₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,331,354 members, 8,449,902 topics. Date: Wednesday, 22 July 2026 at 01:20 PM

Toggle theme

Critique99's Posts

Nairaland ForumCritique99's ProfileCritique99's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 (of 5 pages)

PoliticsRe: North - Fulani Are Not Indigenous to Nigeria by critique99: 11:58am On Jun 27, 2024
Antitankweapon:
The indigenous people of Northern Nigeria must realize that they were blind for too long. They were blind for way too long. And they must begin to make amends across all aspects of their traditional, cultural, religious and political lives.

For a long time, the Fulanis (who migrated from Futa Jallon in Guinea) held sway in the North, completely subduing the indigenous northerners via centuries of brigandage, deceit, religious indoctrination and political division.
With the successful brainwashing of indigenes, the Fulani controlled the traditional, cultural, religious and political life of indigenous Northerners. Sad but true. Migrants and descendants of migrants subdued indigenous northerners in their land, and controlled their traditional, cultural, political and religious life. Its a big mistake of the past and Nigeria suffered for it.

We are telling every Northerner that the Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. They are the only ethnic group that are not indigenous to Nigeria. Their progenitor migrated from Futa Jallon in present day Guinea. History is there for you to read. The Fulani are not real Nigerians, and will never be Nigerians. You need to have this fact engraved on your minds.

We are saying to indigenous Northerners, enough of Fulani madness in the North. Enough of fulani migrants dominating northern indigenes. Enough of Fulani leading indigenes. The Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. The Sultan is not indigenous to Nigeria. His throne is NOT ancestral to the North. His ancestors are in Guinea. He is an obstacle to Nigeria's greatness.
Enough of the Fulani misleading the North to destroy Nigeria, for Fulani interest.
PoliticsRe: North - Fulani Are Not Indigenous to Nigeria by critique99: 11:56am On Jun 27, 2024
cheesy
Phranx1:
What a heart "KIDNAPPING" topic.
PoliticsRe: Sultan Of Sokoto - Anatomy Of A Fall by critique99(op): 11:53am On Jun 27, 2024
shocked
PoliticsRe: Sultan Of Sokoto - Anatomy Of A Fall by critique99(op): 11:53am On Jun 27, 2024
cry
critique99:
The indigenous people of Northern Nigeria must realize that they were blind for too long. They were blind for way too long. And they must begin to make amends across all aspects of their traditional, cultural, religious and political lives.

For a long time, the Fulanis (who migrated from Futa Jallon in Guinea) held sway in the North, completely subduing the indigenous northerners via centuries of brigandage, deceit, religious indoctrination and political division.
With the successful brainwashing of indigenes, the Fulani controlled the traditional, cultural, religious and political life of indigenous Northerners. Sad but true. Migrants and descendants of migrants subdued indigenous northerners in their land, and controlled their traditional, cultural, political and religious life. Its a big mistake of the past and Nigeria suffered for it.

We are telling every Northerner that the Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. They are the only ethnic group that are not indigenous to Nigeria. Their progenitor migrated from Futa Jallon in present day Guinea. History is there for you to read. The Fulani are not real Nigerians, and will never be Nigerians.

Having successful conquered and subdued the Hausa, the Fulani saw Nigeria as a prize or as a property they possess. They don't see themselves as part of a nation they love; they see themselves as the owners of Nigeria. And since the Fulani hold leadership in the North, they put Fulani interest above Nigeria's interest.

Yes, my people, the Fulani put Fulani interest above Nigeria's interest. How? Because the only way the Fulani can maintain their control of North, is to present the South as a political contest or political enemy.

Nigeria's unity and greatness was sacrificed for the Fulani to retain their control of the North.
Nigeria's national politics became a domination contest between North vs South.

How can a nation become great by division? How? Division that only favours the Fulani. When the North fights the South, Fulani wins.

During the 2023 election period, the Sultan chaired a political meeting, where he insisted that Power should not rotate to the South. Can you imagine? Can you imagine that? If that was done, it marks the end of Nigeria. The whole South should be shut out of leadership. That was the Sultan's proposal, just to benefit the Fulani , Nigeria should die. This is a classic example of how the Fulani sacrifice Nigeria for their own interest. And this was in 2023 before the election. During the election, the Sultan did much worse that imperils Nigeria further. The suffering of every Nigerian today sits on the neck of the bastard Sultan of Sokoto.

