Davinchecodes's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Davinchecodes's Profile › Davinchecodes's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (of 19 pages)
felixomor:I asked you a question. Prove that god exist. You just beating about bush instead of countering my question with fact. |
Winner01 , Richirich713, felixomor ,
naijadeyhia scholar8200 , malvisguy212 ,
Muafrika2, Dejideji1 , truthman2012,
Image123 , InesQor, Joshthefirst
MrPresident1, gatiano sukkot, OLAADEGBU ,
vooks, UyiIredia , Jeromejnr, thoniameek,
anas09, Tufanja, elantraceey, ceeted,
Chidexter, lezz, analice107, bxcode,
Topeakintola, Tellemall, Ishilove, Drefan2,
Strawman, dazzle101, Dejideji1,
Farmerforlife, 4evergod2, udysweet,
Edelweiss44 , DeepSight
Johnydon22 ilovetheline, JackBizzle, Kay17,
AgentOfAllah, Ayomikun37 , hahn ,
sonOfLucifer , frank317 , Decker , |
felixomor:Go see your doctor. |
muteEcho:What has nigeria done for you? |
KingEbukasBlog:Can you prove that? |
KingEbukasBlog:Cause? if you mean big bang yes. |
You all claim that god created the universe?
Which created it?
Oduduwa
Allah
Jehovah
Buddha? |
KingEbukasBlog:Yes the universe came from nothing. |
felixomor:Yea , yea the flying spaghetti monster is real. |
KingEbukasBlog:https://www.quora.com/What-do-atheists-think-to-be-the-reason-for-the-origin-of-the-universe-and-everything |
KingEbukasBlog:https://www.quora.com/What-do-atheists-think-to-be-the-reason-for-the-origin-of-the-universe-and-everything |
felixomor:. Am on nairaland. Even though you claim god is everywhere I don't see him on nairaland. You asked me a question and I reply. Lol God can't reply you. And can we have a logical discussion rather than shifting goal post. |
KingEbukasBlog:Do spaghetti monster exist or do they have a beginning? |
You funny religious apologist can't. Proof that god exist without thumping your imaginary bible as evidence. Is god a he or she? If God (or any other metaphysical being or beings) were real, and people were really perceiving him/ her/ it/ them, why do these perceptions differ so wildly? |
felixomor:Lol I exist cause u replied me. God is imaginary |
KingEbukasBlog:Nope it depends on the circumstances involve. |
KingEbukasBlog:Am on mobile. I Will add later. Now face the topic |
KingEbukasBlog:The link doesn't prove anything. With every other object and phenomenon in our experience, we use the scientific method to determine whether it exists or not. For example, X rays are invisible, but we know that they exist. We can devise scientific experiments to prove that they exist. Then, once proven to exist, X-rays can be used predictably in all sorts of beneficial ways. If you would like to hypothesize that God exists, then you should say to yourself, "Let's devise a repeatable scientific experiment to provide evidence that God exists." Every experiment we devise demonstrates, yet again, that God is imaginary. |
With every other object and phenomenon in
our experience, we use the scientific method
to determine whether it exists or not. For
example, X rays are invisible, but we know
that they exist. We can devise scientific
experiments to prove that they exist. Then,
once proven to exist, X-rays can be used
predictably in all sorts of beneficial ways.
If you would like to hypothesize that God
exists, then you should say to yourself,
"Let's devise a repeatable scientific
experiment to provide evidence that God
exists." Every experiment we devise
demonstrates, yet again, that God is
imaginary. |
KingEbukasBlog:Leprechauns Now let's imagine that we have a conversation one day and I say to you, "I believe in Leprechauns. You cannot prove that Leprechauns do not exist, therefore they exist. " You actually have heard of Leprechauns. There are lots of books, movies and fairy tales dealing with Leprechauns. People talk about Leprechauns all the time. Leprechauns even have a popular brand of breakfast cereal. A page like this describes/defines the traits of Leprechauns. But that does not mean that Leprechauns exist. If you read the folklore around Leprechauns, you realize that certain aspects are impossible. For example, Leprechauns are defined to be beings who keep a crock of gold at the end of a rainbow. But anyone who understands rainbows knows that there is not a geographic location associated with rainbows. Rainbows are not physical objects, but instead are optical phenomena dependent on an observer. Therefore rainbows do not have fixed X/Y locations for their ends on the ground. This is the problem with the Leprechaun legend - Leprechauns have a property that is impossible, and therefore we can say that Leprechauns do not exist. There is no "end" to any rainbow, and therefore no pots of gold located at such a point, and therefore no Leprechauns. They are as imaginary as the gerflagenflopple. Is there something that would prove Leprechauns to be real? First, we would need to change the definition of Leprechauns. We would have to drop the "pot of gold at the end of the rainbow" part of the definition, because that part is impossible. But if we do that, we are not talking about Leprechauns anymore. This is another way to know that Leprechauns are imaginary. Noah's Ark Another imaginary thing that, like Leprechauns, we hear quite a bit about in our culture is the story of Noah and his Ark. How do we know that the Noah's Ark story is imaginary? First, the story contains an element that is impossible. Genesis 7:20 says, "The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits." This would mean that Mt. Everest, with a height of 29,000 feet (8,850 meters) or nearly 6 miles, was covered in water. It is impossible because that water does not exist. A planet does not magically get covered in 6 miles of water, and then have the water magically disappear. Second, there is no evidence that the event actually occurred. And a planet-wide event of this proportion would necessarily leave incontrovertible evidence behind. There would be geological evidence, archeological evidence, ice core evidence and so on. Genesis 7:21 states: "Every living thing that moved on land perished � birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind." That would leave behind massive amounts of genetic evidence in every species, as