Moniepoint emerged publicly as a PoS company powering agents nationwide, it wasn’t the destination. It was the entry point.

Visit technaija.com for more related articles.

At the time, PoS terminals were exploding across Nigeria, in barber shops, pharmacies, kiosks, and roadside vendors. Everyone saw the scale. Few saw the vulnerability. Behind every successful agent was a business owner juggling inventory, rent, payroll, supplier payments, and personal survival, all through tools that barely spoke to each other.

Moniepoint paid attention.

By dominating PoS infrastructure, the company earned something far more valuable than transaction volume: trust. Every successful withdrawal, every stable settlement, every day an agent’s terminal didn’t fail quietly stitched Moniepoint deeper into the daily rhythm of Nigerian commerce. That trust became leverage.

Then the shift began.

Instead of remaining a transaction pipe, Moniepoint started wrapping itself around the business owner. Business accounts followed. Then transfers. Then, expense tracking. Then, working capital loans are built on real transaction data, not guesswork. What looked like rapid expansion was actually a slow reveal of a long-held blueprint.

In under two years, Moniepoint transformed from “the PoS company” into a full-stack financial partner, not by shouting, but by showing up consistently where banks often disappeared.

The genius wasn’t speed. It was sequencing.

Each product solved a problem Moniepoint had already observed at scale. Merchants didn’t need convincing; the tools felt like a natural extension of how they already worked. This is what lock-in looks like when it’s earned, not forced. When leaving feels inconvenient, not because of contracts, but because everything finally works in one place.

What makes Moniepoint’s story compelling is that it never tried to look like a Silicon Valley fintech. It behaved like infrastructure. Quiet. Unsexy. Relentless.

Tosin’s leadership reflects that philosophy. He rarely sells hype. He builds systems that compound. While others chased consumer apps and flashy features, Moniepoint stayed close to the cash register, close to traders who open shops before sunrise and close long after dark. That proximity shaped the company’s product instincts.

Today, Moniepoint sits at a rare intersection in Nigerian tech: massive scale, deep usage, and growing product breadth. It processes billions in transactions, serves millions of businesses, and increasingly feels less like a fintech startup and more like a financial operating system.

But the most important part of the story isn’t the valuation conversations or expansion headlines. It’s the restraint. Moniepoint didn’t rush to become everything. It became useful first. Then indispensable.

In an ecosystem where many startups burn brightly and fade quickly, Moniepoint’s rise feels different. It’s not loud. It’s structural. And that may be its greatest advantage.

From PoS scale to full-stack lock-in in two years isn’t a flex. It’s a case study in what happens when you build patiently, listen obsessively, and respect the quiet complexity of the people you serve.