We are saying to indigenous Northerners, enough of Fulani madness in the North. Enough of fulani migrants dominating northern indigenes. Enough of Fulani leading indigenes. The Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. The Sultan is not indigenous to Nigeria. His throne is NOT ancestral to the North. His ancestors are in Guinea. He is an obstacle to Nigeria's greatness
Enough of the Fulani misleading the North to destroy Nigeria, for Fulani interest.
PoliticsSultan Of Sokoto - Anatomy Of A Fall by critique99(op): 11:27am On Jun 27, 2024
The indigenous people of Northern Nigeria must realize that they were blind for too long. They were blind for way too long. And they must begin to make amends across all aspects of their traditional, cultural, religious and political lives.

For a long time, the Fulanis (who migrated from Futa Jallon in Guinea) held sway in the North, completely subduing the indigenous northerners via centuries of brigandage, deceit, religious indoctrination and political division.
With the successful brainwashing of indigenes, the Fulani controlled the traditional, cultural, religious and political life of indigenous Northerners. Sad but true. Migrants and descendants of migrants subdued indigenous northerners in their land, and controlled their traditional, cultural, political and religious life. Its a big mistake of the past and Nigeria suffered for it.

We are telling every Northerner that the Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. They are the only ethnic group that are not indigenous to Nigeria. Their progenitor migrated from Futa Jallon in present day Guinea. History is there for you to read. The Fulani are not real Nigerians, and will never be Nigerians.

Having successful conquered and subdued the Hausa, the Fulani saw Nigeria as a prize or as a property they possess. They don't see themselves as part of a nation they love; they see themselves as the owners of Nigeria. And since the Fulani hold leadership in the North, they put Fulani interest above Nigeria's interest.

Yes, my people, the Fulani put Fulani interest above Nigeria's interest. How? Because the only way the Fulani can maintain their control of North, is to present the South as a political contest or political enemy.

Nigeria's unity and greatness was sacrificed for the Fulani to retain their control of the North.
Nigeria's national politics became a domination contest between North vs South.

How can a nation become great by division? How? Division that only favours the Fulani. When the North fights the South, Fulani wins.

During the 2023 election period, the Sultan chaired a political meeting, where he insisted that Power should not rotate to the South. Can you imagine? Can you imagine that? If that was done, it marks the end of Nigeria. The whole South should be shut out of leadership. That was the Sultan's proposal, just to benefit the Fulani , Nigeria should die. This is a classic example of how the Fulani sacrifice Nigeria for their own interest. And this was in 2023 before the election. During the election, the Sultan did much worse that imperils Nigeria further. The suffering of every Nigerian today sits on the neck of the bastard Sultan of Sokoto.

We are saying to indigenous Northerners, enough of Fulani madness in the North. Enough of fulani migrants dominating northern indigenes. Enough of Fulani leading indigenes. The Fulani are not indigenous to Nigeria. The Sultan is not indigenous to Nigeria. His throne is NOT ancestral to the North. His ancestors are in Guinea. He is an obstacle to Nigeria's greatness
Enough of the Fulani misleading the North to destroy Nigeria, for Fulani interest.
PoliticsNorth - Another Quit Notice To Fulani Settlers by critique99(op): 10:18am On Jun 24, 2024
For the unteempth time, I have to remind us that: Nigeria is NOT Fulani homeland.

Nigeria is NOT Fulani homeland. The Fulani homeland is Futa Jallon in present day Guinea. The Fulani are NOT indigenous to Nigeria. And their cattle grazing is also NOT the culture of any indigenous Nigerian ethnicity. Cattle grazing is not a Nigerian thing, it is Fulani culture and they are not indigenous Nigerians. Open grazing should be BANNED outright. There is No need to debate the culture of non-indigenes of Nigeria.

Every Fulani man is a naturalized Nigerian, not an indigenous Nigerian. The indigenous Nigerian is superior to a naturalized Nigerian. The Fulani are not indigenous Nigerians. They have NO ancestral right or claims in Nigeria. Their ancestors are in Futa Jallon. And they are free to GO HOME to their ancestral Lands. We indigenes would not leave Nigeria for them; they are free to GO back to their real home in Futa Jallon.