each species narrowed to a single breeding pair. For these reasons we can easily say that the story Noah's Ark is imaginary - a fictional fairy tale. God If you think about it, you will realize that there is no difference between God and Leprechauns. Lots of people talk about God as though he exists, but there is no actual evidence for God's existence. And there should be, because there are many positive claims in the definition of God. For example: God has never left any physical evidence of his existence on earth. All historical gods were imaginary and we know it. None of Jesus' "miracles" left any physical evidence either. God has never spoken to modern man, for example by taking over all the television stations and broadcasting a rational message to everyone. The resurrected Jesus has never appeared to anyone in a provable way. The Bible we have is provably incorrect and is obviously the work of primitive men rather than God. When we analyze prayer with statistics, we find no evidence that God is "answering prayers." Huge, amazing atrocities like the Holocaust and AIDS occur without any response from God. And so on There is absolutely no evidence indicating that God exists. There is a tremendous amount of empirical evidence that God does not exist. For example, God is defined as a prayer-answering being, but we know with certainty that the belief in prayer is a superstition. Therefore we can conclusively say that God is imaginary. Dig That |
felixomor:It means god is a imaginary being. |
Igboboy59:Lol you such a kid. Grow up boy |
felixomor:Leprechauns Now let's imagine that we have a conversation one day and I say to you, "I believe in Leprechauns. You cannot prove that Leprechauns do not exist, therefore they exist." You actually have heard of Leprechauns. There are lots of books, movies and fairy tales dealing with Leprechauns. People talk about Leprechauns all the time. Leprechauns even have a popular brand of breakfast cereal. A page like this describes/defines the traits of Leprechauns. But that does not mean that Leprechauns exist. If you read the folklore around Leprechauns, you realize that certain aspects are impossible. For example, Leprechauns are defined to be beings who keep a crock of gold at the end of a rainbow. But anyone who understands rainbows knows that there is not a geographic location associated with rainbows. Rainbows are not physical objects, but instead are optical phenomena dependent on an observer. Therefore rainbows do not have fixed X/Y locations for their ends on the ground. This is the problem with the Leprechaun legend - Leprechauns have a property that is impossible, and therefore we can say that Leprechauns do not exist. There is no "end" to any rainbow, and therefore no pots of gold located at such a point, and therefore no Leprechauns. They are as imaginary as the gerflagenflopple. Is there something that would prove Leprechauns to be real? First, we would need to change the definition of Leprechauns. We would have to drop the "pot of gold at the end of the rainbow" part of the definition, because that part is impossible. But if we do that, we are not talking about Leprechauns anymore. This is another way to know that Leprechauns are imaginary. Noah's Ark Another imaginary thing that, like Leprechauns, we hear quite a bit about in our culture is the story of Noah and his Ark. How do we know that the Noah's Ark story is imaginary? First, the story contains an element that is impossible. Genesis 7:20 says, "The waters rose and covered the mountains to a depth of more than fifteen cubits." This would mean that Mt. Everest, with a height of 29,000 feet (8,850 meters) or nearly 6 miles, was covered in water. It is impossible because that water does not exist. A planet does not magically get covered in 6 miles of water, and then have the water magically disappear. Second, there is no evidence that the event actually occurred. And a planet-wide event of this proportion would necessarily leave incontrovertible evidence behind. There would be geological evidence, archeological evidence, ice core evidence and so on. Genesis 7:21 states: "Every living thing that moved on land perished � birds, livestock, wild animals, all the creatures that swarm over the earth, and all mankind." That would leave behind massive amounts of genetic evidence in every species, as each species narrowed to a single breeding pair. For these reasons we can easily say that the story Noah's Ark is imaginary - a fictional fairy tale. God If you think about it, you will realize that there is no difference between God and Leprechauns. Lots of people talk about God as though he exists, but there is no actual evidence for God's existence. And there should be, because there are many positive claims in the definition of God. For example: God has never left any physical evidence of his existence on earth. All historical gods were imaginary and we know it. (see this page) None of Jesus' "miracles" left any physical evidence either. (see this page) God has never spoken to modern man, for example by taking over all the television stations and broadcasting a rational message to everyone. The resurrected Jesus has never appeared to anyone in a provable way. (see this page) The Bible we have is provably incorrect and is obviously the work of primitive men rather than God. (see this page) When we analyze prayer with statistics, we find no evidence that God is "answering prayers." (see this page) Huge, amazing atrocities like the Holocaust and AIDS occur without any response from God. And so on There is absolutely no evidence indicating that God exists. There is a tremendous amount of empirical evidence that God does not exist. For example, God is defined as a prayer-answering being, but we know with certainty that the belief in prayer is a superstition. Therefore we can conclusively say that God is imaginary |
cstr44:The same russians who kicked. The nazzi ass with just limited weapon? |
kodded:That jerk is just trying to make things awkward for Trump. |
Explorers:That's my favourite gun. |
MarkGeraldo:
|
MarkGeraldo:
|
[quote author=IamLEGEND1 post=52543198][/quote]
|
I wanted to give a fuc.k but I schooled in france and no fuc,k was giving.
|