All the problems in Nigeria is because the "Fulani want to make Nigeria their home". All the problems in this country is because the Fulani want to make Nigeria their home. All the killings and crises in the North for over 200years are an attempt at expansionism and land grabbing, which must now be resisted with decisive firmness. The northerners have been blind for way too long.

There is no North vs South domination contest in Nigeria. There is not. The South is not interested in dominating the North; we just want a united prosperous nation. The North vs South dominance is a brainwashing concept used by the Fulani to fool the indigenous Northern politicians to focus on the South, whilst the Fulani get the freedom to ravage their land and expand their emirates.

Know this: when the North fights the South,, the Fulani are the winner. Yes, you win for Fulani. Because they have conquered you, you now conquer the South for them. Pls, wake up. Don't be used. Leave the South alone, and face your enemies who have ravaged your lands for centuries.

Northern leaders must now:
A) Scrap the emirate system which is alien to the North. There were no Emirates before Fulani came to the north.
B) Remove the Emirs and re-instate the indigenous Sarkin kings of the North.
C) Stop wearing the Turban. It is Fulani cultural signature. There was no Turban before Fulani came to the North.

Northern leaders must look inwards and solve their problems. Free yourself from mental slavery and stand up to your enemies. The South is not your enemy; but the Fulani are your enemies.
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 10:44am On Jun 22, 2024
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 10:43am On Jun 22, 2024
kiss
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 12:07pm On Jun 21, 2024
critique99:
He insults our intelligence.
kiss
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 12:07pm On Jun 21, 2024
critique99:
Criminal Sultan
He insults our intelligence.
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 11:45am On Jun 21, 2024
Criminal Sultan
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 11:41am On Jun 21, 2024
critique99:
Why Ops.
wink
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 10:20am On Jun 21, 2024
Why Ops.
PoliticsRe: More Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op): 10:20am On Jun 21, 2024
Zxcvbnmghtr:
grin

The poster is not even a Muslim. Funny lots. grin
Join me
PoliticsMore Muslims Denounce the Sultan Of Sokoto by critique99(op):
Following my earlier thread in which I revealed the discussions among Southern Islamic preachers, we have noted significant interest in the conversation. And many Muslim faithful seem to be happy with the revelations now coming to light.
New contributors to the discussion aligned with the views shared, and further denounced the Sultan of Sokoto calling him the biggest religious criminal in Nigerian history. The key point from the new discussion is:

a) who appointed Sultan as head of Nigerian Muslims?
b) should a religious office be merged with Sokoto king?

Nobody could remember when, where, and how the Sultan was appointed or consecrated as Head of Nigerian Muslims.

In every other religion, there is a clear path to accession of high religious office. First, you must have lived a whole life of service to Allah, which would manifest as you climb the religious ladder, till you become a religious head. That is how it is with high religious offices, and the holders live exemplary lives. That is the way it is in all religions; the exception is with Northern Muslims. Someone becomes Sultan and immediately he assumes head of Nigerian Muslims. HELL NO. No, no, no. . It should NOT be like that. A religious office is separate from king. And before you attain such office, your exemplary life devoted to Allah must be well known to faithfuls, because they have seen you rise through the ranks. High religious offices are NOT for random people.

And as religious head, you are devoted to God/Allah. You role is to lead Muslim faithful in worship of Allah, and your religious office confers you with the authority to lead religious activities. Your whole life would have set the example for Muslims before you ever attain such office.

In Northern Nigeria, we have a Sultan who arrogated to himself the title of Head of Nigerian Muslims, but engages in all kinds of covert criminal activities, and he thinks we do not know. Take a look at the covert activities of a so-called religious leader

A) subverting democratic process [this one is fresh in our mind]
B) influencing judges [Sultan calls northern Judges and encourages them to give fraudulent judgements]
C) supporting criminal activities [Sultan signed numerous letters in support of Boko Haram]
D) inviting Islamic terrorists to Nigeria [this year alone, Zakir Naik and Hamas have come to Nigeria]
E) inciting northern military officers and giving ethnic orders [numerous testimonies abound]
F) influencing and using government officials to promote northern interest [live testimony from several people]
G) causing religious division [voice of Esau, hand of Jacob]
H) championing the North/South divide [live testimony]
I) importing migrants, killers and criminals to destabilize the nation [voice of Esau, hands of Jacob]
J) driving the Fulani conquest agenda [voice of Esau, hands of Jacob, from intelligence source]
No other king does these things.
These are the covert activities of a man who is supposed to be Devoted to God, and guide Muslim faithful to lead righteous lives. A man who was never appointed or elected into any religious position. Since when did the Head of Muslims become an appendage of Sokoto Caliphate. Northern Nigeria is a den of illiteracy, am sorry. There is nothing right in the North, everything is upside down. A king should NOT be a religious office. Religion is Not tradition.

Fulani did NOT bring Islam to Nigeria. Fulani did NOT bring Islam to Hausa land. The Dan Fodio jihad was extremist and doesn't entitle the Sultan to be the Head of Nigerian Muslims. Sokoto jihad is not a consecration to office as Head of Nigerian Muslims. And certainly, the office of Head of Nigerian Muslims can NOT be hereditary, neither is a religious office related to traditional kingship. Religion is different from tradition. Religion is different from politics. Religion is religion. It can NOT be mixed with tradition or politics. Muslims must wake UP.

Please we need answers to the questions:
a) who appointed Sultan as head of Nigerian Muslims?
b) should a religious office be merged with Sokoto king?

Time is set to have the elect a new Head of Nigerian Muslims, a consecrated office whose holder is not a covert criminal. Discussions are ongoing. Please submit your opinion.

PoliticsRe: Southern Muslims Denounce Sultan Of Sokoto. To Elect New Islamic Leader. by critique99(op): 1:36pm On Jun 19, 2024
RepoMan007:
The spell over their hearts have come to an end? Lol.

How can the backward region be allowed to interpret a Saudi Arabian book and colonize southerners through the constitutional recognition give to a religion?

I hope this is real as we dont want jihadi southerners to spring up in addition to cultism.
Southerners are educated and enlightened. No religion can make them killers. We aren't stew.pid
PoliticsRe: Southern Muslims Denounce Sultan Of Sokoto. To Elect New Islamic Leader. by critique99(op): 1:34pm On Jun 19, 2024
Nelsondiego69:
majority or 99%, y'all using this southern name to drag other regions into your thing
ki ni itumo huh
PoliticsRe: Southern Muslims Denounce Sultan Of Sokoto. To Elect New Islamic Leader. by critique99(op): 11:47am On Jun 19, 2024
Emu4life:
This is just a Figment of this Christian Extremists' @Op's Imagination.

Fyi, Islam isn't like Christianity where everyone wakes up, build their own Church/Business Centers and starts fleecing the gullible sheeples cheesycheesycheesy
Leave the Op alone and focus on the message.
PoliticsRe: Southern Muslims Denounce Sultan Of Sokoto. To Elect New Islamic Leader. by critique99(op): 11:47am On Jun 19, 2024
Emu4life:
I'm 99% sure that the Motherfvcker that compiled this piece of trash is a Palm Wine Guzzling Okoro . Thier inferiority Complex is second to none.
This is fact bro, you can't be everywhere and you can't know everything. This is real fact.
PoliticsSouthern Muslims Denounce Sultan Of Sokoto. To Elect New Islamic Leader. by critique99(op):
There is talk among Southern islamic preachers on the need to have a religious figure for Southern Muslims.
Alas, people are beginning to wake up to the deceit by the Sultan, and I have been privy to one such conversation on Whatsapp.

There are concerns that the Sultan of Sokoto is not a real Islamic figure.., but uses Islam to fool Northern Muslims, as well as to hide the real intention of his Fulani people. Also of note is the fallacy that the Fulanis brought Islam to the North, which is a untrue. There was Islam in the North before the Fulani came. However, the Fulani brought radicalism, through Jihad, which enthroned a doctrine of violence and bloodletting in the North. This jihad-induced 'radical islam' was a fundamental shift from the 'modest Islam' practiced by the Hausa before Fulani came. Moreover, radical Islam is been anti-civilization, is backward, and unacceptable in an enlightened 21st century.

Also of concern is the Sultan's political activities, his traditional kingship, which are all parallel from real religious office. The Sultan has been fingered in numerous crises that affects the North and Nigeria as a whole. From subverting democratic processes, to influencing judges, to influencing politicians, to supporting criminal activities which was evidenced during the Boko Haram crises, to inviting islamic terrorists to Nigeria, to inciting military officers of northern extraction to take ethnic-related actions, influencing and using government officials to promote northern interest, to causing religious division, to even championing the North/South divide which no other king does, to even importing migrants, killers and criminals to destabilize the nation, etc. The Sultan is the biggest singular problem that Nigerians must fix if we must make progress as a United nation. And alarmingly, he does all this things by masking as a monarch and an Islamic leader. This is unacceptable and in-fact, it is insulting because it plays on Northerners' intelligence or rather Northerners' illiteracy.

The entirety of the Sultans covert activities are criminal in nature, and cannot be compatible with someone who holds a religious office.
Moreover the kind of radical Islam practiced by the Sultan-led muslim North is different from the modest Islam practiced in the South. Southern Muslims worship Allah and live peacefully among Christians. Southern Muslims don't mob or kill people and rarely do we have a case of Christian vs Muslim violence in the South. While in the North, the radical Islam seeks to fight and kill Christians, destroy Churches and do all sorts of babaric things that are incompatible with a modern society. This is the radical Islam the Fulani have brought to the North and which they blinded the North with. There is no other black African country where you have radical Islam in all of Africa, except Northern Nigeria. Thanks to the Fulani and Hausa mumu.ism

Combining the Sultan's criminal activities, which he hides using Islam, there are now talks among Southern Muslims to create the highest religious office for Southern Muslims. A strictly religious office whose holder would be shielded from traditional, political, cultural, civil and criminal problems. Most importantly, an office whose holder would represent the modest Islam that is practiced down South, not the killer and babaric Islam up North. I am glad that enlightened Muslims are waking up. Discussions are ongoing, please make your contributions freely.

PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 1:00pm On Jun 17, 2024
undecided[quote author=critique99 post=130515732][/quote]
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 1:00pm On Jun 17, 2024
cry
critique99:
2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.

ll
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 11:07am On Jun 17, 2024
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 11:07am On Jun 17, 2024
cry
PoliticsRe: Sultan of Sokoto, Emir Of Kano, Shehu Of Borno Who Is More Influential? by critique99: 10:48am On Jun 17, 2024
MrProlific95:
In South South Nigeria the Oba of Benin, Olu of Warri are highly revered.

In South West Nigeria, The Oni of Ife, Alaafin of Oyo are almost mystical respected.

So then I ask who is more influential between the Sultan of Sokoto and Emir of Kano and Shehu of Borno historically and otherwise who is more influential in National matters.

Maybe one of them can appeal to Tinubu to make things easier
I appeal to everyone to IGNORE this thread. Do Not reply this mofo.
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op):
2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.

ll
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 10:20am On Jun 17, 2024
critique99:
2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.
2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 10:02am On Jun 17, 2024
2. Don't abuse, bully, deliberately insult/provoke, fight, or wish harm to Nairaland members OR THEIR TRIBES.
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 9:57am On Jun 17, 2024
Chinkoalhaji34:
Lets keep the laughter rolling, Tinubustyle!
critique99:
President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly are on the path to greatness, IF they successfully restructure Nigeria back to regions, based on the map submitted by Afenifere.

This thread calls for Support for the National Assembly to approve the return to Regions,... but on ONE condition. The ONE condition is that the Eastern side of that map should be reworked to satisfy the SE and the SS zones. Currently, there are grumbles about the Eastern zone in the map which Afenifere has prepared. And quite frankly, I think the grumbles are genuine concerns.

We can NOT afford to build a nation where one side is unhappy. It would never work. No great nation is built by keeping one region dissatisfied. If we want Nigeria to work, to be great, then every indigene must be happy. Hence, the Eastern side of that Afenifere map should be corrected to satisfy the wishes of the Eastern people. Then we can all be happy with the restructuring. And Bola Tinubu would have achieved one great thing in his lifetime.

Corrections to the Regional Map - My Suggestions.

First, there was no reason to divide Cross River state into two, and push one part into the Eastern Middle Belt region. There is no sensible reason for it, and infact it would cause dissent in the SS region, which isn't good for Nigeria. So, the division of Cross Rivers State is unnecessary, evil and not justified. It should be reversed and Cross River state should be left as it is. ... Rather, we should create a Bakassi State, from reclaimed land in the Calabar waters, and use that to compensate the Bakassi people for the great mistake of the past. The Bakassi State should be created from reclaimed land. It would be a small state though, but is necessary to compensate the Bakassi people for the wrong Nigeria did them. If we do this, we would have fixed the Bakassi problem alongside achieveing Regionalism. Perfect.

Secondly, the Anioma side of Delta State should be joined with the South East region. I am surprised this was not done, and quite frankly it is wicked and unacceptable. If Kwara State was joined with the SW, then Asaba should be joined with the SE. Asaba is Igboland, and they are indigenous Igbos; so putting them with their SE brothers is the fair thing to do; same as was done with Kwara yorubas. Fix this to satisfy our Igbo brothers. Nigeria can NOT be great by keeping one region unhappy.

I have highlighted TWO issues that should be fixed in the regional map prepared by Afenifere. (1) Push Asaba and Anioma to join their SE brothers. (2) Reverse the division of Cross Rivers state, and instead create a Bakassi state from reclaimed land in the Calabar Atlantic.

If we successfully fix these two things on the Afenifere regional map, then every region would be happy to accept the Regional Structure. Bakassi people would be happy at last; Biafra agitation would end, Oduduwa Republic would also end. One stone to kill 3 birds. Regionalism, if done right, would fix those fundamental problems. But if we fail to fix those two things, the East would remain dissatisfied, and we cannot build a great nation when a region is displeased. We must be matured to make every indigenous Nigerian feel at home. We are all Nigerians in our country, and no indigene should feel dissatisfied in his native land.

I want to urge President Tinubu and the National Assembly to commit to restructuring Nigeria to regions, only if the TWO issues I mentioned are corrected. If Regional government is the only thing Tinubu achieved, then so be it. He would have done one good thing in his lifetime.
critique99:
President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly are on the path to greatness, IF they successfully restructure Nigeria back to regions, based on the map submitted by Afenifere.

This thread calls for Support for the National Assembly to approve the return to Regions,... but on ONE condition. The ONE condition is that the Eastern side of that map should be reworked to satisfy the SE and the SS zones. Currently, there are grumbles about the Eastern zone in the map which Afenifere has prepared. And quite frankly, I think the grumbles are genuine concerns.

We can NOT afford to build a nation where one side is unhappy. It would never work. No great nation is built by keeping one region dissatisfied. If we want Nigeria to work, to be great, then every indigene must be happy. Hence, the Eastern side of that Afenifere map should be corrected to satisfy the wishes of the Eastern people. Then we can all be happy with the restructuring. And Bola Tinubu would have achieved one great thing in his lifetime.

Corrections to the Regional Map - My Suggestions.

First, there was no reason to divide Cross River state into two, and push one part into the Eastern Middle Belt region. There is no sensible reason for it, and infact it would cause dissent in the SS region, which isn't good for Nigeria. So, the division of Cross Rivers State is unnecessary, evil and not justified. It should be reversed and Cross River state should be left as it is. ... Rather, we should create a Bakassi State, from reclaimed land in the Calabar waters, and use that to compensate the Bakassi people for the great mistake of the past. The Bakassi State should be created from reclaimed land. It would be a small state though, but is necessary to compensate the Bakassi people for the wrong Nigeria did them. If we do this, we would have fixed the Bakassi problem alongside achieveing Regionalism. Perfect.

Secondly, the Anioma side of Delta State should be joined with the South East region. I am surprised this was not done, and quite frankly it is wicked and unacceptable. If Kwara State was joined with the SW, then Asaba should be joined with the SE. Asaba is Igboland, and they are indigenous Igbos; so putting them with their SE brothers is the fair thing to do; same as was done with Kwara yorubas. Fix this to satisfy our Igbo brothers. Nigeria can NOT be great by keeping one region unhappy.

I have highlighted TWO issues that should be fixed in the regional map prepared by Afenifere. (1) Push Asaba and Anioma to join their SE brothers. (2) Reverse the division of Cross Rivers state, and instead create a Bakassi state from reclaimed land in the Calabar Atlantic.

If we successfully fix these two things on the Afenifere regional map, then every region would be happy to accept the Regional Structure. Bakassi people would be happy at last; Biafra agitation would end, Oduduwa Republic would also end. One stone to kill 3 birds. Regionalism, if done right, would fix those fundamental problems. But if we fail to fix those two things, the East would remain dissatisfied, and we cannot build a great nation when a region is displeased. We must be matured to make every indigenous Nigerian feel at home. We are all Nigerians in our country, and no indigene should feel dissatisfied in his native land.

I want to urge President Tinubu and the National Assembly to commit to restructuring Nigeria to regions, only if the TWO issues I mentioned are corrected. If Regional government is the only thing Tinubu achieved, then so be it. He would have done one good thing in his lifetime.
critique99:
President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly are on the path to greatness, IF they successfully restructure Nigeria back to regions, based on the map submitted by Afenifere.

This thread calls for Support for the National Assembly to approve the return to Regions,... but on ONE condition. The ONE condition is that the Eastern side of that map should be reworked to satisfy the SE and the SS zones. Currently, there are grumbles about the Eastern zone in the map which Afenifere has prepared. And quite frankly, I think the grumbles are genuine concerns.

We can NOT afford to build a nation where one side is unhappy. It would never work. No great nation is built by keeping one region dissatisfied. If we want Nigeria to work, to be great, then every indigene must be happy. Hence, the Eastern side of that Afenifere map should be corrected to satisfy the wishes of the Eastern people. Then we can all be happy with the restructuring. And Bola Tinubu would have achieved one great thing in his lifetime.

Corrections to the Regional Map - My Suggestions.

First, there was no reason to divide Cross River state into two, and push one part into the Eastern Middle Belt region. There is no sensible reason for it, and infact it would cause dissent in the SS region, which isn't good for Nigeria. So, the division of Cross Rivers State is unnecessary, evil and not justified. It should be reversed and Cross River state should be left as it is. ... Rather, we should create a Bakassi State, from reclaimed land in the Calabar waters, and use that to compensate the Bakassi people for the great mistake of the past. The Bakassi State should be created from reclaimed land. It would be a small state though, but is necessary to compensate the Bakassi people for the wrong Nigeria did them. If we do this, we would have fixed the Bakassi problem alongside achieveing Regionalism. Perfect.

Secondly, the Anioma side of Delta State should be joined with the South East region. I am surprised this was not done, and quite frankly it is wicked and unacceptable. If Kwara State was joined with the SW, then Asaba should be joined with the SE. Asaba is Igboland, and they are indigenous Igbos; so putting them with their SE brothers is the fair thing to do; same as was done with Kwara yorubas. Fix this to satisfy our Igbo brothers. Nigeria can NOT be great by keeping one region unhappy.

I have highlighted TWO issues that should be fixed in the regional map prepared by Afenifere. (1) Push Asaba and Anioma to join their SE brothers. (2) Reverse the division of Cross Rivers state, and instead create a Bakassi state from reclaimed land in the Calabar Atlantic.

If we successfully fix these two things on the Afenifere regional map, then every region would be happy to accept the Regional Structure. Bakassi people would be happy at last; Biafra agitation would end, Oduduwa Republic would also end. One stone to kill 3 birds. Regionalism, if done right, would fix those fundamental problems. But if we fail to fix those two things, the East would remain dissatisfied, and we cannot build a great nation when a region is displeased. We must be matured to make every indigenous Nigerian feel at home. We are all Nigerians in our country, and no indigene should feel dissatisfied in his native land.

I want to urge President Tinubu and the National Assembly to commit to restructuring Nigeria to regions, only if the TWO issues I mentioned are corrected. If Regional government is the only thing Tinubu achieved, then so be it. He would have done one good thing in his lifetime.
PoliticsRe: President Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 9:55am On Jun 17, 2024
Chikel20000:
U tried and u were very sincere in ur opinion....nice one....but I don't think it will stop d agitation for Biafra.....though it is good n will help ease d pains of d eat but d presidency knows what to do?
Regional structure would stop the agitation. If we grant regions more powers, then agitations would die out.
PoliticsPresident Bola Tinubu - Memo To National Assembly by critique99(op): 9:39am On Jun 17, 2024
President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly are on the path to greatness, IF they successfully restructure Nigeria back to regions, based on the map submitted by Afenifere.

This thread calls for Support for the National Assembly to approve the return to Regions,... but on ONE condition. The ONE condition is that the Eastern side of that map should be reworked to satisfy the SE and the SS zones. Currently, there are grumbles about the Eastern zone in the map which Afenifere has prepared. And quite frankly, I think the grumbles are genuine concerns.

We can NOT afford to build a nation where one side is unhappy. It would never work. No great nation is built by keeping one region dissatisfied. If we want Nigeria to work, to be great, then every indigene must be happy. Hence, the Eastern side of that Afenifere map should be corrected to satisfy the wishes of the Eastern people. Then we can all be happy with the restructuring. And Bola Tinubu would have achieved one great thing in his lifetime.

Corrections to the Regional Map - My Suggestions.

First, there was no reason to divide Cross River state into two, and push one part into the Eastern Middle Belt region. There is no sensible reason for it, and infact it would cause dissent in the SS region, which isn't good for Nigeria. So, the division of Cross Rivers State is unnecessary, evil and not justified. It should be reversed and Cross River state should be left as it is. ... Rather, we should create a Bakassi State, from reclaimed land in the Calabar waters, and use that to compensate the Bakassi people for the great mistake of the past. The Bakassi State should be created from reclaimed land. It would be a small state though, but is necessary to compensate the Bakassi people for the wrong Nigeria did them. If we do this, we would have fixed the Bakassi problem alongside achieveing Regionalism. Perfect.

Secondly, the Anioma side of Delta State should be joined with the South East region. I am surprised this was not done, and quite frankly it is wicked and unacceptable. If Kwara State was joined with the SW, then Asaba should be joined with the SE. Asaba is Igboland, and they are indigenous Igbos; so putting them with their SE brothers is the fair thing to do; same as was done with Kwara yorubas. Fix this to satisfy our Igbo brothers. Nigeria can NOT be great by keeping one region unhappy.

I have highlighted TWO issues that should be fixed in the regional map prepared by Afenifere. (1) Push Asaba and Anioma to join their SE brothers. (2) Reverse the division of Cross Rivers state, and instead create a Bakassi state from reclaimed land in the Calabar Atlantic.

If we successfully fix these two things on the Afenifere regional map, then every region would be happy to accept the Regional Structure. Bakassi people would be happy at last; Biafra agitation would end, Oduduwa Republic would also end. One stone to kill 3 birds. Regionalism, if done right, would fix those fundamental problems. But if we fail to fix those two things, the East would remain dissatisfied, and we cannot build a great nation when a region is displeased. We must be matured to make every indigenous Nigerian feel at home. We are all Nigerians in our country, and no indigene should feel dissatisfied in his native land.

I want to urge President Tinubu and the National Assembly to commit to restructuring Nigeria to regions, only if the TWO issues I mentioned are corrected. If Regional government is the only thing Tinubu achieved, then so be it. He would have done one good thing in his lifetime.

PoliticsRe: Nigeria Immigration Service: A Memo To Remove Migrant Fulani From Nigeria by critique99(op): 12:17pm On Jun 03, 2024
babasolution:
Can Nigerians be seen moving carelessly through out bush paths,villages and forest in say Senegal for example without them being queried,searched ,rounded up and possibly deported back to NIG.

Why are Fulani's in the name of being nomadic allowed free movement in Nigeria without question.

Why are the governments of the major tribes particularly allowing all these in their various states.
That is because of the mental conquest of the North. Remember that northerners held sway as military presidents for over 40years. Hence, the problems you mentioned. But you are right, the Fulani end time is nearing soon.

1 2 3 4 5 (of 5 pages)